Skive:
'To evade one's work or duty, esp. out of laziness' (Penguin Pocket English
Dictionary)
Obviously just a British word...
Tris
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 September 2001 21:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Editing Inbox
Slow is an understatement!
And sufficient for what?
My point is not that it can't be done, but that it is
patently stupid to do so. And there's always some
manager who'll say but Microsoft says this is all it needs.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Hi folks,
I'm currently looking into the E2K conferencing server product for our
organisation, maybe looking to supplement some Tandberg video conferencing
kit we're getting for conference rooms.
There seems to be a lack of information on the Microsoft site about this
product. I'm after user
Steve,
If you use sites in AD it might be worth checking your IP address ranges are
set correctly. I had trouble on a dual homed machine which got confused
between main and management LANs, some OM functions being at a remote site.
regards,
Richard Dann
-Original Message-
From: Steve
hi ed,
i don't see a problem with editing inbox contents, in fact i find it to be a
useful feature. however, one of our site managers expressed the opinion that
someone could falsify the contents of a recieved message (say from a
customer) in order to get away with something.
What does
We're running a single Exchange 2000 SP1 server. A couple of weeks ago I
enabled Mailbox Manager on it. Following the directions in the July
issue of Exchange Administrator Magazine, I set it up to run on Saturday
at midnight, and told it to delete anything in the Inbox, Sent Items,
and Deleted
Hi All
I know one should not generalise and each system is different. I
acknowledge these two factors, but does anyone have any stats on the
average transfer speed they obtained while doing a move mailbox. The
servers in question are not in my site so I cannot quickly run a test. The
servers are
Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley asked people to report this
info to him. About a month ago, I'd say. I don't know how many people
forwarded off-site, and it was never determined how a high or low SIS
ratio affected the move rate, but he may have his results in compiled
form. My
Thanks Richard.
Just for the record, I used ntdsutil to transfer the 5 FSMO roles to one of
the other DCs.
Then the Exchange install ran fine.
Steve
Richard Dann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve,
If you use sites in AD it might be worth checking your IP address ranges are
set correctly. I had
Thanks Tom
That was doing one by one right? Not using exmerge.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2001 02:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley
Never said that it was a production server...It does fine for what it is
asked to do. I've never had a problem with it.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: George Halstead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Hehe - Aye Aye, Captain!
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: MS Easybake Oven
Belay
Explain yourself there, cowboy! No one gets off calling me stupid easily.
Thems fightin' words, Matey! Arrr!
It does what it is asked to do. Nothing more. It isn't screaming at me
saying PLEASE, FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS, PUT SOME MORE MEMORY IN
ME! or anything like that. I don't ask
Have you looked at Q250422?
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 08:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Background Sync
We have a large sales force using Outlook
How can I check that when i'm typing in this person's address in the To:
field and it acts like it's recognizing something that is not there? One
thing that seems kind of strange is that when you type the name it it has
little small green lines underneath the name. Looks something like this: _ _
The article also mentions applying SR-1 as well...
Do they encounter sych problems while online?
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 09:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
The small green lines typically mean you have more than one email address
listed for that contact and it doesnt know which one you want to use. Have
you done a Find in the contacts to see if they are not indeed listed
somewhere?
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
Is there more to the error than Errors... synchronization? If the client
is having problem resolving the NetBIOS name to IP then it will give an
error like Errors... synchronization. In most cases, further information
is available in a synchronization log in the Deleted Items folder
on the contrary, i'm not worried in the least. i just wanted some feedback
from other exchange admins on how they may respond to such a concern from
their managers.
in fact, your comments are much the same as what I've already sent to the
manager in question.
dan.
I think you are needlessly
They have not done SR-1 yet. It was a ghosted image with just
the original Outlook 2000 build. Sorry, which article references
the need to upgrade to SR1?
Yes, there are intermittent problems syncing even when online.
Thanks,
Karen
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Andy David wrote:
The article also
Lessee, errors in background sync, check the sync log in deleted
items, and connection to server failed. Unfortunately the only
sync logs in Deleted Items are when the sync *is* successful.
Thanks for trying, though.
- Karen
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Stephen Mynhier wrote:
Is there more to the
Tape them to the back of the stall doors in the bathroom. And over the
urinals in the men's room.
...Joel Osborn
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Every once in a
Hey, we all have our strengths. Many guys are a lot more comfortable cooking
over a fire (gas, charcoal or wood) out of doors. and that cooking is mostly
of the meat variety.
That way you have more time to get the fire out before you risk burning the
whole house down.
...Joel Osborn
Harriet -
Upgraded to Sp4, applied all subsequent hotfixes and the Security Rollup
Patch on many servers. Took exactly 1 hour on servers with approx 25GB
priv.edb.
If you have teamed NICs on Compaq servers, be sure to break the teaming
before applying the Security Rollup Patch and then re-team
Yeah, unfortunately the store is inconsistent so moving al in one go is
not going to solve anything ...:-( We need to move the healthy boxes
and leave the inconsistent ones behind
Thanks for the reply
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25
that's not cooking, it's pyromania with a bit of tong handling.
Hey, we all have our strengths. Many guys are a lot more
comfortable cooking
over a fire (gas, charcoal or wood) out of doors. and that
cooking is mostly
of the meat variety.
MS has posted a possible scenario for IE6 that would leave it vulnerable to
Nimda...
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
topics/NimdaIE6.asp
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
Try moving mailboxes in small groups of 20-30. Then check database
consistency. I have seen the move cure corruption problems. I think you will
be pleasantly surprised. A 20MB mailbox takes about 3-5 minutes, in my
experience, over a similar LAN.
Michael Herrick
Groton CIT Messaging Services
I undestand what you are saying.
But does the exact error read:
Errors in background synchronization. In most cases, further information
is available in a synchronization log in the Deleted Items folder. The
Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are
network
Yes, that is the exact error. We suspected a DNS error and have
made sure that the Exchange servers are properly listed in DNS.
As an additional measure, we have added local host files to a few
users to see if that made a difference. Again, we have the same
result - sometimes it works,
I´m about to move some mailboxes from one exchangeserver to another in the
same site.. Do I have to specify the new exchange server on every client,
or is it taken care of automatically?
_
List posting FAQ:
Have someone memorize the announcement and walk around the office thinking
really hard about the announcement and then hope that telepathic osmosis
works in your favor.
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Exchange
Automagically.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: moving mailboxes
I´m about to move some mailboxes from one exchangeserver to another in the
same site.. Do I have to specify
...or maybe she won't create PUBLICALLY ACCESSIBLE SHARES on an Exchange
box, perhaps. Or browse the web or read her email from it.
You identify your points of possible infection, and you protect them. I
don't need to put mousetraps in my gasoline tank, because I'm fairly
certain that they'll
Ladies and Gentlemen of the list , here's my situation in brief:
Yesterday someone on our network was infected with the Nimda virus (through
an infected web page and unpatched IE 5.01 install, but that's beside the
point)... I had Netshield 4.5 running on our main file server, set to email
Does anyone know why when some people search their address book in outlook
2000 for a contact it doesnt always find the person, but when I go to
another users machine it does appear. Is their a way to set up exchange 5.5
with better address book views. The address book is a public address book.
Go to www.trend.com and download the fix utility for nimda. Also clean
the server out first and disconnect every client mmachine from the network
until the server is clean. Then run the fix on the client machines with out
them connected to the network. I had the same problem with outlook.
I got these at one time too, and saved this article
MS wrote awhile back:
The Dreaded ASP 0115 Error
error 'ASP 0115'
Unexpected error
/Web Name/ASP file name.asp
A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script
cannot continue running.
If you get this error message, you have a leg
I had a similar problem after applying the hot fix for the nimda virus.It
replaces asp.dll, which was causing asp pages not load properly. I have had
to revert back to an earlier asp.dll.
The developers are currently looking into the problem
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson
YIKES!
You are in for a long strange trip indeed.
It took us Alliance support, and an onsite MS engineer to get past these
problems. I will dig up a final report, and share it with you!
Franklin
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
U... What the hell does having IIS on a server without file based
virus scanning have to do with anything?
Case in point, I have an E2K server with IIS 5.0 with all of the
necessary patches and updates. What the hell is a file based scanner
going to do for me that my email virus scanner
Address Book Views in Xadmin would be what you're looking for...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Background Sync
Does anyone
Sooo...Following this logic...Seatbelts prevent car accidents, right?
John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
Network Engineer
Business Men's Assurance
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
If that is the error that you are receiving then you are in all likelihood
having name resolution problem. When the error is rec'd check ping by IP
and ping by name. You are either having network problems or your DNS is
misconfigured
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin
To:
Someone hear something?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/25/01 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Background Sync
Does anyone know why when some people search their address book in
outlook
2000 for a contact it doesnt always find the person, but
There is also Profile Maker, which we use here at the college.
www.autoprof.com
Ray Desjardins, MCSE
Manager of Systems Services
Technical Services
Bridgewater State College
Bridgewater, MA 02779
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL
Richard,
But the thing is that we don't have the virus running around anymore...
I've cleaned the infected machine and it's not putting files on the file
server anymore... NetShield kept the files off the server(s)... Other
mailboxes / users aren't experiencing the strange speed slowdown that
Yuck 0115 errors suck.
Most of my random ASP 0115 errors went away with some permission changes.
Why permission changes fix RANDOM errors I will never know, but it did help
us.
The following blurb is from this article:
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q194190
Experiencing the same thing here, also.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL
Thank you all for the replies. I decided to take your advice and use mail
relaying normally. As you said, less complicated, and still does not
jeopardize security. Thanks again.
Best Regards
Nizar El-Assaad
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
An external web development company .They are still working on the problem.
I can send you an earlier ver of file if you want to try that.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2001 16:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ASP 0115 Errors on
Are you the only one with a slow client? You might start looking at
your network infrastructure if you believe the virus is gone. Have you
run the nimda scanner from www.Eeye.com on your network to see if there
are any other vulnerable machines? Do you have Xadmin loaded on your
workstation?
MS says Critical... apply patch, and I patch. Period.
Exchange is so intensive that we don't want anything else running on it.
Increasing the responsibilities of the server increases the points of
vulnerability. Every function has a vulnerability, and every vulnerability
has a defense. If you
if both exchange servers are in the same site it should resolve the new
server location for you. At least that has been my experience.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: moving
Why dont you remove your profile from outlook and add it again that workes
for me sometimes.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Exchange Clients SLOW -
No, I haven't run the tool from eEye, but Xadmin opens just fine on my
workstation. Other mailboxes open just fine on the workstation as well, no
problems there... My mailbox, OTOH, runs like a snail on every workstation
I've tried it on...
Sorry, guess the subject should've been Exchange
Joe are you recieving email within that mailbox and if you are from where.
Do u have your virus protection email u whenever you receive a virus.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. Still on.
Here is what I got from them:
September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world.
Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
tragedy.
As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged
that the business and
I have NetSheild running on the servers, but have turned off email alerts
because of the great number of messages caused by Nimda yesterday... I
have Groupshield Exchange running on the server to stop Nimda from coming in
via email... Neither has reported a hit of Nimda since late yesterday
I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as
he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they
would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been
canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
You are right and I am wrong. Happy?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
U...
What is MEC??
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC
I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as
he was not willing to fly down there after
Well, unless you have some rebuttal to prove me otherwise... Please
enlighten me if there is something I'm missing. I'd really like to
know...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:43 AM
To:
I'm not interested in arguing either...
Now for my rebuttal... No server is bullet proof unless it is
disconnected from the network and turned off. Now for having a file
based scanner, you also have to consider the costs, both hidden and
unhidden. There is the extra processor utilization,
Ummm... Brian never said that he runs it against the Exchange folders. What
the poor guy is trying to say is he's running it. If he's got it all
configured correctly it won't do any harm. We've been running NetShield AV
on our Multi-Purpose branch office servers that have Exchange on it for
Ok good.. Back to getting my Arse kicked at Nintendo by my 5 year old..
Wish he would let me once and a while..
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my
websites
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
LOL!
Ha! I'm a good admin, maybe even a great admin. I certainly haven't
been subject to virus outbreaks... Yet. ;o)
I do understand your theory though...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Tuesday, September 25,
Microsoft exchange conference..
Mike Mitchell
eMAIL Systems Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
this more of a outlook question then exchange. Several users are using exchange as a
filing cabinent for their powerpoint files, etc. They've been told to save their
files off to their personal network drives. Several users have several thousand of
these such attachments in their inbox.
Then find an OUTLOOK user list
Mike Mitchell
eMAIL Systems Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
-Original Message-
From: Clarke Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks to everyone for there help last month with the problem I had with the
ESA not starting. I finally had to call PSS to solve it. I have included
the original message below for reference. The key was the statement
regarding missing protocol sequences. I have copied the registry entries
I forgot who my tech buddy is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
Hey! Get off my Tech Buddy! Only I am allowed to harass him. ;o)
Hi Everyone
I was able to figure this out on my own, so I thought I would share the
wealth...
I uninstalled IIS, installed OWA, then installed the security patches. If
you install the security patches for IIS first, then I had a problem with
OWA.
I hope this helps someone else.
Thanks
Clarke,
Go to www.cdolive.com sample code library. They have a sample script there
that saves all attachments coming to a public folder to a file server. I'm
sure you can modify it to run against the existing messages in people's
mailboxes.
Mike,
Step away from the coffee machine! Nice and
what do you have your max mailbox size set at?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 10 August, 2001 16.55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Policy
Partially kidding.
We keep tape backups for 60 days. Deleted item retention is
I had to go check the archives to find out who mine was. ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
I forgot who my tech buddy is
Will do.
-Original Message-
From: Khin Thuzar Nu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: GAL Modify Tool
I found the article on it.
Article ID: Q186950
Please ignore my request
Thanks,
Thuzar
Would you be my tech buddy?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
I forgot who my tech buddy is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope..I'm still scheduled to go. Haven't heard anything about cancelling.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
It will be automatic, as long as you're not going to pull the plug on the
old Ex server. As long as the old Ex server is on the clients will resolve
to their new home. If you're going to decommission the old server give the
clients enough time to log on to Ex at least once.
W
-Original
Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi
powers? :)
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
NT Server Workstation Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
The force flows from within, you must concentrate on what surrounds you.
Be mindful of the future, but not at the cost of the present.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212
-Original
Send Haikus on Fridays you will. Fish Tacos you will eat. And BLB's avoid
you shall.
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
The force flows from within, you must
The store on one box is taking 100% of one CPU. We had a student this
morning that sent a message to all the students on campus about 8000
mailboxes. The message contain voting buttons, delivery receipt, and
read receipt. I recalled the message but the server continues at 100%
on one of the
Yes. Yes. To Obi Van Erik you listen. Show you the way he will.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
Send Haikus on Fridays you will. Fish Tacos you will eat. And BLB's
Disable circular logging, delete all PST's, get good backups and you
will unleash the power of Exchange
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Crumbaker, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
Kevin,
Hi!
I don't know why you think why I am wrong. Why don't you call Antivirus
companies and tell them they are wrong for supporting file based A/V
products on Exchange servers.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin
How can I move the root of an Imap public folder.
The real problem is that we moved public folders to a new server but
after stopping all exchange services in the root server , the clients can
not access to any Public Folder because we can use only one root.
The root was created in one server
The front-end server shows me the internal HTTP virtual servers created to
internal OWA access.This situation sends me an error because IIS can not
find the virtual folders(Most of the traffic is closed). What should I do
to refuse this message?
The last part of that message should read When I read messages WIHTOUT
attachments that are very long, they open in a split second.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Labonte
Sent: September 25, 2001 08:45
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: Messages with attachments are slow to display
NT4.0, SP6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4
When my users access messages with attachments the server responds very
slowly. It does not appear that the size of the attachments matters only
that there is one. If I try and open a message with an attachment it will
take 2 to 5 seconds longer to open. When I
NT4.0, SP6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4
When my users access messages with attachments the server responds very
slowly. It does not appear that the size of the attachments matters only
that there is one. If I try and open a message with an attachment it will
take 2 to 5 seconds longer to open.
When I
Hello all.
I'm new to the scripting side of exchange and am having problems with trying
to find examples of VB code or how to accomplish the following:
1. When an email is posted into a public folder a script is run to copy a
text file attached to the email to a network share.
2. Next copy
NT4.0, SP6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NAV for Exchange
When my users access messages with attachments the server responds very
slowly. It does not appear that the size of the attachments matters only
that there is one. If I try and open a message with an attachment it will
take 2 to 5 seconds longer
G'day,
Does anyone know if it's possible to have the IMC generate RFC822 headers
based on the RFC821 'MAIL FROM' and 'RCPT TO' information? I was thinking
something along the lines of 'X-Sender:' and 'X-Receiver:' headers with the
actual values used in the RFC821 part of the SMTP conversation..
First delete the Queue.dat file from your IMC folder.
You might be looping. Second, with the info provided that sounds normal.
John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
Network Engineer
Business Men's Assurance
-Original Message-
From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
I understand both your points. I, myself, think there is some merit to
having file-based scanners. We recently just started using them on our
Exchange servers, and I must admit that I was rather shocked to find several
viruses on our server. They were all rather harmless, but I was still glad
1. Go to www.cdolive.com sample code library.
2. Go to www.cdolive.com sample code library.
3. Go to www.cdolive.com sample code library.
-Original Message-
From: CHALONER, Karl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
