It does fix some issues, mostly free/busy related though. We did see some
improvement after that fix on the Event Services but not on the OWA boxes.
For that ASP 0115 problem though, you really really REALLY want to upgrade
your IIS server to Win2K and run IIS 5.0.
We had the 0115 problem
I added the server to an existing 5.5 organization and yes, I can see the
GAL, and the names resolve correctly. Thanks for your help on this.
Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE
Kegler, Brown, Hill Ritter
65 E. State Street, Suite 1800
Columbus, Ohio 43215
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
I do have the regular host DNS records set up - is that the DNS entries you
are referring to?
Thanks for your input.
Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE
Kegler, Brown, Hill Ritter
65 E. State Street, Suite 1800
Columbus, Ohio 43215
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
While it may not be standard operations, I'm trying to bounce spam and junk
mail before it gets transmitted. For example, here's the message I get back
when you try to send to an invalid yahoo.com account:
A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error.
554 delivery error: dd This user
Where did you get that idea? I've (had to) run ESEUTIL numerous occasions
(especially in the good old Exchange 4.0 days). It was always on raid5 sets
and NEVER had any problems. Then again, I won't mention the name, but I was
running on quality hardwareq.
On the other hand, I agree that
I heard today.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
|+---
|| Tony
Those that really know have all signed NDA's.
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange SP2
Tease
If I told you I would have to kill you type thing
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange SP2
Those that really know have all signed NDA's.
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
Have you actually installed mailbox manager yet? When you do, you can
configure it by doubleclicking on the object in Site\Configuration\Add-Ins
container.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Exchange
Why should I blame the AV product.
Both problems could have been fixed by the users going to the WINDOWSUPDATE
site and pulling down the critical updates. That's not too hard is it? The
users just have to open IE, click on Tools - Windows Update, then when the
site pops up, down load the
are you sure that's legal?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange SP2
If I told you I would have to kill you type thing
-Original Message-
From: Kevin
Sure. They signed the contract under threat of death,
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange SP2
are you sure that's legal?
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Corporate policies may or may not allow all users to
access WindowsUpdate, or if they are using WinNT / 2000 / XP
they might not have local admin rights.
Not quite as simple as your glib assertion would have it.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
No kidding. The **last** thing I am going to do give users local admin or
allow them to update their OS from a vendor over the internet.
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000; Onstream SC30 tape device.
In a test lab I've upgraded an Exchange 5.5 sp4 configuration on NT4
sp6a (PDC) to Windows 2000 (with ADS). I now wish to restore the live
service backup (NTbackup) to this machine and ever since meeting Remote
Storage Manager,
Also, next time you need to do this, build another Exchange box, move all
the users to the new one. Stop the IS on the old one, delete the PRIV.EDB,
start the IS and then move everybody back. Voila! No risks, no hassles.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL
I wasn't talking about CORPORATE users. I was talking about HOME users. A
lot of the sircam/badtrans.B hits are coming from Mindspring.com;
bellsouth.net; Earthlink.com; and other home user ISP domains. If you read
my original post, you would have seen that I was talking only about HOME
users.
fair enough for me !
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange SP2
Sure. They signed the contract under threat of death,
-Original Message-
From: Avi
Main problem I've encountered with RSM is that it can't refresh media
when you change it. So you have to tell RSM to refresh itself.
Have a look at
http://www.jsiinc.com/sube/tip2200/rh2265.htm
Might also help:
KB Q239892
KB Q267574
jang
-Original Message-
From: Roger Mackenzie
I have moved about 90 mailboxes to a new exchange 5.5 server that I joined
into our site. Now all users can't delete or move multiple mail items. One
at a time works fine. Other that that everything seems to run fine. Any
Idea's
Rob
5.5 admin internet mail service, internet mail, advance options.
Have fun
Jeff
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange
How on earth can you boss still go out to the internet and access his
outlook if his account was deleted? Are you sure it's not just somebody
changed the account's display name and you don't see it where it's supposed
to be?
S.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL
The reason is the Application object only applies when you're writing
scripts for Office applications. Same thing with the Inspector objects and
such. When you have a folder script, you have to use CDO. You're trying to
use the Outlook Object Model in your folder script which won't work. I
That was it! I checked and exchange was only using 32meg of memory, ran the
optimizer and after 10 seconds it jumped to 250meg. Is 32 the default??
Thanks A lot
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange
http://eventid.net
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2001 16:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID internet web site
Good morning to
whoops.
put a www. infront of that.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2001 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event ID internet web
hi all.
came in this morning to see my event log littered with the following for
many, but not all of my users:
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
Event Category: Access Control
Event ID: 1029
Date: 12/3/2001
Time: 10:34:21 AM
User:
www.eventid.net
--
From: John Matteson
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2001 10:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID internet web site
Good morning to you all:
Someone, on one of the lists that I monitor, put
Holidays are included in a text file for Outlook 98... It can be edited to
include additional holidays, although 'to the end of time' might make it a
very large text file (unless you're a Branch Davidian or bin Laden). I
believe the name of the file in question is outlook.txt.
Chris
--
Chris
Oh.. you mean that overpriced sport where bad-tempered, poorly dressed,
overpaid prima donnas, run back and forth across a patio deck punching each
other out?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is
No... That's what happens after they fail to graduate. At the only level
that matters, only the 'adult supervision' tends to act like that.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I got McBee's new book on E2K. Great book. But starting on page 748 he
refers to registry edit that allow changes to make the Password Change
button disappear. It refers to a key
\\HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\EXChangeWeb\OWA There is no OWA
key. Is this for the upcoming E2K SP2
SP2 not required (see Q297121).
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA E2K
Task manager indicated it was mmc.exe - very strange. Stopping the server
protect service though is what fixed it. Even changing the scan to incoming
only did not improve things.
tjh
-Original Message-
From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001
Because Toto we are not in Kansas any more.
Go Cyclones!
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
If you do that, how will you keep up with all the jokes and the lost kid -
please read!! emails?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping bad email addresses at the gates
You punched a peeve.
After supporting over 100 Windows home users a weekend for the last eight
months, I can tell you, they updated from windows update or the 'update
alert' and kept up with the updates until the computer started giving
Exception OE's out the wazoo.
So then they 'rebooted'
I had fun explaining to a naive-user in the weekend why
antivirus software was essential.
If it is that essential, why doesn't it come with
Windows XP?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
p.s. I do part time
You have to have an AD account for every mailbox.
Silly wabbits.
Missy Koslosky
Exchange MVP
- Original Message -
From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Global addess w/o a mailbox in E2K
What's the impetus for the question being asked?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Global addess w/o a mailbox in E2K
Is this possible in E2K? or do you HAVE to have an
Boy can I identify with that.
And to some extent, it is understandable. When a user goes out and buys a
car, other than for tags, they really don't have to go anywhere else or
purchase anything else to make it usable or safe. Everything needed to make
it usable is included when you take
Except for that damn pesky gas, the routine maintenance, the huge
aftermarket and customization industries and let's not forget the friendly
neighborhood mechanic who just took me for a cool grand.
To some extent I can identify with both sides of the fence, but the reality
is that the clueless
After all that round and round we had about Virus/Viri.. you go and throw in
MORE Latin?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe
Well you have to look at this in the entire perspective.
Taking the spin on your analogy.
To be honest the car and computer are both useable of the lot, or out of the
box more often than not.
However most people don't drive the car without.
Insurance (incase of accidents)recurring cost
I need to forward a message to a user who has another mailbox somewhere
else, but has two address, in different domains. I know this is going to get
me killer for not using a mail forwarder. But I need a fix now.
So I was thinking a Global SMTP address that just forwards it to the other
address.
Mmm, impetus meaning motivation (or momentum) in English is the only
structure that would make sense here so there is no case for a Latin
instruction/lesson/all out war.
:(
E.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Global addess w/o a mailbox in E2K
After all
No sir, you REALLY didn't need that catalytic converter in your exhaust
system. It just robs you of MPG and makes you use that more expensive
unleaded gas.
I said that the user didn't need to purchase any thing else to make it
useable or safe. And don't we have an aftermarket customization
Why not use a mail enabled contact?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re:
If everything to make it usable and secure was included, Microsoft would
face another anti trust case ...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am:Montag, 3. Dezember 2001 18:27
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff:RE: Badtrans and
Impetus: a driving force!
1 a (1) : a driving force : IMPULSE (2) : INCENTIVE, STIMULUS b :
stimulation or encouragement resulting in increased activity
2 : the property possessed by a moving body in virtue of its mass and its
motion -- used of bodies moving suddenly or violently to indicate
Again.. I said USEABLE, not Legal (insurance, tags, tax sticker).
Having worked in a service station, way back when full service wasn't just
for people with handicap plates, you would be surprised at how many almost
flat tires came in, cars running without (a lot of) coolant, oil that
didn't
Cause I don't know how! I little help thanks, also all references can be
noted by page in Jim McBee's Exchange 2000 Server. Not done reading yet.
Thank you!
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03,
Why does it have to come from Microsoft?
Why can't the system builder install an AV product on the system. I'm sure
if HP worked a deal with Trend or Norton for their home PC virus product,
the value add would be great, at little extra cost to the end user.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac
Guess I forgot to add the tongue in cheek tag.
Sorry all.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is
I haven't bought a new pc in a while but didn't most mfg's bundle McAfee or
Norton AV with them?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Dell and Gateway both include Norton A/V in their computers, free of charge.
I've purchased about a dozen of each in the past two years and they come
preloaded.
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul
Sent: Monday, December
I don't think that would work. Why bother? Use Set
objSession=EventDetails.Session and then go from there. No need to get the
inspector object etc. You can get the message object directly from the
EventDetails object. Set objMessage =
objSession.GetMessage(EventDetails.MessageID, NULL). Two
Flame. -4 Karma. I can't resist the reply to that bit of nonsense.
No, if Microsoft made a secure OS it would be the end of the world, because
you know H.E.-double-toothpick will be frozen over.
(if the truth hurts, stop here)
Microsoft is under Anti-trust scrutiny because they made shady
We have recently installed Exchange Server 2000 (+SP1).
All the contacts of our company (structured in subfolders) were transfered
from Outlook 2000 to public folders in Exchange Server. Thus, the contacts
can now be seen and used by the entire company staff (as required).
However,
we cannot use
We have recently installed Exchange Server 2000 (+SP1).
All the contacts of our company (structured in subfolders) were transfered
from Outlook 2000 to public folders in Exchange Server. Thus, the contacts
can now be seen and used by the entire company staff (as required).
However,
we cannot use
Hi Everyone,
I'm rather new to Exchnge Server 2000 (and all mail servers, but I think I
have a grasp...so please bear with me). After a router failure (probably
only a coincidence) users on my exchange server have reported mail only
being delivered to their mailboxes intermittently (and now, I
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2001 15:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Badtrans and SirCam
Corporate policies may or may not allow all users to
access WindowsUpdate, or if they are using WinNT / 2000 / XP
they
Hello there,
My Current environment:-
Domain - NT 4 Domain Controller with SP5
File Server - Windows 2000 SP2 Member Server
Exchange Server - NT 4 with SP5 Exchange Server 5.5 with SP4
Backup Application - Veritas Data Centre
Backup Media - Compaq DL Tape Library with 10 slots of cartridge
Hi Everyone,
I'm rather new to Exchnge Server 2000 (and all mail servers, but I think I
have a grasp...so please bear with me). After a router failure (probably
only a coincidence) users on my exchange server have reported mail only
being delivered to their mailboxes intermittently (and now, I
Hi!
I would also like to know how the permissions work!
Our public folders in Drive M: show that Everyone has Read Execute, List
Folder Contents and Read rights and no-one can post to the folders 8-(
What should they be and how do they interact with System manager?
Incidentally, this is EX2000,
But, the bad part is that most home users don't update...
Maybe not at all. Heck, a lot of small businesses don't update either.
And Whatever comes on the PC is probably already 6 months old.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Denis
I picked this up from the newsgroups .. it might explain some stuff :)
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 Listowner
www.exchange-mail.org
Thank you for contacting Microsoft.
Microsoft Exchange 2000 Service Pack 2 was originally scheduled to be
released on November 29th, but it is not yet
Ignore the M: drive. Pretend it doesn't exist; odds are it doesn't do
anything you want to use it for and that it doesn't do what you think you
might want to use it for. For 99.98% of shops the only things you could do
with/via/for the M: drive would result in a $249 phone call.
Chris
--
Chris
Hi All,
Is there a way, when Outlook is in Corporate / Workgroup mode, and an
Internet Email account is configured, to do a send as so the email is
from your Internet Email account and not as your Exchange identity?
In Internet Only mode the Send Button has a drop down to change
identity. Is
Except for Public Folders, the ADC should work fine. I replicate 3 separate
5.5 orgs with it.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: LDAP for Address books?
I'm thinking that the
I think the issue is with your DNS Server. Also is anyone else hosting your
DNS for you maybe they have the IPs wrong.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Paul J. Caritj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Missing Messages
Hi
We just installed McAfee GroupShield 4.5SP1 on our Exchange 5.5 server.
When we receive an attachment that had a virus it is deleted and we get a
notification message. However when we look at it the only information
present is the ticket number and the virus type. The intended recipient,
hrmm.. the ones I have gotten from GW and Dell have all been full versions,
yet, as someone point out earlier, they are about 6 months old and require
LiveUpdating immediately.
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent:
That happens with our Symantec too, not sure why though. It only addresses
internal mail.
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outook / Exchange question
Hi All,
Is there a
I'm seeing mixed opinions in the archives about the best way to upgrade
Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise. FAQ states:
1. Do a backup. (yadda yadda online, offline, ERD)
2. Run setup from the Enterprise CD
3. Select Reinstall option to upgrade the server
Archives hint at re-applying NT SPs
Oops sorry, wrong email. Tee hee
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outook / Exchange question
That happens with our Symantec too, not sure why though. It only addresses
Beer, beer, beer, beer, and yes
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Standard to Enterprise
Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett
You need to download and setup the Name Resolver utility that is a part of
this. I believe this only works if you are quarantining to the Database option
and not a folder.
-Original Message-
From: Bean, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange
Using the AVAPI? This is an inherent limitation of the API.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Bean, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Exchange
When I attempt to do step 4 Click Delivery Options, in How to Configure
Mail Forwarding.
I do not see a delivery Options button. I though this was only for
mailboxes not contacts.
-John Q
_
List posting FAQ:
yes
yes
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Brasslett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:00 PM
Subject: Standard to Enterprise
I'm seeing mixed opinions in the archives about the best way to upgrade
Exchange 5.5 Standard to
You can also do what I used to do when we were on Groupshield, which is look through
the imcdata\in\archive directory and look at the files that came in at the time the
virus alert was sent by Groupshield. This, needless to say, assumes that you have
message archiving turned on.
-Peter
I hate when you fail to matriculate. It just leaves one feeling so empty and
unfulfilled.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Badtrans and SirCam
Hah. Go Terps!
Missy Koslosky
Hello All,
Have somebody experience with this permissions (or something like that)
problem?
I have two LAN segments protected with a FireWall. At private segment, I
have one PDC ( NT 4.0 + SP6a ) with ( Exchange 5.5 + SP3 ) running OK
In the public segment I have a WEB Server (NT4.0 + SP6a +
MSMERGE is what I used, worked fine.
-John Q
- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 2:51 PM
Subject: Exchage 5.5 to 2000
I have an existing Exchange 5.5 server running in the old network/domain.
I
sorry for the other vague response - i hadn't fooled with this in a while.
This doc will help you out more. check out the section authentication
requirements and firewall setup. also, place a firewall btwn owa and the
internet on the public segment. last, run host ids, iislockdown and urlscan
No easy way in Outlook 2000. Outlook 2002 has Send Using however that
will let you specify which account to send through.
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original
Your server's SMTP virtual server or IMS communicates with the Yahoo!
server. The Yahoo! server rejects the RCPT TO: because the recipient
doesn't exist. No message was sent; the conversation was rejected early on.
Therefore your server issues the NDR.
To everyone who wants to understand SMTP:
Chill. He gave you the answer, dude. He didn't insult your ancestry.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Select View--From Field. Enter the sender in the from field. You must have
Send As rights for the user to do this.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I'm still in the process of checking technet and the like but have come up
dry thus far:
It seems that whilst mailbox limits are being enforced correctly, no
warnings are being received.
NDR's are being generated and logged under Event viewer (ID 290). but now
warning messages are
91 matches
Mail list logo
