Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or
whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc...
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam
I am
Anyone know how to configure exchange 5.5. sp3, on w2k to dial an isp via a
newly installed isdn Terminal adapter ?
I think i need to do somehing so theres an entry in the adress book, but
what about the connections thing ? any help advice gratefully recieved.
TIA
Paul
Soysal
Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the
cooking channel
mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem
to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will
complain even louder when they receive spam because the
Default settings are usually ok, but the main consideration is to ensure
that your backup schedule does not conflict with the IS maintenance
schedule.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 15 January 2002 17:19
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server
running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well
as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just
use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if
you like integrated AV engines...)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Irfan
Hello all,
Our Exchange server is suffering from a problem where a mail gets
delivered, but the mail sticks in the IMS's 'Outbound mail awaiting
delivery' queue with '(host unreachable)' next to it.
This results in the IMS retrying to redeliver the mail at the set
intervals and the
Does the non-working Exchange server have a lmhost file with an old
setting of sorts? I would check if that server can see the domain
controller(s). Wins/DNS settings all ok and working?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January
I'd rather not put Outlook on a server, however I can't find the 32-bit
Exchange Client for NT anywhere, Technet has plenty of updates but not the
base installation.
Can anyone provide a link, or a means of getting the file?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator
Tel:
Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give
no indication of the spec of your hardware so if I say yes and it all grinds
to a halt, don't blame me!
(Neil, have been using VScan 470 on Mimesweeper 4.2_6 and Groupshield, and
Webshield and lucky rabbits feet and
Cisco PIX? No SMTP fixup
-Original Message-
From: Earl, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Troublesome IMS
Hello all,
Our Exchange server is suffering from a problem where a mail gets
delivered, but
look in the client directory on your Exchange Server CD.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download?
I'd rather not put Outlook on a
is this essential? i just checked our pix and smtp fixup is enabled - i'm
not aware of any problems though...
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 12:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Troublesome IMS
I'll have to defer to those that are running PIX.[1] A quick search through
the archives will more then likely reveal that no fixup protocol smtp 25
is highly recommended. Additionally, a quick web search on no fixup
protocol smtp 25 will reveal that use of the command is mixed. Some claim
it
Yes, I did...
Regards,
LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in
how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us
configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer
to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double
It sounds as if something is corrupted...
You dont need the PAB anymore do you?
-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PAB Sync Tool
Yes, I did...
Regards,
Yeah, that's amazing. Anyway I got 1 Ghz Processor, with 1 GB of ram,
with RAID 1 and RAID 5.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Anti-Spam
Irfan, you
Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and
implementing Outlook Web Access?
We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message that
says
Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related
fixes required for Outlook Web
Access.
The
Dear E2K/AD gurus
We will be implementing two forests in our company,
which is at the moment split into two Exchange 5.5
Orgs.
I need to establish if/how we can permission users in
one forest to the mailbox folders of users in the
other forest. I know that trusts can be set up between
forests,
Ah, you got no problems then!
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 13:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anti-Spam
Yeah, that's amazing. Anyway I got 1 Ghz Processor, with 1 GB of ram, with
RAID 1 and RAID 5.
Regards,
And it's not on my Nov 97 CD. I know we got it off the CD when we rolled
out Exchange. Do you have any April 1997 CD? The PC and MAC Exchange 5.0
client is on there!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:08 AM
To:
I ll try
thnx
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:13 AM
Aan: Exchange Discussions
Onderwerp: RE: scripting mailbox attributes
Check www.cdolive.com
(http://www.cdolive.com/address.htm)
Jim
-Original
There is also an April 98 cd.
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download?
And it's not on my Nov 97 CD. I
As much as I know you don't want to hear it: as far as I can figure,
Microsoft's advice is spot-on... live with it or implement the auto-accept
script! My understanding of the way Microsoft's resource booking works
(without the script) is exactly the behavior you are seeing. Sue Mosher may
have
Morning,
There is one SMTP address I want to use for PF on Exchange 2000 (single
site, single server) and is already in use. Now I traced it with the
help of Find Exchange Recipients from All Address Lists and it points to
PF named mf-erac 05731796. First part of the name is project code, but
I imported the personal address book to contacts however, I'm trying to see
if there is a way to update personal distribution lists that are stored in
your contacts to the GAL.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:29 AM
I just purchased Exchanger Server 5.5 Secrets by Robert Guaraldi.
Anybody want to express their opinions on whether it is a good book or not.
Chris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
What do you think about it?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 13:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Book
I just purchased
Hope you guys can help with this query to checkout my chain of thought.
Exchange 5.5 Organisation, multi-ste and multi-server. Current servers are
located in a resource domain with a trust relationship to the user domain.
The resource domain needs to be retired to consolidate domains, the service
I've just skimmed over it, and it seems like a it would be helpful. I am
just trying to see if was worth the buy, if not I can take it back and get
something more worthy.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:44 AM
To:
It has been discussed here. Check the archives. I'm also pretty sure that
there is a Q-article on it, but I can't find it.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5
minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this
address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems
to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail
You've missed something. :)
You can have more than one account in the site which has service account
admin privledges and you can also change the service account
(http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxe.htm). Making the change isn't
trivial, but it is possible.
-Original Message-
Okay friends one more, you have convinced me to stop brick backup and try
Ed's Never Restore.
Just a lil smaller question now. Has anybody experience on how much the
database size will grow with the follwing facts:
23 Gig priv.edb
2 Gig pub.edb
~ 700 users
mailbox limits set to deny sending at 65
Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the
company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with
it as will you.
Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless
thousands who LOVE it.
-Original Message-
From:
There are a set of tools for AD, one tool in the set allows you to force
replication.
Does anyone know what the name of this tool set id?
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One is glad to be of service
--Robin Williams ( Millennium
Repadmin.exe or via the AD Sites and Services IIRC.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Really Off Topic
There are a set of tools for AD, one tool in the set allows you to force
Some Win2k CD Support Tools ...
REPADMIN.EXE: Replication Diagnostics Tool
Checks replication consistency between replication partners, monitors
replication status, displays replication metadata, forces replication
events and knowledge consistency checker recalculation.
REPLMON.EXE: Active
Did you look in the windows 2000 support tools cd??
However
If you go into AD site and services, drill down to the site you're at, then
the server you're on. On the right, you should see the other servers in the
site. If you right click on one of the servers on the right, replicate now
One of the best Exchange 5.5 book is written by Paul Robichaux.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Book
I've just skimmed over it, and
what happens when you do a manual SMTP session with their server?
Q153119
-Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while:
http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam:
Yes, true. I have it here next to me now. The best and easiest to read
exchange 5.5 book around. Look it up on Amazon.
'Managing Microsoft Exchange server'
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Martin
It's a Select disk - from memory you need to copy the files to the server,
rename srvmin or srvmax to setup and then run it.
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From:
I have some Outlook 2000 clients that were sending/sharing calander info via
email msgs. Their clients were setup as Internet Mail accounts. Since we
activated Exchange 2000 when they now send their calander msgs. the accept
button does not appear. I think it is the message format that
There are too many unknowns - how much whitespace do you have now,
single-instance ratio, actual use of the mailboxes (just because the users
have 65MB limit, doesn't actually mean they will use it all - believe me!!),
how much data they receive a day, etc., etc., etc.
We have a winner... That's it exactly. You have to rename the files to
Setup.exe
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
It's a Select disk - from memory you
Exchange is the only thing running on the box, and remember it worked fine
until mid-nov.
PSS etc has been working on this since mid-nov and hasn't been able to even
come up with an idea why it's happening, let alone a fix.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL
I would try a manual send and if that also failed contact that domain's
postmaster.
- Original Message -
From: Hooks, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: 5.5.0 DNR
I am getting the message below back from
I've set up a lab to test our AD migration plan, but I've ran into a problem
and was wondering if anyone out there knows the solution.
Short version:
How do you completely remove all information about a domain from AD if the
DC for that domain is not available?
Long version:
I created an AD
Maybe IP forwarding is not set?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
And then I saw her face,
and now I'm a Script Believer...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question
LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you
Success! Thanks Tristan / Matt!
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access
We have a winner... That's it exactly. You have to rename the
The manual SMTP session seemed to work fine. No reply yet, but no errors either. The
other end is and Exchange 5.5 box:
220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
5.5.2653.13) ready
It seemed pretty slow to establish the initial connection, maybe 30 seconds.
Windows 2K SP2
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange
Bad, very bad
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question
And then I saw her
Yes, OWA works fine
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:03 PM
To:
No, the logs just show normal activity. Nothing stands out.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David
here?
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question
Bad, very bad
Regards
Mr
Yes to all your questions Ben. But the Exchange server isn't a DC. It's a
standalone.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL
Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice
reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm.
Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary
input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data.
Both Exchange servers are member servers.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15,
Is there anything on the server or client side of Exchange/Outlook that
would not allow a user to delete an e-mail until it is actually opened or it
stays in the mailbox at least for some predefined amount of time (say for 6
months before the user is able to delete it)?
Is there any utility
So if OWA works can we assume that the problem is at the client side?
Joshua Morgan
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
It was his singing,
I had to turn down my computer.
;0)
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 14:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question
Well, I already walked down to the managers office and
printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets
NT Password Authentication
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:09 PM
To:
Well, I'm just trying to figure out why this setup works on one server and
not the other. I was able to connect on the Good server. AFter that I
moved my mailbox to the Bad server I was unable to connect. So I don't
think it's a client side problem. It looks more like on the server side.
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems. (tm)
Set your deleted items retention time very high. Hope you have lots of disk
space.
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange
Is anyone using the MessageLabs Anti-spam service or looked into them?
http://www.messagelabs.com/ Just looking for some feedback as we are
seriously considering their services so we don't have to take on the support
for it internally if something goes wrong.
Diane
Diane Boehm
SC Johnson
This is what is happening: A user sends an email to a bad address
and receives this error:,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obviously, the syntax is incorrect with that comma in the beginning of it.
The user receives the following message multiple times.
553 ,[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced ''
553
I've got a similar issue affecting a 2K client that is not a domain member
and connects through RAS or VPN. Server is NT 4.0 SP6A w/ 5.5 SP4
Previous server was a BDC and as long as the workstation was logged on using
the same credentials as used on the network, member of a workgroup that had
So true.. our company logo should beWe love to micro manage
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question
-Original Message-
Not in Exchange. You could implement an archival solution I suppose,
depending on the actual desired objective. There are some archival solutions
listed at www.mail-resources.com I believe.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
Just wait till I start throwing dung at you.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question
What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr.
I have never had trouble with OL97 or OL98 reconnecting to the server after
a move. Perhaps Sakti just has a bad setup, or bad colleagues. At a
minimum they are clearly misinformed.
Now to your response. You never once said that a colleague had planted this
erroneous information in your head
Sorry, it can be more clear:
so that the mail sender within the same organization can set-up the property
in the outgoing e-mail such that the recipient can not delete the mail (or
mark as read) until he fulfills the sender's attributes .
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori
Sure, set the subject line to Complete the following or you shall be fired
and terminate as appropriate. Insert EC truism here
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I would just catch it and throw it right back at you!!!
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question
Just wait till I start throwing dung at
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 15:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
Sorry, it can be more clear:
I thought Lori's reply was pretty clear.
so that the mail sender
I have now placed my 'anti dung' screen on my monitor.
Strange, i can no longer see mails from Richard Tener...
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16
You need the StiCk.
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
Is there anything on the server or client side of
Exchange/Outlook that would
Thanks Chris. I admit this is the only part I wasn't sure on, if I gave a
new NT account service admin rights over the site and config containers but
I couldn't find any articles relating to if this would work. I guess it
would still be okay when you removed the first server in the site?
I had
Ok here is another one for you...
I have my AD setup and I am assiging OfficeXP, Visio 2002 and McAfee Virus
Scan.
My Windows 2000 machines install with no problems, my Winodws XP machines
only install McAfee.
Now my Office and Visio assignments came After Mcafee was installed... Could
it be
Have you checked to make sure users have rights to access this computer
from the network on the problem server?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Problem
Do you sell those? I could really use one? How about a 'full body anti
dung suit'? I could really use one around here.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE:
It went like this:
Me - telnet 194.154.211.74 25
(20 -30 second wait - maybe they should look at Q286375...)
Them - 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
5.5.2653.13) ready
Me - HELO mail.arendt-medernach.lu
Them - 250 OK
Me - MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to mention. Check the problem server's security log for 534
errors. If you see them, take a look at Q159930.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Problem
Have you checked to make
IMHO MS is right: We have had similar problems in the past. Every time it
happened, our firewall people claimed innocence, and every time they were
eventually proven guilty.
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jonathan Beeler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 16.
Does this problem still happen? It looks to me like it was just an
aberration.
You might try turning your SMTP logging up a few notches, try sending again
(via mail client, not manually), then checking the logs.
You don't have a PIX firewall in place, do you? You might check to make
sure that
SC Magazine just did an E2K AV review. More information about it is
available here:
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article;
sid=72mode=order=0
(link may wrap)
Just goes to show everyone has an opinion I guess.
--
Chris Scharff
The Mail Resource Center
Wow!!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
SC Magazine just did an E2K AV review. More information about it is
available here:
Wise aged Exchange Pros:
Does putting the swap file on it's own spindle, gain much in performance?
Or is it better to just split the system mirror and put the swap on the
second half?
Proposed configuration is:
1. Mirror for system
1 Mirror for swap
1 Mirror for logs
1 Raid 0+1 for database
hmmm. Odd choices.
Not to mention that everyone gets at least 4 1/2 stars out of a possible 5.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
SC Magazine just did
Another question I have is, can you migrate from one Forest to another using
MS Migrate?
I am attempting to create a new forest and move a EX5.5 system to E2K in a
entirely new forest domain.
I am ditching the 5.5 system all together, I just need the old mail moved,
so I don't believe I need the
norton wins? are they mad?
symantec are too slow with their updates, hours behind trend during recent
outbreaks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Shouldn't really be much of a surprise. It's kind of like VARBusiness
and CNR constantly giving CA products very high marks in reviews. I
believe the reviews are written by a bunch of trolls that never actually
install the products, let alone use them. They read the back of the
boxes and write a
sung to the Beverly Hillbillies Theme
Let me tell you a story about man named Wang,
Thought he'd make some bucks by buying up ol' Cheyenne.
Long Island is the place you wanna be,
so he took over CA and made the users scream.
ArcServe that is. Inoculan. Brick Level Backups. Blue Screens.
Thanks Chris,
That was exactly what I was looking for. What I am doing after I enabled
journaling was to send all messages to a mailbox and then set up a rule to
move the attachments to a personal folder.
Works well.
_
List
Mail comes in with out a problem from this person. Both manual tests I sent earlier
were received. However, it was a problem all yesterday, this morning, and continues to
be a problem now. No, no pix firewall in place. Do you suppose it could be related to
Q286375? Do you know of a way to
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
