All Nt4 SP6a Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Ive got a stack of SMTP email stuck at the MTA in Server A, destination
Server B. Server B is down. Server B had the only IMC in the Org. Made
another IMC on Server A, all new incoming/outgoing smtp email now flowing
ok.
Is there anyway of lifting the smtp
Putting exchange on NAS seems to be like making a bear dance.
Sure it can be done, but everyone is happier in the long run if you just
don't bother.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 February 2002 07:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re:
That was my idea also. Of course the manufacturers of NAS devices will
always try to make a selling point. Trying to convince management not to
implement NAS will be harder then ever now.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
Hello.
I know it has been posted before, however, I may have missed any responses
to this query. Is there any scripting/registry/software patch available
to reword the standard Mailbox Limit messages generated by Exchange 5.5?
Thank you.
Is it to do with the wording RE. The PST's ?
I now exactly the problem but couldn't find a solution.
-Original Message-
From: Bob P. Antonietti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 February 2002 12:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Your Mailbox is over it's Limit Message
Hello.
I
Am I missing something? When I read
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=kb;en-us;Q317173 I
still don't see where Microsoft supports NAS. Doesn't the NetApp appliance
look like a mapped drive to Exchange?
Denny
At 10:54 AM 2/12/2002 +0100, Martin Tuip wrote:
That was my
Easy answer, NO there isn't.
-Original Message-
From: Bob P. Antonietti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Your Mailbox is over it's Limit Message
Hello.
I know it has been posted before, however, I may have missed
Three words:
Test the performance.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:54 AM
Subject: Re: Exchange and NAS
That was my idea also. Of course the manufacturers of NAS devices will
Yes, Ed, I don't really know what I am doing with this. And it turns out
the user had made a mistake. But it would be handy to learn how to prove
that there is nothing wrong in the system.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11,
Not only has it been posted before it is a FAQ, the link for which is at the
bottom of every message.
- Original Message -
From: Bob P. Antonietti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:54 AM
Subject: Your Mailbox is over it's
The MTA on ServerA should reroute on it's own as long as the MTA on ServerB
is down.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:28 AM
Subject: Mail Queued at MTA
All Nt4 SP6a Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Ive got a
Has anyone read Motor Trend's last issue. They're comparing a Geo Metro
with a Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and NAS
Has anyone seen
I read that (specifically the 5.5 one) to be the same position they have
always taken: We realize it can be done, but just because it can be doesn't
mean it should be done. And no where does it explicitly state that they will
support that config.
I CAN run every exchange server on a box I bought
If you do buy a server from WallMart, be sure its the Rack-Mountable NSync
2002. The BackStreet Boys Workgroup Server is nothing more than a
refurbished Milli Vanilli Pentium II.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:52
you must have grown up in the 80s if you remember Milli Vanilli.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
You're assuming I have grown up.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange and NAS
you must have grown up in the 80s if you remember Milli Vanilli.
Did you look at..
http://www.outlookcentral.com/wpo/default.htm
Soysal, Serdar wrote:
Well, then check cdolive.com. You're bound to have a solution between those
two websites.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002
There is that...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange
Bill,
1. After you have NSlookup up and running, I'm assuming that you did a
lookup on westgroup.net? This is the information I got back. Looks good to
me.
westgroup.net nameserver = ns1.westgroup.net
westgroup.net nameserver = ns2.westgroup.net
westgroup.net
I've kind of figured DNS out on my own over the years, but if you're
truly interested, everyone says that O'Reilly's DNS and BIND book is the
bible.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
I have an Exchange 2000 server that includes several separate customers
attaching via Outlook 2002. One customer (several different users) is
having an issue sending attachments to some external recipients. The
attachments (word, excel) will be received and displayed as win.dat. This
does not
the MS KB is now USELESS. I am, at present, seeking a channel to report this, but
they really don't seem to care. The premier website is even worse - I can't even get
in because the friggin' passport thing is broken.
Since they made the www.exinternals.com website go away, there are now NO
Exchange 5.5, SP4 NT4SP6
When I create an email group I want to disable the users ability to see the
group membership?
How can I do this?
Thanks!
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Are you talking about a Distribution List that does not show others the
recipients contained in it?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 February 2002 16:30
To:
Do you mean hiding it from the GAL ?
-Original Message-
From: Phil [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to not allow people to see group members?
Exchange 5.5, SP4 NT4SP6
When I create an email group I
No sorry.
I want people to see the actual group name; ex, Finance but I do not want
them to be able to see who is in the Finance group.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:37
Subject:
You have to create an new Virtual Directory that points to the iisadmpwd
directory...I don't believe it is done by default in IIS 5.0. We had to do
this a week or two ago, because our users were getting 404-page not found
errors, when they clicked the chage password button.
Jim Blunt
Try www.slipstick.com they have a pretty good setup.
- Original Message -
From: Kim Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: OT Microsofts Knowledge Base
the MS KB is now USELESS. I am, at present,
I think the option to recover deleted items was only added with Outlook 98.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead !
All
I have
Look on the advanced tab in the Exchange Admin tool. Place a check mark
on the option Hide membership from the address book.
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How to not allow people
Wrong thread Darren!
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 February 2002 16:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing
Sorry about that ...
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recover Deleted items Missing presumed dead !
Wrong thread Darren!
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network
For recipients that have trouble receiving attachments configure their
recipient object to send in plain text. And do keep WordMail disabled.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
It is not created by default, and you also need a certificate, whether
you generate your own or buy one.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is/was a specific Q article regarding this issue, though it seems to
have mysteriously disappeared.
MSKB has just been jacked up since they upgraded it.
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange
The Domain is in native mode since step 17 (sorry I ment native, not single... bad
english). I turned off the old 5.5 machine yesterday. From clients point of view
everything is fine. 'Only' the system-manager and the backup are causing trouble.
Tomorrw I will remove the old server...
I
Try using this KB site:
http://search.support.microsoft.com/kb/c.asp?fr=0sd=techln=en-us
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT Microsofts Knowledge Base
the MS KB is now
Ack sorry I clicked the all inconsistency button in the DS/IS consistency
adjuster but I must not have clicked it properly. I ran it again and
clicked the button and it works. Sorry!!!
Lou
-Original Message-
From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12,
Yup that was it for number 2!
Thanks to everyone who reponded ... we are still looking into the other
solutions ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Maclaren, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 5:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000
I guess we're talking E2k here? Yes?No?
Dr Evil
Throw me a frickin bone here
Dr Evil
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 February 2002 17:15
To:
Google's a reasonable alternative to search the knowledge base, type in
whatever you want to search for and stick in
site:support.microsoft.com
to restrict where it looks.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 February 2002 20:21
To: Exchange
Thanks, Chuck. This is a trip - they seem to have put the KB website back the way it
was, weeks ago, when it worked. Does anyone else see that? Wow, they actually fixed
it.
The premier site is still unreachable, but I never use that one except as a last
resort.
-Original
Hi there... Upon further investigation and testing, I now get this error
after upgrading my client software to outlook 2002..
Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The
operation failed. An object could not be found.'
When looking this up on the MS site
Is there any good solutions for public folder contacts? I am looking for
something that is a little bit easier for the end user to get in and use a
shared calendar/contacts base.
Any info would be appreciated.
Mike
_
List posting
Just use www.google.com and prefix your query string with
site:microsoft.com (without the quote marks).
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL
Why would you be using Outlook 97 on a W2K workstation? It's not even
supported any more is it?
You could try removing and reinstalling.
Or you could simply use a later client to recover deleted items.
DumpsterAlwaysOn only enables recovery from folders other than Deleted
Items. The feature
Describe what you're trying to restore and how you restored it in more
detail.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Masochism.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
How do you assign someone ownership rights to a DL? I looked and couldn't
find how to do that.
Thanks
Saul
You can put them in separate containers.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
I must be missing something. I go to Active Directory users and computers
right click on the DL group and under General I don't see the Owner.
Thanks
Saul
It's right there, Owner in the General tab of the list's properties.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq
Actually it can be done with an event script. I've written one that I might
be persuaded to share.
Dan Ferneyhough
DJF Systems
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your Mailbox
Thanks to all. It is defintely RTF setting. Plain text works!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Using Plain Text. It works.
Including the original post in your reply. Priceless.
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: win.dat attachments
Thanks to all. It is defintely RTF
If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backups Checklist
NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in
Well, had you asked the question correctly, you might have gotten a
better answer. You hijacked a thread about Exchange 5.5 distribution
lists to ask about Windows 2000 Active Directory distribution GROUPS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Right. Backing up the log files with the IS running is worthless.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy
And a cool PPT of the whole thing I found while confirming the log file
thing (I was thinking of trying to replay the log files in event of
longstanding corruption which would be a useless thing to do).
I always work better with big pretty pictures.
I always thought that if you backed up priv.edb at midnight and then
priv.edb goes down at say noon the next day, that rolling back the log files
from midnight to noon when the failure occured would allow you to reclaim
the mail that is not in that restored version of priv.edb?
- Original
open DL. Click on Security, Adavnced then the Owner tab. Make sure in view
Advanced features for AD users and computerzs.
Well, had you asked the question correctly, you might have gotten a
better answer. You hijacked a thread about Exchange 5.5 distribution
lists to ask about Windows 2000
Anyone?
I'm developing an application that extends the functionality of exchange
to mobile devices and I'd really appreciate opinions from owners of
exchange servers on running the application as an extension on the actual
exchange server vs running the application on a seperate server alongside
Try this...
C:\nslookup
Default Server: sttlpop1.sttl.uswest.net
Address: 206.81.192.1
set q=mx
westgroup.net
Server: sttlpop1.sttl.uswest.net
Address: 206.81.192.1
westgroup.net MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = articuno.westgroup.com
westgroup.net MX preference = 10, mail
Get a bigger disk.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian
Risnoveanu
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002
Sure, that's true. But the mail in those log files wouldn't have been
backed up since he's talking about backing everything up at the same
time. If you do an incremental backup of Exchange, that's just what it
does--it backs up the log files. But it won't be of much use if you
don't use the
And call Symantec.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Installing Norton Antivirus
Get a bigger disk.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
LOL!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kjeld Janssen
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:34 AM
To:
I was in there earlier And just prior to reading your post, I had
removed my address book, and re-added it. Then all worked fine.
It was real weird I guess just by respecifying it. It reset it all.
Thanks to everyone who offered advice!
It is really appreciated.
--
Dustin
The point would be that if the priv or pub got trashed (assuming hardware
failure of some sort on the drive with those files) while the system was
running you could restore the priv or pub from the previous night and replay
the current days log files that are on a different drive (recommended
Turn off that circular logging!! Your full online backup should be set to
flush committed logs and then they'll go away. If they don't go away, check
your backups.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange
I generally don't like to add SW to an Exchange server unless you MUST. Such
as AV.
As a rule of thumb, I think that 3rd party apps should be written in a way
that I have the option of running them on the server or not. Such as the
Blackberry server app.
If I had no choice but to run it on the
Our customer has 2 exchange 2000 server
Since they upgrade to Exchange SP2, they have authentification problems
They can access their eMail using POP (so user and password are ok )
THey cannot access anymore their mail using owa. THey are prompt for
their
user and password but can't access
committed flush...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backups Checklist
Turn off that circular logging!! Your full online backup should be set to
flush committed logs and
Thanks for the feedback. I do have 3 physical arrays on 2 different
controllers (1 with 2 channels)
C: mirror - OS
D: mirror - Logs
E: Raid5 - DBs
So it seems I can just do a full online backup of the stores via the
exchange aware ntbackup. If I lose the store, I can put new disks in my
raid5
Again -- how are you going to back up the log files while they're in use?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Ook. - The Librarian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mood, Steve
I am getting a 4283 error about 4 times an hour on my bridgehead server.
Anyone know if I should be concerned or what the cause is?
The error says:
Unable to recognize an internal message identifier. Internal connection
handle (LPI) 1-15-2 Error cod:8465 [POP4 POP4 UP 7 228] (14)
Any ideas?
Jeez, or even type the error message into their knowledge base (at
symantec.com of all places) which gives you an immediate hit on an
article entitled, strangely enough, Error: Unable to create mailbox.
DAPI or memory error when installing Norton AntiVirus for Microsoft
Exchange
Any important issues running these two together? We are currently on a
Exchange 5.5/NT 4 system and are thinking of redoing the system. Not ready
for Exchange 2000 as I believe it requires active directory.
TIA
_
List posting FAQ:
you mean the one log file that is being written to at the time of the
backup? Magic, of course! Hmmm
Good question . . . Open File Agent? But then I need ArcServe or BE right?
Do *you* know the answer? Besides an OFFLINE backup?
LOL
- Original Message -
From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not backing up the log files but expecting them to be in existence on the
server after a failure of the priv or pub in which case I should be able to
do a no loss restore (previous nights store plus todays logfiles). Isn't
that kind of the point of turning off circular logging in the first place
A key difference between a public folder and a mailbox is that with a
public folder a status of whether a message is read is maintained for
each user who adds it to Favorites. With a mailbox, a message read by
one is read by all. That makes a mailbox more suitable for a help
desk type activity
Of course, an application that runs under elevated permissions can do
just as much damage on a separate box as when running on the mailbox
server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
Why, he'll use the NTBACKUP /IMEANIT switch of course!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent:
Yes, except that the restore will replay the log files for you
automatically.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
No, the answer is: Put your log files on a seperate set of spindles that you
bought at a different time than the spindles the IS is on and you should be ok.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
As a result of the war, corporations have
Look in the archives. That question is asked and answered pretty much
every other day.
I hate it when people just pop in to ask their question without reading
the transactions.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and
If you install Exchange 5.5 on a win 2K server you may burn up your monitor.
Unless you have an ATI graphics card at which point your mouse may start
acting up.
S.
PS: For a useful answer read the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I am running Windows 2000 Small Business Server SP2 and Exchange 2000 Server
SP2. When I try to login to OWA I can login (i even get a login box asking
for username, password, domain) to public folders by
http://192.168.x.x/public but when I try to login to a mailbox ex:
Does anyone know how to create a mailbox in Exchange 2000 that will catch
all non-deliverable or wrongly addressed mail sent to a domain?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
There's no love today. No one wants to answer :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:4283 Error
I am getting a 4283 error about 4 times an hour on my bridgehead
Hi, quick question.
I have about 5 domains that receive mail on my exchange server, everyone
here has an @americanexcelsior.com address. Is there an easy way to give
everyone 2 more internet mail address without going through each recipient
and doing it manually?
I'd like to add a [EMAIL
Version and SP?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 4283 Error
There's no love today. No one wants to answer :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create a mail-enabled user with the SMTP address
SMTP-CatchAll-SYS-E2KMS@yourcompany.com and grant yourself rights to view
its contents. That's all you need to do.
S.
PS: For a useful answer, read the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
http://www.cdolive.com. Contact Siegfried as to pricing terms.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Justin
Re write the RFC so that is an RFC supported feature. Basically no.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Justin
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange
Does the recipient have an SMTP address with a form that matches the
default recipient policy?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Which version of Exchange? If Exchange 5.5, you can do a directory export
of all your mailboxes to a csv file. Then you can massage the csv file in
Excel, add the SMTP addresses you want, save the csv file and import it
back.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL
Q266792
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=kb;en-us;Q266792
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 4283 Error
There's no love today. No one wants to answer
It matters when you buy the drives?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Tuesday, February 12,
Which version of Exchange?
With 5.5, you could use directory import into the field
Secondary-Proxy-Addresses.
With 2000, you can use a recipient policy.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
Oops, my bad. Yes it's Exchange 5.5. I'll give that a go.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail recipients
Which version of Exchange? If Exchange 5.5, you can
That worked. Thank you. It was creating the default recipient policy as
mydomain.local rather than mydomain.com. One more question...are there
certain ports that must be enabled (other than port 80)for OWA to work
through http://publicIP/exchange/bob if you are setup to port-forward from a
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
