The database will grow if you then import the data again. It is at this
point that SIS is lost.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Orlowski
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge?
I think
If you remove the second virtual server, does the problem persist?
On 3/25/03 0:17, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Chris it is not working without disclaimer as well I have checked it.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Monday,
Which version of Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Veld, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Has anyone tried to use a VBscript to change the primary SMTP address
for a
number of users?
We are in
Do you by any chance get an attachment on the recipient end when you send a
message?
--
From: Exchange List
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 00:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Second SMTP
It was working before but when I
The other day I posted a msg. about outlook rules. I'm still trying to find
info on how to make the rules work on the local outlook client computer.
This way I can leave the exchange server out of the loop.
Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550
In fact I just did something like this a few days ago, but for the opposite
reason (post divestiture cleanup).
I don't see the putex statement in your script - you can't do a substring
search across elements of an array, as in the line where you're doing
REPLACE(...)
You need to do a PutEx to
You mean other than just simply creating client-side rules?
http://www.slipstick.com/rules/serverbased.htm
- Original Message -
From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:54 AM
Subject: Rules
The other day
I need just client side rule.
Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
I can't help with actually doing this from VB (I use CDOEXM from C++), but if
you get an IMailRecipient interface on the user object, you simply set the
SMTPEmail property to change the primary SMTP address. (In C++ it's the
put_SMTPEmail method). The old primary address is demoted but left
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, at 8:46am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're all talking like it's an either/or situation.
Not so much either/or as you've already lost.
If, on the other hand, it comes straight to you then it's as secure as
it's possible to get with *regular* e-mail.
Regular email
Hi all,
We are a small company using Exchange 5.5 and our company has several
doctors and medical groups who are clients. With the new HIPAA regulations
regarding patient information privacy going into effect soon we may need to
encrypt our outbound email messages so that they can only be
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, at 9:00am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the new HIPAA regulations regarding patient information privacy going
into effect soon we may need to encrypt our outbound email messages so
that they can only be read by the intended recipient.
This question does not have an easy
I don't think our illustrious IT1 will be able to set up a new machine.
Configurations on Navy ships are rather fixed.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, March
LOTS of things need changing.
LOTS of things to plan.
DNS; WINS; all of those legacy LMHOSTS and HOSTS files that are still in
use; every router that remembers routes; all default gateways;
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2003 22:05
Kevin,
Implement the Exchange 5.5 own encryption system KMS, if it's for your own
Outlook users?(doesn't work for strangers).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Bachelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25
hello..
i have several instancess that several of my users are checking thier
email, the pop3 client does not recognize the password and then it ends up
locking up their email accout.. any ideas..
_
List posting FAQ:
hello.. I have been dealing with this issue ever since we moved to
exchange 2000. We are running windows xp with the pop3 connector.
several of my users accounts are getting locked out as if they are
entering and incorrect password. The users account information
(password) is not being recognized
have several of my users that are setup as pop3. users accouts are
locking up email accounts when they state to save email password in pop3
settings.. any ideas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Verisign has some decent white paper reading:
https://www.verisign.com/resources/wp/index.html
Look a little ways down on the page for:
Healthcare
- Securing Electronic Information in Healthcare Organizations
- Healthcare Authentication Services
Might be worth a few minutes to read...
The users are entering their username or password incorrectly?
The users are entering their username or password incorrectly?
The users are entering their username or password incorrectly?
Why are the users using POP3 to access their mail?
On 3/25/03 7:45, Hector Cortez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No they are not.. I have verified all information.. The only conclusion
I have found on this was to delete the protective storage in the
registry in windows xp, I believe it's a client to server authentication
bug
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Remember when accessing Exchange sometimes via POP3 the username may not
be listed exactly how you would think
I'd still like to know Why the users are using POP3 to access their
mail?
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL
What errors are in the event viewer on the Exchange server when this occurs?
If you run a network sniffer, what does the POP3 conversation look like?
POP3 authentication isn't exactly a complex thing
telnet mailserver 110
user username
pass password
You said you are running Windows XP with the
All traffic seams fine.. I know, I know I take all the criticism in a
positive way.. I inherited this NOS and am in the process of moving over
to mapi. I have just been getting a lot of grief form the coats on why
this is happening. As we wall know.. All of corporate end users are not
the
Did you check the event logs as Chris suggested? They should tell you
everything you need to know concerning this issue. My gut reaction is
that the users are NOT logging in with the account name, but instead are
using something like their Alias name.
Also, do you have cross-over account names?
I've seen this with Exchange 5.5 as well. Never could figure out why it was
happening. Why not just disable account lockouts?
-Original Message-
From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and pop3
Good afternoon,
We are in the midst of budgeting for the year 2004. Active Directory is a
Security Team directive and if they get their piece done, we will be able to
migrate to Exchange 2003.
Currently we are using Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5.
We have 4500 mailboxes and will probably grow to
Thank god.. Now I know im not crazy.. I have tried to disable the
account lockouts but due to audit purposes I cannot .. Have you ran into
any fixes or workarounds until I convert to mapi
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003
Depends
Yes
Yes
Maybe
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Migration of Exchange 2003
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:18:29 -0500
Good afternoon,
We are in the midst of budgeting for the year
Thanks for the answers. Could you please elaborate on them?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Migration of Exchange 2003
Depends
Yes
Yes
Maybe
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL
Audit purposes? Such as security audit? I'd say that you've got bigger
issues if your users are using POP3 and sending clear text passwords.
My opinion is turn off account lockout and forgo the audit crap until you
can convert these users to MAPI connections.
I never found a solution that
Yeah thanks for your help.. Do you have any ideas or program
recommendation on a quick, easy and low end user involvement for the
mapi setup
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
What Client are you running?
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3
Yeah thanks for your help.. Do you have any ideas
D E P E N D S
Y E S
Y E S
M A Y B E
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Migration of Exchange 2003
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:26:15 -0500
Thanks for the answers. Could
We are on windows OS and outlook XP client
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3
What Client are you running?
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony is such a dog.. Thanks Tony.. Please disregard any eMAILs from me in
the future. I would
appreciate that.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migration of Exchange 2003
D E
There are many options for re-configuring Outlook to MAPI depending on the
version of Outlook. The more difficult task is getting all the email in
those PST files back on the server.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003
Your question was very general and you can't expect any specific answers
outside of 'grab the whitepapers and read!'
As I answered elsewhere, you are in a great position to learn, plan and take
charge of this future project.
William
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL
We had a similar problem. I don't recall what version of Outlook and I
don't have an outlook 2000 client to test with. I don't even recall if
this option exists in OL2000 but if it does, turn it off.
Look in Toolsoptionsother and see if the checkbox is checked that says
Enable Instant Messaging
Have you tried to log in with domain\username? The problem may be that the
client machine is not logged onto the domain and therefore the full username
(with domain) is not passed.
Just a thought.
Danny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Well depending on your Windows OS you should be able to script it
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3
We are on
Disable account lockout is a band-aid and shouldn't be the fix.
Do the event logs show where the lockout are coming from? The same PC's that
have the problems? What e-mail client are you using?
Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
503-675-5510
-Original
Silly thing - anyone else ever have messages take 2 hours to go to this list
and other messages take no time...??? Other Internet mail for me flows
quickly, but occasionally posting to this and the W2K list lag WY
behind...although I get incoming and replies to other lists back quickly.
Dave
I can say that my exchange server seems to dislike AOL addresses
-Original Message-
From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow posting to lists
Silly thing - anyone else ever have messages take 2 hours to
That's probably healthy.
Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
503-675-5510
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow posting to lists
I can say
Yes...
-Original Message-
From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Silly thing - anyone else ever have messages take 2 hours to go to this list
and other messages take no time...??? Other Internet mail for me flows
We see this problem every once in a while in Outlook 2K, and in our case it's nearly
always caused by a bloated outcmd.dat file. This file holds toolbar and menubar
customizations and is usually no more than 10k in size. Sometimes though it balloons
to as much as a 1 MB in size and does awful
When you change the Maximum Message size in the IMS on the General tab, what
do you have to do to make that change take affect?
Last time I tried to increase the maximum size, I first restarted the IMS
service. That didn't work, so I restarted all the Exchange services. After
no luck there, I
My Black hole fix seems to be doing a pretty good job. So far, I have 97
email addresses added to it and I'm adding more as I receive the Unknown
Recipient messages. I temporarily added myself as a member of the distro
list so that I can put some numbers out there and actually see what kind of
Restart of the IMS is all that is required. Connecting to the server on port
25 and issuing the EHLO command will verify the size change. The change
should be made on all servers with an IMS if necessary.
On 3/25/03 23:56, Biesecker, Noel E. IT1(SW) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When you change the
Ensure individual mailboxes do not their own (more restrictive) limit set.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2003 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changing message size limit in Internet Mail Service Connector
OK, I have an issue which I'm hoping someone can point in the right
direction...even if it's only to ask some questions I haven't thought of
yet.
OK, first the setup:
DC's and GC's running Win2k SP3. We are in a child domain.
E2K SP3 running on Win2k SP2 member servers. There are 5 Admin groups
I strongly suspect that HIPAA and e-mail don't mix.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bachelder
Sent: Tuesday, March 25,
It's pretty obvious from his description that it's Exchange 2000.
I use ADSI for these things. The proxyAddresses attribute is an array.
Code I've written manipulates the entries in the array. Be sure not to
put the same address in twice--ADSI doesn't like that and you'll get the
typical
In the client specify the account in the format:
Domain\User_ID\Mailbox_Alias
Forward slashes are also acceptable, even required for some clients that
don't like backslashes like some versions of Netscape Mail. And make
sure you've entered the password correctly. If this is configured
wrong,
Maybe his filter didn't like the word proxyAddresses.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:08 PM
To: [EMAIL
I am trying to install a new exchange site in my existing exchange 5.5
organization. However, the installation on my new server (that I want to
put in it's own site in my current organization) only gives two options:
join and existing site OR create an entirely new organization and site--no
No.
Let me refresh the scenario again. I have configured default smtp virtual server to
send all outbound mails on port TCP 26, I have created a second smtp and configured it
on TCP port 26, now everything is working fine except when a user of server A send the
message to server B user, the
58 matches
Mail list logo
