Had no luck with the knowledge base tried a couple of the resolutions but
didnt make any difference still have same problem.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Hi All
Just a quick question, we currently have Exchange 5.5 on a dinosaur of a
server. We have just started to use scripts and its forever hanging. We
want to upgrade to Exchange 2000 and a new server.
What spec server would you get for stableness and resilience i.e.
processing power, HD
The way some of the Digital Viruii of the New Frontier work, This will happen.
Lets say you and XYZ corp communicate via Email, and you are in his addressbook.
They are hit with one of the digital predators(Virus). for every email that virus
sends, it will pull two names out of the infected one's
Sorry to hear that. Did you have a question?
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Can not map exchange 5.5 to domain controller
Had no luck with the knowledge base tried a couple of
This is the very reason the hey you idiot you sent me a virus messages
don't work. Now if we could only get those automated messages turned off.
We to have been fighting this with SOBIG, I spent over 8 hours trying to
convince a user who only has is a custom recipient on our system that his
Several Times.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Relaying On when Set to Off?
Tried rebooting the box?
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
Stay away from 486-based machines.
-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Server
Hi All
Just a quick question, we currently have Exchange 5.5 on a dinosaur of a
server. We have just
15K SCSI drives and as much memory as you can afford or your server can
handle.
Hi All
Just a quick question, we currently have Exchange 5.5 on a dinosaur of a
server. We have just started to use scripts and its forever hanging. We
want to upgrade to Exchange 2000 and a new server.
Seriously, a Compaq ProLiant with 1GB RAM and dual 1+ GHz CPUs would
probably do fine (can you get anything less nowadays?). Try to get one
that could hold at least 7 drives, then you would be able to build three
separate RAID volumes (RAID1, RAID1, RAID5) for an optimal disk IO ***.
The size of
all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the
exchange servers via Outlook.
The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log
on.
NT 4 domain
Windows 2000 sp 3
Exchange 5.5 sp4
all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs
this started
Thanks for the input 8-)
Vas Constantinou
- Original Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: New Server
Seriously, a Compaq ProLiant with 1GB RAM and dual 1+ GHz CPUs would
Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400
They cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Any commonality that you can see among those
Problem solved!
- Original Message -
From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
They cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook.
-Original
We instituted the same policy yesterday. We started diverting all office
format documents as well as .txt files (we had seven instances of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make it all the way to the mail server, where the AV picked
it, because the attachment was disguised as a .txt file.) for testing. We
told
that is the puzzling part . . .
auth to different dc's
mail on different mail servers
different segments/switches on the network
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM
Subject: Re:
It's [EMAIL PROTECTED] To learn more about this virus, click on this link:
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mail
Excuse my ignorance what is the vulnerability, do you have a Q article or
security update number from MS. When was the vulnerability reported.
TIA,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also
try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a
network problem or DNS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Thursday, September
yep. they can ping mail server . . . I will try the OWA
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
This may seem too simple but can they
If ping works still try and put the IP address in the profile for the server
name.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
yep. they can ping mail server . . . I will
everyone has the same dns settings due to dhcp
would licensing give this error? I see nothing for either in the event logs
on the dc or exchange server
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003
cannot find inbox for same users via OWA
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email
My only other guess is multiple domains running on trusts that are fouled up
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:37:06 -0400
everyone has
If you are running the Licensing Service, disable it.
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
everyone has the same dns settings due to
when we delete and then recreate the profile it resolves the mailbox with no
problems.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
If ping
My turn to ask stupid questions :)
I have a user who is reporting that when she looks at this particular
public folder, the folder is empty but the status bar shows 0 items, 7
unread (also she has a shortcut to that folder and there is a fat (7)
next to it).
I remotely accessed her PC and ran
oh oh
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:38:55 -0400
cannot find inbox for same users via OWA
- Original Message -
From: Tony
we do have a trust but all these users are in the same domain as the
exchange servers and primary accounts are theirs [the users] from this
domain as well. The other is just a resource domain . . .
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
all are per seat
let me try that
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
If you are running the Licensing Service, disable it.
-
Are there 7 messages in the folder which are marked private?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:39 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 0 items, 7 unread
Subject: 0 items, 7 unread
My turn to ask stupid questions :)
What if you run OWA on a different PC and try to log in as the user
whose mailbox cannot be found?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:39 AM
The folder is empty according to ESM.
However the folder has 7 subfolders. What a weird coincidence.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
Are there 7
no dice
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
If you are running the Licensing Service, disable it.
- Original Message -
same result
- Original Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:41 AM
Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
What if you run OWA on a different PC and try to log in as the user
whose
I have seen this with mailboxes as well and the only way I have cleared it
is by using the Exchange Client to access it and delete the messages.
Helen
Bournemouth University
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:40 PM
So nothing was changed on the servers?
Was anything changed on those workstations?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
cannot find inbox
There has to be something logging when attempting to login to the mailbox.
Did you look hard at the logs?
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Date: Thu, 11 Sep
We are currently running Exchange 5.5 SP4 clustered on an NT4 Domain. Is it
possible to move the servers to a 2000 domain without breaking Exchange?
I'm having a problem using SRS to replicate the data between the E5.5 and
E2K server. It works flawlessly in our testbed, but when I try to install
Hi,
So, the virus taking advantage of this MS Word/VB vulnerability is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, are you simply blocking *.txt extensions in your Exchange AV or
some other file formats?
We were talking about this in our security meeting yesterday however
this is the first I have heard of an
There you go...problem solved!
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 17:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
yes. What was the problem again?
Erik,
Actually, that's not what I said. Technically, I do see that I added some
unrelated information that could confuse you. Let me attempt to clarify.
These four security bulletins came out this month, detailing vulnerabilities
in the MS Office Suite:
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4
1 smtp server, 1 mailbox server
Have checked the box for 'hosts and clients that sucsessfully authenticate',
but yet when I go to abuse.net/relay.html I fail every time. Server started
doing this yesterday and was wiped and completly reinstalled not 1 hour ago.
This
Which tests do you fail?
Are the test messages actually delivered?
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Cant pass a relay test.
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4
1 smtp
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html and telneting self testing. But the mails
DO NOT appear to deliver. What I dont understand is in the past we have
passed these tests. Suddenly I get a email that we are on the ORDB list.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Thanks, but there is nothing in that folder. ESM reports 0 items. Tried
Exchange client anyway - it sees nothing.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Helen Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September
A Compaq DL380 G2 (G3 would be better) with one or two CPUs, 1GB of ram
Two 36GB drives in RAID1 for OS, swap, exchange logs (not the
greatest, but OK for 100 users)
However many 72GB in RAID5 for exchange store.
My personal opinion is to avoid 15K drives - we've had a couple of these
fail.
And an SDLT tape drive to go along with it.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Server
A Compaq DL380 G2 (G3 would be better) with one or two CPUs, 1GB of ram
Two 36GB
I like the new ML530G2 I got (for my sql app)...12 HS drive bay's room for
the DLT drive...it's sweet...
6304 raid card
did I mention it's fast??? it is
Ok it hurt putting it in the rack alone
now to just get one for exchange and retire the ML350...
I woyuld bet the failure on the 15k
What about MDBVU32?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 18:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
Thanks, but there is nothing in that folder. ESM reports 0 items. Tried
Exchange client anyway - it sees
:)
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
What about MDBVU32?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11
FYI,
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
bulletin/MS03-035.asp
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The New MS Word / VBA
Hi,
Thanks for the answers in advance...
I am running Exchange 5.5 on a 2000 server. The name alias are first name
initial and then the last name. What is the best practice for a name change,
such a new married user. Do I need to delete the mailbox and then create a
mailbox with the new name
MDBVUE does not see anything either.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
What about MDBVU32?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
If you right-click the folder and choose mark all as read, what happens?
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:14 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 0 items, 7 unread
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
MDBVUE does not
I generally change the display name to reflect the new name, add an SMTP
address for the new name and then set it as the primary. Occassionally I
will change the alias as well, but generally only if I am renaming the
NT account (4.0) name.
-Original Message-
From: Pouncey, Mark
Perzactly!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Name change procedure
I generally change the display name to reflect the new name, add an SMTP
address for the new name and then
Ladies and gentlemen,
I've developed a somewhat odd quirk and am hoping that someone can help
me sort it out...
First the basics: Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP3...
I have a user, Daniel Julien, who originally existed in our parent
domain... Due to some changes in the organization,
Hello All.
Exchange 2000
OWA
Windows XP Desktop
After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting
having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or
reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office
2000 CD in.
I did my homework and
Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Hello All.
Exchange 2000
OWA
Windows XP
Which specific online tests do they fail?
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test.
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html and telneting self testing.
I did that.not good enough. The people that install the new desktop
machines just won't accept that answer and think it is my job to go out
to 250 machines and fix them because I was the one that upgraded
Exchange and since I upgraded Exchange it hasn't worked...and that in
their eyes is my
Do they have VPN access? You could put the installation point somewhere on
the network and they could browse to it.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange
Good idea. That is definitely worth mentioning.
If you come up with any other ideas, I would appreciate the input. I am
really getting beat-up over this.
Is it 4:30 yet Aaarrgg!
Thanks again.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Reset the view in Outlook. The user has a custom view running.
Regards, Michael
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
MDBVUE does not see anything either.
I did /cleanviews right away - that didn't help.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
Reset the view in Outlook. The user has a custom view running.
Regards,
Maybe I dont understand your question. They fail the open relay test. I
never get a 550, its alway 250 ok.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test.
Which
Do an LDIFDE export of your whole AD with flags
-r (mailnickname=*) -l proxyAddresses
This will create a text file showing all mail-enabled users' e-mail
addresses. Search the file for duplicates.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original
User reports - that helped. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
If you right-click the folder and choose mark all as read, what happens?
I found a way with a registry hack to turn off multimedia extensions
in OWA. Is this OK to turn off? What are the ramifications of turning
off multimeida extensions on my Exchange 2000 server?
Samanthna
_
List posting FAQ:
But its not just one test is it?
Arent there something like 8 or 9 variations to see if the relay is indeed
open?
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:46 PM
Subject: RE: Cant pass a
The name that is resolving
/o=NAMFG/ou=CLEVELAND/cn=NA-STORDY/cn=DANIELJULIEN is the
legacyExchangeDN for one of the two mailboxes with the same proxy
addresses... do a search in your forest for each of the following:
/o=NAMFG/ou=CLEVELAND/cn=NA-STORDY/cn=DANIELJULIEN
Daniel Julien
I'm betting
Really?
220 postoffice02.aruplab.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail Serv
ice 5.5.2653.13) ready
ehlo foo.bar
250-postoffice02.aruplab.com Hello [216.30.136.98]
250-XEXCH50
250-HELP
250-ETRN
250-DSN
250-SIZE 5140480
250-AUTH LOGIN
250 AUTH=LOGIN
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 OK
Did you check the little box which says that this server normally
accepts mail for your domain? It's not an open relay if you use your
e-mail address and your mail server accepts mail for it... that is what
it is supposed to do. Your server 'fails' test 6, and as the testing
data indicates that
Dunno, I only install the components I specifically need on my servers...
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA/Multimedia Extensions
I found a way with a registry hack to
The multimedia extensions can be blocked from downloading or being installed
by blocking that feature in OWA. Look at the OWA 2000 Deployment Guide on MS
Exchange site it is there with other goodies too.
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Knowledge Base Article Q298110 talks about a reg hack to fix this. Maybe
that would work?
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:42:16
I have users running Outlook 2000 on Windows 2000 desktops connected to an
Exchange 2000 server on Windows 2000. Periodically the users will be
prompted to provie a user name, password, and domain name. However, after
you provide this informtion, Outlook still repeatedly prompts you to
provide
Their passwords are about to expire. I have seen this a lot with Outlook
2002. For some reason it freaks out when one's password is about to
expire. Usually Ctrl-Alt-Del/Change Password, then Logoff/Logon does the
trick.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Andrey,
Actually at this point passwords are not set to expire on this network.
This will even happen to a new account that has just been setup. It seems
to be happening to all the users connected to this exchange server, not
just a select few.
Nadine
We're seeing the same issue on a small handful of our desktops. I
checked the same Q articles but no luck.
Exchange 2000 w/SP3 rollup hotfix v1 Windows 2000
Outlook 2002 SP2
3 out of 4 times the workaround was to uninstall then re-install Office.
This did not work for the 4th user. This 4th
I assume domain authentication is occurring correctly? Anything in the
security logs?
-Original Message-
From: Nadine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials
I have users running
Yes, domain authentication is occurring correctly and there is nothing
unusual in the security logs.
I assume domain authentication is occurring correctly? Anything in the
security logs?
-Original Message-
From: Nadine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003
Then probably the RFR or NSPI component of the System Attendant service
is misbehaving. RFR is in charge of arranging a meeting between a MAPI
client and a Global Catalog. For some reason such a meeting is not
taking place. Are there network issues between clients and domain
controllers?
By the
what the
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test.
Really?
220 postoffice02.aruplab.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail Serv
ice
ahhh ok , thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test.
Did you check the little box which says that this server normally
accepts mail for your domain?
They also *appear* to fail test 7 BTW. The key is whether they test message
is actually delivered or NDR'd.
As for receiving an email that you are on the ORDB list...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Thursday, September
87 matches
Mail list logo
