Hi Ed
I think you'll find that I followed my initial post with an immediate
follow up that stated:
Sorry, I should have said that it eliminates any key-logging concerns
related to authentication - it obviously can't stop the actual recording
of keystrokes by key-logging software.
It will
Unfortunately, they're about the only method that really works.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Thursday,
I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be
plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p
The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from
the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email
filters from working,
I would guess that the junk mail filters are using rules, and you might need to set
Continue Processing Rules
But then if you've already filtered them are they junk?
Harriet
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 September 2003 09:51
To: Exchange
Well in outlook 2003, the junk rules are replaced with a built in filter
facility, a separate entry from normal rules. The email is definintly
Junk, but I'm wanting to use the safe lists that are now built in. With
safe lists all emails are moved to Junk Email unless the sender is on
your safe
Ah, you want to use the White list capability. May I suggest instead
you just set Junk E-mail to High and use your usual rules. That works
exceptionally well for me; I get maybe 2-3 spam in my mailbox a day. I
get more than 150 in the Junk e-mail folder that I never have to deal
with.
-Ben-
Yah, but the problem is, even with my Junk E-mail set to High, my
usual rules are over-riding the built in Junk Filters of Outlook 2003.
So if I have my normal rules turned off, the Junk Mail filter works
well an moves mail from the inbox into the Junk Mail folder and leaves
none-junk in the
Unplugging your server from the internet works, and the results are
uniform, as opposed to the haphazard loss of legitimate mail one gets
with an RBL. Given corporate penchant for conformity, I can't imagine
why that option wouldn't go over well. Quack!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
This was an explicit design decision based on client feedback during the
beta. The overwhelming response was, that if I have rules touching my
mail, it is for a reason, don't treat it as spam. Unfortunately it
appears that you are in the minority on this one, it's unlikely that the
behavior you
We have recently installed Antigen on our Exchange 2k server.
I'm just wondering are most using ESE or VSAPI modes?
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
www.mpdinc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212
The general ranking of preferred scan methods from top to bottom is ESE,
AVAPI, MAPI.
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Antigen
We have recently installed Antigen on our
Is it the order your rules are firing off in?
Since I don't have OL2003 yet, I'm not sure how this is configured yet, but
can you move the Junk Filters rule to the top of the list, so that it fires
off first?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ
I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc.
After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see
the public folders. Why?
Eric
_
List posting FAQ:
PF's take time to replicate. Be patient. I have some take as long as a day
From: Eric Holtzclaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Public Folder Problem
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:52 -0700
With Exchange 2000
Well I started this last night, I hope It did not replicated the default
settings of the new server to the old one.
Could of this happened?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the
setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct,
right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change
the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name.
Ed
Don't laugh...some PHB in the UK banned his employees from using e-mail.
Deluged Telecoms Boss Bans Staff E-Mails:
http://tinyurl.com/oif5
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
In Exchange System Manger, Folders, I right click to connect too. I
choose the new server and it has all of the default stuff like EFORMS
FREE BUSY ETC.
But, when I choose the old server, which has the important PF it prompts
for a user name and password and I type it and says that the object is
I have to agree to both points. That's why we setup a cheep Xwall box in front of our
Exchange servers. We have it using several lists and some custom
filters to tag spam before delivering it to exchange. Our users can then use the tags
to create server side filters for their mailboxes as THEY
Is the public store mounted on that server?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003
Yes, and the Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm look still to have the data. The new
server PF is small and the old server is much larger.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder
Good Afternoon,
I have an calendaring issue. I can't see my calendars from one site to
another. All of the users can see other users the calendars in within one
site but not between sites.
Can anyone help???
Thank You
Paula
Email admin
Greetings,
I am using the Auto Accept utility for Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have
several resources that have the Agent Tab available to them in the Inbox and
I have a few that don't have the agent tab turned on. How do I turn that tab
on for all resources so that when I configure Auto Accept
I had initially installed EXCH on C: (system partition), and had all the
services on that drive. Later I added more drives and moved some of the EXCH
services to other partitions.
Now C: hosts only DSADATA (Directory Working Path) and MDBDATA (IS Working
Path).
I'm running out of space on C: and
Well Outlook98 is a while back, somewhere in the options-Advance-Add IN
manager, you have to turn on the server side scripting tab right? I think
every version of Outlook gets you there in a different way :)
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
ED,
How bad would to use the old servers Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm to try to get
them back to the new server?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Eric Holtzclaw
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem
Yes, and the Pub1.edb and
I assume that this is regarding Exchange 5.5, no? Set up public folder
affinity between the sites and/or create replicas of the free-busy system
folders in every site.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original
You have to turn the agent tab on each mailbox? I looked in the mailboxes
that do not have the agent tabs and I find that scripting is turned on.
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Good afternoon all:
I have a user that has deleted a public folder that had more
than one sub-folder.
Deleted items retention was set on the public folder store. (E2K with
sp's running on top of Win2K SP4)
I can see the folder that she deleted when using the Recover
Deleted Items
I have received a request to add the dates our organization is off or considered
holiday's to everyone within our Exchange org. Has anyone received similar requests
and if so are there any recommendations on how to perform this?
Thanks
Chris Martinez
City of San Antonio
Wk: 210.207.6503
www.slipstick.com has several suggestions including a custom form that
can be used.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:49 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Adding Calendar Dates
Subject: Adding Calendar Dates
I
Why not just one shared calendar?
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Martinez
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have received a request to add the dates our organization is off or
considered
Is there a way of sending attachments as read only?
I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to
the information store.
I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002.
Thanks,
Carmila
This email message may contain information that is confidential
There a reason you don't send the attachment as a PDF?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Read Only Attachments
Is there a way of sending
Has anyone worked with Replistore by Legato? If so can you please let me know if
you're happy with the product and maybe what problems you've had with it.
TIA,
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In some cases the attachments need to be sent as either word or excel
documents and the recipient needs to modify it and send it to someone
else but the original attachment needs to be kept as well.
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
There is a new virus. The code name is WORK. If you receive WORK from
your colleagues, your boss, via e-mail, or from anyone else - do not
touch WORK under any circumstances. This virus wipes out your private
life completely. If you should happen to come in contact with this
virus, take two
If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Read Only Attachments
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ]
While I would love to not have the spam traffic hit my
network at all, the only effective way to do that is with the
blacklists in blocking mode.
That is absolutely not true. Utterly false. They are the state
I don't think you would be successful with that.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw
Sent: Wednesday, September 24,
My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and
modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the
other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this
opens up another issue of forgotten passwords.
We basically just need to make sure
It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving
it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know
where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not
save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if
it could do
What if you set the attribute on the file as read only before sending?
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments
My users need to be able to save the document
It will however if it is posted to a public folder.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments
It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without
Hello,
Does it start to recovery at all before giving you that error? I had a
situation where recovering a deleted PF would begin recovery and then
error out. I was able to get most of it back, just by canceling the
Recovery before it would error out. Took a couple attempts to get the
timing
Hello all,
I am having an issue in Exchange 2k SP3. I have size restrictions in
place on the Public Folders at the store level. There is a sub-folder in
the default PF tree that has had the size restrictions removed, but
whenever the user tries to exceed 100MB (the restriction set at the
store
No...it won't.
If you save an attachment to an e-mail, located in a PF to your HD and
modify it, you are working on a new copy of the document...not the one sent
in the original e-mail. Then once you are done working on the document, you
reply to the original or post a new message, it is adding
You sure about this?
Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment.
Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the
word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a
different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with
By the way, I didn't reply or forward the email message. I just opened
it up and modified it a bit, closed it and said yes to the prompt asking
if I want to save the document.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Would OfficeXP's Send for review or the save with revisions options
play into this?
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 13:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments
By the way, I didn't reply or
I was always under impression that the changes would be saved into the
message if one answered Yes to ***Outlook's*** question Do you want
to save changes?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco
Jim,
If I drag a doc into a public folder, then open that doc within outlook,
edit it, and save it... it saves directly back to the public folder. I never
stated opening it as an attachment on the local drive. However if I email
that doc to the public folder as an attachment then you are correct
Yep...using OfficeXP at least, I get the following options when I do that:
Do you want to merg changes in 'Blah.doc' back into 'c:\user\blah.doc'?
Yes, No and No, don't ask again
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003
Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users
Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read
the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the
IS.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users
Read permissions to
Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder.
Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the
document and control which copy they can edit.
Are the users all employees of your company/organization?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director
Yes all employees are from our company.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments
Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder.
Not
O.K., here's another suggestion:
Send out an e-mail to all employees instructing them that when they
receive these documents via e-mail they are to save them to their hard
drive and edit them from there. Violations of this policy will not be
tolerated.
There are seldom good technological
Thank you for the suggestion. I think that's the only other thing that
we can do right now.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments
O.K., here's another
I can start the recovery, and I can see the recovered folder in the spot
where it's supposed to be, but it errors out without a chance to
cancel the restore.
At the moment it looks like I'm going to have to be purchasing the
OnTrack PowerControls product.
Anyone have any experience with it?
It worked.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem
I don't think you would be successful with that.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
Have two offices with WAN link (512k), on same Win2k
domain, presently one Exchange 2000 server in main
office, other office connects to their mailboxes via
WAN. This is too slow for users so plan is to install a
second Exchange 2000 server at the branch office, on
their existing Win2k server that
I am experiencing the same symptoms with one PF that a user asked me to
recover. Outlook recovers the folder and most of the messages in that
folder, but then errors out saying that some items could not be
recovered.
(I have turned off NAVEX and it is still acting the same way)
-Original
Exch 5.5 sp4 win2k sp4
Hello
I am lately seeing some emails from a crystal enterprise server that submits
email to the bridgehead server, but they sit in the que as host
unreachable. what gives? The bridgehead has dns server it can talk to,
should it be able to send email to itself and forward
OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed
to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160
did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even
more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes
and lost a
Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread...
OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed
to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160
did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even
more unfortunately, a couple of them
Matt,
What does this have to do with the thread in place? Perhaps if you want
help you need to send a new e-mail so that a new thread starts (or
continue the thread this started on)??
I know those that will want to help will find it easier if this is the
case.
My $0.02 (inc GST).
themolk.
Sorry about that. I was a bit flustered at the time and didn't realize
I had done so. You'll note that I did post the same message with a
different subject afterward...
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:56 PM
I've not ever had to do a real clenched-up DR for my Exchange 5.5, but you
should just be able to run the restore on a stand-alone machine and save the
data to a pst or something. The tape drive will have to be directly
connected to the 5.5 machine if you are using NT4 ntbackup. Win2000 may
Hi List,
Quick question: I'm I right when I say that the size of the partition which
holds the transaction logs should be bigger as the mail volume you process
between full backups?
Any good links on how to set up an Exchange 2003 server, disk wise?
Thanks,
Jeroen Peters
Mongo head hurt.
You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make
sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5
server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as
the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop
How many users? Sounds like money is available. Why not increase the pipe.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Adding branch office X2K server
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Have two offices with
Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another
member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server.
So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with
the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was
used to seeing
Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on
it?
Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM
To:
Andy,
Just now I am able to see the server through management console and
NTBACKUP. Restarting the services may have done it. I'm attempting to
restore at this point... I was able to point it to the new 5.5 server
once I set it to erase everything that was already there. I've got my
fingers
I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work
just as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000
Hmmm... One more thing... Does the server I'm restoring to require the
same name as the old server? Not just the same org and site?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
I
No.
Is this an online backup?
Simply re-direct the info store restore to the recovery 5.5 server. You
don't need to restore the directory to get at the mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, September
The archives of this list would be a good place to look.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen Peters
Sent: Wednesday,
79 matches
Mail list logo
