RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
Hi Ed I think you'll find that I followed my initial post with an immediate follow up that stated: Sorry, I should have said that it eliminates any key-logging concerns related to authentication - it obviously can't stop the actual recording of keystrokes by key-logging software. It will however, basically eliminate the possibility of someone gaining access to your email system using credentials left behind by one of your users which is where we happen to draw the line in terms of functionality/security. Greg -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 19 September 2003 7:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Perhaps, but that's not what he said. Ed --- Steve Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't, but it keeps people from reusing credentials. At least I believe that's the posters point. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security I don't see how that would stop key-logging. Ed --- Greg Marr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have set up our OWA to require two-factor authentication (SecurID) which eliminates any key-logging concerns but this system is not cheap at approx $300 AU ($160 US) per user. The upside is that you can use the same system to authenticate all of your remote access users (dial-up, VPN, etc) and this is the function that really allows me to sleep well at night. I guess that it all depends on how many people are going to require this functionality and of course, your budget. Greg -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security We talked about this exact scenario. We decided that given how easy it is to install a key logger, and other malware, on public systems we decided it was too risky. We are planning on using public folders quite heavily with data that we can't risk getting out. Same with the address books. We are trying to figure out a way to give people access to email only from a public terminal. No public folders or address books. If you have any suggestions, that would be great. Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security ISA is a better solution in a DMZ because it doesn't require the plethora of holes in the internal firewall. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tec hnet/prodtechnol/isa/deploy/isaexch.asp Requiring VPN (your other message) is a good idea, however, you may be coming back to ISA or some other idea when your users demand to be able to get e-mail from a coffeehouse kiosk terminal. Ed --- Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to admit to being a little confused, how would ISA help, aside from being a proxy? Which isn't nothing, but I'm wondering if I'm missing something else. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Don't forget you also have to fully protect the front end server from all the other servers on the DMZ from which it is not isolated. Those other systems may have been placed on the DMZ in an insecure state with the thought that if anyone broke them, they would be isolated from the internal LAN. What happens when you put the FE in the DMZ is you break that theory. The DMZ is no longer isolated from the LAN. You definitely have to secure the FE, but once you have, why not put it inside where it is not at risk from questionable systems on the DMZ? Better to put an ISA server in the DMZ as was suggested earlier. Regarding IPSEC, Exchange 2003 explicitly states that IPSEC is now supported between front end and back end. So if you upgrade, that's perhaps an option. Though a lesser one than using ISA imho. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
Unfortunately, they're about the only method that really works. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL RBL's are not a good thing. They tend to jam legit users/companies in with the spammers. A couple of them just went poof here recently and marked the world as spammers. Do you really want to trash your communications link that way? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:36 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2003 RBL Subject: Exchange 2003 RBL Has anyone used the RBL feature in Exchange 2003? How effective is it? What is / are the most reliable list to use? Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
I would guess that the junk mail filters are using rules, and you might need to set Continue Processing Rules But then if you've already filtered them are they junk? Harriet -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
Well in outlook 2003, the junk rules are replaced with a built in filter facility, a separate entry from normal rules. The email is definintly Junk, but I'm wanting to use the safe lists that are now built in. With safe lists all emails are moved to Junk Email unless the sender is on your safe list. The problem is if you have any other rules set to move the emails it prevents the Junk Mail feature from working as it should. I have already turned off stop processing other rules. Thanks for the help though :) -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions I would guess that the junk mail filters are using rules, and you might need to set Continue Processing Rules But then if you've already filtered them are they junk? Harriet -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
Ah, you want to use the White list capability. May I suggest instead you just set Junk E-mail to High and use your usual rules. That works exceptionally well for me; I get maybe 2-3 spam in my mailbox a day. I get more than 150 in the Junk e-mail folder that I never have to deal with. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 00:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters Well in outlook 2003, the junk rules are replaced with a built in filter facility, a separate entry from normal rules. The email is definintly Junk, but I'm wanting to use the safe lists that are now built in. With safe lists all emails are moved to Junk Email unless the sender is on your safe list. The problem is if you have any other rules set to move the emails it prevents the Junk Mail feature from working as it should. I have already turned off stop processing other rules. Thanks for the help though :) -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions I would guess that the junk mail filters are using rules, and you might need to set Continue Processing Rules But then if you've already filtered them are they junk? Harriet -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
Yah, but the problem is, even with my Junk E-mail set to High, my usual rules are over-riding the built in Junk Filters of Outlook 2003. So if I have my normal rules turned off, the Junk Mail filter works well an moves mail from the inbox into the Junk Mail folder and leaves none-junk in the Inbox. If I have my rules turned on, these take precedence and the mail is moved via the rule and the Junk is no longer sorted out. i.e. the rule moves the junk into the folder the rule has specified, preventing the built in junk filters within outlook 2003 from working. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Ah, you want to use the White list capability. May I suggest instead you just set Junk E-mail to High and use your usual rules. That works exceptionally well for me; I get maybe 2-3 spam in my mailbox a day. I get more than 150 in the Junk e-mail folder that I never have to deal with. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 00:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters Well in outlook 2003, the junk rules are replaced with a built in filter facility, a separate entry from normal rules. The email is definintly Junk, but I'm wanting to use the safe lists that are now built in. With safe lists all emails are moved to Junk Email unless the sender is on your safe list. The problem is if you have any other rules set to move the emails it prevents the Junk Mail feature from working as it should. I have already turned off stop processing other rules. Thanks for the help though :) -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions I would guess that the junk mail filters are using rules, and you might need to set Continue Processing Rules But then if you've already filtered them are they junk? Harriet -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
Unplugging your server from the internet works, and the results are uniform, as opposed to the haphazard loss of legitimate mail one gets with an RBL. Given corporate penchant for conformity, I can't imagine why that option wouldn't go over well. Quack! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:45 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Exchange 2003 RBL Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL Unfortunately, they're about the only method that really works. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL RBL's are not a good thing. They tend to jam legit users/companies in with the spammers. A couple of them just went poof here recently and marked the world as spammers. Do you really want to trash your communications link that way? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:36 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2003 RBL Subject: Exchange 2003 RBL Has anyone used the RBL feature in Exchange 2003? How effective is it? What is / are the most reliable list to use? Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
This was an explicit design decision based on client feedback during the beta. The overwhelming response was, that if I have rules touching my mail, it is for a reason, don't treat it as spam. Unfortunately it appears that you are in the minority on this one, it's unlikely that the behavior you see now will change anytime soon. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:51 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters Subject: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Antigen
We have recently installed Antigen on our Exchange 2k server. I'm just wondering are most using ESE or VSAPI modes? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company www.mpdinc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antigen
The general ranking of preferred scan methods from top to bottom is ESE, AVAPI, MAPI. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Antigen We have recently installed Antigen on our Exchange 2k server. I'm just wondering are most using ESE or VSAPI modes? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company www.mpdinc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters
Is it the order your rules are firing off in? Since I don't have OL2003 yet, I'm not sure how this is configured yet, but can you move the Junk Filters rule to the top of the list, so that it fires off first? -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters Yah, but the problem is, even with my Junk E-mail set to High, my usual rules are over-riding the built in Junk Filters of Outlook 2003. So if I have my normal rules turned off, the Junk Mail filter works well an moves mail from the inbox into the Junk Mail folder and leaves none-junk in the Inbox. If I have my rules turned on, these take precedence and the mail is moved via the rule and the Junk is no longer sorted out. i.e. the rule moves the junk into the folder the rule has specified, preventing the built in junk filters within outlook 2003 from working. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Ah, you want to use the White list capability. May I suggest instead you just set Junk E-mail to High and use your usual rules. That works exceptionally well for me; I get maybe 2-3 spam in my mailbox a day. I get more than 150 in the Junk e-mail folder that I never have to deal with. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 00:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters Well in outlook 2003, the junk rules are replaced with a built in filter facility, a separate entry from normal rules. The email is definintly Junk, but I'm wanting to use the safe lists that are now built in. With safe lists all emails are moved to Junk Email unless the sender is on your safe list. The problem is if you have any other rules set to move the emails it prevents the Junk Mail feature from working as it should. I have already turned off stop processing other rules. Thanks for the help though :) -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions I would guess that the junk mail filters are using rules, and you might need to set Continue Processing Rules But then if you've already filtered them are they junk? Harriet -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2003 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003 Junk Mail Filters I know this isn't an outlook support list, but I thought there must be plenty of Outlook experts in an Exchange discussion list :p The problem I'm having is that if I have rules set to move mails from the inbox to other folders for some reason, this prevents the Junk Email filters from working, and I would like to use the safe lists that are built into Outlook 2003. Anyone know a way around this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe:
Public Folder Problem
With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Problem
PF's take time to replicate. Be patient. I have some take as long as a day From: Eric Holtzclaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Public Folder Problem Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:52 -0700 With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
Well I started this last night, I hope It did not replicated the default settings of the new server to the old one. Could of this happened? Eric -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Problem PF's take time to replicate. Be patient. I have some take as long as a day From: Eric Holtzclaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Public Folder Problem Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:52 -0700 With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct, right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
Don't laugh...some PHB in the UK banned his employees from using e-mail. Deluged Telecoms Boss Bans Staff E-Mails: http://tinyurl.com/oif5 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL Unplugging your server from the internet works, and the results are uniform, as opposed to the haphazard loss of legitimate mail one gets with an RBL. Given corporate penchant for conformity, I can't imagine why that option wouldn't go over well. Quack! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:45 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Exchange 2003 RBL Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL Unfortunately, they're about the only method that really works. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL RBL's are not a good thing. They tend to jam legit users/companies in with the spammers. A couple of them just went poof here recently and marked the world as spammers. Do you really want to trash your communications link that way? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:36 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2003 RBL Subject: Exchange 2003 RBL Has anyone used the RBL feature in Exchange 2003? How effective is it? What is / are the most reliable list to use? Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
In Exchange System Manger, Folders, I right click to connect too. I choose the new server and it has all of the default stuff like EFORMS FREE BUSY ETC. But, when I choose the old server, which has the important PF it prompts for a user name and password and I type it and says that the object is no longer available. Eric -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct, right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
I have to agree to both points. That's why we setup a cheep Xwall box in front of our Exchange servers. We have it using several lists and some custom filters to tag spam before delivering it to exchange. Our users can then use the tags to create server side filters for their mailboxes as THEY wish. While I would love to not have the spam traffic hit my network at all, the only effective way to do that is with the blacklists in blocking mode. Doing that is just not acceptable in a business environment. On the other hand, my Exchange 2003 lab server that receives my personal mail has those RBLs turned on in full blocking mode. My main personal account was getting about 200+ spams a day and maybe 5-10 real mails before I turned on the RBL blocking in Exchange 2003, since then it has cut it to maybe 10 spams still making it to my box, and frankly if some real mail bounces, my friends and family know how to get me another way. --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL Unfortunately, they're about the only method that really works. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL RBL's are not a good thing. They tend to jam legit users/companies in with the spammers. A couple of them just went poof here recently and marked the world as spammers. Do you really want to trash your communications link that way? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:36 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2003 RBL Subject: Exchange 2003 RBL Has anyone used the RBL feature in Exchange 2003? How effective is it? What is / are the most reliable list to use? Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
Is the public store mounted on that server? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem In Exchange System Manger, Folders, I right click to connect too. I choose the new server and it has all of the default stuff like EFORMS FREE BUSY ETC. But, when I choose the old server, which has the important PF it prompts for a user name and password and I type it and says that the object is no longer available. Eric -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct, right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
Yes, and the Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm look still to have the data. The new server PF is small and the old server is much larger. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem Is the public store mounted on that server? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem In Exchange System Manger, Folders, I right click to connect too. I choose the new server and it has all of the default stuff like EFORMS FREE BUSY ETC. But, when I choose the old server, which has the important PF it prompts for a user name and password and I type it and says that the object is no longer available. Eric -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct, right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please help - Calendaring issue!!
Good Afternoon, I have an calendaring issue. I can't see my calendars from one site to another. All of the users can see other users the calendars in within one site but not between sites. Can anyone help??? Thank You Paula Email admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agent Tabs In Outlook
Greetings, I am using the Auto Accept utility for Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have several resources that have the Agent Tab available to them in the Inbox and I have a few that don't have the agent tab turned on. How do I turn that tab on for all resources so that when I configure Auto Accept it works properly? I have gone those the folders; system folders; events roots; eventconfig_SERVERID and everything is correct. I have assured that the account is the same in all resources. Still I am perplexed and need your assistance. Thanks!!! Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cleaning up EXCHSRV folder
I had initially installed EXCH on C: (system partition), and had all the services on that drive. Later I added more drives and moved some of the EXCH services to other partitions. Now C: hosts only DSADATA (Directory Working Path) and MDBDATA (IS Working Path). I'm running out of space on C: and was wondering if I can remove some of the EXCHSRV folders that perhaps are no longer needed, without breaking EXCH. Do I have no choice but to re-install EXCH? On a related note, is there a utility (on resource kit, etc.) that will automate reporting of the space on the hard drives? EX 5.5, NT 4, SP6 Thanks --Alex Alborzfard -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Agent Tabs In Outlook
Well Outlook98 is a while back, somewhere in the options-Advance-Add IN manager, you have to turn on the server side scripting tab right? I think every version of Outlook gets you there in a different way :) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Agent Tabs In Outlook Greetings, I am using the Auto Accept utility for Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have several resources that have the Agent Tab available to them in the Inbox and I have a few that don't have the agent tab turned on. How do I turn that tab on for all resources so that when I configure Auto Accept it works properly? I have gone those the folders; system folders; events roots; eventconfig_SERVERID and everything is correct. I have assured that the account is the same in all resources. Still I am perplexed and need your assistance. Thanks!!! Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
ED, How bad would to use the old servers Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm to try to get them back to the new server? Eric -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem Yes, and the Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm look still to have the data. The new server PF is small and the old server is much larger. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem Is the public store mounted on that server? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem In Exchange System Manger, Folders, I right click to connect too. I choose the new server and it has all of the default stuff like EFORMS FREE BUSY ETC. But, when I choose the old server, which has the important PF it prompts for a user name and password and I type it and says that the object is no longer available. Eric -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct, right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help - Calendaring issue!!
I assume that this is regarding Exchange 5.5, no? Set up public folder affinity between the sites and/or create replicas of the free-busy system folders in every site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Please help - Calendaring issue!! Good Afternoon, I have an calendaring issue. I can't see my calendars from one site to another. All of the users can see other users the calendars in within one site but not between sites. Can anyone help??? Thank You Paula Email admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Agent Tabs In Outlook
You have to turn the agent tab on each mailbox? I looked in the mailboxes that do not have the agent tabs and I find that scripting is turned on. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Agent Tabs In Outlook Well Outlook98 is a while back, somewhere in the options-Advance-Add IN manager, you have to turn on the server side scripting tab right? I think every version of Outlook gets you there in a different way :) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Agent Tabs In Outlook Greetings, I am using the Auto Accept utility for Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have several resources that have the Agent Tab available to them in the Inbox and I have a few that don't have the agent tab turned on. How do I turn that tab on for all resources so that when I configure Auto Accept it works properly? I have gone those the folders; system folders; events roots; eventconfig_SERVERID and everything is correct. I have assured that the account is the same in all resources. Still I am perplexed and need your assistance. Thanks!!! Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein
Good afternoon all: I have a user that has deleted a public folder that had more than one sub-folder. Deleted items retention was set on the public folder store. (E2K with sp's running on top of Win2K SP4) I can see the folder that she deleted when using the Recover Deleted Items tool, but I get an error message saying that I don't have the permissions necessary. I've even gone through the process outlined in KB 811385, but that hasn't worked. Anyone have any suggestions? The folder was replicated to other servers, but I get the same thing when I use a mailbox on the other servers to attempt to recover the public folders. TIA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding Calendar Dates
I have received a request to add the dates our organization is off or considered holiday's to everyone within our Exchange org. Has anyone received similar requests and if so are there any recommendations on how to perform this? Thanks Chris Martinez City of San Antonio Wk: 210.207.6503 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's never that important...until it fails! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding Calendar Dates
www.slipstick.com has several suggestions including a custom form that can be used. -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:49 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Adding Calendar Dates Subject: Adding Calendar Dates I have received a request to add the dates our organization is off or considered holiday's to everyone within our Exchange org. Has anyone received similar requests and if so are there any recommendations on how to perform this? Thanks Chris Martinez City of San Antonio Wk: 210.207.6503 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's never that important...until it fails! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding Calendar Dates
Why not just one shared calendar? Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Martinez Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have received a request to add the dates our organization is off or considered holiday's to everyone within our Exchange org. Has anyone received similar requests and if so are there any recommendations on how to perform this? Thanks Chris Martinez City of San Antonio Wk: 210.207.6503 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's never that important...until it fails! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read Only Attachments
Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
There a reason you don't send the attachment as a PDF? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT-Replistore By Legato
Has anyone worked with Replistore by Legato? If so can you please let me know if you're happy with the product and maybe what problems you've had with it. TIA, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
In some cases the attachments need to be sent as either word or excel documents and the recipient needs to modify it and send it to someone else but the original attachment needs to be kept as well. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions There a reason you don't send the attachment as a PDF? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a new virus
There is a new virus. The code name is WORK. If you receive WORK from your colleagues, your boss, via e-mail, or from anyone else - do not touch WORK under any circumstances. This virus wipes out your private life completely. If you should happen to come in contact with this virus, take two friends and go straight to the nearest bar. Order drinks and after three rounds, you will find that WORK has been completely deleted from your brain. Forward this virus warning immediately to at least five friends. Should you realize you do not have five friends, this means you are already infected by this virus and WORK already controls your whole life. If this is the case, go to the bar and stay until you make at least five friends. Then retry. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
-Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] While I would love to not have the spam traffic hit my network at all, the only effective way to do that is with the blacklists in blocking mode. That is absolutely not true. Utterly false. They are the state of the art of late-1990s spamblocking technology. Unfortunately, it's not the 90s any more. (I'm disagreeing with EdC here also, I just happened to pick your message to reply to) Doing that is just not acceptable in a business environment. That is absolutely 100% true. Utterly factual. :) On the other hand, my Exchange 2003 lab server that receives my personal mail has those RBLs turned on in full blocking mode. My main personal account was getting about 200+ spams a day and maybe 5-10 real mails before I turned on the RBL blocking in Exchange 2003, since then it has cut it to maybe 10 spams still making it to my box, and frankly if some real mail bounces, my friends and family know how to get me another way. That's nice, if friends and family were the only ones we had business relationships with. But not all of us are Amway reps or Mary Kay distributers. There are real antispam solutions extant, and they're far more accurate than DNSBLs alone. Although DNSBLs are a useful component of a real solution. For the next three weeks, until every last one of them is DDOS'd off the planet. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
I don't think you would be successful with that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem ED, How bad would to use the old servers Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm to try to get them back to the new server? Eric -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem Yes, and the Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm look still to have the data. The new server PF is small and the old server is much larger. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem Is the public store mounted on that server? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem In Exchange System Manger, Folders, I right click to connect too. I choose the new server and it has all of the default stuff like EFORMS FREE BUSY ETC. But, when I choose the old server, which has the important PF it prompts for a user name and password and I type it and says that the object is no longer available. Eric -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct, right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
What if you set the attribute on the file as read only before sending? -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
It will however if it is posted to a public folder. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein
Hello, Does it start to recovery at all before giving you that error? I had a situation where recovering a deleted PF would begin recovery and then error out. I was able to get most of it back, just by canceling the Recovery before it would error out. Took a couple attempts to get the timing just right. I found one post in Google where a user said they tried and tried and finally it worked out. It never did for me. One post back to the list on my problem said they were never able to recover the PF, and finally went back to tape. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:44 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Subject: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Good afternoon all: I have a user that has deleted a public folder that had more than one sub-folder. Deleted items retention was set on the public folder store. (E2K with sp's running on top of Win2K SP4) I can see the folder that she deleted when using the Recover Deleted Items tool, but I get an error message saying that I don't have the permissions necessary. I've even gone through the process outlined in KB 811385, but that hasn't worked. Anyone have any suggestions? The folder was replicated to other servers, but I get the same thing when I use a mailbox on the other servers to attempt to recover the public folders. TIA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder issue
Hello all, I am having an issue in Exchange 2k SP3. I have size restrictions in place on the Public Folders at the store level. There is a sub-folder in the default PF tree that has had the size restrictions removed, but whenever the user tries to exceed 100MB (the restriction set at the store level) he receives the following error: Can't move the items. The item could not be moved. It was either already moved or deleted, or access was denied. If he reduces the size of the PF to under 100MB he can add to it. I have removed the check box to Use Store defaults, in the Limits tab and have left everything else blank. I assume that this means there is no size restriction on this particular folder. Am I right??? Please help, thanks. Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
No...it won't. If you save an attachment to an e-mail, located in a PF to your HD and modify it, you are working on a new copy of the document...not the one sent in the original e-mail. Then once you are done working on the document, you reply to the original or post a new message, it is adding the document that was on your HD and is not overwriting what is already in the store...it's adding a second document to the store. The only way this would be possible, is if you were saving attachments off to a file server and including a link to that file in the post or e-mail. Then, if the individual goes out and modifies the document at the end of the link, it would indeed change the base document sent to everyone. But again, in that case, set the original to read only. Doesn't Office also come with a version control tool somewhere in the settings? -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It will however if it is posted to a public folder. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or
RE: Read Only Attachments
By the way, I didn't reply or forward the email message. I just opened it up and modified it a bit, closed it and said yes to the prompt asking if I want to save the document. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended
RE: Read Only Attachments
Would OfficeXP's Send for review or the save with revisions options play into this? -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments By the way, I didn't reply or forward the email message. I just opened it up and modified it a bit, closed it and said yes to the prompt asking if I want to save the document. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Read Only Attachments
I was always under impression that the changes would be saved into the message if one answered Yes to ***Outlook's*** question Do you want to save changes? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments By the way, I didn't reply or forward the email message. I just opened it up and modified it a bit, closed it and said yes to the prompt asking if I want to save the document. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
Jim, If I drag a doc into a public folder, then open that doc within outlook, edit it, and save it... it saves directly back to the public folder. I never stated opening it as an attachment on the local drive. However if I email that doc to the public folder as an attachment then you are correct in assuming it stores a copy in local settings/temp interweb files and that is the one that gets updated in this case. - Scott Weston - -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments No...it won't. If you save an attachment to an e-mail, located in a PF to your HD and modify it, you are working on a new copy of the document...not the one sent in the original e-mail. Then once you are done working on the document, you reply to the original or post a new message, it is adding the document that was on your HD and is not overwriting what is already in the store...it's adding a second document to the store. The only way this would be possible, is if you were saving attachments off to a file server and including a link to that file in the post or e-mail. Then, if the individual goes out and modifies the document at the end of the link, it would indeed change the base document sent to everyone. But again, in that case, set the original to read only. Doesn't Office also come with a version control tool somewhere in the settings? -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It will however if it is posted to a public folder. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message.
RE: Read Only Attachments
Yep...using OfficeXP at least, I get the following options when I do that: Do you want to merg changes in 'Blah.doc' back into 'c:\user\blah.doc'? Yes, No and No, don't ask again -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments I was always under impression that the changes would be saved into the message if one answered Yes to ***Outlook's*** question Do you want to save changes? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments By the way, I didn't reply or forward the email message. I just opened it up and modified it a bit, closed it and said yes to the prompt asking if I want to save the document. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.
RE: Read Only Attachments
Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original
RE: Read Only Attachments
Yes all employees are from our company. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message
RE: Read Only Attachments
O.K., here's another suggestion: Send out an e-mail to all employees instructing them that when they receive these documents via e-mail they are to save them to their hard drive and edit them from there. Violations of this policy will not be tolerated. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Ed- If you require a technological solution then I would encourage you to look at posting the documents in Read-only network directories or in Public Folders that the users have read-only access to, rather than trying to e-mail them. Either that or be satisfied with the notion that the original, unaltered, document still resides in the Sent Items folder of the original sender. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Yes all employees are from our company. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock
RE: Read Only Attachments
Thank you for the suggestion. I think that's the only other thing that we can do right now. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments O.K., here's another suggestion: Send out an e-mail to all employees instructing them that when they receive these documents via e-mail they are to save them to their hard drive and edit them from there. Violations of this policy will not be tolerated. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Ed- If you require a technological solution then I would encourage you to look at posting the documents in Read-only network directories or in Public Folders that the users have read-only access to, rather than trying to e-mail them. Either that or be satisfied with the notion that the original, unaltered, document still resides in the Sent Items folder of the original sender. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Yes all employees are from our company. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein
I can start the recovery, and I can see the recovered folder in the spot where it's supposed to be, but it errors out without a chance to cancel the restore. At the moment it looks like I'm going to have to be purchasing the OnTrack PowerControls product. Anyone have any experience with it? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Subject: RE: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Hello, Does it start to recovery at all before giving you that error? I had a situation where recovering a deleted PF would begin recovery and then error out. I was able to get most of it back, just by canceling the Recovery before it would error out. Took a couple attempts to get the timing just right. I found one post in Google where a user said they tried and tried and finally it worked out. It never did for me. One post back to the list on my problem said they were never able to recover the PF, and finally went back to tape. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:44 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Subject: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Good afternoon all: I have a user that has deleted a public folder that had more than one sub-folder. Deleted items retention was set on the public folder store. (E2K with sp's running on top of Win2K SP4) I can see the folder that she deleted when using the Recover Deleted Items tool, but I get an error message saying that I don't have the permissions necessary. I've even gone through the process outlined in KB 811385, but that hasn't worked. Anyone have any suggestions? The folder was replicated to other servers, but I get the same thing when I use a mailbox on the other servers to attempt to recover the public folders. TIA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Problem
It worked. Eric -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem I don't think you would be successful with that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem ED, How bad would to use the old servers Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm to try to get them back to the new server? Eric -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem Yes, and the Pub1.edb and Pub1.stm look still to have the data. The new server PF is small and the old server is much larger. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem Is the public store mounted on that server? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem In Exchange System Manger, Folders, I right click to connect too. I choose the new server and it has all of the default stuff like EFORMS FREE BUSY ETC. But, when I choose the old server, which has the important PF it prompts for a user name and password and I type it and says that the object is no longer available. Eric -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Problem You created replicas on the new public folder server, right? And the setting for the new mailbox store's default public folder server is correct, right? You might have to have your users refresh their profiles. Change the last letter of their name or server name and then click Check Name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Problem With Exchange 2000 Move server FAQ I now have 2 E2K servers side by side, same versions etc. After doing steps 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. My MAPI clients can not see the public folders. Why? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Adding branch office X2K server
Have two offices with WAN link (512k), on same Win2k domain, presently one Exchange 2000 server in main office, other office connects to their mailboxes via WAN. This is too slow for users so plan is to install a second Exchange 2000 server at the branch office, on their existing Win2k server that is already part of the same domain as the main office. The idea is that the mail still arrives in the main office then to setup a routing group to forward the mail to the branch office. I also need to move the mailboxes of the users I guess so they access them on their local server. Questions: 1. Any tips on how to quickly set up the server side of things and any pitfalls that may be encountered? 2. How do I move the mailboxes from one server to the other? Many, many thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein
I am experiencing the same symptoms with one PF that a user asked me to recover. Outlook recovers the folder and most of the messages in that folder, but then errors out saying that some items could not be recovered. (I have turned off NAVEX and it is still acting the same way) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein I can start the recovery, and I can see the recovered folder in the spot where it's supposed to be, but it errors out without a chance to cancel the restore. At the moment it looks like I'm going to have to be purchasing the OnTrack PowerControls product. Anyone have any experience with it? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Subject: RE: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Hello, Does it start to recovery at all before giving you that error? I had a situation where recovering a deleted PF would begin recovery and then error out. I was able to get most of it back, just by canceling the Recovery before it would error out. Took a couple attempts to get the timing just right. I found one post in Google where a user said they tried and tried and finally it worked out. It never did for me. One post back to the list on my problem said they were never able to recover the PF, and finally went back to tape. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:44 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Subject: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Good afternoon all: I have a user that has deleted a public folder that had more than one sub-folder. Deleted items retention was set on the public folder store. (E2K with sp's running on top of Win2K SP4) I can see the folder that she deleted when using the Recover Deleted Items tool, but I get an error message saying that I don't have the permissions necessary. I've even gone through the process outlined in KB 811385, but that hasn't worked. Anyone have any suggestions? The folder was replicated to other servers, but I get the same thing when I use a mailbox on the other servers to attempt to recover the public folders. TIA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Emails to same domain
Exch 5.5 sp4 win2k sp4 Hello I am lately seeing some emails from a crystal enterprise server that submits email to the bridgehead server, but they sit in the que as host unreachable. what gives? The bridgehead has dns server it can talk to, should it be able to send email to itself and forward that on to the mailbox server? much thanks e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.5 to 2000 Transition
Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
Matt, What does this have to do with the thread in place? Perhaps if you want help you need to send a new e-mail so that a new thread starts (or continue the thread this started on)?? I know those that will want to help will find it easier if this is the case. My $0.02 (inc GST). themolk. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 25 September 2003 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
Sorry about that. I was a bit flustered at the time and didn't realize I had done so. You'll note that I did post the same message with a different subject afterward... Matt -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL Matt, What does this have to do with the thread in place? Perhaps if you want help you need to send a new e-mail so that a new thread starts (or continue the thread this started on)?? I know those that will want to help will find it easier if this is the case. My $0.02 (inc GST). themolk. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 25 September 2003 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 RBL OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
I've not ever had to do a real clenched-up DR for my Exchange 5.5, but you should just be able to run the restore on a stand-alone machine and save the data to a pst or something. The tape drive will have to be directly connected to the 5.5 machine if you are using NT4 ntbackup. Win2000 may be able to see the tape drive from other servers. Not sure. I'd just steal the tape drive and put it on your DR server to do the restore. Apologize later, if necessary. Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transaction log partition size
Hi List, Quick question: I'm I right when I say that the size of the partition which holds the transaction logs should be bigger as the mail volume you process between full backups? Any good links on how to set up an Exchange 2003 server, disk wise? Thanks, Jeroen Peters _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding branch office X2K server
How many users? Sounds like money is available. Why not increase the pipe. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Adding branch office X2K server Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Have two offices with WAN link (512k), on same Win2k domain, presently one Exchange 2000 server in main office, other office connects to their mailboxes via WAN. This is too slow for users so plan is to install a second Exchange 2000 server at the branch office, on their existing Win2k server that is already part of the same domain as the main office. The idea is that the mail still arrives in the main office then to setup a routing group to forward the mail to the branch office. I also need to move the mailboxes of the users I guess so they access them on their local server. Questions: 1. Any tips on how to quickly set up the server side of things and any pitfalls that may be encountered? 2. How do I move the mailboxes from one server to the other? Many, many thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your existing Internet access and enjoy patented spam protection and more. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Andy, Just now I am able to see the server through management console and NTBACKUP. Restarting the services may have done it. I'm attempting to restore at this point... I was able to point it to the new 5.5 server once I set it to erase everything that was already there. I've got my fingers crossed... I'd really like to go home! Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work just as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Hmmm... One more thing... Does the server I'm restoring to require the same name as the old server? Not just the same org and site? Matt -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work just as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
No. Is this an online backup? Simply re-direct the info store restore to the recovery 5.5 server. You don't need to restore the directory to get at the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Hmmm... One more thing... Does the server I'm restoring to require the same name as the old server? Not just the same org and site? Matt -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work just as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log partition size
The archives of this list would be a good place to look. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen Peters Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Transaction log partition size Hi List, Quick question: I'm I right when I say that the size of the partition which holds the transaction logs should be bigger as the mail volume you process between full backups? Any good links on how to set up an Exchange 2003 server, disk wise? Thanks, Jeroen Peters _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
