is appreciated.
Regards
Sander
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
Thanks Tom
That was doing one by one right? Not using exmerge.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2001 02:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley
Yeah, unfortunately the store is inconsistent so moving al in one go is
not going to solve anything ...:-( We need to move the healthy boxes
and leave the inconsistent ones behind
Thanks for the reply
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25
I think it is good practice to advise your end user about the move and
hence this gives you the opportunity to ask him\her to close his\her
outlook, to prevent any loss of mail is a smooth one to use...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Thank you all for your response, I'll try the move mailbox.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2001 01:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
I agree with missy
- Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 08:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate
Thank you all for your response, I'll try the move mailbox.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tony
How to make a new domain name? i.e. change your email domain or add
another? Just accept mail on your IMC for that domain and make sure you
have the corresponding MX record in your DNS
maybe misunderstanding the Q Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Well with a general question like that, what did you expect? A yes/no
poll? A washing list of problems that can/could occur? I wouldn't
honestly know what to answer this fella.
non-sarcastic Sander
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 October 2001
I would suggest you use your ISP's SMTP as a smart host, remenber you
are on dial-up (usually slower than LAN) so why try handle the
additional resolving/retrying if your ISP can handle this for you.
I set all my dial-up mail servers to do this.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El
servers etc. Check TechNet if no joy, phone PPS.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 October 2001 04:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HOW Outlook connects to Exchange
I have a little issue. First I'll give you the problem, then what
thing my old
Unix pal didn't see his post, he would just mail the guy - RTFM. (not
that that necessarily solves anything)
So, put in its proper context it is a good question, coming from Adriaan
like this, it is not.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Your are a nice one to speak of clog peoples mail with Crap, you send
the same silly question 4 times!
Anyway I will not go down to your level...
Have a nice day.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:06
Hi Joe
Try this link for some info on Exchange 2000 Clusters.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG246265.html
Hope this helps
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is the @customerdomain your inbound one? If so, than the behavior seems
correct to me as you are not relaying. You were authenticated as an
user.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:07 AM
To: Exchange
Hi Anthony
Have a look at Q289553 re the second type of NDR.
I looks to me you may need to look your SMTP connectors, you appear to
be relaying/using a smart host that doesn't seem to work correctly.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes, depending on what Thomas exactly wants to achieve, he would have to
tinkle with only the IMS or the IMS and registry.
Oh yeah, now it's Friday!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Exchange
Nice signaturethat Spanish too?
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: QA: OWA in forgien country
I thought it was interesting as well, that at various places once signed
hosting multiple
companies in an hosting/ASP environment.
Thanks
Sander
Korbi.net
HostASP.net
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: FED UP!!!
OK. Some progress if anyone is interested
Hey! Plse don't start with the finger-in-the-dyke story:-)
cheesemanSander
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mirroring Exchange server
A Netherlands-based solution?
;)
Martin 'who lives a few feet below sealevel also' Tuip
Exchange 2000 list owner
www.exchange-mail.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
us that Dumbo wasnt real either!
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mirroring Exchange server
Ja! Goede man die Walt Disney :-)
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Thanks Craig. Ok, I'll humor you I didn't post the original
question.
I agree with you that a stand-by server or mirror server is expensive.
Ed Crowley's views on clustered Exchange servers is all too clear. Moral
of the story; build a redundant as possible server with good backups.
Sander
Ya forgot to salute!! And stand on attention when ya speak to us...:-)
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
Motivated, Dedicated and True to the Anti-Virus
LOL! Spot on there ...:-) Oh no, spot is a dog (or troll in Richard's
case)
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
Someone
Just a quick question Martin, why do you have MX 20 Exchange ? If
Exchange listens on port 97 nobody is going to find it anyway (on port
25) if MX 10 goes down, or am I missing something really obvious
here...:-)
Monday morning early Sander
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
listens on port 25, Mailmarshall is
installed
on a separate box.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL
I think you should have a look at www.cdolive.com , they have sample
codes (for those of us who aren't brilliant coders...:-) to do a lot of
custom things on Exchange.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Morten B. Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9
Have you checked what your logon credentials are? You (your logon
account) need to be part of Schema Admins to make updates to the Active
Directory Schema.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Dragan Debeljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange
Ed has this saying about fixing bad behaviour with technology. Check
with HR first if this is acceptable company policy. You would probably
have to script something to run on each each users computer to fill in
that specific email address in the bcc field. Hell no, brrr don't go
this way.
Sander
Does the non-working Exchange server have a lmhost file with an old
setting of sorts? I would check if that server can see the domain
controller(s). Wins/DNS settings all ok and working?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15
space.
Sander
Oh I nearly forgot - MCSE NT4 MCSE Windows 2000 ...:-)
-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials
Well if I were posting questions on the site I
In Exchange 2000 you can limit the number of recipients on the
Properties/Messages page of your virtual SMTP connector. That would mean
the total number of recipients per message, not per TO: and per CC:
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
netbios-ns 137/tcpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service
137/UDP -- NetBIOS Name Server
The network basic input/output system (NetBIOS) Name Server (NBNS)
protocol, which is part of the NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NetBT) family of
protocols,
I got it from our TAM a while back when I was looking for it, so I
presume you would contact your local PPS and they will post it to you.
All documentation points to the resource kit for Exchange 2000, but I
have never been able to find it in there-(
Sander
-Original Message-
From
LOL! (s'pose that means I'm in, otherwise I would be out, right?)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002
I'll be IN the office all next week
Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let a human do the work of a machine - The Matrix
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: An Active/Active
Ah Barry, but a little bit further it says:
Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your
power to do so. Proverbs 3:27
So let the man have his messages, I think they are good:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
So what happens to the new emails when the real server is down, does the
test server except them? This would result in a loss of emails when the
real server comes back onb I agree with Louis here, get the test
server on a different physical network.
Sander
-Original Message
Yep, make the original incoming address a D/L and one recipient of the
D/L is a contact (you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon, so it will get a copy of the incoming email)
Have fun
Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let
They only way Exchange is going to forward anything is through SMTP. So
what do you mean by locally? You do not need an internet presence to be
a mail server, one can relay/Pat/Nat whatever you want. I take it the
two servers can talk TCP/IP to each other?
Sander
-Original Message-
From
on the Exchange box.
7. Fish Taco's on Friday?
8. Have a beer.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder
Definitely.
To make it clear.
Create a User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create
Human Electric? Cool, so the Matrix is true! Humans running on
electricity sorry got carried away here. So what was the question
again?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Will depend on your local environment. Possible - yes. Acceptable -
depends. I prefer a Raid set up, but again for 5 users IDE will do etc
etc.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
I like keeping Exchange logs at least until I run a full backup ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 09:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: best practice
Hi,
looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs
May they need to be paid?
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 03:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
upgrade isp services.. is there a wizard for that ? :-}
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL
Without sounding too nasty:Why do people care when it comes out? Unless
you have a serious problem and than you should talk to PPS anyway
climbing off my soap box. Sander
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 09:07
To: Exchange Discussions
the biggest car, fastest computer
and
the newest service packs.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
September... any takers yes, no...Sold to the gent with the funny
hat...Oh, sorry mam...
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 02:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
July
-Original Message-
From: Stephen
searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet
site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I
tried it but no joy.
Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do
if I can't get this resolved soon.
Thanks
Sander
Thank you Jeffrey!!
It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file.
Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap!
Tks
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34
To: Exchange
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
Did you lose any mail?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM
Ok, and since the Store was not mounted, no new content could be added.
I think I was lucky and that wasn't by design ...:-) Live and learn!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 03:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat
concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a
1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2002
Stuur drop asb!...:-)
Sander - Kaapstad
-Original Message-
From: Willigen, Maarten van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 12:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
I am in Amsterdam Holland
Maarten
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto
How much you are needed? How much work you really need to do or how many
$$$'s they think you are worth:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2002 09:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange engineer needed!!!
how much
search...:-)
My question is: How to get rid of those items in the EDB file. A
consistency check says the file is consistent. Any answers welcome, even
if you feel I must research more, that's great too, but plse point me in
the right direction.
Regards
Sander
Thank you Jeffrey
I guessed that it were valid pointers pointing to a missing item, just
didn't know how to get rid of them. Will run this tonight, as I can't
take the production system down during the day.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL
not open. We have come to terms with that and now just
want to clean up the pointers that have no entries in the new STM file.
Hence Jeff's recommendation to run isinteg against the EDB file, rather
than to go back in time with a restore.
Tks
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto
How nice, messaging support according to this OOF from Colin Camilleri.
I hope Alan knows what's coming his way!...:-)
Hi,
I am no longer working for HP. Please contact Alan Fraser for any Mail
and Messaging issues.
thanks and regards,
Colin
Make sure you have a ptr record for your mail server in your DNS.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 08:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fix reverse DNS (?)
Dear All,
Some of our customers do receive the following NDR
in the properties and off you go. I'm trying to
replicate the problem on my test environment, but I thought I'd ask if
anybody has ever run into anything like this before.
Thanks
Sander
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Thanks! That solved the Public Folder send as, but not the
Distribution List (which was visible).
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 11:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Send As
You did unhide the PF, do you
Thanks. I actually was on this site this morning, but must have missed
this article.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 01:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Send As
More info on this can be found at
http
Fair enough, he did however say he had 25 users:-) He would need to
keep the 16 GB limit in mind. Curbing the attachments will help to
stretch the amount of actual mail you can have.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 2002 03:40
I don't think that there is something like that coded in, but you could
probably use a script.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 July 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: question about attachments
Dear All
Just a quick question
So how did you find this David? ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 04:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2k Sp3 is out
Nothing mentioned on the Microsoft pages, but
http://download.microsoft.com/download
Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
We
Lol! You can't have everything you know
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
and sleepless nights about bankruptcy?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van
Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that. I wanted the
systems
to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others
involved. What type of SLA do you have with UUNET?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar
into a faster
port, preferably one that is closer to the Internet? :0
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same
if I had that kind of setup, I would
probably
use it as well.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same
the correct accounts across.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 09:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server
Mark,
Are you not able to do the 'move server' method (IE just like a restore
set
up
It's Windows 2000 without the AD ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3
pedant
What's NT2000?
/pedant
Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I think it's the unique SID of the account that is the problem on the
new box. I'm sure if you could synchronize the SID's you would be well
away. I'm not sure if Microsoft would approve of this though.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01
Hey, if I can get that type of speed out of it, it can be a Persian for
all I care...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
What sort of cat? Domestic shorthair
Correct, I modify the email domain name and exchange accepts for that
new domain.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 August 2002 04:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changing Reply To address
a header rewrite per domain? So
This has been discussed before (all the different types of spam
filtering) and I think one of the drawbacks from this type anti-spam was
that other people decide for you what is spam.
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August
What about the aditional overhead (cost) of Windows 2000 server as he
will need an AD. I would say rather stick with NT4.0 and Exchange 5.5
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 05:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I subscribe to this one, does that qualify? ...:-)
Happy searching!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 03:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Listserve Recommendations
So it seems I'm soliciting opinions on list serve software
Sander
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Chris
CDOLive has code for Exchange 5.5 for this, called Attachement
Extraction Folder Script. Needless to say Exchange 2000 is somewhat
different...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 04:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Without being funny, read the material available on Microsoft's site
about Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 and test, test, test.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 08:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000
I
Maybe Swink has been bought out by the Post Office:-)
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 01:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Well, I sent it on Friday
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
Well for one, who is going to accept 15MB on the incoming side? I
definitely wouldn't. Without attachments 15MB is a hell of a lot of
typing ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
...:-)).
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 September 2002 06:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem
In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine
with a large
Lol, thanks
Sander
SysAdmin Manager
Korbitec Korbi.net
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 01:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem
Sander - I only say this because the disk is non-removable, so
For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important
this is for you.
M pie, it's nearly lunch time here...
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge
Hi
objections against ADC? I moved my organization (three
different sites) over from NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5 to Windows 2000 with
Exchange 2000. I got to know the ADSI editor pretty well after that, but
hey it worked in the end ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL
MSDN is your friend! (until you actually find that the specific thing
you need to know how to get around isn't in there...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2002 09:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: support
Lol!
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 October 2002 11:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
If you were referring to me, I'll show you my willy...
Regards
_MR._ Andrea Coppini
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I.
Waiting for a time out perhaps?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 03:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP retry queues
Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain
to me why Exchange 2000
May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1035442040/
sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance
(Link wraps)
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net
Lol!
Oh, by the way, for more info on your Goatse follow the link below. But
you really shouldn't have posted this to the list. You could have send
it direct if you feel that strong about it.
http://www.dangerz.net/gatasa/article.shtml
Anyway, we all live and learn.
Cheers
Sander
What exactly do you mean by edit containers and what version of
Exchange are you running.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net]
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permissions
Hi there all,
Is there a way I
users part of the security group.
Each one of those users would need to run Exchange Admin.
I really wouldn't want so many people editing my exchange environment,
but your business requirements may vary.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM
You basically want to delegate specific tasks down to certain users.
Sure, in a larger organisation, that makes perfect sense (as long as
those delegates know what they are doing)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net]
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:59
Logic would dictate that it can, otherwise you would need a dedicated
server for that only. That sounds silly. I have however not tested this
in real life.
frantically looking in some documentation Sander
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:jwkelley;qualcomm.com]
Sent: 06
I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their
mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a
periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.
Sander
-Original
the user a bit of slack here David.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy.
I don't back up
I don't know Peter, moving all the mail to an Oracle box just doesn't do
it for me ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:PETER.SEITZ;cubic.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 07:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
.cshrc
short% more .cshrc
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
