RE: 5.5 and AutoAccept script
Sorry, missed that, nope it doesn't. Just a typical mailbox. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 and AutoAccept script The only reason I can think that this is happening is that something is trying to create a new Tasks folder and doesn't see the real one. Does this profile have a non-primary Tasks folder that isn't named Tasks? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finch Brett Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 and AutoAccept script For some reason the 'tasks' folder is being renamed (tasks1, tasks2...all the way up to as high as 70) and the only common denominator is these are resources (rooms etc..) which use the 'enhanced' Autoaccept script (from V4 from ExchangeCode). Haven't seen this before (I suppose a clean freebusy may help) and generally the system has been fine, little change to it over the years. What and why causes it is beyond me (Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on Win2K SPK4 both loaded with post SPK_X hotfix's). Also the final folder (taks70) is in fact the true special' folder yet I can't seem to rename it back (after I delete all the folders). The only 'Q' article I found suggested Exmerge which I thought was a bit extravagant for such a task. Anyone got a better way? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
5.5 and AutoAccept script
For some reason the 'tasks' folder is being renamed (tasks1, tasks2...all the way up to as high as 70) and the only common denominator is these are resources (rooms etc..) which use the 'enhanced' Autoaccept script (from V4 from ExchangeCode). Haven't seen this before (I suppose a clean freebusy may help) and generally the system has been fine, little change to it over the years. What and why causes it is beyond me (Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on Win2K SPK4 both loaded with post SPK_X hotfix's). Also the final folder (taks70) is in fact the true special' folder yet I can't seem to rename it back (after I delete all the folders). The only 'Q' article I found suggested Exmerge which I thought was a bit extravagant for such a task. Anyone got a better way? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
ReadAsPlain in OL2K3
I can't seem to find a 'Q' article on how to invoke this or if possible. In OL2K and OL2K2(XP) the registry was the same except for versions (9.0 vice 10.0). Registry entries for OL2K3 are no where near what they were for the previous versions. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIIS and Free Busy
I was actually surprised to find out that the next gen of Meta Directory (MIIS) will not do Free Busy. So what are people using in 2000/2003 to get Free Busy info across Forests? I thought if they can generate a GAL, why not Free Busy? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resource bookings and liabilities
A little off the topic of norm but was curious if a few who have resource booking for LCD Projectors, laptops etc... have some kind of liability template they send along with the confirmation of the booking. You know the usual Risk Management mumbo jumbo, leave it in your car with the doors unlocked and it is not covered, 'you break you buy' etc... I wouldn't mind taking a look at such a template if you have one. Thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55
Ok we all know about Outlook2003 and Exchange 5.5 OWA, so now you can just grab the patch, silly question but does it just need to go onto the OWA server or the Exchange server as well, the DOC's doesn't really tell you which server to apply it to. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55
Thanx... Seems like I'll be patching the PROD box now anyways, just not the CDO :) Nice slammer of a day, 7 hotfixs at once... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55 Right. Just the OWA box -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55 MS PSS only had me patch the OWA server and I have not had a problem since. Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finch Brett Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55 Ok we all know about Outlook2003 and Exchange 5.5 OWA, so now you can just grab the patch, silly question but does it just need to go onto the OWA server or the Exchange server as well, the DOC's doesn't really tell you which server to apply it to. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55
I'm glad I waited, security ms03-047 takes care of this as well. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55 Thanx... Seems like I'll be patching the PROD box now anyways, just not the CDO :) Nice slammer of a day, 7 hotfixs at once... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55 Right. Just the OWA box -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55 MS PSS only had me patch the OWA server and I have not had a problem since. Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finch Brett Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2K3 Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 2657.55 Ok we all know about Outlook2003 and Exchange 5.5 OWA, so now you can just grab the patch, silly question but does it just need to go onto the OWA server or the Exchange server as well, the DOC's doesn't really tell you which server to apply it to. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: strange problems
I had better luck in NT4 and multihomed NIC's than in Win2K. I have the unfortunate need to make my Exchange box a DC which is also multihiomed (The the main DC but still). The hoops you need to go through in Win2K is pretty serious. A lot of 'Q' articles on multihoming DC's (with DNS) and NetBIOS etc... -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: strange problems Not sure about the DC in the other site. It is currently down, can't get to it to check. The DC in the same site that went down today was not a GC, however it had been autodiscovered by Exchange as a Configuration DC. Also I just straightened out another issue - this server has multiple NICs and all of them had NetBIOS bindings (MS Client and File and Print). I removed NetBIOS bindings from the NICs that don't need it (cluster heartbeat NICs) as it was causing Browser to get disoriented. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: strange problems Does the DC that goes down also a Global? From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: strange problems Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:37:53 -0400 Hi all. We are having some interesting problems with one of our Exchange 2000 SP3 cluster. I wonder is anyone here has seen something like this. It seems that whenever a DC *in another AD site* goes offline, this particular Exchange server starts acting up: users can't connect to the server with Outlook, ESM reports that the stores are dismounted, refreshing the storage group view produces an error that Information Store service may not be running, intermittently the stores seem to mount again, then again appear dismounted. Why would Exchange start acting up like this if one of many DCs goes offline, especially if this DC is in another AD site? We end up failing over the cluster to another node and the server is happy again, until next time. Also another (but I believe related) issue - today a DC in the same AD site went offline and caused all users whose mailboxes are homed on this cluster to receive Error 500 Internal Server Error in OWA. We had to change the server properties under the DS Access tab to manually list good DCs instead of letting Exchange discover DCs automatically, then failed over the cluster - OWA started working fine again. The other two Exchange 2000 SP3 clusters did not get affected by this at all. To the best of my knowledge all these clusters are built the same. They sit in the same rack. They are on the same VLAN. They use the same hardware. They are up to the same SP and patch levels. Any ideas? Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
I am a little too use to Veritas and Ex 5.5 so I am new to the 'STM' file and the backup procedures of Exchange2K3 (same as 2000 it appears). I am trying to backup using NTBackup to a disk, all the rest of the backup completes but I can not get the Exchange portion to backup correctly. It appears from the log, I get the volumes and (based on size) what appears to be the Public folders but I can't seem to get the Private store to backup. At the very bottom (pasted below) is where it fails. I've searched for the error in the 'Q' articles, I don't seem to find anything (looking in Exchange2000 kB's). Maybe it's just a RC bug... -Original Message- To: Finch Brett Subject: Full Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: File Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup (via shadow copy) of C: C_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:25. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 591 Files: 3588 Bytes: 182,742,183 Time: 3 minutes and 40 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of D: D_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 150 Files: 520 Bytes: 51,624,632 Time: 12 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of F: F_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #3 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Directories: 263 Files: 4262 Bytes: 407,445,513 Time: 1 minute and 40 seconds Backup of U: \\homeserver\homeshare$ Backup set #4 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 101 Files: 2706 Bytes: 116,742,999 Time: 1 minute and 7 seconds Backup of HOMESERVER\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group Backup set #5 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Backup is already active. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupSetup()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Functions called in an invalid sequence. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupClose()' additional data '-' The operation was ended. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 0 Files: 0 Bytes: 0 Time: 1 second -- The operation did not successfully complete. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
Ok, thanks. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1) Create a separate, distinct, backup job for the Exch store and it should work. - Original Message - From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:16 AM Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1) I am a little too use to Veritas and Ex 5.5 so I am new to the 'STM' file and the backup procedures of Exchange2K3 (same as 2000 it appears). I am trying to backup using NTBackup to a disk, all the rest of the backup completes but I can not get the Exchange portion to backup correctly. It appears from the log, I get the volumes and (based on size) what appears to be the Public folders but I can't seem to get the Private store to backup. At the very bottom (pasted below) is where it fails. I've searched for the error in the 'Q' articles, I don't seem to find anything (looking in Exchange2000 kB's). Maybe it's just a RC bug... -Original Message- To: Finch Brett Subject: Full Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: File Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup (via shadow copy) of C: C_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:25. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 591 Files: 3588 Bytes: 182,742,183 Time: 3 minutes and 40 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of D: D_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 150 Files: 520 Bytes: 51,624,632 Time: 12 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of F: F_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #3 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Directories: 263 Files: 4262 Bytes: 407,445,513 Time: 1 minute and 40 seconds Backup of U: \\homeserver\homeshare$ Backup set #4 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 101 Files: 2706 Bytes: 116,742,999 Time: 1 minute and 7 seconds Backup of HOMESERVER\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group Backup set #5 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Backup is already active. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupSetup()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Functions called in an invalid sequence. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupClose()' additional data '-' The operation was ended. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 0 Files: 0 Bytes: 0 Time: 1 second -- The operation did not successfully complete. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
Yep, running in it's own backup job is the thing to do, thanks all. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1) Did you check out this article?? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;820852 Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1) I am a little too use to Veritas and Ex 5.5 so I am new to the 'STM' file and the backup procedures of Exchange2K3 (same as 2000 it appears). I am trying to backup using NTBackup to a disk, all the rest of the backup completes but I can not get the Exchange portion to backup correctly. It appears from the log, I get the volumes and (based on size) what appears to be the Public folders but I can't seem to get the Private store to backup. At the very bottom (pasted below) is where it fails. I've searched for the error in the 'Q' articles, I don't seem to find anything (looking in Exchange2000 kB's). Maybe it's just a RC bug... -Original Message- To: Finch Brett Subject: Full Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: File Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup (via shadow copy) of C: C_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:25. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 591 Files: 3588 Bytes: 182,742,183 Time: 3 minutes and 40 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of D: D_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 150 Files: 520 Bytes: 51,624,632 Time: 12 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of F: F_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #3 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Directories: 263 Files: 4262 Bytes: 407,445,513 Time: 1 minute and 40 seconds Backup of U: \\homeserver\homeshare$ Backup set #4 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 101 Files: 2706 Bytes: 116,742,999 Time: 1 minute and 7 seconds Backup of HOMESERVER\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group Backup set #5 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Backup is already active. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupSetup()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Functions called in an invalid sequence. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupClose()' additional data '-' The operation was ended. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 0 Files: 0 Bytes: 0 Time: 1 second -- The operation did not successfully complete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Agent Tabs In Outlook
Well Outlook98 is a while back, somewhere in the options-Advance-Add IN manager, you have to turn on the server side scripting tab right? I think every version of Outlook gets you there in a different way :) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Agent Tabs In Outlook Greetings, I am using the Auto Accept utility for Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have several resources that have the Agent Tab available to them in the Inbox and I have a few that don't have the agent tab turned on. How do I turn that tab on for all resources so that when I configure Auto Accept it works properly? I have gone those the folders; system folders; events roots; eventconfig_SERVERID and everything is correct. I have assured that the account is the same in all resources. Still I am perplexed and need your assistance. Thanks!!! Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
Would OfficeXP's Send for review or the save with revisions options play into this? -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments By the way, I didn't reply or forward the email message. I just opened it up and modified it a bit, closed it and said yes to the prompt asking if I want to save the document. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Schedule backup/copy of single public folder
I thought you could just select 'recover deleted items' by highlighting the public folder, there is no dumpster per say? -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Schedule backup/copy of single public folder Exchange 5.5sp4 running on Windows 2000 SP3, 180 day deleted item retention enabled on public and private stores. We have a public folder with around 2000 contacts in it. Recently the people who look after those contacts have been making a lot of changes, and a couple of times have managed to stuff up the contents of the folder (losing all the assigned categories). I can't watch them whilst they work (and wouldn't want to) and whilst I suspect it's been down to finger trouble I look after the mail servers so if they need the contents back as they were it comes my way. There's been nothing in the dumpster, I'm assuming changing a contact doesn't count as a deletion of the original in the way moving it would? I don't do bricks level backups, only online backups using ntbackup, and it's a PITA to restore the databases to a recover server as there's about 50gb in all to deal with. One thought was to set something up that every X hours simply copies the contents of the folder to a backup folder which is read-only to all but the service account (or whatever the copy job would run under). I'm unsure what, if any options there may be to acheive this automagically - appreciate any thoughts (guillotining their fingers isn't an option). regards, Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to update public free/busy data.
That's just them opening someone else's (or a resource) calendar. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to update public free/busy data. Exchange 2000 SP? version 6.0.6375.0 (on Windows 2000 SP4), Outlook 2002 SP2 + All Security Updates on Win 2000 Pro XP Pro We have a number of users who are reporting that when they exit from Outlook 2002 they get the following warning message: Unable to update public free/busy data. You do not have sufficent permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact or your system administrator. Other users have reported getting the same error at random intervals thoughout the day (likely when some background synchronization is taking place -- or so I suspect). The Exchange Server is not local. It is located in another state and accessed over a 4xT1 WAN link. I do not personally have access to the Exchange Server (maddening for an ex-ExchAdmin like myself), but do have contacts who are. Can anyone provide insight as to what object is being referenced and/or what steps can be taken to eliminate the error? My research to date has not produced any solutions. Mucho Appreciato. Steven A. Christensen Sr. Network Engineer USPS Topeka MDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to update public free/busy data.
Well it 'could' always be something else, that is for sure. I know myself from here though, that exact message pops up on a regular basis and it is when someone (even if they have owner / editor rights) opens a calendar resource, be it an Admin Ass't opening their boss's calendar or someone booking a room. To me, it's quite common. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unable to update public free/busy data. I'm afraid I would disagree. I get the error occasionally myself, and am accessing nothing outside of my own mailbox. I've just triple-checked that to be certain. I have no delegates, and nobody has me as a delegate. I also am not synchronizing any Public Folders. Even if you are correct, why the warning message? Can it be prevented? Steve C. - Original Message - From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:49 AM Subject: RE: Unable to update public free/busy data. | That's just them opening someone else's (or a resource) calendar. | | -Original Message- | From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:45 | To: Exchange Discussions | Subject: Unable to update public free/busy data. | | | Exchange 2000 SP? version 6.0.6375.0 (on Windows 2000 SP4), Outlook | 2002 SP2 | + All Security Updates on Win 2000 Pro XP Pro | | We have a number of users who are reporting that when they exit from Outlook | 2002 they get the following warning message: | | Unable to update public free/busy data. You do not have sufficent | permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact | or your system administrator. | | Other users have reported getting the same error at random intervals | thoughout the day (likely when some background synchronization is | taking place -- or so I suspect). | | The Exchange Server is not local. It is located in another state and | accessed over a 4xT1 WAN link. I do not personally have access to the | Exchange Server (maddening for an ex-ExchAdmin like myself), but do | have contacts who are. | | Can anyone provide insight as to what object is being referenced | and/or what steps can be taken to eliminate the error? My research to | date has not | produced any solutions. | | Mucho Appreciato. | | Steven A. Christensen | Sr. Network Engineer | USPS Topeka MDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachment Blocking/Unblocking via Exchange server
There is an article at MS which forces the client to use the Public Folder Outlook Security Settings or Outlook 10 Security Settings (for XP) setup for security. Using that, they can't over ride. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachment Blocking/Unblocking via Exchange server Hello All. Windows XP defaults to blocking level 1 attachments. I did my homework on the issue and have found out that this can be changed at either the client or the Exchange server. I was wondering how other Exchange Administrators handle attachment blocking and what your theory on the subject? I do not want to unblock at the server level and want to tell users to Zip files before sending. Level 1 does not block .zip files. Thanks for any comments. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
The plot thickens I think I'd be doing some offline testing soon. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Also my be of note It defrags the Pub like 3 times and I get an Event ID of 183 at about 6:59am noting this: MSExchangeIS (289) Online defragmentation of database 'E:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' was interrupted and terminated. The next time online defragmentation is started on this database, it will resume from the point of interruption. It never completes Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Tried that and it does not help Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Russ Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I've had this happen before. A reboot has fixed it. Russ --- Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a Server Exchange 5.5 Sp4 that when I look in the Log File I do not show the online defrag of the Priv. however I show the Pub. Any ideas on why this would not be running? Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 C. 864 449-9912 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suspened email account.
Easiest thing I do is just put a delivery restriction on the mailbox (myself only) and disable the account, hide from the GAL. Since we do not allow OOO's this will alert someone that tries to send that the mailbox is not being actively used and it prevents garbage from piling up in the inbox. I also make a list of DL's they belong to and remove them during the interim. With maternity leave extended to 1 year now, this is pretty common practice around here. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 12:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suspened email account. I have a user that is going to go TDY for six months and i would like to know if there is a way in Exchange 5.5., that i can put a hold on his email . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Search for events 1221, if nothing on private, increase the size of your event log more than likely. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have a Server Exchange 5.5 Sp4 that when I look in the Log File I do not show the online defrag of the Priv. however I show the Pub. Any ideas on why this would not be running? Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 C. 864 449-9912 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Typically by default, every 24hours after startup is when you should see 1221 priv. So are you saying of have multiple days of logs you can look at? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I have nothing with 1221 for Priv but the Size as I can tell is fine ... I mean I have many other events after the 1221 for the Pub Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Search for events 1221, if nothing on private, increase the size of your event log more than likely. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have a Server Exchange 5.5 Sp4 that when I look in the Log File I do not show the online defrag of the Priv. however I show the Pub. Any ideas on why this would not be running? Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 C. 864 449-9912 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
Yep, Advanced TAB can hide it from the GAL (also means you can not access it from OWA). -Original Message- From: Senty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Hi Experts, sorry for my little knowledge as new to Exchange. Got inherited with some couple of Exchange servers. I want to know if its possible to create a new mail box and hide it and if possible all the incoming mails can be received or not.. Looking forward to hear from you. Senty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5 and Windows XP
I've seen something similar, more related to IE6 On the machine try this...Start-Run - regsvr32 urlmon.dll -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 16:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 5.5 and Windows XP Hey ya all, Have a problem using owa on a windows xp machines. When a user reply's or forwards a message in owa, the message disappears. This does not happen on windows 98 machine or on machines that are not fully patched. Is anyone out there experiencing this too? What did you do to alleviate this? john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Yeah you make an interesting point. I myself ran OL2K3 for a spell against my 5.5 system, though I can't see how a client could make a change to what appears to be a schema property (5.5 I mean). But obviously if there is a fix... -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 14:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Once I have accessed my mailbox on the exchange server with outlook 2003 I have apparently infected it with the PR_FREEBUSY_ENTRYIDS property, a fourth field in something that previously had 3. I would have to delete my mailbox and create a new one to get rid of the 4th field. And once I do that, some other rogue user will install Outlook 2003 and crash it again. -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Don't you love it when, You tell the Doctor it hurts to do that, then he says Then don't do that!. Then have you try OL2000 or OL2002? Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Ok, you got me... I am the bad user who crashes OWA when I access my own inbox, and I am running a beta (build 5329) of Outlook 2003. Is there a fix? (did I mention before that Andy David is God Like??) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Well I'd assume you did do the NAVEupdate as you changed the registry, what build of NAV? Mine is 2.18(Build 80). The only reason I suggested RAR was I knew NAV can't read it, so it would allow it through. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I found this (http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180 069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocumentprod=Norton%20AntiViru s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchangever=2.xsrc=entpcode=nav_exchangedtype=corp svy=prev=miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says it should allow ZIP files through if it's password protected but it didn't. I tried both 1 and 0 for the entry but it still got stopped. I tried rar files, password protected and it got through, no problems. I then tried a non pasword protected rar file and it to got through. How interesting... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Yeah but you did run Naveupdate after you set it to 0 right? -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 08:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Yes, I did run that and I have the same build. The key in question is AllowEncryptedArchives, correct? I set it to both 1 (it was already set to that) and 0 and the password protected zip file (using WinZip 8) got quarantined (it contained two .vbs files) Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I'd assume you did do the NAVEupdate as you changed the registry, what build of NAV? Mine is 2.18(Build 80). The only reason I suggested RAR was I knew NAV can't read it, so it would allow it through. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I found this (http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180 069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocumentprod=Norton%20AntiViru s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchangever=2.xsrc=entpcode=nav_exchangedtype=corp svy=prev=miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says it should allow ZIP files through if it's password protected but it didn't. I tried both 1 and 0 for the entry but it still got stopped. I tried rar files, password protected and it got through, no problems. I then tried a non pasword protected rar file and it to got through. How interesting... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Well also you have to set in the registry not to turf encrypted files (or something of that nature). I know for some areas, if they can't scan a zip, it is turfed, that feature has to be disabled if you password protect a ZIP. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files So if I tell them to password protect the zip files, they will be left alone? That would be good enough for me I think. Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files That is the nature of it. I don't belief that NAV checks the mime time so an option would be to rename them i.e. .ex_ .ba_ etc. The other option is to password protect the Zip files and then they will not be scanned. -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing domain membership on Exchange server
Well you could keep the old NT4 NetBIOS domain name and create a new AD domain name, then there is no impact. Or read the FAQ's on this (for renaming moving servers). Although many say it is not possible, I have twice made the NT4 and AD the same name (upgrade only of course, when upgrading the PDC and the time comes to select the AD name, unplug the NIC wire and it will let you name the AD the same as the NetBIOS domain)). -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 16:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing domain membership on Exchange server Shortly, we will be eliminating an NT 4 domain and I was wondering if we disjoin an existing mail server from NT4 domain and join it to Active Directory, will it have any adverse impact on us? Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches.
Well I always use a BAT file so I can apply all patch's at once on the fly and with each new patch, I make a new version of the BAT file so I can keep track. Try something like this (it does IE as well). @echo off setlocal set PATHTOFIXES=\\server\hotfix$ rem Upto MS03-033 (#40 Security is fixed by #33) Aug 21 2K3 DirectX9B applied seperate rem @echo rem pause @echo off %PATHTOFIXES%\Q282784_W2K_SP5_x86_en_qfecheck.exe -z -m %PATHTOFIXES%\Windows2000-KB823559-x86-ENU-spk3-or-spk4.exe -z -u %PATHTOFIXES%\Windows2000-KB823980-x86-ENU.exe -z -u %PATHTOFIXES%\Q823718_MDAC_SecurityPatch.exe /q /C:dahotfix /Q /R:N %PATHTOFIXES%\ie-w2k-ie-aug-ms03-032-q822925.exe /n:v /q:a /r:n %PATHTOFIXES%\qchain.exe %systemroot%\shutdown.exe /c /r @echo!!! Q282522 may NOT be listed, this is ok ! :) rem pause exit -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 09:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches. O.K., so the big ones are 823890 and 823718? I'll have to research on what others. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches. If they were released after sp4 was, yes. All SP's and hotfixes need to be installed chronologically. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches. This may be a stupid question. We are looking into applying SP4 to our 2000 servers. If we apply SP4, will it require the re-install of any security patches that we have put into place in the last few weeks such as MDAC or any of the buffer overflow security patches we have put into place after the 2000 SP4 release? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DEU Resume
I can't believe how many places increase the SPAM 3 folder with useless alerts. Worst, having to tell a postmaster how to correctly read a delivery report... -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 13:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I got the same DEU Resume message, and assumed it was a sobig byproduct. On a slightly different topic, I sure wish AOL would stop sending out replies to the Sobigs they block. -Peter -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume Looks like the SoBig.F virus. So far we have got 300 and counting of this thing. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I'm seeing that from the Four Season's Hotel - not sure if it is a virus or not - might be coming in as part of the current SoBig.E variant. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DEU Resume Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you never sent to them? About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and the DD-214. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.
You have the Q article that relates to setting this flag? We used to have it with NAV in MAPI/VAPI mode, then we went to MAPI only and scheduled scans so the store wasn't always being re-scanned when the latest virus definitions arrived. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 08:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age. Just to give you a comparison, I'm running a Dell PE 6600, 2 Gigs RAM, dual 1.4 GHz processors, 900 users spread over 3 Message Databases and two RAID arrays. We still get the flag. I get the flag when I'm sitting still too, no manual activity on the laptop that I'm using. The flag is set by Outlook and is an indication of slow response by the Exchange server. The timeout for the flag can be set in the registry, or the flag can be turned off all together. The only thing I've found so far is that it's an incentive to performance tune your Exchange server and then look for other reasons for slow response time. The flag can also pop up when the workstation is doing some background work, like rendering a graphic and trying to update free/busy time on the Exchange server at the same time. It's an indication of performance problems, just not specific as to the cause. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:39 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age. Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age. Until recently, our Exchange 5.5 Server has been running smoothly. Lately however, it has been running S..L..O..W on occasions. Our server is older (Dell 6300 with Dual 400 MHZ processors and 1.5 GB of memory. 700 users). The only thing that's changed is we have recently started upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP workstations. Almost all those users receive the following message the first time they logon Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server Exchange. You can cancel the request or minimize this message to the Windows taskbar until Outlook closes the message automatically. Some of them receive the message more frequently. Maybe the two issues aren't related, but I thought I'd start here, since it's the only thing that's changed recently. Is anybody else having issues using XP Professional with Exchange 5.5? Thanks. Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Goofy Exchange / Win2K3 problem
Thanks, it is Outlook2002 (2K2) on Exchange2003 on Win2003 (2K3) but as you mentioned, a test bed. As you pointed out, it looks more like a Outlook MAPI problem than with Exchange2K3 so I can leave as is, just thought it weird. As you pointed out, best practices though would typically not have this situation in production anyways. Thanks for the long of it all, being the cheap that I am, I'm waiting for MS's version of VM to be released to MSDN subscribers :) -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 23:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Goofy Exchange / Win2K3 problem Hi Brett: Hummm, where to I start I have never seen this problem. What is the error message? Is it a MAPI error? I'm betting it is. I doubt it is really Exchange 2003 related, but more related to the fact that you have Outlook installed on the Exchange server. Yes, I know, we have all done this, but it is a really bad practice for a couple of reasons. First of all, both Outlook and Exchange have their own MAPI DLLs. I'll bet E2K3 has a much more recent version of the DLLs than Outlook 2000. If you happen to get MAPI versions conflicting, it could be bad for both the Exchange server as well as Outlook. It is also bad to do this for security reasons. Same reason it is not a good practice to give administrators mailboxes. The more surface area you give a potential virus/worm/Trojan/etc..., the more it can potentially exploit. Having a full featured MAPI client on the server or an administrator accidentally running this malware could be worse than an end-user running it. Finally, (I'm assuming you don't have an RC in production) if you are evaluating E2K3, you should get the RTM version. It is available at http://www.microsoft.com/exchange for download. Exchange 2003 will run on Windows 2000, but it is much happier on Windows 2003. Consider that during your evaluation, too. If you are short on hardware for your evaluation, get yourself a copy of VMWare and build a virtual workstation that you can run your test client from. Or even a couple servers, just plan on lotsa RAM. Hope this helps a little, - Jim sends -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:21 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Goofy Exchange / Win2K3 problem Subject: Goofy Exchange / Win2K3 problem Originally I though it was an Exchange 2K3 (RC1) problem until I went to another machine and ran Outlook 2K2 (latest patched) to recover a deleted item (from the deleted items folder). I try to recover the same deleted email from a Win2K3 server (which is running the Exchange 2K3) and I get a error, Outlook can not perform the operation. Same version of Outlook, reinstalled it to be sure and I can recover a message from a emptied Deleted items bin from a W/S but not from a Outlook client on the server itself. Coming from 5.5 I assume this has to be a bug but maybe someone with more experience in the new Exchange products could shed light on this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ports over VPN
Well it would be within the VPN right. 1723 for IKE and 500? (client specific I dunno) for the tunnel, then Outlook would run as per normal on a LAN where it would establish a connection to Exchange server on 135 and then get a random port above 1024 blah blah... That's my understanding. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 08:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ports over VPN Anyone have a list of the ports used by Outlook to Exchange 5.5 over vpn? thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goofy Exchange / Win2K3 problem
Originally I though it was an Exchange 2K3 (RC1) problem until I went to another machine and ran Outlook 2K2 (latest patched) to recover a deleted item (from the deleted items folder). I try to recover the same deleted email from a Win2K3 server (which is running the Exchange 2K3) and I get a error, Outlook can not perform the operation. Same version of Outlook, reinstalled it to be sure and I can recover a message from a emptied Deleted items bin from a W/S but not from a Outlook client on the server itself. Coming from 5.5 I assume this has to be a bug but maybe someone with more experience in the new Exchange products could shed light on this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2K (or 2003) and Outlook 2K2
Oh I naturally thought OE would handle RTF. Thanks. I guess also keep to the simplest rule and run plain text, hard to screw that up :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange2K (or 2003) and Outlook 2K2 Use html, OE and a significant number of other clients (almost everyone else) don't understand Outlook's RTF. From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:34:59 -0600 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange2K (or 2003) and Outlook 2K2 I created an external contact in a new OU in the AD of a Win2K3 Ent server that is also running Exchange 2K3 (RC1). So the client is using Outlook Express 6.1 with all patch's, we are using Outlook2K2 SPK2 all the patch's. If we send using RTF, the attachments are no where to be found. If I change the properties in the contact so in the GAL it is plain text only, that is fine. It is ok for now but in the future there will be a need to utilize RTF. I looked in the MS Support and found a couple articles that seemed to relate to this but mentioned they were fixed in SPK's for Exchange 2000. Have I missing something in the creation of the external contact? In 5.5 utilizing RTF for external contacts was good if you knew they were using MS email products on the other end. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =e nglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
Well I can only speak for myself, a 5.5 shop that did 2K AD and waited for the rest. We're going Ol2K3, Ex2K3 and Win2K3 when it all comes together. I think Terminal Server (dialup or Internet) is more viable than VPN. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access to remote access to Exchange. But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially over dial-up. I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, by using RPC over HTTP. Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead? What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Exchange Admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange2K (or 2003) and Outlook 2K2
I created an external contact in a new OU in the AD of a Win2K3 Ent server that is also running Exchange 2K3 (RC1). So the client is using Outlook Express 6.1 with all patch's, we are using Outlook2K2 SPK2 all the patch's. If we send using RTF, the attachments are no where to be found. If I change the properties in the contact so in the GAL it is plain text only, that is fine. It is ok for now but in the future there will be a need to utilize RTF. I looked in the MS Support and found a couple articles that seemed to relate to this but mentioned they were fixed in SPK's for Exchange 2000. Have I missing something in the creation of the external contact? In 5.5 utilizing RTF for external contacts was good if you knew they were using MS email products on the other end. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2003 Antivirus
Latest build for Ex2000 from Symantec will install on 2K3 (though if you enable content filter it faults and restarts a lot). For now though at least it is something. Previous versions didn't even install. Although they won't support it, obviously they have an unofficial change of heart. -Original Message- From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 19:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch2003 Antivirus What antivirus solutions are available either for purchase or download or in beta? I looked at Trend, Sybari and Symantec, but didn't find any product references to Exchange 2003. I did see on Symantec site the url for the Beta for Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange. Anyone tried this yet? http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/products.cfm?productid=66 (At the very bottom of the page) Anyone else gone through this process yet? - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SQL
Well you could accidentally turn off the SQL box and see what an uproar arises :) Seriously though, double all downtime for service because of this dual role. People will tolerate downtime for just about anything but email. Maybe if you remind them that every time there is a maintenance requirement on SQL, email will be going away also. By the sounds of the DB service though, you could probably get away running it on a software mirrored beefed up desktop. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL The old Exchange box is a relic, it's going one way or the other and I wouldn't use it for solitare at this point. This whole discussion arouse when I put together a request for a new Exchange server. I don't think I am going to be able to win the argument to keep them separate. The SQL server was overkill to begin with now I'm going to have to live with SQL and Exchange on one box. I was looking for known software related issues that might help me with my argument but I couldn't find any. Thanks for the help, Scott. Move Exchange to this box, move SQL to the old Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and SQL We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3 raid configurations with about 200 gb of hd space that's basically being used to run a 2 gb database for about 20 users that will never grow. My boss thinks we should move our exchange 5.5 server (about 120 users) to this box (going to Exchange 2000 in a few months) because it's not being utilized fully. Other than the if we lose SQL we lose Exchange theory, why else is this a bad idea? Thanks in advance, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Where to look to allow email
Ok as I fumble through 2003 from 5.5, it was a relative easy process to allow my home firewall router to email me in the morning with the log reports. Now it can't send me the email reports. The part I don't understand is if this is considered a relay restriction, I simply add the 192.168.0.1 to the relay restrictions of machines allowed to relay, (in the virtual SMTP server properties) it doesn't appear to resolve this issue. What am I missing on this? I can't authenticate against it so that isn't a option. P.S. xx.mydomain substitutes my home domain. -Original Message- Ok 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 11, 44, 250, 0, HELO, -, FVS318, 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 42, 55, 250, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 40, 43, 250, 0, RCPT, -, TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:01:16, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 60594, 40, 43, 240, 60656, QUIT, -, FVS318, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where to look to allow email
But it is 01 - 0.5 , with internal DNS, why would that matter? It is the router to internal mail server. It isn't going public. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where to look to allow email Your home firewall is not going to have a Public IP of 192.168.0.1, now is it? Try adding the Public IP of your firewall instead of your internal IP. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:05 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Where to look to allow email Subject: FW: Where to look to allow email Ok as I fumble through 2003 from 5.5, it was a relative easy process to allow my home firewall router to email me in the morning with the log reports. Now it can't send me the email reports. The part I don't understand is if this is considered a relay restriction, I simply add the 192.168.0.1 to the relay restrictions of machines allowed to relay, (in the virtual SMTP server properties) it doesn't appear to resolve this issue. What am I missing on this? I can't authenticate against it so that isn't a option. P.S. xx.mydomain substitutes my home domain. -Original Message- Ok 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 11, 44, 250, 0, HELO, -, FVS318, 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 42, 55, 250, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 40, 43, 250, 0, RCPT, -, TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:01:16, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 60594, 40, 43, 240, 60656, QUIT, -, FVS318, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Format
I haven't seen all the tracks to this but is it just a couple users to a couple users or an entire site to site with this 'dat' problem? If it's just a couple users I would ensure their personal contact list doesn't have anything special set and they are using that instead of the GAL. From site to site the3 format depends on the version of Exchange I believe, in 5.5 it's x400, not sure if everything is SMTP or not in 2000. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Format When sending a message between exchange servers in the org, does exchange follow the internet message formats? Or is the message format only followed then you actually send an email message outside of your org? I'm still stuck with my winmail.dat problem between exchange servers. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Format
Well then if everyone is on the GAL and the DL is on the GAL, first thing I would do is ensure none of them have each others names in their Persona Contacts or Personal Address book. If J Smith the boss is on both, even on a GAL DL, the personal settings would take precedence (rule this out from the get go). -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Format It's about 2 users sending to a distribution list. The users say they picked the DL from the GAL. They're sending the message with attachments and are using rich-text format. I know it's only 2 users but they're sending the email messages to the big bosses and it's been driving us nuts. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions I haven't seen all the tracks to this but is it just a couple users to a couple users or an entire site to site with this 'dat' problem? If it's just a couple users I would ensure their personal contact list doesn't have anything special set and they are using that instead of the GAL. From site to site the3 format depends on the version of Exchange I believe, in 5.5 it's x400, not sure if everything is SMTP or not in 2000. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Format When sending a message between exchange servers in the org, does exchange follow the internet message formats? Or is the message format only followed then you actually send an email message outside of your org? I'm still stuck with my winmail.dat problem between exchange servers. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Real world experience
I will spare the gory 'political' details as we are in the midst of trying to consolidate 35 '5.5' Exchange servers in 35 domains to as little servers as possible. We're looking at an Exchange 2K3 rollout and probably a hybrid AD using MS's meta directory (maybe). The real question is I am looking for real world experience with something similar to what we are going to from a Exchange 2K shop. Essentially we'll be looking at 5,000 users (.5 GB per mailbox) to start with another 5,000 in phase 2 and 5,000 more in phase 3. With a new 2K3 AD, we'll probably consider at least 2 DC's and one dedicated server for OWA. The main mail servers and storage is really the number cruncher. It's looking like a 3 server cluster and external storage (AV also has to be factored). All client stations will be on at least 10 if not 100 switched lines, GB speed on the WAN backbone. I have gone to Dell and other places to run the traditional load 'configuration wizard' and I have always preferred to error on the side of you can never have too much power. I would like to hear from people using SAN's or the like to account for TB size storage and backup. How close was the configuration load wizards to what you really required. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Real world experience
You mean you don't believe MS has fixed this in Exchange2K3 ? :) Thanks -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Real world experience Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange... (Am I sounding a little repetitive here? I seem to say that alot) -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions I will spare the gory 'political' details as we are in the midst of trying to consolidate 35 '5.5' Exchange servers in 35 domains to as little servers as possible. We're looking at an Exchange 2K3 rollout and probably a hybrid AD using MS's meta directory (maybe). The real question is I am looking for real world experience with something similar to what we are going to from a Exchange 2K shop. Essentially we'll be looking at 5,000 users (.5 GB per mailbox) to start with another 5,000 in phase 2 and 5,000 more in phase 3. With a new 2K3 AD, we'll probably consider at least 2 DC's and one dedicated server for OWA. The main mail servers and storage is really the number cruncher. It's looking like a 3 server cluster and external storage (AV also has to be factored). All client stations will be on at least 10 if not 100 switched lines, GB speed on the WAN backbone. I have gone to Dell and other places to run the traditional load 'configuration wizard' and I have always preferred to error on the side of you can never have too much power. I would like to hear from people using SAN's or the like to account for TB size storage and backup. How close was the configuration load wizards to what you really required. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Real world experience
Ok thanks, seems like the ideology of bringing servers online as mailbox's increase. I haven't heard any other alternative. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 15:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Real world experience Just left an HP session at TechEd. Although there were obviously vendor-specified disclaimers, the speaker's verdict was pretty simple -- Clustering just isn't meant for Exchange. Like asking a car manufacturer to fix that whole smashing-when-you-drive-your-car-into-a-brick-wall sorta thing. It's not broke. It's just not smart. stemy -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Real world experience Subject: RE: Real world experience You mean you don't believe MS has fixed this in Exchange2K3 ? :) Thanks -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Real world experience Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange... (Am I sounding a little repetitive here? I seem to say that alot) -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions I will spare the gory 'political' details as we are in the midst of trying to consolidate 35 '5.5' Exchange servers in 35 domains to as little servers as possible. We're looking at an Exchange 2K3 rollout and probably a hybrid AD using MS's meta directory (maybe). The real question is I am looking for real world experience with something similar to what we are going to from a Exchange 2K shop. Essentially we'll be looking at 5,000 users (.5 GB per mailbox) to start with another 5,000 in phase 2 and 5,000 more in phase 3. With a new 2K3 AD, we'll probably consider at least 2 DC's and one dedicated server for OWA. The main mail servers and storage is really the number cruncher. It's looking like a 3 server cluster and external storage (AV also has to be factored). All client stations will be on at least 10 if not 100 switched lines, GB speed on the WAN backbone. I have gone to Dell and other places to run the traditional load 'configuration wizard' and I have always preferred to error on the side of you can never have too much power. I would like to hear from people using SAN's or the like to account for TB size storage and backup. How close was the configuration load wizards to what you really required. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange and Terminal Server
I've been scouring a peculiar issue with preferences and signature files in Outlook2K2 and Terminal Server. I have gone to the point where I even deleted profiles to resolve this but for what ever reason, Terminal Server looses Outlook2K2 (With all patch's 10.4712.4219) signature files (located in the signature folder) and all preferences. It keeps them for a few logins and then they just disappear. I've searched all throughout MS's website. The Exchange box is a Win2K/SPK3 Exchannge5.5 SPK4. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Terminal Server
No, not roaming, that's the weird thing about it. On Terminal Server, they are all 'local'. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange and Terminal Server Are you using roaming profiles? Different versions of Outlook? I have seen that issue occasionally. - Original Message - From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:35 PM Subject: Exchange and Terminal Server I've been scouring a peculiar issue with preferences and signature files in Outlook2K2 and Terminal Server. I have gone to the point where I even deleted profiles to resolve this but for what ever reason, Terminal Server looses Outlook2K2 (With all patch's 10.4712.4219) signature files (located in the signature folder) and all preferences. It keeps them for a few logins and then they just disappear. I've searched all throughout MS's website. The Exchange box is a Win2K/SPK3 Exchannge5.5 SPK4. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Personal folders are 0kb
Yes just right click on the properties of Outlook and select her profile and remove that 'Archive Folder'. It is empty. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Personal folders are 0kb I have a user that has a pst that she cannot get into and it is showing 0kb for size. Anyone come across this before. Client is Outlook 2002. I have ran scanpst and it says there is no data to recover. Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2K3 OWA Change Password
Has anyone played with this feature (using SSL) to change the password. I
have followed the 'Q' article for Exchange2000 to enable (updating the
metabase via admin scripts etc...) but I noticed in Exchange2000 (I use 5.5)
it still was using the dreaded HTR extension. So I looked at the code
quickly and found the 'options.js' was still trying to call a file with a
HTR extension which I know wouldn't work on a IIS 6 box. The code as
follows...
function openChangePassword()
{
var objLocation = window.location;
var szServer= objLocation.host;
var szClose = g_szUserBase + /?Cmd=close;
var szURL = https://; + szServer +
/iisadmpwd/aexp2b.htr?
So I change the extension to ASP as there is a file named aexp2b.asp in the
'iisadmpwd' folder. I also confirmed anonymous access was enabled and still
nothing, it calls up a page that it says isn't there. Anyone got this
working?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's
I'm stuck in the install trying to register the DLL's 'regsvr32 oledb32.dll'. The original problem is based 'Setup failed with 0xc103798a registering the base dav protocol which I found in the Q base as Q296436 based on Exchange2000 on Win2000 where you have to manually register the C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\msdaurl.dll, C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Msdaipp.dll and C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Oledb32.dll. This is a 2003 and 2003 problem and I can't register the Oledb32.dll (I am dual booting with Win2K but since Exchange2K3 can run on Win2K, these DLL's should be cross compatible anyway. Can someone check and see what version of Oledb32.dll they are using (mine is 2.71.9030.0) with a running Win2K3 / Exchange 2K3 setup. I don't want to roll back another attempt as it was a mess last time to get rid of the failed install and try again. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's
Thanks, just a expand and replace did the trick :) -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's Fresh install of Win2K3 RC2 and Exchange 2K3 Beta 2: 2.80.1015.0 Greg -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2K3 and registering DLL's I'm stuck in the install trying to register the DLL's 'regsvr32 oledb32.dll'. The original problem is based 'Setup failed with 0xc103798a registering the base dav protocol which I found in the Q base as Q296436 based on Exchange2000 on Win2000 where you have to manually register the C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\msdaurl.dll, C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Msdaipp.dll and C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\Ole DB\Oledb32.dll. This is a 2003 and 2003 problem and I can't register the Oledb32.dll (I am dual booting with Win2K but since Exchange2K3 can run on Win2K, these DLL's should be cross compatible anyway. Can someone check and see what version of Oledb32.dll they are using (mine is 2.71.9030.0) with a running Win2K3 / Exchange 2K3 setup. I don't want to roll back another attempt as it was a mess last time to get rid of the failed install and try again. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5 and change password feature
It may also be a issue that 'hta' extensions are removed from IIS (MS essentially gave up trying to protect that extension) or the global ASA has been altered to not allow password changes. -Original Message- From: Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 5.5 and change password feature Hello All, Domain A Where the NT user accounts reside Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 servers Domain B IIS 5.0 Server with OWA installed and working fine for email 1 Way Trust Domain B trusts domain A Should users be able to change their passwords from OWA using the change password feature. Basically it does not work. I get the proper Internet Service Manager for IIS 5 page asking for the domain, account, old, new, and confirm password fields. However my assumption is that since the 2 domains do not trust each other it is not going to work. When attempted I am getting access is denied. Thanks Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1
I'm not sure about Outlook2K2 but I would ensure you have authentication set to prompt in the IE settings, maybe check from IE, 'Tools'- 'Internet Options' - 'Security' - 'Custom Level', at the bottom is a setting to ensure it's not anonymous logon (change to always prompt). The Oulook2K2 is interesting, if that station was ever used in a 'kiosk type' situation, I wonder if credentials are hard coded in the registry? If it's opening the same wrong email inbox, it could be that the inbox has some crazy permissions set to it (deu's often allow 'anonymous'or 'default' to their inbox). Those two situations combined could explain this. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 5:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 Not Dns..I have three other workstations hat work with this problem mailbox. It is directly related to this one workstation not asking for username and password!! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 Check the DNS settings. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 OK maybe I did not explain myself well enough. It is only this one workstation. IE thru OWA does log me into the wrong mailbox (because I am never prompted for a username password) and outlook 2002 will not let me log into the correct mailbox either. I've set up 3 other workstations all 3 can log into this particular mailbox. My problem I am trying to resolve is getting this problem workstation running XP pro and outlook 2002 and IE 6.x (whatever) to login into the correct mailbox. With username and password not being asked for I cannot log into the proper mailbox. Remember this is a hosted exchange. When I launch outlook 2002 I can pick the wrong mailbox. But since my credentials seem to have already been passed onto the exchange server I'm stuck on looking at one global address list and not the address list I need to long into the problem mailbox from this workstation. Same problem with IE. I loaded Netscape On this workstation and I get into the proper OWA mailbox. Exchange is fine..the problem is not on the servers it is totally related to this one work station. In the old days I would blow off the tcpip protocol reboot reinstall reboot and be one my way. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 Well, the question I'd ask is why would you want to? Evading answering the OWA question entirely, you can use http://server/exchange/smtp_local-part which will then prompt you for credentials if you don't have sufficient ones to log in using NTLM. I'd also respectfully point out that it doesn't only relate to that workstation. Re: Outlook... Why would you want it to prompt you for credentials if you are logged in as the proper user with the correct mailbox configured in the profile? On 1/11/03 10:32, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree. But how do I resolve the owa issue. It actually relates only to this workstation. I downloaded Netscape. I can get into OWA to the right account. It asks me for a username and password. How can I correct IE on this system? How can I force outlook 2002 to ask for username and password. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 OWA is a matter of NTLM authentication it would appear. Outlook 2002 sounds like the profile is already configured with a mailbox that matches the currently logged in user, not the one you are trying to access... A similar answer to the OWA issue. On 1/11/03 7:26, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any Idea's on this. -Original Message- From: Matt Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 ok Here is what I got. Probably a simple answer for this but my brain is now mush. The workstation running outlook 2002 has 2 problems. 1. When you launch OWA it goes straight to a mail box (the wrong one) with out asking for username and password. I cleaned IE of cookies and files not corrected. If I go thru AOL on this computer I get the login screen and all is find. With outlook 2002 I cannot get connected to proper mail box. Once again outlook 2002 does not prompt me for user name and password so I end up looking at a different hosted global address list. Default
RE: some messages to the deleted items
Junk email filters are famous for this... I would look again ... -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: some messages to the deleted items MSX5.5+SP4 Outlook2002/Outlook2000 we have received two reports form differents users that *two* incoming messages do not show up in the inbox but arrived directly to the deleted items, the clients have no outlook rules to do that. wehave noticed that the messages were *high importance* ones, we can not duplicate the issue (even after sending high importance messages back) Have you seen this before? any ideas? tia -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Security
I had the same problem when sending email via MAPI with my backup software. If you create a MAPI profile of the account you're using to send with, then you can use the registry settings to bypass security. This URL has lot's of links on how to bypass the security in specific situations. -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 0:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Security Thanks for the reply. I have played with BLAT and Jmail, but the beauty of using the MAPI client is that it stores a copy of the email in the 'sent Items' folder. I suppose I could just blind copy the email to another address and use that as the copy. M -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 28 December 2002 12:29 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Security I have a VB app that generates an email using my MAPI profile and sends them out automatically. Since the security update, I get a warning message and a Yes/No prompt. If I change the VB code that '.send's the email and mark it as (vbYes), it simply opens the mail object and I have to click 'Send' before it will go. I find it much easier to NOT use MAPI when sending mail with VB. You can do it directly using the Winsock control or you can buy a SMTP ActiveX control. You could also use a program like BLAT in conjunction with the shellexecute command. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: The content of this email is confidential and may contain legally privileged information intended only for the individual or entity named above. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that the use, distribution and publication of the above information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact Domainz by returning the email and destroying the original. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Banner on 5.5
All the reference and articles I can find talk about changing the banner on a 2000 Windows/200 Exchange system via AD. In NT4 if you had 2 NIC's, Exchange 5.5 use the TCP/IP properties of the individual NIC and report back that FQDN when you did a telnet to that IP. I upgraded the NT4 box to Win2K and all DNS references are correct but it chooses to use the first NIC's FQDN even when I telnet into the box on the other IP. Is there a REG hack for 5.5 to use a specific FQDN in the banner? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ugh, Argh I know it's here, I can't find it.
Ok you know in OWA 5.5 SPK4 the issue when you click open email message and no text appears in body, only a reply or forward will display it ? It's a easy fix I've done it, I just can't find the fix, the troubleshooting OWA from MS URL no longer exists either. I know it's not a full blown diag problem, I know it's a simple one... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multihome NIC's
I can't seem to find an article on how to restrict the use of RPC over one NIC and use the other NIC for only SMTP on a Exchange 5.5 (SPK4) box. I'm thinking I can answer the first part by using the 'Advanced features' of the NIC (in W2K) and disable NetBIOS compeltely. But ensuring all SMTP traffic in and outbound to one is the problem. We're upgrading the server from NT4 to Win2K and I know the Compaq Dual NIC's can use the Intel Dual Port drivers which allow a little more flexibility in the way they operate. Can someone send me a 'Q' article if this can be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keeping up with Exchange 5.5
I just noticed another post SPK4 fix ... http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=45312area=searcho rdinal=4 I can't seem to find a good URL that has a list of post SPK4 fix's. I know I've applied at least 6. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Keeping up with Exchange 5.5
Well no not this one, but I do recall a few of them were security related (ASP and IMS). Which is why it would be nice to take a look at all of them and decide. Quite frankly with the timing of this one, I'm wondering if a beta of Outlook11 didn't spur this... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 19:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Keeping up with Exchange 5.5 But do you really need to apply them if you aren't experiencing the specific issues they address? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Finch Brett Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions I just noticed another post SPK4 fix ... http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=45312area=sear cho rdinal=4 I can't seem to find a good URL that has a list of post SPK4 fix's. I know I've applied at least 6. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails
Go look at Power Tools from www.nemX.com . There are many more like Scan mail from trend Micro, it's like AV, everyone will like or hate some brand. I like Nemx because if didn't really have to change any DLL's or anything, went in very smooth and slick. -Original Message- From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [mailto:Clint.Kleciak;CIGNA.COM] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails Any such functionality or third product tool? thanks Clint -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This e-mail transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange backup
Well everyone hates the other guy's backup :) We finally gave up on ArcServe, it worked so poorly and they have horrible support. We used Veritas competitive upgrade to replace and have been happy ever since. It's a good product, I'm not aware of anyone dumping Veritas to go to Arcserve. Make a case for the value of your Organization's email, get the tools and hardware you need (5K will get you a nice external SCSI LTO tape drive for your server) or ask management to put it in writing that you're not responsible for lost email due to failed backups. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 15:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange backup I like to know how other are doing their exchange server backup for the user mailbox. We are running exchange5.5 and Arcserve with exchange agent. Arcserve is running on a separate server then the Exchange server. We have been getting a lots of unsuccessful backup for the mailboxes. Should we run Arcserve on Exchange server? Any respond is helpful. Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Yes I fully accept my redundant attempt to go the extreme. -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:DNicholson;rapidapp.com] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's If that is what had happened with the coffee, I suppose you might have an actual point. But it's not. So you don't. :) Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:brett.finch;hrs.ualberta.ca] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Can you say 'risk management'. If someone can drive up to a window, order a coffee then take the lid off, drive over a speed bump and sue someone else, anything is possible :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Can you say 'risk management'. If someone can drive up to a window, order a coffee then take the lid off, drive over a speed bump and sue someone else, anything is possible :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 21:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's I've never heard of a single instance where a lawsuit was initiated against an organization based on incoming *spam*. Can you point to one? I can point to deals which didn't get done because of RBLs which resulted in real monetary loss, which would seem to make one more likely than the other unless you can point to a court case I'm not aware of. Matt's client side could technically be much different from a normal organization since his firm provides hosting to businesses (clients) who have their own users (another type of client). There are plenty of examples of server based filtering based on individual user settings which could potentially meet his objective and address your objection. Most of those solutions are poorly done IMNSHO. RBLs in general aren't content filtering solutions, they are connection filtering solutions. While they may at some level achieve similar results, their objectives are actually quite different. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:brett.finch;hrs.ualberta.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I've watched this thread for a while. I don't buy the argument that a ten million deal will fail because of a bounced email via RBL. It's just as likely that a dept. with predominant females could sue for fifteen million for sexual harassment in the fact the company with the ten million dollar deal didn't take reasonable steps to protect them from this spam. There also seems to be no argument about the value of email in the workplace and that a business may find they loose a ten thousand dollar deal but save fifteen thousand in the fact their people are actually doing what they were hired to do (as mentioned in other posts bandwidth costs, storage costs as well). As for the per client configuration, that works until they start adding their contacts to the junk list or they log into a Terminal Server or via wireless with a PDA. We also don't hire people based on their skills to manage their email. Finding a moderate RBL with reasonable rules and sending a nice e-mail back to a would be spammer seems to work as well as anything. -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Very true..We have hosted exchange for business and we get the sh-t spammed out of us. But we do not block any email! That may change as our customers are complaining bitterly. The best solution we would like is a filter on the client side and not the server side. MacAfee spam kill product looks nice but I do not know if it can talk to Exchange server. (not POP) I just felt we started something ugly on this list!!:) Wanted to clarify why we were interested. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's And in general, the business needs of a firm providing free web based e-mail, vs. the business needs of a Fortune 500 company are a tad different. So are the usage patterns and a host of other factors. My only comment about RBLs as it related to your question (not being defensive, just reiterating for those who might have lost track) was that I hoped Microsoft would not integrate RBL functionality directly into the Exchange product because I felt that such solutions were best left to 3rd party vendors... and then proceeded to mention a couple of reasons why I thought this to be true. -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions I originally questioned about RBL's for exchange because we host a large .com whose main stay of business is free web based email. They have 100k plus users and get spammed to death. We have content filtering tools, we can blacklist known spammers, and we can even shut down ip's at the router. They still get spammed to death hurting their service. Customers complain. The owner of this .com asked us to use spamcop. Since enlisting spam cop 100's of thousands emails are now refused a day!! All of the users were notified of the use of spamcop and were told to report any emails that should have gotten thru. It has been 3 months now and one reported email that should have gotten thru did not. Our customer is happy, his users are happy and we spend a lot less time tracking spammers. Our servers are happy, our sans are happy, I'm happy. Oh our bandwidth
RE: RBL's
I've watched this thread for a while. I don't buy the argument that a ten million deal will fail because of a bounced email via RBL. It's just as likely that a dept. with predominant females could sue for fifteen million for sexual harassment in the fact the company with the ten million dollar deal didn't take reasonable steps to protect them from this spam. There also seems to be no argument about the value of email in the workplace and that a business may find they loose a ten thousand dollar deal but save fifteen thousand in the fact their people are actually doing what they were hired to do (as mentioned in other posts bandwidth costs, storage costs as well). As for the per client configuration, that works until they start adding their contacts to the junk list or they log into a Terminal Server or via wireless with a PDA. We also don't hire people based on their skills to manage their email. Finding a moderate RBL with reasonable rules and sending a nice e-mail back to a would be spammer seems to work as well as anything. -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Very true..We have hosted exchange for business and we get the sh-t spammed out of us. But we do not block any email! That may change as our customers are complaining bitterly. The best solution we would like is a filter on the client side and not the server side. MacAfee spam kill product looks nice but I do not know if it can talk to Exchange server. (not POP) I just felt we started something ugly on this list!!:) Wanted to clarify why we were interested. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's And in general, the business needs of a firm providing free web based e-mail, vs. the business needs of a Fortune 500 company are a tad different. So are the usage patterns and a host of other factors. My only comment about RBLs as it related to your question (not being defensive, just reiterating for those who might have lost track) was that I hoped Microsoft would not integrate RBL functionality directly into the Exchange product because I felt that such solutions were best left to 3rd party vendors... and then proceeded to mention a couple of reasons why I thought this to be true. -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions I originally questioned about RBL's for exchange because we host a large .com whose main stay of business is free web based email. They have 100k plus users and get spammed to death. We have content filtering tools, we can blacklist known spammers, and we can even shut down ip's at the router. They still get spammed to death hurting their service. Customers complain. The owner of this .com asked us to use spamcop. Since enlisting spam cop 100's of thousands emails are now refused a day!! All of the users were notified of the use of spamcop and were told to report any emails that should have gotten thru. It has been 3 months now and one reported email that should have gotten thru did not. Our customer is happy, his users are happy and we spend a lot less time tracking spammers. Our servers are happy, our sans are happy, I'm happy. Oh our bandwidth is happy also!! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:esojka;NBME.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's You following remark ... Seems to say ? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's depsite it's poor grammar ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Walsh, Ric Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok your spelling remark was rude to all of us. You following remark despite it's poor grammar seems to say that the rest of us are dumber that you. I'd have to say that it was ALL rude. Ric Walsh -Original Message- From: Walsh, Ric Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. Have you though of taking an anger management class? Ric Walsh _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.Net Server and Exchange 5.5
Well I know SPK3 for Exchange2K was released for compatibility with .Net server but I am assuming it was more of a ADS issue. Does anyone know (or are they now) if running 5.5 on a .NET server is being done. I know MS hopes the last of us NT4 die hards go to .Net and AD 1.1 which is exactly what we are planning for. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5
Thanks, I guess I should be a bit more clear, I'm not looking for any change in the 5.5 program or for it to be aware of anything. I just want the services to start if I choose to upgrade a NT4 box to a .NET box. As in the upgrade path to Exchange2000 required the NT4 system first upgrade to Win2K, my thinking is for us holdouts to be attracted to the next Exchange version beyond Exchange2000, a upgrade path will probably be made available. That means NT4 - .NET first (hopefully). -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 Do I know for sure? No. Can I make an educated guess? Yes. No, 5.5 will not be made .NET aware. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:brett.finch;hrs.ualberta.ca] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 Well I know SPK3 for Exchange2K was released for compatibility with .Net server but I am assuming it was more of a ADS issue. Does anyone know (or are they now) if running 5.5 on a .NET server is being done. I know MS hopes the last of us NT4 die hards go to .Net and AD 1.1 which is exactly what we are planning for. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally fixed Postmaster issues!
Well if anyone remembers, I was trying to alter the default postmaster reply in a site that belongs to a ORG where we have many SMTP connectors. The first article shows how you can edit the registry and reboot, but for the life of me I couldn't understand why it wasn't working. The second article clears up an issue, which now makes everything work correctly, go figure. Just thought I'd post this info along to the group as when I first asked about this, I got a lot of responses about others who couldn't make this work correctly. These are the two articles for making the local postmaster the replying postmaster. #1 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q182010 #2 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q251441 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messages delayed by black hole queue?
Are you running any AV on the Exchange box(s)? I had a similar problem, it was NAV that was causing the problem when I was in the MAPI / VAPI mode and the Exchange client retry of 5000ms was too low. I cranked it up to 5ms. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Messages delayed by black hole queue? Yes, we have a Unix-based firewall in front of our Exchange Servers. It acts as a smart host, and re-writes e-mail addresses. I could telnet to its SMTP port if I wished, but I'm not sure how it would help. Note that the message was apparently sent, and moved to the Sent Items folder. However, the firewall's logs showed that it was not received until three days later. This suggests that the firewall was not the problem. As well, it took a 'Move Mailbox' operation to release the message. That suggests - to me - that the Exchange database had a problem somewhere. This all sounds faintly familiar; I could've sworn I saw a similar problem in a posting on this list. Naturally, I can't find the blasted thing when I want it. Even more naturally, I can't remember whether (or how) the problem was resolved. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:48 PM Subject: RE: Messages delayed by black hole queue? Are there any sort of SMTP relays in front of your Exchange Server? Can you manually telnet to the servers in question? Also, make sure the emails arent being delivered to alternate mx record for the external users you are sending to and then somehow never getting routed correctly to them. Belive it or not, an email I sent two months ago to an account in London just got delivered last week. Do you have any headers you could post here? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 9:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messages delayed by black hole queue? EX5.5, SP3, NT4, SP6a, OL98 and OL2K: A few dozen users (out of 3,500) - including me! - have been complaining that e-mails sent to external addresses never arrive. They don't even get off the Exchange Server(s), but are not in any queue that I can see. In desperation, I moved my own account to another server (in the same site). A message I'd sent on Monday was held somewhere, and not delivered until Thursday. The headers suggested that it was composed and sent on Thursday. I've searched the archives, and couldn't find anything related to this. I also searched my own archive of this list, with no result. Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 Spam Block multiple domain
In Exchange 5.5 (SPK4 NT4 SPK6a) on the Internet Mail Connector, the tab Connections with the message filtering tab. You can specify the address but you have to type each offending host one by one. Is there a way to import an ASCI text? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
Well I have a YAHOO account as well, sometimes a delay happens but as you mentioned, it works. I hate to ask but you did ensure (since it is only 1 person) that there is no filtering rule on the client, sending e-mail from this outside user to oblivion? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
Several links for you to follow up with http://ordb.org/ http://ordb.org/faq/#how_to_close http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Install
Is the IIS box a member server of the Exchange Domain and what account are you using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Install I'm trying to intall the Outllok Web Access into a Windows 2000 SP2 Server (with IIS installed).I have the Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 installed into a Windows NT4 SP6a. The setup fails, when I indicate the Exchange Server's name, with the following error: Access is denied Microsoft Windows NT Ad no: 0CxC0020005 or, Microsoft Exchange Directory DS_E_COMMUNICATIONS_PROBLEM Someone can help me? Thanks, Eva Janakieff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q article confirmation
I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Q article confirmation
Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend. Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to work in it's present form. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q article confirmation Version and SP? [1] [1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Q article confirmation I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Q article confirmation
Yeah but I'm fed up with calling PSS, that's why I thought I could get a easy answer here. I thought surely someone has made this registry hack work. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q article confirmation The article says it's fixed in the next sp. Since there was no sp listed at the time of the article, and you're on sp4, they seem to think you shouldn't have the problem. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q article confirmation Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend. Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to work in it's present form. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q article confirmation Version and SP? [1] [1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Q article confirmation I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
That's white space within the DB (from delete mail etc...), not what is on the actual disk. Is that what you mean? -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default Sys Admin on SMTP
We are a Exchange 5.5 SPK4 ORG, my server is on it's own site and runs it's own SMTP connector, it holds several MX records that all work. In reference to the following article, I have a problem where I want all the postmaster error messages to be generated from the server I administer. http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 I also stopped and restarted all services to ensure changes took effect. The problem is that the default reply to address is coming (and being sent) from the postmaster account of the main server in the ORG, not from my server in this SITE. If you were to reply to me [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note the missing t), then you should get the Unknown Recipient message from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] but you don't, it comes from the postmaster@. the ORG's first (main) server. If we both run our own SMTP connections, our MX records are correct, then why is this and how can I stop it from happening. I thought from the article up top I could fix it but apparently not. What am I missing here? Thanks in advance, probably a simple fix, once I actually find it... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Default Sys Admin on SMTP
Yes I did do the reg hack as it stated, I thought it was an unusual one. System Administrator's SMTP Addr (REG_SZ) which I thought was a little off, maybe a typo within the article? I just stopped ALL exchange services and restarted, didn't reboot. I thought maybe System Administrator's SMTP Address vice what the article states but I decided to check here first before I start any variation experiments in my registry :) -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 22:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Default Sys Admin on SMTP And you've done the reg modification? I know this works as I've done it several times (actually I think I may have written that article, cant' remember for sure). - Original Message - From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 6:37 PM Subject: Default Sys Admin on SMTP We are a Exchange 5.5 SPK4 ORG, my server is on it's own site and runs it's own SMTP connector, it holds several MX records that all work. In reference to the following article, I have a problem where I want all the postmaster error messages to be generated from the server I administer. http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 I also stopped and restarted all services to ensure changes took effect. The problem is that the default reply to address is coming (and being sent) from the postmaster account of the main server in the ORG, not from my server in this SITE. If you were to reply to me [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note the missing t), then you should get the Unknown Recipient message from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] but you don't, it comes from the postmaster@. the ORG's first (main) server. If we both run our own SMTP connections, our MX records are correct, then why is this and how can I stop it from happening. I thought from the article up top I could fix it but apparently not. What am I missing here? Thanks in advance, probably a simple fix, once I actually find it... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How Organizational Forms Work?
Also remember to replicate the folder from it's primary locations and also depending on how your security is laid out, setting permissions to at least review if you have cross domain issues. -Original Message- From: Scott Perley-TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 23:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How Organizational Forms Work? I haven't had any problem with this. We have about 80 forms used from our Org Forms library. There are about another 20-30 used strictly from public folders. Scott Perley TELUS Mobility [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How Organizational Forms Work? Our environment consists of Exchange 5.5/SP4 servers with OL2000 and we have approximately 25,000 users. We currently do not allow forms to be published to the Organizational Forms Library because of a fear of the impact it will have on Outlook response time if there are too many forms. Is this a legitimate fear? I can not find any Microsoft Documentation that states why we shouldn't publish forms to the Organizational Forms Library. And currently, this policy is stifling Outlook/Exchange development projects. Can anyone provide me with some advice on this issue? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OutlookXP and Exchange 5.5
I've tried everything to get rid of that annoying feature that seems to take a OLXP client offline all the time. I tried to disable offline use, tried disabling AV email scanning, I am at a loss how I can get rid of this stupid message from the OLXP client Requesting data from MS Exchange Server every time a user wants to open an attachment or a Public Folder. Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a with OutlookXP (SPK1) client. I've searched here and at MS's knowledge base, what am I missing? I truly doubt it is a network issue, switched 100MB to the desktop, and Fast Ethernet channels via switch to the server, load in minimal as well. I'm convinced it is the client... Any idea's anyone? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OutlookXP and Exchange 5.5
Some good ideas to look into from all, thanks... -Original Message- From: Ed Smits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 17:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OutlookXP and Exchange 5.5 Don't discard the network idea without checking it thoroughly - I run OXP on WinXP, connect to an Exch. 5.5 SP4 server, and get that message from time to time only when I connect from home via ADSL and VPN. I've seen it momentarily a few times at the office getting data from another server on the far side of the WAN, usually those times can be fairly easily correlated to times of network congestion. ED -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OutlookXP and Exchange 5.5 I've tried everything to get rid of that annoying feature that seems to take a OLXP client offline all the time. I tried to disable offline use, tried disabling AV email scanning, I am at a loss how I can get rid of this stupid message from the OLXP client Requesting data from MS Exchange Server every time a user wants to open an attachment or a Public Folder. Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a with OutlookXP (SPK1) client. I've searched here and at MS's knowledge base, what am I missing? I truly doubt it is a network issue, switched 100MB to the desktop, and Fast Ethernet channels via switch to the server, load in minimal as well. I'm convinced it is the client... Any idea's anyone? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
