I *guess* you could do that ... I'd rather just unhide the folder from the
GAL. :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Contact Folders in OWA
I think you'd have to
In my (granted, limited) experience I have seen the cause of this to be
whatever AV is running on the Exchange Server. If an item is being
synchronized that hasn't been flagged as scanned by the antivirus software
on the server, it will try to scan it before allowing it to be synchronized
...
Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 14:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Synchronizing Outlook for Offline use
Interesting how the only list I'm subscribed to that doesn't prevent OOO's
from going to its members is one for email admins.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
If I remember correctly the AutoAccept wizard from exchangecode.com had the
functionality to blast to a number of boxes, and had a browse button so you
could probably apply your own script. Worst case, write another CDO script
to apply your other script. :)
-Original Message-
From:
If merging the two organizations is not an option, it may be a good idea to
investigate at least sychronizing the GALs ... in my experience most users
want the other email system just so they can have all those email
addresses, really nothing more.
-Original Message-
From: Chris
Indeed -- I always find it interesting that while Linux advocates are often
the loudest anti-Microsoft lobbyists, their products continue to look more
and more like the Microsoft products they hate. From a purely user
standpoint, I would think that only hurts their cause why would a user
Users with owner rights probably hosed the permissions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unable to see certain public folders
In my organisation, they use an awful lot
I have heard many references to scancal.exe as a tool to try and
troubleshoot the nasty calendar problems where viewing a calendar pegs
outlook.exe at 100% (even through free/busy is still available via meeting
request) . does anyone have a copy they'd be willing to send me? And
before
If it were me, I'd write a quick perl script or something that polls for
only the stuff you want and sticks them in your own log dump area, be it a
flatfile or database somewhere (there's also a gazillion tools that are
already written out there that will do the same thing, but for cost.)
There's
good uses for a DMZ.
There are.
Exchange just isn't one of them.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:53 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Subject: RE: lesser
Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Here's what's so sacred: your users' ability to generate
revenue. It's all a matter of perspective -- to someone in a
small
or smtp
I see. What's your take though? Are we babysitters or what?
Jason Cook
J.H. Ellwood and Associates
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange
enterprises. Do you every check where people work or what
their experience is before you post? You might find it
enlightening...
G.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 21:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser
Sure ... I've been working with Exchange since late 1995, mostly with
organizations that are around 1-3 servers in one site. Haven't really
worked closely with the larger implementations unfortunately ... the
consulting firm I used to work for dealt mainly with smaller clients with
tight
Not to take sides, but I have to admit that sometimes reading through this
list I feel like I'm surrounded by prepubescent boys. Granted, I'm new to
the list and are probably not in the in crowd, but please remember we're
all professionals here with jobs that keep us busy and stressed, and
Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
That's quite a leap, to say that offline maintenance is
causing 2 or 3 mailboxes out of 1200 to be unable to respond
there
Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
Sure ... I've been working with Exchange
Just adding the IP and name to your hosts file (and making sure the
necessary ports are open on the firewall) will allow it, but you should
probably consider a VPN instead to assist in securing the connection. Keep
in mind it will be chatty as hell too, which usually ain't pretty over an
First rule: Don't ever let internet traffic talk directly to the heart of
your network. Stick something in the DMZ, be it an SMTP relay or an OWA
box, but never let 'em talk directly to your Exchange box. The real
question behind determinig SMTP or OWA is (in my opinion) a question of
Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 18:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
First rule: Don't ever let internet traffic talk directly to
the heart of your network. Stick something in the DMZ, be it
an SMTP relay
PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
-- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 --
===
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday
.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:53 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
So you'd allow from any to your inside boxes
, I'm not going to just pick your mail server, I'm going
to pick your entire network.
Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I'm interested in hearing some sound arguments on why offline maintenance
should *not* be performed ... I've heard/read quite a few people cringing
about it, but can never back it up. I've been doing it for years without a
hitch; I think as long as the proper precautions are taken and proper
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments
Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Butler
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
with the exchange client?
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook appointments on Exchange
We're having a severe problem with a few mailboxes on our
Exchange 5.5 server, even
: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
Explain what you mean by the phrase rigorous maintenance.
Your administrative practices may be the root cause of the
problem you are trying to solve.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
tool to use at this point and are open to suggestions.
Thanks!
Jon Butler
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
tool to use at this point and are open to suggestions.
Thanks!
Jon Butler
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
tool to use at this point and are open to suggestions.
Thanks!
Jon Butler
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
tool to use at this point and are open to suggestions.
Thanks!
Jon Butler
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians? All this useless chatter is driving me up
the wall ...
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
just prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.
If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's
down the road and to the left.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing
is to maintain the investment my company has
made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem.
Jim Helfer
WTW Architects
Pittsburgh PA
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange
I'm sure I'm not the first to need this, but I am working on a deadline and
am having difficulty finding the right tool quickly. If this has been
resolved on the list before, I would appreciate a thread title to aid in my
searches.
I have a public folder of contacts on Exchange 5.5 with Outlook
37 matches
Mail list logo
