RE: unhold
decompose -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold Defile -Original Message- From: Kevin Wilkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeFrag -Original Message- From: Glaman, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeCrypt -Original Message- From: Marty Gavin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeRail -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DePlane -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DePlane From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: unhold Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:03:01 -0800 DeFlowers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DePants -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeThong -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unhold Unhold _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Expand your wine savvy - and get some great new recipes - at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: SBS 2003 Tools
I want to say maybe SBS2003 will goo to 75 these day's...or is that Novell? -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SBS 2003 Tools I am over 50 users -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SBS 2003 Tools Upgrade to SBS 2003? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SBS 2003 Tools On CD #4 of the Install CD's there lies all of the special features that makes SBS, SBS. I really like the Backup Tool, and Monitoring Tool. I have tried to install it on a Windows 2000 server and of course it says this is for SBS 2003. Does anyone have a idea how to port this over to 2000? The SBS 2003 tools really work well, much better than SBS 2000 did. Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
and I suppose...Can't we all just get along... is next and maybe Kumbyha It's the holiday seasonim thinking Seuss a classic... -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance. -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Shut the fu*k up already, everyone. If anyone wants to continue this childish diatribe, take it offline. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Yes, you certainly schooled me. You are so very witty and clever I could never hope to compete with such a superior intellect. An AOL reference? Paaaleeeze. I get along with my coworkers just fine, thanks for your concern. Value is irrelevant, hence the point about a philosophical discussion. Many times, the greatest evils are wrapped in appealing packages. And yes, I love my fans. With fans like mine, who needs detractors? Let's call it 98, but I've been out a while since Exchange was not my focal point in recent years (nor is it now, I just thought I'd smack you around a bit.) Yes I am contributing. You got that right, genius. What gave it away, the 'you've got mail' chime? As far as the philosophical issue goes, you don't seem to have a lot of supporters. Do you have co-workers? Do you get along? I bet not. And you didn't comment on the VALUE of people like Missy, Ed, CTHULU, et al versus what you bring to the table. I'm done with this. You lose, and you will always lose. Have fun with your adoring fans. began 4-5 years. Ha! That puts you at around 1999-1998. This list has been around since 1994. This is a philosophical issue about ethics that has been raging for about 8 years or so. I specifically try to avoid the subject, but certain individuals can't seem to let it go. Guilty conscious maybe? Who knows. And you are contributing to the continuation of this thread. Welcome to the party. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SBS Setup
I go by... Lots of RAM but not more the 2GB As much CPU as I/they can afford SCSI disks preferrend but fast IDE for small user count... SCSI tape drive for sure..20GB dat4 usually default type install I have not done a W2K3 SBS yet but have 2 scheduled... for like 5 and 10 user shop's since I havent had to really deal with SBS since 4.5 (ok I loaded sbs w2k3 rc1..it was cool)I still remember it is a bit of a mystical beast and temperamental I think to the poor sole down the road who has to maybe fix it after me... I subscribe to KISS 2 cents bill PS my 2 DL330 1-2.0Ghzp4/1MB RAM/Dual 80GB IDE 8200RPM Mirrored via the cpw ML330 built in raid... insert disk let it load... -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: SBS Setup All, I'm trying to figure out what is the best design (hardware wise) for a SBS server that I will be setting up here in the future. I'm trying to figure out what is the best way to maximize the server's resources with the setup. One question I do have is. When you setup SBS can you point all the different applications (E2K3, SQL, Sharepoint etc) do different file locations? I tried asking the MS Conceirge people but they didn't know as well. I was wondering if it would be a good idea to maybe seperate some apps and put them on their own controllers. What do you recommend? TIA, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
note to self...Dip self in liquid latex piror...if ever meet these guy's in person -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I heard you have operating privileges at the local bath house. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Im Dr. Love. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Actually, degree DOES equal title. One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next day Washington State Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some mythical contributions I have made to the industry. My signature would now read: DR. James Blunt, Computer Engineer -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research. degree title check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles. googling Dr. receives honorary degree lawyer receives honorary degree Just for reference. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
I have in fact I had to tell trend about it... My first cutting edge I got hammered last week monday been cleaning since WORM_AGOBOT.A3 it's a bite... there was no def on it from anyone and I have yet to figure how it got inlikely a rogue laptop plugged in.. it's bite's Im crabby bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I put 691 on my Exchange server on Sat. So far so good, but I haven't seen any of these new virus's yet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Your welcome. Waiting on it myself. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe:
RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls
OH my...TMI -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls Hell, I have two in my bathrooms alone! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls In my house I have 3 phones. One in the kitchen, one in my office, and one in my bedroom. All the same number. I want to have that still. So in my case, going to a single cell really makes no sense unless I want to carry my phone all over the house. Then when a call comes in for my wife, having to carry the phone to her. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls Sorry...guess you're right on that point... Guess I was thinking more along the lines of the having multiple cell phones with the same number bit. If you had 3 Cingular phones with different numbers and a cradle for each, then at least when they ring, they'd all ring on one number...would save you the hassle of forwarding them all by hand every day after hours. BTW...what would be the point of having multiple cell phones with the same number? Wouldn't it be kind of annoying to have them all ring, anytime one of them received a call? Wouldn't it be simpler to have work pay for your cell phone, with the authorization to use it for personal use as well? Or am *I* missing something? ;0) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls But you still have to use landline service to have this. I interpret this as simple call forwarding made simpler. Maybe I am missing something. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls Martin, This first link may be the answer to your problem...it's what I plan on going to in the near future. The second link is an option, if you choose to wait as long as six months. Call Forward Service Has Many Advantages - Cingular: http://tinyurl.com/vd8n Home-To-Cell Phone Number Transfers OK'd - Coming soon: http://tinyurl.com/vd8s -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls I haven't had a modem in at least 3 years. I don't even want a landline anymore, but until someone can come up with a way to have multiple cell phones with the same number, I'm stuck. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going to go down the shutdown path... some dust covers an old rule of thumb I either read/heard/experienced once...that when shutting down one of the Exch services ..particularlly with a remote script etc... issue the command three times in the script... don't ask... again it sticks in the duldrums of my feable mind but it's there for 55 you could get fancy and write it so it check service state also..which might help I could be way off bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way? -Original Message- From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns? Greetings, 2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4. I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service? --Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
Andy shouldn't that be (remember click your heals together 3 times and repeat) net stop MSExchangeIMC /y since he only wanted the IMC? bill Wouldn't net stop MSExchangeSA /y take down basically all of exchange -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? Specifically: net stop MSExchangeSA /y ( 3 times) -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going to go down the shutdown path... some dust covers an old rule of thumb I either read/heard/experienced once...that when shutting down one of the Exch services ..particularlly with a remote script etc... issue the command three times in the script... don't ask... again it sticks in the duldrums of my feable mind but it's there for 55 you could get fancy and write it so it check service state also..which might help I could be way off bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way? -Original Message- From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns? Greetings, 2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4. I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service? --Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
then it's beer time -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? Oh man... just shut down the server for the night. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? Andy shouldn't that be (remember click your heals together 3 times and repeat) net stop MSExchangeIMC /y since he only wanted the IMC? bill Wouldn't net stop MSExchangeSA /y take down basically all of exchange -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? Specifically: net stop MSExchangeSA /y ( 3 times) -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going to go down the shutdown path... some dust covers an old rule of thumb I either read/heard/experienced once...that when shutting down one of the Exch services ..particularlly with a remote script etc... issue the command three times in the script... don't ask... again it sticks in the duldrums of my feable mind but it's there for 55 you could get fancy and write it so it check service state also..which might help I could be way off bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns? wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way? -Original Message- From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns? Greetings, 2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4. I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service? --Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
wont it just build up at your ISP and then flood your link that way? -Original Message- From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns? Greetings, 2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4. I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to help reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the job. Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service? --Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: webmail
would that be Lime Jello Shot's? Lamb..ummm.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webmail Our special today is lamb shank, brussels sprouts and lime jello. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webmail May I substitute rings for fries and add a chocolate malt instead of a pop? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webmail Would you like to Super size this order sir? _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webmail when i access my webmail i recieve only the parent directory _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Capturing users' access to OWA
and there are some tools out there to help you parse those log's if you dont want to write it yourself... at least I seem to remember -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Capturing users' access to OWA IIS logs -Original Message- From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Capturing users' access to OWA Hello folks: Our environment: native E2k, FE/BE for OWA. What is the best, most efficient way to track user's access to OWA? I'm looking to begin tracking OWA usage (how many users are logging in, how often and for how long, etc.). I've read about filtering through the IIS logs and am just about ready to call into PSS, however, I was wondering if anyone has come across any other solution. Thanks in advance! -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on the road
VPNsetup OL to do traveling user -Original Message- From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on the road I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange mails on the road. They want to do this from within Outlook. When I POP the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his messages, even those he has already read. Is there a way around this? If I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get duplicates? Thanks, Steve Cobb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Limits
work all night and a drinka rum! Day light come and me whanna go home -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits Personal or standard Day0? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits Other than 0! g -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Limits It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right or wrong answer. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exchange Limits Subject: Exchange Limits Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some select staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits. I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them? Thanks for your help! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email frm Exch at command ln/script???
Im wondering if there is a way I can e-mail from a command line/script thru/directly from my exchange box...(Exch55sp4+post, NT4sp6a+post) Like if I was on my unix box (running sendmail) I might do uuencode /dr/rpt/rpt.txt |mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then cron this I did see some of a MS tech note(193685) of loading and using the IIS SMTP svc to do this... But Id rather not load another svc..etc SO can anyone one Ya or NA this and/or point me in the direction I need to go? basically I need to do a script where I can attach like 3 files to 1 e-mail and have it go out automatically...every X times a day thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email frm Exch at command ln/script???
thx I thought about doing a telnet to 25...my Q on that is how would I attach the 3 files which need to go with the e-mail??? BLAT - I used it a couple times..it's an option...was hoping to avoide another something if poss.. Ok if I preformat...again how would I attach the 3 files I need to... More detail: See Ive got these 3 files I need to attach to the e-mail...2 are excel, 1 is ZIP. these things need to go to an e-mail address every few hours... thx bill -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email frm Exch at command ln/script??? You can use Telnet on port 25, connect to your Exchange server and send a message. Or you could use Blat - a great command line utility for sending mail. You also should be able to drop a preformatted text file into the Pickup directory. The file format should be like this FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SUBJECT: test This is a test. . Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email frm Exch at command ln/script??? Im wondering if there is a way I can e-mail from a command line/script thru/directly from my exchange box...(Exch55sp4+post, NT4sp6a+post) Like if I was on my unix box (running sendmail) I might do uuencode /dr/rpt/rpt.txt |mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then cron this I did see some of a MS tech note(193685) of loading and using the IIS SMTP svc to do this... But Id rather not load another svc..etc SO can anyone one Ya or NA this and/or point me in the direction I need to go? basically I need to do a script where I can attach like 3 files to 1 e-mail and have it go out automatically...every X times a day thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email frm Exch at command ln/script???
yeah the sendmail does appear to do things like sendmail in unix.. I was just trying to avoide loading yet another something to worry about... I was hoping there might be some simple something I could do directly with the exch smtp (IMS) to do this in a script..etc.(without having to do huge scripting which i bite at) bill -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email frm Exch at command ln/script??? yeah... I didn't catch that until too late... I often use PERL with the SendMail module to send stuff... I believe it supports attachments.. but don't know for sure... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email frm Exch at command ln/script??? thx I thought about doing a telnet to 25...my Q on that is how would I attach the 3 files which need to go with the e-mail??? BLAT - I used it a couple times..it's an option...was hoping to avoide another something if poss.. Ok if I preformat...again how would I attach the 3 files I need to... More detail: See Ive got these 3 files I need to attach to the e-mail...2 are excel, 1 is ZIP. these things need to go to an e-mail address every few hours... thx bill -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email frm Exch at command ln/script??? You can use Telnet on port 25, connect to your Exchange server and send a message. Or you could use Blat - a great command line utility for sending mail. You also should be able to drop a preformatted text file into the Pickup directory. The file format should be like this FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SUBJECT: test This is a test. . Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email frm Exch at command ln/script??? Im wondering if there is a way I can e-mail from a command line/script thru/directly from my exchange box...(Exch55sp4+post, NT4sp6a+post) Like if I was on my unix box (running sendmail) I might do uuencode /dr/rpt/rpt.txt |mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then cron this I did see some of a MS tech note(193685) of loading and using the IIS SMTP svc to do this... But Id rather not load another svc..etc SO can anyone one Ya or NA this and/or point me in the direction I need to go? basically I need to do a script where I can attach like 3 files to 1 e-mail and have it go out automatically...every X times a day thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003
Exchange Svr 2003 Deployment Guide CH4 pg 49 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Sure you can, just not in-place. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 You can not go directly to E2K3 from Exchange 5.5. IIRC From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:54:18 -0400 I don't think you will be able to find a definitive answer to this, but IMO, I wouldn't use the 2003 ADC to migrate 5.5 to E2k. There seems to be a lot going on here: W2003 domain, E2k and E2003 servers, migration from 5.5 etc.. Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with it after testing in the lab, and forget the E2k bit entirely? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Just upgraded a domain from Windows NT to Windows 2003. Our next phase will migrate Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 with some users going to Exchange 2003 (so it can be proven as a viable endpoint for the migration) using the Move Mailbox method. If I use the ADC for Exchange 2003, does anyone know if there are any gotcha's moving mailboxes from the Exchange 5.5 server to the Exchange 2000 server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Memory Usage for Store.exe
I could help if you could tell us about the hardware a bit..Proc, HD's , RAID? (s), number of users 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Memory Usage for Store.exe Ok, the consensus is: it's normal. Ed, I agree on using as much memory as possible, but to the point of making EX non-responsive?! I guess a memory upgrade is in order. On a somewhat related note, I originally installed Exchange on the System partition (drive). Now it's running out of space. Besides reinstalling Exchange and put it on another drive, which is not very practical, since it's a production machine, do I have another option? --Alex Alborzfard -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Memory Usage for Store.exe You didn't buy all that memory for it to sit unused, now did you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Memory Usage for Store.exe EX 5.5, SP4 on NT 4 SP6a Store.exe is showing a high memory usage. The box has 512MB of memory, of which between 396-400MB are being used by Store.exe. Isn't this too high? Besides the obvious (adding more memory), what can be done to improve the EX performance. With other EX services, AV software and other misc. services, there is not much Available Memory: between 4-18MB. This has created problems in sending and receiving, as the server sometimes doesn't respond in time and just times out. Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange smtp stops responding
you might want to give us a bit more detail... example... 1.)I can not send/rec external-internet e-mail 2.) Clients running OL...just kinda of lock up... 3.) Any info in your log's??? sorry your statement is a bit vague exchange version? server version? Av software? BU software? service pack levels? anything else on the box? 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Eric Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange smtp stops responding every few days exchange stops sending emails, if i reboot the server everything is ok for a few days then it starts happening again any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 - upgd/mig...
thanks Ed. Guess Ill just kinda be Leaping (History Of the World Part I ... comes into mind) thx bill -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 - upgd/mig... Yeah. They stole my idea and gave it that silly name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 6:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 - upgd/mig... Q to all...after reading part of this thread and being in the boat of starting to plan my migration and just reading some of the FAQ's with regard to: Exchange 2003 server. And the only other option is called the leap frog migration. You configure the Active Directory Connector (ADC) for Exchange 2003 between the Active Directory and Exchange 5.5 Directory Service. Install a new Exchange 2003 server into the enterprise and move the Exchange 5.5 users to Exchange 2003. Would/is this say similar/akin to doing like Ed's server move method...in that I guess my main concern would be to keep the SIS of the exch DB's?? add your just moving over the users mailbox's to the new server...??? Also does anyone know if MS plan's to produce a tool to do a direct type upgrade from 55 to E2k3? thanks bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Exchange 5.5 is not supported on Windows 2003 server. I don't even know if it would work. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Martin, I guess I didn't phrase it right. If I install Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2003 Server will that work in an NT 4.0 Domain Architecture? Thank again. Mario -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 You are going to need to get your AD infrastructure in place before you think about upgrading your Exchange server to anything other than 5.5. So the simple answer is no. You must have AD. As for your other question, Exchange 2003 will install on W2K or W2K3, but to take advantage of features like RPC over HTTP, you will need Windows 2003. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Martin, Thanks for your response. Another Question: When you say build the new Exchange Server Install 2003 and move the Mailboxes, are you saying install Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2003 box? But will that work in an NT 4.0 Domain Environment? Remember, we are still on a NT 4.0 Domain Structure and moving to AD. Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 1. Yes 2. No 3. You cant directly upgrade Exchange 5.5 to 2003. If you need to keep Exchange on the same hardware you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K, then upgrade 5.5 to 2000, then upgrade 2003 to 2003, the upgrade the OS to 2003 if you choose. The better solution would be to get a new Exchange server, install 2003 and move the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Have a few questions: We are currently about to start a Migration to AD. We have a Exchange 5.5 Server on a Windows NT 4 box. We are moving the Exchange 5.5 Server to a Windows 2000 Box due to limitation on the Old Hardware. After our AD Migration we are going to upgrade to Exchange 2000 I have a few questions that I was wondering if anyone can help. 1. Will Windows 2003 Work in an Windows 2000 AD Environment 2. Will Exchange 5.5 Work on a Windows 2003 Box? 3. Will Exchange 5.5 Upgrade to Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Box or Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003 work on a Windows 2003 Box that is in a Windows 2000 AD Domain or a Windows 2003 Would appreciate any assistance. Or if you could let me know what's the best migration path to make it easier. :) Thanks for your help in advance! *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do
OWA - NLB
Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from what Ive found so far I can only do NLB with W2K Adv svr...Is there a way to load NLB to W2K svr standard? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA - NLB
Thanks..actually I am about to replace my main switches... Might you have an Idea which cisco units could do this PS to All...Actually you can add NLB to W2K stantard..BUT you must purchase Application Center 2000..which has NLB as one of it's components..and well then you have to purchase sometype of license cause you are now auth to 1 but hitting many. the cost of all this work out to be cheaper to purchase Adv Svr... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB You could do it if you use Cisco and or Alteon Load balancing switches to do Harware balanacing but costs may be the same as upgrading to enterprise version of Exchange. Soemthing to consider. From: Bolser, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:07:08 -0400 Only supported on Win2k advanced server: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/windows2000serv/Default.asp It's listed under Increased Scalability -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - NLB Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from what Ive found so far I can only do NLB with W2K Adv svr...Is there a way to load NLB to W2K svr standard? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA - NLB
thanks..already did so..just wondering if you had any more input on model's thanks all bill -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB You would have to contact the vendor and explain what your trying to accomplish and get the latest info. Hardware -vs- Network load balancing both have their place. From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:24:45 -0400 Thanks..actually I am about to replace my main switches... Might you have an Idea which cisco units could do this PS to All...Actually you can add NLB to W2K stantard..BUT you must purchase Application Center 2000..which has NLB as one of it's components..and well then you have to purchase sometype of license cause you are now auth to 1 but hitting many. the cost of all this work out to be cheaper to purchase Adv Svr... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB You could do it if you use Cisco and or Alteon Load balancing switches to do Harware balanacing but costs may be the same as upgrading to enterprise version of Exchange. Soemthing to consider. From: Bolser, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:07:08 -0400 Only supported on Win2k advanced server: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/windows2000serv/Default.asp It's listed under Increased Scalability -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - NLB Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from what Ive found so far I can only do NLB with W2K Adv svr...Is there a way to load NLB to W2K svr standard? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA - NLB
Yeh Im finding thatI was just maybe thinking since I was going to get the new switches maybe I could also get some small NLB for not too many more kinda throw into the cisco switch..etc... Really all I want to do it NLB 2 - WWW and 2 - TS thanks bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB This isn't a standard Cisco switch thing. You would need a Cisco load balancer. Though I would probably look at F5 first. BTW, these kinds of things are $$$ -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Thanks..actually I am about to replace my main switches... Might you have an Idea which cisco units could do this PS to All...Actually you can add NLB to W2K stantard..BUT you must purchase Application Center 2000..which has NLB as one of it's components..and well then you have to purchase sometype of license cause you are now auth to 1 but hitting many. the cost of all this work out to be cheaper to purchase Adv Svr... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB You could do it if you use Cisco and or Alteon Load balancing switches to do Harware balanacing but costs may be the same as upgrading to enterprise version of Exchange. Soemthing to consider. From: Bolser, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:07:08 -0400 Only supported on Win2k advanced server: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/windows2000serv/Default.asp It's listed under Increased Scalability -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - NLB Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from what Ive found so far I can only do NLB with W2K Adv svr...Is there a way to load NLB to W2K svr standard? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 - upgd/mig...
Q to all...after reading part of this thread and being in the boat of starting to plan my migration and just reading some of the FAQ's with regard to: Exchange 2003 server. And the only other option is called the leap frog migration. You configure the Active Directory Connector (ADC) for Exchange 2003 between the Active Directory and Exchange 5.5 Directory Service. Install a new Exchange 2003 server into the enterprise and move the Exchange 5.5 users to Exchange 2003. Would/is this say similar/akin to doing like Ed's server move method...in that I guess my main concern would be to keep the SIS of the exch DB's?? add your just moving over the users mailbox's to the new server...??? Also does anyone know if MS plan's to produce a tool to do a direct type upgrade from 55 to E2k3? thanks bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Exchange 5.5 is not supported on Windows 2003 server. I don't even know if it would work. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Martin, I guess I didn't phrase it right. If I install Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2003 Server will that work in an NT 4.0 Domain Architecture? Thank again. Mario -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 You are going to need to get your AD infrastructure in place before you think about upgrading your Exchange server to anything other than 5.5. So the simple answer is no. You must have AD. As for your other question, Exchange 2003 will install on W2K or W2K3, but to take advantage of features like RPC over HTTP, you will need Windows 2003. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Martin, Thanks for your response. Another Question: When you say build the new Exchange Server Install 2003 and move the Mailboxes, are you saying install Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2003 box? But will that work in an NT 4.0 Domain Environment? Remember, we are still on a NT 4.0 Domain Structure and moving to AD. Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 1. Yes 2. No 3. You cant directly upgrade Exchange 5.5 to 2003. If you need to keep Exchange on the same hardware you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K, then upgrade 5.5 to 2000, then upgrade 2003 to 2003, the upgrade the OS to 2003 if you choose. The better solution would be to get a new Exchange server, install 2003 and move the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 Have a few questions: We are currently about to start a Migration to AD. We have a Exchange 5.5 Server on a Windows NT 4 box. We are moving the Exchange 5.5 Server to a Windows 2000 Box due to limitation on the Old Hardware. After our AD Migration we are going to upgrade to Exchange 2000 I have a few questions that I was wondering if anyone can help. 1. Will Windows 2003 Work in an Windows 2000 AD Environment 2. Will Exchange 5.5 Work on a Windows 2003 Box? 3. Will Exchange 5.5 Upgrade to Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Box or Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003 work on a Windows 2003 Box that is in a Windows 2000 AD Domain or a Windows 2003 Would appreciate any assistance. Or if you could let me know what's the best migration path to make it easier. :) Thanks for your help in advance! *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Server
I like the new ML530G2 I got (for my sql app)...12 HS drive bay's room for the DLT drive...it's sweet... 6304 raid card did I mention it's fast??? it is Ok it hurt putting it in the rack alone now to just get one for exchange and retire the ML350... I woyuld bet the failure on the 15k drives it heat...especially in s 380 tight...more fans -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Server A Compaq DL380 G2 (G3 would be better) with one or two CPUs, 1GB of ram Two 36GB drives in RAID1 for OS, swap, exchange logs (not the greatest, but OK for 100 users) However many 72GB in RAID5 for exchange store. My personal opinion is to avoid 15K drives - we've had a couple of these fail. -Original Message- From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Server Hi All Just a quick question, we currently have Exchange 5.5 on a dinosaur of a server. We have just started to use scripts and its forever hanging. We want to upgrade to Exchange 2000 and a new server. What spec server would you get for stableness and resilience i.e. processing power, HD space, Memory, Raid etc if you need it for- 100 Users in which are all heavily dependant on email as we are becoming more of an internet and email company Quite a few mail shots to all our clients per week Running a few scripts daily Cheers for input and advice Vas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
right but the bad thing is it sound's like you had/have your exchange server directly open to the internet bill -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet The good thing is that I've recently been testing a VPN concentrator for remote connectivity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
ok let me see if I read you right here.. you have your exchange server 55 open to the internet...SO a user can directly access it using OL..with NO VPN or other.. just direct??? which means you have 135-139 open to the internet??? (amoung possible other ports??) AND Now these users can't connect to the exchange server with their OL? OR do you mean you are on some type of WAN, VPN ..etc bill -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. Thanks for any ideas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - IMSS white list from exch
Has anyone done a white list for/in Trend IMSS where.the white list would be populated from the exchange server? i.e. the valid smtp addresses used/setup in the exchange server just a Q right now exch55sp4+post/nt4sp6a+post thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Ill throw in 2 cent on this thread. starting with W2k3 MS has ripped the TS CAL out of XP - W2k Pro.. YOU must! purchasing it at like 80.00 per TS - CAL now if your still running W2k..that's another story...and you have been..umm grandfathered provided you where running W2K TS and those w2k-xp pro machine had been using TS Now the above may have changed since like march -may when they told me all this at a MS thingy for Partners reselling..etc... prior to w2k3 svr release.umm yes I gave them pleny O stuff on this Now..for my environment here...which is primary sales..at this time I choose NOT to let my guy's VPN with there laptops.. evey remote type user uses Citrix-TS session's..work's very well...I is easy to walk anybody thru setup's problems..etc...likely way easier then if I had all those VPN tunnels... BUT true in the future to get more functionallity to my sales guy's those with Laptops will get VPN tunnels. For those home office users..they will continue with TS- Citrix sessions it depends on Yours and your business needs etc.. depending on what you will design to get the functionality to your users Im finding I will have soem type of hybrid..to meet the requirements of my Org.. PS the TS- Citrix stuff..Man I can deploy a new office anywhere in the world in no time..all I need is an internet connection..bang you have everything you need.. bill -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Thoughts from his manager? lol As in all of these things, it depends on the company. Simple is relative term and troubleshooting VPN issues with remote users can be a headache in itself. I could easily argue that using the NFUSE web interface to access Citrix is a heck of lot easier to walk Joe Salesguy through at his hotel rather than trying to figure out why he cant connect to the VPN. One another note, since hopefully most corporate laptops are using W2k or XP, there are no requirements to buy TS CALS to access a Terminal Server. At least for now. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:53 AM Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue I would disagree. Lets say Joe Salesguy is on a flight. He is working on a big sales proposal that needs to go out ASAP. He is meeting with the company the next day. Using OL with offline folders he is able to go over past conversations regarding the clients needs and thoughts from his manager. Then he is able to write the proposal, and have everything ready. He lands, gets to his hotel, connects to the net, initiates the VPN and the mail is on its way. His work is done and everyone is happy. You could do this with TS, it would just mean a little more work. I guess what my thinking is, is why invest all this extra money in TS Cals or Citrix CAL's and ask everyone to completely change the way they work when all you really need is a VPN. It would probably cost less and be much more user friendly. No changes to their work flow, just a simple icon they click on after they connect. Your solution is totally viable. I just don't see the point in asking everyone to change their workflow for what is really a quite simple problem and solution. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue If you dont have an Internet or RAS connection your not getting anywhere regardless of your e-mail client. You have to copy files to your local drive to work on them in any case and thats not really an issue with Terminal anymore and its very simple with Citrix. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's what I kept thinking -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Makes laptop use a little tough though. From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there is a positive ROI. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange
RE: Sobig.F alert
Ok so Ive got this Q...some of the article say's about it downloading this Trojan from some server out there OK so..like does this then mean..that somebody has decompiled this puppy and found this out OK wouldn't they have found out where this server out there is? domain name? ip? somthing? just Q bill -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=1211e=1u=/nm/20030822/tc_ nm/tech_internet_virus_dcsid=95573372 -Original Message- From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sobig.F alert FYI... http://www.f-secure.com/news/items/news_2003082200.shtml _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sobig.F alert
beer please.Oh and bring the BBQ rib's too... -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert T-minus 10 minutes . Its the end of the world run for your lives... -Original Message- From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Yes it is. Since we are not sure what the payload is, we patched for the new MDAC security patch. Hey, who knows? Better to be safe than sorry. T-minus 20 minutes. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Oh crap, I didn't think that anyone actually hooked Skynet up to the internet. T-Minus 30 minutes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=1211e=1u=/nm/20030822 /tc_nm/tech_internet_virus_dcsid=95573372 -Original Message- From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sobig.F alert FYI... http://www.f-secure.com/news/items/news_2003082200.shtml _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sobig.F alert
well's that where My q came inChris even put up a piece which said they new about 20 servers ..18 OFFL, 2 ONL so then they have ID'd these things right? why not publish the IP and/or the domain names ..so people could block these too... it just say's about UDP port ..couldnt that also change on the fly? bill -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert wouldve been nice for them to publish the IP list so we could block it from our firewalls. Incoming and outgoing. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert If only Arnold wasn't running for governor. We could send him back in time to stop Skynet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steck, Herb Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert As if we all didn't have enough to do? -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert T-minus 10 minutes . Its the end of the world run for your lives... -Original Message- From: Sagert, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Yes it is. Since we are not sure what the payload is, we patched for the new MDAC security patch. Hey, who knows? Better to be safe than sorry. T-minus 20 minutes. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Oh crap, I didn't think that anyone actually hooked Skynet up to the internet. T-Minus 30 minutes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=1211e=1u=/nm/20030822 /tc_nm/tech_internet_virus_dcsid=95573372 -Original Message- From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sobig.F alert FYI... http://www.f-secure.com/news/items/news_2003082200.shtml _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Re-install Exchange 5.5
password crack the exchange service account then FAQ for Ed's server move method. 2 cents' bill -Original Message- From: Dolphin, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re-install Exchange 5.5 Yup! Inherited server...I have service account rights to the site and server but only admin rights to the recipients. I am able to pretty much do everything I need to do but the time has come to stop putting off a re-install. Can anyone reccommend or point me through a walkthrough on re-installing exchange. I would like to look at as many points of reference as possible. Or if anyone has some personal experience they can share I'll take that too! We have only one server/one site/10 public folders for calenders/90 email recipients. Exchange 5.5 SP4. Pretty basic setup...Thanks all! JD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
You mean in Viruswall.. right cause I cant find any type setting in the IMSS product...and tech support was clueless on it bill -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Depends on what you have set in the configuration. If you have it set to NOT look inside zip files, they come right through. I have it set to look inside the zip files and it rips out the blocked extensions, even when renamed. When user's complain about it, I tell them to Password Protect the zip file and they are happy. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:18 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? sorry my bad...Im running IMSS515..never loaded the viruswall since IMSS was supposed to be the better..updated version at least that is what trend told me... I might just load up virus wall and see... As a note: Scanmail also let's thing thru that are ZIP'd..i.e. EXetc. in zip files even though you might block them at attachments... -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Depends on the version I suppose, but the 3.7 and 3.8 Unix versions kill the files -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? interesting that the NT product does -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? VirusWall for Unix doesn't pass that through - in fact, I'm on a call with a user about it now. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I wish Trends IMSS would DO this with the IMSS..if you zip it up it comes right thru... so you could send all the EXE's etc...you like to your friends.. it's a bummer bill -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? It's known behavior (i.e. default and Symantec knows about it). If you want someone to send you a zip file that contains a file with an extension you are blocking, you can either have them password-protect it (which Symantec can't scan - assuming you are not blocking encrypted containers), or have them rename the file in the zip. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Subject: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm
RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
I wish Trends IMSS would DO this with the IMSS..if you zip it up it comes right thru... so you could send all the EXE's etc...you like to your friends.. it's a bummer bill -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? It's known behavior (i.e. default and Symantec knows about it). If you want someone to send you a zip file that contains a file with an extension you are blocking, you can either have them password-protect it (which Symantec can't scan - assuming you are not blocking encrypted containers), or have them rename the file in the zip. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Subject: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
interesting that the NT product does -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? VirusWall for Unix doesn't pass that through - in fact, I'm on a call with a user about it now. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I wish Trends IMSS would DO this with the IMSS..if you zip it up it comes right thru... so you could send all the EXE's etc...you like to your friends.. it's a bummer bill -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? It's known behavior (i.e. default and Symantec knows about it). If you want someone to send you a zip file that contains a file with an extension you are blocking, you can either have them password-protect it (which Symantec can't scan - assuming you are not blocking encrypted containers), or have them rename the file in the zip. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Subject: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
sorry my bad...Im running IMSS515..never loaded the viruswall since IMSS was supposed to be the better..updated version at least that is what trend told me... I might just load up virus wall and see... As a note: Scanmail also let's thing thru that are ZIP'd..i.e. EXetc. in zip files even though you might block them at attachments... -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Depends on the version I suppose, but the 3.7 and 3.8 Unix versions kill the files -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? interesting that the NT product does -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? VirusWall for Unix doesn't pass that through - in fact, I'm on a call with a user about it now. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I wish Trends IMSS would DO this with the IMSS..if you zip it up it comes right thru... so you could send all the EXE's etc...you like to your friends.. it's a bummer bill -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? It's known behavior (i.e. default and Symantec knows about it). If you want someone to send you a zip file that contains a file with an extension you are blocking, you can either have them password-protect it (which Symantec can't scan - assuming you are not blocking encrypted containers), or have them rename the file in the zip. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Subject: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
I think that is the answer to the universe... -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. OK you win. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 3 Layers of Virus protection. 42. - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:40 AM Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. We use 3. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
yes. but the soup is included with the lunch special -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Ill take the beef and broccoli, and the fried rice. Do I have to pay extra for the egg fu yung? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Actually, I think you get two engines of your choice for free, and beyond that they cost extra. -Peter -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Check with Sybari, but I believe that when you license Antigen you get one engine license included. Hunter -Original Message- From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Does that mean I will have to buy minimum 2 antivirus product if only using Sybari for the framework? 1 antivirus vendor because I need its engine (eg Norman) and another 1 is Sybari because I need its framework. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2003 1:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Sybari focused on developing the application framework. Virus engines are provided by several 3rd party vendors. There are a number of settings which can be tweaked with regards to scanning bias to make tradeoffs between speed and scanning when using multiple engines. -Original Message- From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:06 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Pardon my ignorance here about Sybari product. Doesn't it have its propriery engine - why use Sophos and Norman Data Defense engine in this instance? Or perhaps, Sybari has to depend on 3rd party's AV engine ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Three here as well. Sybari running Sophos engine on the protocol servers (all SMTP mail passes through them, they are in an NLB cluster) Mailbox Servers have Sybari with Norman Data Defense Desktops have NAI McAfee (Spam is marked by spam assassin on a couple of Linux boxes that sit in front of the protocol servers) -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. We have three on most of our customers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Tony Hlabse Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
well when my dad was a kid...a milk shake cost 10 cent's and we liked it! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I remember as a kid during the summertime. We would be outside throwing rocks at cars when you would hear the jingle of the ice cream man. Back then $5 would get you a snow cone and a good sized bag of weed. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. That's how I remember it. I love Antigen. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Actually, I think you get two engines of your choice for free, and beyond that they cost extra. -Peter -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Check with Sybari, but I believe that when you license Antigen you get one engine license included. Hunter -Original Message- From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Does that mean I will have to buy minimum 2 antivirus product if only using Sybari for the framework? 1 antivirus vendor because I need its engine (eg Norman) and another 1 is Sybari because I need its framework. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2003 1:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Sybari focused on developing the application framework. Virus engines are provided by several 3rd party vendors. There are a number of settings which can be tweaked with regards to scanning bias to make tradeoffs between speed and scanning when using multiple engines. -Original Message- From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:06 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Pardon my ignorance here about Sybari product. Doesn't it have its propriery engine - why use Sophos and Norman Data Defense engine in this instance? Or perhaps, Sybari has to depend on 3rd party's AV engine ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. Three here as well. Sybari running Sophos engine on the protocol servers (all SMTP mail passes through them, they are in an NLB cluster) Mailbox Servers have Sybari with Norman Data Defense Desktops have NAI McAfee (Spam is marked by spam assassin on a couple of Linux boxes that sit in front of the protocol servers) -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. We have three on most of our customers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Tony Hlabse Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
Ok when I used to run GS45 on my exch55.. 1.) It scanned everything in the system...I believe it was at the IS type level...SO it scanned every internal message sent and every incoming and out going from Exchange... SO If I had aliases..which I had a couple..it scanned for me It might/should stop clean something if it was set that way...i.e. is should grab the virusesIf your using the content filer part it should grab thatit most times did for me... that was a while ago...I went with another software...but that's what's still in my memory about GS45 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield I know this is not a 100% exchange question. We are running 5.5 and Groupshield. If someone sends an email to an alias on the system, would Groupshield stop it? We have a user that claims that he is getting email at his real address that is infected with viruses. This email gets bounced off the exchange server through an alias. Any help would be appreciated. Tigue __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
when in dough ghost a known good, over right known bad? -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available tried that...still did not fix it for us..made it worse for the particular client -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available We recently had a problem as well. The resolution was do de-install tcpip and re-install on the workstation having the issue. Have no idea why that would fix it, but it worked in our cases. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available I've had the same problem with a couple of my workstations herecan do nslookup to exchange server, ping, map a drive, via unc, changed rpc binding order on the workstation, can have the user move to another machine in same office works fine, move to another xp machine works fineetc, etc...ultimately had to reinstall xp. Something is going on with outlook2002 and xpthis is not the only email we've had on this problem... john -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange (5.5) server not available This is very strange and I'm at a complete loss as to what the problem is. As of yesterday, 3 out of 53 computers all connected the same or similar way with the same OS and Outlook client... are encountering one or more of the following problems: Server: Exchange Server 5.5 with latest patches Workstations: Windows 2000 with SP3 or 4 - all patched for Blaster worm. Outlook 2002 1. Very long delays in viewing messages at times (though quite often). The message, Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange Server appears and requires a very long time before it completes. It's like being on a very slow MODEM connection. I have sense attempted to re-establish the client connection by removing their profile. Upon entering the client name and clicking check name, the workstation can no longer see the Exchange server at all. 2. Connecting a client (Outlook connecting to Exchange Server setting) is impossible. Typing the user name and clicking check name takes over 5 minutes before the message, Exchange Server unavailable appears or Outlook could not log on. Check to make sure you are connected to the network and are using the proper server and mailbox name. All systems can browse the Internet and also ping the MS Exchange server and telnet to port 25 on the Exchange Server from both internally and externally. I've attempted connecting to the Server's name, its specific IP address... nothing seems to work from Outlook or its client configuration program. What has happened since last Wednesday that is causing problems on only 3 of 53 workstations? I'm at a loss!! Help please! SDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filtering pif and scr
I believe you can Demo both Trend Products and Antigen..by going to their respective web sites..etc Me Id get something on that box fast...that's just me... -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Filtering pif and scr Exchange 5.5 NT4 We are getting a lots of attachment with pif and scr today. We do not any third party filtering software install yet. Can I filter this extension with Exchange? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
Good Technology...Rocks! Ive got , my sales guy's love it..like almost 100% itergration with OL/Exchange once the unit is setup the only time I have to recradle the unit is to do a software upgrade to the unit.. USA Only a this time..OK it work in Sao Paulo Brazil RIM - BB Im also demoing the BB BES server for coverage outside the USA BES..ONLY sync's E-mail and Calendar..at this time all else MUST be cradled to sync - Intellisync... Im not thrilled with the BES...they say they will have Contacts and other Wireless sync by Q1 of 2004... It's no comparison to Good...Now of course the Good device doesn't have a browser at this time.. each has it's thing bill -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Blackberry (RIM) Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service? Or does anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology? With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service. Thanks! The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
it's what happens when you've beer goggled too much... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution What's a google? From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:25:43 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution Search on Google. I have seen products like that before. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
Remeber with the Pocket PC devices..battery life bites.. with the 957 I can get a solid 5 day of heavy usage without recharge for the G100..they said a day or maybe two less. with the my BES demo server and 6710 (GSM and phone) I get about 2 maybe 3 day's minimal phone usage..mainly stand by remember to balance user exp Note it's NOT a total 100% sync. for example Ive got my people on MB restriction's...now this can be a pain..SInce! the delted Items at this time do NOT sync i.e. when my guy's hit their limit..they cant clean it out..Ive got to do them a favor. and do it... Yes it's supposed to come down the pike at some point... the Word, excel, PDF view cap is cool..but watch your bill's I got some seriously huge bill's for users running over their monthly MB plan...so choose your plan's carefully.. I do have to give Cing / Good Kudo's for giving steep discounts on those users... I didnt have to pay those 1500+ per user bill's..they disc it nicely... Also Note: Good can now directly do this setup without Cing and it can be a bit less $$$ bill -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM) Any work on when they would be able to do pocketPC devices? I would rather wait till then to move. -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM) Same here, Goodlink ROCKS! We started out with 4 handhelds in our IT department under BES and slowly moved up to 7 with sales execs. Then they started wanting to be able to view Word memos attached to emails. We ran into Good at Interop about that time and were hooked as soon as we saw the software. We converted in January as soon as Cingular made nearly free upgrades available (give you the server and base handheld licenses for the cost of 1 year support we would buy anyway). We have never looked back. 100% wireless sync, basic attachment viewing, and soon support for the Treo 600, and PocketPC smartphones. Several of our users, myself included, are really looking forward to the Treo/Palm and PocketPC phone support to just carry a single device around for email and phone use. --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM) Good Technology...Rocks! Ive got , my sales guy's love it..like almost 100% itergration with OL/Exchange once the unit is setup the only time I have to recradle the unit is to do a software upgrade to the unit.. USA Only a this time..OK it work in Sao Paulo Brazil RIM - BB Im also demoing the BB BES server for coverage outside the USA BES..ONLY sync's E-mail and Calendar..at this time all else MUST be cradled to sync - Intellisync... Im not thrilled with the BES...they say they will have Contacts and other Wireless sync by Q1 of 2004... It's no comparison to Good...Now of course the Good device doesn't have a browser at this time.. each has it's thing bill -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Blackberry (RIM) Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service? Or does anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology? With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service. Thanks! The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Ah thanks Miles...well then that would leave me out as I am Open... Oh well just have to wait for the media. thanks bill -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Actually you can unless you are under an open license. If you are on open, you have to order the media kit. Here is the link for select and enterprise. Note you will need your contract info to register for access. Select and Enterprise licenses: https://licensing.microsoft.com/eLicense/L1033/default.asp Once logged in click on the downloads link on the left hand frame. Then you can search for the iso by product. --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 that's what I kind'a figured..but since there was that post about there being one.. but little detail given..I figured Id at least try and see... my poor rep... thanks martin bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 There is no site on MS that you can do that. MSDN maybe, but that's not what you want. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FYI: I contacted my MS rep for the URL and they gave me the eopen.microsoft.com which appears to be basically useless to download.. and While I like my MS rep he had no clue on any of this so IF anyone else could shed some light that would be appreciated thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site where you can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products. You can contact your MS rep to get the URL. You'll need to be added as a user to the site, so contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have this done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
well yours is definitely bigger then mine -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
dont do the BLB... IMHO If I needed this Id use exmerge and write the script to do it that way 2 cents bill PS see the FAQ on BLB -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
that's what I kind'a figured..but since there was that post about there being one.. but little detail given..I figured Id at least try and see... my poor rep... thanks martin bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 There is no site on MS that you can do that. MSDN maybe, but that's not what you want. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FYI: I contacted my MS rep for the URL and they gave me the eopen.microsoft.com which appears to be basically useless to download.. and While I like my MS rep he had no clue on any of this so IF anyone else could shed some light that would be appreciated thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site where you can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products. You can contact your MS rep to get the URL. You'll need to be added as a user to the site, so contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have this done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions
RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
yes at 300 baudI cant understand why it wont generate anything...Ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Over dialup? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Looking up c1041722 in Technet yields a number of hits. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Hello All. Still having a problem viewing Mailbox Rights for users. When I click on the Mailbox Rights... button under the Exchange Advanced tab, I get the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service could not find the specified object ID no: c1041722 Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension Any ideas? Please help. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
I can do some large number with it but only really in to file mode -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I am not doing BLB. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 You're not going to get a gig a minute on BLB's regardless of the HW. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange server). I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. Raj -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
thanks that would be me..as I am my staff ;-) I will contact myreseller..agha thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site where you can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products. You can contact your MS rep to get the URL. You'll need to be added as a user to the site, so contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have this done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: AV/Spam scanning services
consider this Ive got the trend suite + IMSS (SMTP gateway product) Now beside's Martin's list of danger (See FAQ) Ive add a bunch of other stuff. i.e. Ive set it pretty aggressively. here's what I came into this morning: , -- From: System Attendant Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:24:52 AM To: Administrator Subject:[MailServer Notification] To Administrator a virus was found and action taken. Auto forwarded by a Rule ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message details were: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = Brea;[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Subject = MOTHER PC CHIPS Scanning time = 08/05/2003 03:24:50 Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002/598 Action taken on message: The message body contained JS_FORTNIGHT virus. ScanMail deleted the message body. Warning to administrator. ScanMail has detected a virus. Who: Brea;[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 08/05/2003 Time: 03:24 AM Type: scheduled scan Now Ive got to go check me IMSS to why it made it past... But if I had, had NO AV on my exchange box Id be infected!! In Fact! before I loaded the trend exchange AV, I had another companies AV...and well when I loaded the trend It found a bunch of viruses which where hang'in around If I could justify the Antigen AV for exchange..IN A heart beat... In fact Im looking to made change my AV lic and setup to try in squeeze in the Antigen.. Also Note: IF you only use a gateway AV..what happens when I user brings something in from Home...they will dispite company policy. Viruses thru web site's..you get block them all... Once it's inside you'd be screwed... I personally would not run a Exchange server without it..in fact same for any mail server... but then that's me It's going to cost you more when something slip's by..it time then the intial capital cost and yearly service/subscription cost..etc My 2 cents bill ,, I'm considering going with an outside SPAM/AV company. However, my manager feels that we don't need to put AV on our Exchange server if we do...so I am considering going just with AV/SPAM on our Exchange server and keeping everything in house. I was considering using MX Logic Defense Level 3 and using Antigen on Exchange server. I can't convince him that both would be the way to go...both meaning SPAM/AV outside and AV on Exchange. Now, I am considering just Antigen with the SPAM agent added to it. Anyone got any good points about having both SPAM/AV outside and AV on Exchange that I can bring up to my boss so he can see the added value? His points were...you mean they won't be able to do it as well as we can...then we need to not use them! Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services I see the outsourced AV as another layer that gives me greater defense in depth (I have Trend on every platform). Also their use of multiple and different AV scan engines gives me another (admittedly small) edge. I'll take whatever edge I can get, having been hosed by Iluv you and Funlove. One of my concerns about using this type of service is latency. How much longer does it take a message to get through? Are any of the vendors better or worse in this regard? Michael -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 6:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services My point is that you're spending money on an internal AV product for mail (i.e. ScanMail or Antigen) plus the second layer at the gateway - either internal or external. My caution is geared towards those who think that they ONLY need the outsourcer for AV. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AV/Spam scanning services It's not necessarily about saving money though right? Scanning at the gateway (in-house or outsourced) can be a valid additional level of protection. A significant number of our customers use some form of gateway scanner[1] in addition to their server and desktop based AV solutions. [1] MessageLabs, MailSweeper, Trend's Instercan, et al. From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 07:10:22 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services There are some discussions of a few of them in the archives. Personally, I'm not a fan of outsourced anti-spam, but that's in part because we're a heavily email dependent company and so we can justify the expense of in house measures to combat those issues. As a side
RE: Windows 2000 Backup
ummm that's my stapler... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup Didn't you get the memo? Um.yeah, it's just that we're putting new coversheets on all the TPS reports now before they go out. So if you could do that... it would be great. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:20 PM Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Backup Sorry for the confusion I caused. I mean the W2k NTBackup that comes with Windows 2000 Advanced Server when Exchange 2000 is loaded you can see the BL or mailboxes. Seems from your message that you use the backup that comes with WIN2k server. How does it work for you. My management wants the BLBs and I want to know if anyone used the W2k NTBackup for this? Thanks -Original Message- From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Backup Hello Samantha: In my opinion, BLBs are not worth 2 cents! NTBackup doesn't do BLBs, as Chris said, however, you could use ExMerge to export VIP mailboxes (as someone else posted earlier). We use W2k NTBackup to disk then another scheduler to write that E2k data to tape and it works very well. Make sure you have a well-documented restore procedure to go with your backup plans and understanding all the different restore scenarios (and steps) is key as well. Good luck! -Juancho NT backup doesn't do BLBs. It wasn't engineered by Veritas to have that level of uselessness. You'll need to waste good money to get that kind of inefficiency. From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:20:20 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Windows 2000 Backup Hello All. I noticed that Exchange 2000 can be backed up using the Windows 2000 Backup. Anyone had any experience with this? It looks like it does BLB too! Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
FYI: I contacted my MS rep for the URL and they gave me the eopen.microsoft.com which appears to be basically useless to download.. and While I like my MS rep he had no clue on any of this so IF anyone else could shed some light that would be appreciated thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site where you can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products. You can contact your MS rep to get the URL. You'll need to be added as a user to the site, so contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have this done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe
OT-Exch-Trend 381 -IMSS - Lists?
Does anyone know if there are any list's for the Trend suite? Notability the Exchange piece 381 and/or IMSS 5x thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Availability Exchange 2000
sure but I wont ask why only 3 drives for such a killer box which per the one Im getting for my new sql app has 12 slot's avalable.. more spindles more speed... 45's..start the wayback machine insert 8 track...next floor 78's. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: High Availability Exchange 2000 How about we meet at the malt shop afterwards, do our hair and listen to some 45s? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:24 PM Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 That's a pretty nice server. That's what I have. First off, I would look at Exchange 2003 rather than 2000. Its high availability features are MUCH MUCH better than they were in past versions. So, what are your options? Well, Exchange doesn't mirror, so forget that. You could always go with Clustering which if we are not talking about E2K3, I wouldn't recommend either. SAN is another option. I'm not sure what your cause was for the issue this time, but one thing to remember, no matter what you use you will still have at least one point of failure, and that is the disk subsystem. So what happened anyways? -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 Thanks for the reply. What I have now is: One Server - Compaq ML530 Dual CPU 2GB RAM 3 drives at 36.4 each - RAID 5 Windows 2000 Advanced Server 1000 Mailboxes Samantha -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 Could you tell us a little bit about what you have now? Like what brand of hardware, model, and your current configuration? -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Availability Exchange 2000 Hello All. Little Background: Last week, Exchange 5.5 server went ka-poot early in the day and I was unable to recover the IS. We ended up losing 11 hours of data that was not on a backup tape. A key member of the management team has had the stance in the past that email is best-effort. I knew that would fly until the time that messages and calendar info was lost. I was right! Where there was no money before has come lots of money to make Exchange high availability. Amazing what a little data loss can produce...huh? Anyhoo, my task now is to find information about either SANs, Clustering, Mirroring Any suggestions or comments is always appreciated by you. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5
I personally found I had to enable the additional languages in the browser also.. bill -Original Message- From: Hans-Werner Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 5.5 Hi, today I set up OWA for our Exchange 5.5 Server. I copied all language packs to server but all Browsers show only USA english webpages even when the chosen language is german. Must I activate those language packs anywhere? Or what am I doing wrong? thx for your help -- Hans-Werner Franz http://tollernet.de http://jubis.tollernet.de http://trischa.tollernet.de http://nanuk.tollernet.de http://interspace-networks.de _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
For me I argued potential restore time. then there's the time it takes to back it all up... Also for my users over my WAN links..the smaller their mailboxes the faster it generates for them on their machines. then if I want to get crazy and use say exmerge as a kind'a of BLB .makes it more feasible then I would say maybe there's the load on the disk array...maybe... and so on bill -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of Best Practices or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get HUMONGOUS We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a Point of Discussion of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASPNoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or Limitations of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
RE: Routine Maintenance
me Im no guru like the other people here... so I let the server do it Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check Backup... my backup goes every night -full Backup...check done (note NO BLB!!) my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check done... My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R It run's run's and run's OK once it a great while I reboot it some times I look at my log's..some times I dont If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a while...or so... I try not to fix it if it aint broke... now where is that hammer.. bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routine Maintenance Hello All. Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what kind of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended. Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000/XP clients Thanks! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa exchange 5.5
the way I look at it..is IF i load anything new on a server then I should figure I need to re service pack it. especially anything which interacts that tightly with the OS actually you didnt need to bother with the 2.0 then 3.0 to 4.0 you could have jumped right to 4.0 on the option pack. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5 You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL security hot fixes. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa exchange 5.5 Hi all Just installed sp6a nt and sp4 on this server. IIS was not installed. Installed IIS and the nt 4.0 option pack for IIS 4.0. Everything went fine except I got serveral The ODBC resource DLL (c:\windows\system\odbcint.dll) is a different version than the ODBC driver manager (c:\windows\system\odbc32.dll). I went to the MDAC page at MS to download the correct versions but I must admit I am confused. Which one do I want to download. this server is NT 4.0 running exchange 5.5. I'm alsp assuming this is why IIS 4.0 will not run the default asp web MS installs. I keep getting 500 internal errors. Thanks for any Help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SQL
And remember time is money... bill -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL Sell the SQL box eBay. Use the proceeds to buy two new servers that are more appropriately sized to your environment. Have a beer. :) I doubt you'll have any performance issues, but you will at some point encounter downtime issues. In addition, you will be complicating your environment buy having two very complex services on one machine. It could make troubleshooting more difficult. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and SQL We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3 raid configurations with about 200 gb of hd space that's basically being used to run a 2 gb database for about 20 users that will never grow. My boss thinks we should move our exchange 5.5 server (about 120 users) to this box (going to Exchange 2000 in a few months) because it's not being utilized fully. Other than the if we lose SQL we lose Exchange theory, why else is this a bad idea? Thanks in advance, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SQL
to me if they are both mission critical app's leave them on separate boxes. why make your life harder and the potential failure for the business greater then it needs to be... machine are inexpensivetime is not... my shop it about that same sizeI wouldn't do it...I like the KISS principal .. to me certain things just should be shared... maybe in an inexpensive DR home grown type thing, lab..etc...production..no thanks bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL Move Exchange to this box, move SQL to the old Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and SQL We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3 raid configurations with about 200 gb of hd space that's basically being used to run a 2 gb database for about 20 users that will never grow. My boss thinks we should move our exchange 5.5 server (about 120 users) to this box (going to Exchange 2000 in a few months) because it's not being utilized fully. Other than the if we lose SQL we lose Exchange theory, why else is this a bad idea? Thanks in advance, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email
I'm a simpleton.. but from your description it sounds to me like you have each and every client workstation pop'ing their mail from your third party... We do not have IMS running on Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet email for years. maybe your third party updated/changed something? maybe it may thinks your trying to relay thru them (I've had troubles with covad's mail servers think that on occasion) maybe a quick telnet to the POP and SMTP server on the third party to see if you can communicate with it in general?? just some ideas bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email What does the NDR say? -Original Message- From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:19 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Internet Email Subject: Internet Email This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search function. I use Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. We have our email hosted by a third party but use Exchange locally. Monday I came in and for some reason no one can send internet email anymore. Receiving it is fine but sending it generates a Non Delivery Report immediately after clicking on Send. I did not change anything on Exchange the weekend prior. I have searched many discussions and cannot find an answer that pertains to our problem. Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
I agree totally with Ed...and avoid too many app's on one box (I've got boxes with just 1 app that's a pain) I recently did have to do such a thing..(and break my own person rule of never!) W2K Svr, (DHCP, F/P, IIS) sp2+sp2postfixes faxination Device (fax ports back to my Faxsvr) Surfcontrol Web filter Trend Server Protect Trend Office Corp (for local user AV, mng..etc) APC pwrchute for UPS VNC DL380, int RAID, dual 36GB, 1.5GB RAM... doesn't sound bad does it??? ummwish that was the case...does it finally run?? Yes..stable? 95% (that's good for all that fluff there), actually Ill jinx myself...it's just been running..took 3 loadeds to get it just sobut one app requires I mess with it manually cause it's config interface doesnt want to run right..pain... Hey it's an offcie of like 12 people, if it survives and goes to more people..will I put in another box and divide it up ...you bet! in a heart beat... But it will definately depend on the app's and how the play together... Would I do it from the start for say 30+ people..no way...share some ..yes..totally no.. especially if it's got to communicate with other machine on the end of some WAN type thingy 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server I don't personally like the idea but it's what Small Business Server is all about, albeit for a smaller office population. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions All, Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300 users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works just fine, but now the CTO wants to start doing an Office in a Box concept - where we load tons of additional apps on this server. Sort of like Small Business Server - but with additional licenses (more than 50), and not all the apps are Microsoft. I thought we were being a bit risky having Exchange on the same server as a DC, DNS, and DHCP. Does anyone have any advice on this? Bad idea? Terrible idea? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange
I dont have that many users myself...but I did a while ago and change to Trend's Suite of products Desktop-Servers-Exchange-IMSS(gateway) after having run Mcafee for 3 years here and looked at Symantec and Antigen, and a couple others.. IF I had the budget... Hands down I would have used Antigen for my Exchange and SMTP gateway. And Trend for everything else. As I sit I have trend for everything..and Must say I like it VERY much... features are really nice, product is good to excellent. I have only found one problem/feature with IMSS which is potentially a significant problem for me. I like it, Id use it again...I recommend itit's a very complete suite, and good preformance..etc. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange Hello All. Current Configuration: Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Advanced Server (One server) OWA CA AntiVirus CA ArcServe (w/blb) 19GB IS 900 Users Currently I run all services for Exchange on one server. I know, I know, and I have paid the price more than one late night coming in to reboot because services are failing. Most problems came when ArcServe started the brick-level backups (again I knowcannot convince Mgmt. to stop brick level backupseven with 30 day retention settings). When the BLB started it would knock out OWA or worse, slowing backups to a crawl taking 36 hours to do a brick level backup. Also, when doing virus updates, brick level backups would again fail. When it comes down to it, probably too many services running on one server. I have recently convinced my management to purchase another server for Exchange so that I may move some services from the primary server to a second server. The services that I will be moving to the additional server (additional server will be outside the firewallprimary server inside firewall) are OWA, IIS/HTTP, SSL, SMTP Gateway and the IMC. My question: I am not sure what kind of Antivirus and Antispam software to purchase and where to put it. As I understand it, Computer Assoc. does not sell a product that will scan just the IMC. Trend has a product called Interscan Messaging Security Suite that will scan the IMC box as mail comes and goes through it. Trend's ScanMail for Exchange scans the IS which is good but do I really need it if I am scanning on the second Exchange server IMC? I would appreciate your comments positive or negative. Thanks in advance! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Feedback
Ive used both Dell's and CPQ's..I like them both very well and service for both as always been good to excellent. Have messed with some IBM too and it also seems to be good.. Me I'll keep using the CPQ till HP mess's with the works...(since it's all CPQ here right now...)..then Ill go to Dell -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server Feedback Have not used Dell servers, but HP Proliant servers are excellent hardwares... Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cooke, Brian Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Server Feedback All, We're looking at our options for a new exchange server. On the hardware side of things we're leaning towards Dell. We have never used Dell before though, so I was curious if any one has any feedback as far as Dell servers are concerned and how their support is? Thanks in advance for all your responses. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
thanks No I was kind'a hoping they might add it to IMSS Dont know If I can get the $$$ Antigen..will have to see... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP Antigen will do it. I spoke to Trend about this yesterday and they said it is a limitation of the program (whatever that means). I would not look for them add any new features to their E55 versions of Scanmail. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
IMSS 5.12..true while it will allow attachment blocking. IF say the EXE in questions is zip'd up..NG it passes right thru It does get scanned for vireses...BUT hey...Im a bit of a dictator...NO EXE..etc.. period! in my system so now people have a way of getting around the EXEetc attachment block...just ZIP it up and it's in! bill -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP What version of Trend are you running? All of the versions I know about from Trend allow file blocking based on file extension. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
Death and Taxes = 100% -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Nothing in life is ever 100%. I would be worried about any company that claimed their product worked 100% of the time -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam edoxs blocks 0% legitimate messages because they verify all entries in their filter are spam. Regards, Orin -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Well, you can set up the spamfilter to quarantine the filtered messages for later review and if there should be a legitimate message it can be retrieved. I don't think there are any spamfilters which blocks 100% spam and 0% legitimate messages. Freddie -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2003 16:46 To: Exchange Discussions Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exch 55 pub cal Q
Sorry if this is been ans..before...havent found it on technet yet. a Calendar put in the PUBLIC FOLDERS ALL PUBLC FOLDERS I'd like to assign permissions based on groups to this cal... I even tried it NG..if I assign each user OK... Ex. But say I have 10 users in a group: GROUP1 and I assing GROUP1 permission to the cal... None of the 10 user can get to this cal... only if I assign usres one at a time. What am I missing here? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exch 55 pub cal Q
Unable Disp folderdo not have suff permissions on object.. What I dont know is if it should or shouldnt read into a GROUP to find the user object to then allow permission User object - OK GROUP - NG thanks bill -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exch 55 pub cal Q What error do they get? Is it a top level folder, or buried under others? Does the group receive permissions correctly on any other public folder? etc -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:27 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: exch 55 pub cal Q Subject: exch 55 pub cal Q Sorry if this is been ans..before...havent found it on technet yet. a Calendar put in the PUBLIC FOLDERS ALL PUBLC FOLDERS I'd like to assign permissions based on groups to this cal... I even tried it NG..if I assign each user OK... Ex. But say I have 10 users in a group: GROUP1 and I assing GROUP1 permission to the cal... None of the 10 user can get to this cal... only if I assign usres one at a time. What am I missing here? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP = Bad? -- SMTP = Good?
Depends on your company and what they need. Here: If it's E-Mail and if it does pass thru my Trend box first then to my Exchange box I don't allow it...Yes that includes Web based e-mail accounts too...I block all that too... IM blocked toomost downloading also...my list goes on but that's just here...I've been other place where its a free for alldepends on the company.. if they don't think of it as job security 0.02 bill -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP = Bad? -- SMTP = Good? List, This might be more appropriate for a firewall/security list but it involves email and I don't belong to one of those yet so I'll post my question here. I'm curious as to how many of your companies allow internal clients to access POP mail externally. The reason I'm asking is because I see POP mail as security risk. Let me explain. Our firewall strips all but a few attachments from our incoming SMTP email. With POP however attachments cannot be striped leaving a hole for new virus that aren't detectable yet by our virus software. I'm going to try to talk management into letting me block POP. Is blocking incoming POP something other company do? Is there some other way to secure incoming POP mail? Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Make him carry a pager...wire it too him so it can shock him. write a rule that forwards e-mails from identified VIPS to the pager. thus he will know about it when it forwards to the pagerprovided you wire him correctly.. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you
RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
so then..and Im sure Im a bit off... but say you have 125 users.standard exch(55)...the PRIV on a 15GB disk... (Exchnage main and PUB of different disks) if I gave each user say 100MB mail box... so 100MB * 125 users = 12.5GB (if all users are max'd out) which say would leave me ~ 2.5GB of free room on the 15GB disk... (no system space taken in too account for the example) now if say I set the SEND LIMIT at 75MB... Now here are some Q's 1.) NO...Send and Receive Limit if all users got mail bombedwouldnt if fill the 15GB disk and STOP exch? 2.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to say 100MB. if all users got mail bombed...wouldnt Exch keep running since the 15GB disk still has 2.5GB free??? Note yes users would scream and cry...whats new 3.) Am I miss calculating and - of miss understanding the SEND and RECEIVE potential 4.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to 4x the send limit (75MB) = 300MB then would it 125users * 300MB = 37.5GB wouldnt that exceed the HD space of 15GB and stop exchange??? thanks bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message I've set the prohibit receive limit for my users to be 4x $large_num (which also happens to be their prohibit send number), so they'd certainly be aware of problems _long_ before they hit a sending limit. I also monitor mailbox sizes and proactively take care of issues where a user is approaching limits. While the error message for this issue isn't particularly pretty, it's been the same since Exchange 4.0. With a proactive management style and well reasoned limits, I'm not sure that the actual text of the NDR should be of concern. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, May 24, 2003 7:51 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Exch55sp4 + postsp4 If you have the Prohibit Send and Receive limit set... AND the user is at the limit the person sending the user a message.get's a NDR about receiving user So from checking Technet (Q238498)..this would appear as the normal behavior Um my Q is thiswhy wouldn't it send a message type say User over quota...etc yeh..I know cause MS coded that way It just makes me think a bit..and I was just curious about what those of you more experienced with this beast..Think... anybody know if MS changed this type of thing in E2K3? it seems to me to make more understandable sense if it said the user was over quote..etc... thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
thanks! chris bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message 1. no send/receive limit is probably a bad idea. If one user got mailbombed it could stop Exchange for everyone. 2. The odds of all users being mail bombed is pretty low isn't it? 3. You've not taken into consideration SIS, but it's not necessarily all that important. 4. It would if you believe you have a legitimate threat of being mail bombed, but if that is the case then mailbox limits alone are insufficient protection and you should be looking to disk space monitors and performance related counters to help safeguard the integrity of the system. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:47 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message so then..and Im sure Im a bit off... but say you have 125 users.standard exch(55)...the PRIV on a 15GB disk... (Exchnage main and PUB of different disks) if I gave each user say 100MB mail box... so 100MB * 125 users = 12.5GB (if all users are max'd out) which say would leave me ~ 2.5GB of free room on the 15GB disk... (no system space taken in too account for the example) now if say I set the SEND LIMIT at 75MB... Now here are some Q's 1.) NO...Send and Receive Limit if all users got mail bombedwouldnt if fill the 15GB disk and STOP exch? 2.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to say 100MB. if all users got mail bombed...wouldnt Exch keep running since the 15GB disk still has 2.5GB free??? Note yes users would scream and cry...whats new 3.) Am I miss calculating and - of miss understanding the SEND and RECEIVE potential 4.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to 4x the send limit (75MB) = 300MB then would it 125users * 300MB = 37.5GB wouldnt that exceed the HD space of 15GB and stop exchange??? thanks bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message I've set the prohibit receive limit for my users to be 4x $large_num (which also happens to be their prohibit send number), so they'd certainly be aware of problems _long_ before they hit a sending limit. I also monitor mailbox sizes and proactively take care of issues where a user is approaching limits. While the error message for this issue isn't particularly pretty, it's been the same since Exchange 4.0. With a proactive management style and well reasoned limits, I'm not sure that the actual text of the NDR should be of concern. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, May 24, 2003 7:51 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Exch55sp4 + postsp4 If you have the Prohibit Send and Receive limit set... AND the user is at the limit the person sending the user a message.get's a NDR about receiving user So from checking Technet (Q238498)..this would appear as the normal behavior Um my Q is thiswhy wouldn't it send a message type say User over quota...etc yeh..I know cause MS coded that way It just makes me think a bit..and I was just curious about what those of you more experienced with this beast..Think... anybody know if MS changed this type of thing in E2K3? it seems to me to make more understandable sense if it said the user was over quote..etc... thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
P.S. Then why use the Send and Recieve Prohibit at all? why would one use it...??? bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message thanks! chris bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message 1. no send/receive limit is probably a bad idea. If one user got mailbombed it could stop Exchange for everyone. 2. The odds of all users being mail bombed is pretty low isn't it? 3. You've not taken into consideration SIS, but it's not necessarily all that important. 4. It would if you believe you have a legitimate threat of being mail bombed, but if that is the case then mailbox limits alone are insufficient protection and you should be looking to disk space monitors and performance related counters to help safeguard the integrity of the system. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:47 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message so then..and Im sure Im a bit off... but say you have 125 users.standard exch(55)...the PRIV on a 15GB disk... (Exchnage main and PUB of different disks) if I gave each user say 100MB mail box... so 100MB * 125 users = 12.5GB (if all users are max'd out) which say would leave me ~ 2.5GB of free room on the 15GB disk... (no system space taken in too account for the example) now if say I set the SEND LIMIT at 75MB... Now here are some Q's 1.) NO...Send and Receive Limit if all users got mail bombedwouldnt if fill the 15GB disk and STOP exch? 2.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to say 100MB. if all users got mail bombed...wouldnt Exch keep running since the 15GB disk still has 2.5GB free??? Note yes users would scream and cry...whats new 3.) Am I miss calculating and - of miss understanding the SEND and RECEIVE potential 4.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to 4x the send limit (75MB) = 300MB then would it 125users * 300MB = 37.5GB wouldnt that exceed the HD space of 15GB and stop exchange??? thanks bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message I've set the prohibit receive limit for my users to be 4x $large_num (which also happens to be their prohibit send number), so they'd certainly be aware of problems _long_ before they hit a sending limit. I also monitor mailbox sizes and proactively take care of issues where a user is approaching limits. While the error message for this issue isn't particularly pretty, it's been the same since Exchange 4.0. With a proactive management style and well reasoned limits, I'm not sure that the actual text of the NDR should be of concern. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, May 24, 2003 7:51 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Exch55sp4 + postsp4 If you have the Prohibit Send and Receive limit set... AND the user is at the limit the person sending the user a message.get's a NDR about receiving user So from checking Technet (Q238498)..this would appear as the normal behavior Um my Q is thiswhy wouldn't it send a message type say User over quota...etc yeh..I know cause MS coded that way It just makes me think a bit..and I was just curious about what those of you more experienced with this beast..Think... anybody know if MS changed this type of thing in E2K3? it seems to me to make more understandable sense if it said the user was over quote..etc... thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message
ok I get the second idea...but Im not clear on the mail loop -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message I use it to stop mail loops and keep departments from using a 'receive only' mailbox as a filing cabinet. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:08 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message P.S. Then why use the Send and Recieve Prohibit at all? why would one use it...??? bill -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message thanks! chris bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message 1. no send/receive limit is probably a bad idea. If one user got mailbombed it could stop Exchange for everyone. 2. The odds of all users being mail bombed is pretty low isn't it? 3. You've not taken into consideration SIS, but it's not necessarily all that important. 4. It would if you believe you have a legitimate threat of being mail bombed, but if that is the case then mailbox limits alone are insufficient protection and you should be looking to disk space monitors and performance related counters to help safeguard the integrity of the system. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:47 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message so then..and Im sure Im a bit off... but say you have 125 users.standard exch(55)...the PRIV on a 15GB disk... (Exchnage main and PUB of different disks) if I gave each user say 100MB mail box... so 100MB * 125 users = 12.5GB (if all users are max'd out) which say would leave me ~ 2.5GB of free room on the 15GB disk... (no system space taken in too account for the example) now if say I set the SEND LIMIT at 75MB... Now here are some Q's 1.) NO...Send and Receive Limit if all users got mail bombedwouldnt if fill the 15GB disk and STOP exch? 2.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to say 100MB. if all users got mail bombed...wouldnt Exch keep running since the 15GB disk still has 2.5GB free??? Note yes users would scream and cry...whats new 3.) Am I miss calculating and - of miss understanding the SEND and RECEIVE potential 4.) If I set the Send and Receive Limit to 4x the send limit (75MB) = 300MB then would it 125users * 300MB = 37.5GB wouldnt that exceed the HD space of 15GB and stop exchange??? thanks bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message I've set the prohibit receive limit for my users to be 4x $large_num (which also happens to be their prohibit send number), so they'd certainly be aware of problems _long_ before they hit a sending limit. I also monitor mailbox sizes and proactively take care of issues where a user is approaching limits. While the error message for this issue isn't particularly pretty, it's been the same since Exchange 4.0. With a proactive management style and well reasoned limits, I'm not sure that the actual text of the NDR should be of concern. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, May 24, 2003 7:51 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Subject: Q -Exch55 Prohibit SND/RCV message Exch55sp4 + postsp4 If you have the Prohibit Send and Receive limit set... AND the user is at the limit the person sending the user a message.get's a NDR about receiving user So from checking Technet (Q238498)..this would appear as the normal behavior Um my Q is thiswhy wouldn't it send a message type say User over quota...etc yeh..I know cause MS coded that way It just makes me think a bit..and I was just curious about what those of you more experienced with this beast..Think... anybody know if MS changed this type of thing in E2K3? it seems to me to make more understandable sense if it said the user was over quote..etc... thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
RE: Exchange locks up
me..I might/I do have mailbox limits thus..I dont get to the problem your having... I would do what I did and set mailbox limits thus protecting the system. You'll be unpopular..or at least I am here...but I feel it's one less system thing to worry about.. and the system just run's, the user education is not much fun...cause they want what they want when they want it yeh I have a few less users then you but about the same... of course I could be way off base..Im no exchange guru.. $0.02 bill -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange locks up Why? How does that solve the problem I have today? I only have 150 users and do not anticipate the store will grow over 16 gigs again. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange locks up Buy Enterprise Edition. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange locks up Hello All, Last Wednesday, one week ago, without any warning our information store stopped - reached the 16 gig limit. What I did not know was that the 16 gigs is a total of both the .stm file and the .edb file. I do not know if the public folders contributed to the 16 gigs or not as ours only account for 100 MB. My first gripe - you would think there might be a warning message or two in the event log before it shuts down!? Anyways I knew we were getting closer to the limit and I helped some people get their mailboxes cleaned out in the 2 weeks previous. Here are the steps we followed. Rebooted. IS still would not load. Ran eseutil Brought it online - deleted the deleted items manually and changed the deleted item retention time from 30 days to 6 days. Ran eseutil again - recaptured 5 gigs. Since that day I have the server freeze up several times a day - anyone in Outlook notices - wait a few minutes and everything comes back. If I am at the server I can't even get logged in until it frees up. I have rebooted the server a couple times - no use. The event log reports very, very little. I get a 2078 information error about dsaccess stopping, however this message comes after the slowdown and things are working again - more like a symptom of an underlying problem. I turned up dsaccess logging - no useful info there. Here is the setup: Exchange 2000, sp3 Windows 2000, sp3 dual 1.6 processors 1.5 gigs RAM Compaq proliant, Hardware raid 5 and raid 1 for logs single domain, single site, one exchange server, 150 users running Trend scanmail for exchange Installed Trend Interscan Messaging suite to block spam about 2 weeks ago - however, everything was just fine until the IS reached its limit. Any comments, suggestions or ideas on how to solve this one are appreciated. Thanks. Tim Hooks Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Script execution via e-mail?
For me my question is why would I do it manually when I could have my DHCP server do it for me and for everyone.. very interesting...different systems and all... bill -Original Message- From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Script execution via e-mail? How are you going to find an exchange server if your WINS settings are wrong? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Script execution via e-mail? Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6 SRP Outlook 2000 I'm in the process of changing WINS addresses on remote machines via a script. I know I'm not going to get everyone in the domain the first, second, or tenth time I run this script, however, and am looking for ways to streamline the process. Has anyone here ever created a mailbox that a user could send to that would execute a script? For example, I'm sitting at my machine 'NTPC1' and didn't get the WINS change. I can't change it myself, as I'm not admin on the local box. However, all I need to do is send a blank e-mail with 'WINSCHANGE NTPC1' in the subject and the script will be executed on my machine. Anyone? Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall
mongo like candy.. like his DHCP server to dole out WINS server assignment manual file bad... mongo lazy -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 and firewall Fire good. lmhosts bad. - Original Message - From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:53 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall Hey it's all inside!! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 and firewall lmhosts? Gag me with a spoon! - Original Message - From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:44 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall OK so wins should resolve this. Or can I use lmhosts. It appears one user is running outlook 2002 And performance is much better. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall Slow client opening is about 95% of the time DNS related - your clients are having issues accessing DNS. It could be that they're accessing DNS and getting your public IP address for the mail server, and they're going through the router to hit Exchange. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall Using standard 192.x.x.x. and 255.255.255.0. There are no wins. Pretty simple set up single server running exchange and 1 database program. This works great. I don't think I need to open any addiotnal ports since everyone is behind the firewall and the server is recving email! Fire wall is a soinicwall soho3 -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and firewall Check your subnet and make sure they are correct for Class B or C or how ever you did it. Also check all your DNS and WINS to make sure the clients are routing properly Alex -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Quick questions. Running 5.5 sp3 nt4.0 sp6. Server was not behind firewall running on public IP's. Yesterday installed Firewall 15 wkstations (win98 outlook 2000) and server behind firewall. Gave everyone Private Ips and a 1 to 1 nat for exchange ip address. Everything works internally but outlook on the win98 clients became very slow opening. Most units get the server not available retry Or work off line. I can retry and outlook will eventually hook up but it is way to slow. Is there something I missed. Do not need access to exchange server from outside the network Thanks for any help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: domain name
well..let's see Ed...ok it's like seven ways to kevin Bacon. See months ago Tony asked about installing OWA..IIS ect..I remember He had quite the time with it and many questions. The I think he got it...then I think there was something he asked about a problem about it sometime a month later... So then now maybe he is trying to access it from home on his laptop now he wants to somehow be able to use his domain name www.domain.com to get to his OWA server with out the long drawn out line. So now he's testing at home testing his connection to his OWA server at his www.domain.com and appears to be having some type of DNS issues regarding resolving to his domain so we have hopefully establish the connectin to Exchange since OWA relates to exchange and DNS issues can relate to both thus Tony's question potentiall relates to exchange How does it relate to Kevin Bacon? I suspect some one at the ISP or Tony company knows somebody that knows Kevin Bacon.thus resulting it the final potential connection to Kevin Bacon... bill -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name And that has to do with Exchange how? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: domain name Can some show me where I need to start looking We I connect my laptop to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I could not get to my web page with www.domain.com but I could type in the IP address. When I use a dail-up account I was able to use www.domain.com. Could this be a DNS problem? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: domain name
well if your in there might as well play nice and fix it for him ;-) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name He said his external testing was working, I figured I'd test things for him on his internal network... ;o) -Original Message- From: K J Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Bad, bad, Don. Just test his name resolution with DNS and get on back home like a good lad. +++ Kathy http://www.vendetta.co.uk DNRC Minister for Useful but Irritating Information and Trivia +++ - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:45 PM Subject: RE: domain name I'm on your internal network, now what? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions We have employee who have offices in other division and they were have problem trying to get on OWA. I ask them to try www.jetproducts.com before accessing OWA and but they were not able to the website. When I try tracert I get Unable to resolve target system name but when I use the dail-up account it work fine. I need a couple of people to test this website for me. Thank You Tony -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name well..let's see Ed...ok it's like seven ways to kevin Bacon. See months ago Tony asked about installing OWA..IIS ect..I remember He had quite the time with it and many questions. The I think he got it...then I think there was something he asked about a problem about it sometime a month later... So then now maybe he is trying to access it from home on his laptop now he wants to somehow be able to use his domain name www.domain.com to get to his OWA server with out the long drawn out line. So now he's testing at home testing his connection to his OWA server at his www.domain.com and appears to be having some type of DNS issues regarding resolving to his domain so we have hopefully establish the connectin to Exchange since OWA relates to exchange and DNS issues can relate to both thus Tony's question potentiall relates to exchange How does it relate to Kevin Bacon? I suspect some one at the ISP or Tony company knows somebody that knows Kevin Bacon.thus resulting it the final potential connection to Kevin Bacon... bill -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name And that has to do with Exchange how? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: domain name Can some show me where I need to start looking We I connect my laptop to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I could not get to my web page with www.domain.com but I could type in the IP address. When I use a dail-up account I was able to use www.domain.com. Could this be a DNS problem? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: domain name
On a similar note..Yes you may very well need to add the entry to your private DNS server. As I had to do this for mine...Why? I dupped my domain internally... so my domain server thinks everything I need to resolve is equipname.snd.com BUT my web site ww.snd.com is hosted by out side ISP...thus I put an entry in my DNS servers.. pointing www to my external web www CNAME www.snd-electronics.org But note...As mentioned a few threads agoDNS and win admins.. I tend to be a windows admin more often then other(unix..etc)...so I could be off on the DNS thing. I did get scolded one time by Wcom tech support on my DNS serversthis is just works for my network bill PS. My domain has not been changed to protect the innocent ..as Im often not...anybody worth their salt could find somebodys domian namesooner or later... -Original Message- From: Biesecker, Noel E. IT1(SW) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name This sounds similar to a problem I've been having on my network for a long time. My website was changed from http://www.cnsl.navy.mil/ships/dd989 to www.deyo.navy.mil. This was all done by the external hosting that we go through. Well, after they changed it to www.deyo.navy.mil, from within my local network, we can't get to our website. Our local DNS server resolves it to our local Intranet web page. I'm thinking I need to add a static entry in the DNS server to point to the actual web site? Maybe this is the same sort of issue? IT1(SW) Biesecker, USN USS DEYO (DD-989) Strike Destroyer System Administrator/Network Analyst Serving with Pride -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name I charge for those kinds of services!! -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions well if your in there might as well play nice and fix it for him ;-) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name He said his external testing was working, I figured I'd test things for him on his internal network... ;o) -Original Message- From: K J Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Bad, bad, Don. Just test his name resolution with DNS and get on back home like a good lad. +++ Kathy http://www.vendetta.co.uk DNRC Minister for Useful but Irritating Information and Trivia +++ - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:45 PM Subject: RE: domain name I'm on your internal network, now what? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions We have employee who have offices in other division and they were have problem trying to get on OWA. I ask them to try www.jetproducts.com before accessing OWA and but they were not able to the website. When I try tracert I get Unable to resolve target system name but when I use the dail-up account it work fine. I need a couple of people to test this website for me. Thank You Tony -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name well..let's see Ed...ok it's like seven ways to kevin Bacon. See months ago Tony asked about installing OWA..IIS ect..I remember He had quite the time with it and many questions. The I think he got it...then I think there was something he asked about a problem about it sometime a month later... So then now maybe he is trying to access it from home on his laptop now he wants to somehow be able to use his domain name www.domain.com to get to his OWA server with out the long drawn out line. So now he's testing at home testing his connection to his OWA server at his www.domain.com and appears to be having some type of DNS issues regarding resolving to his domain so we have hopefully establish the connectin to Exchange since OWA relates to exchange and DNS issues can relate to both thus Tony's question potentiall relates to exchange How does it relate to Kevin Bacon? I suspect some one at the ISP or Tony company knows somebody that knows Kevin Bacon.thus resulting it the final potential connection to Kevin Bacon... bill -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: domain name
RE: Quick question re backup
Along with martin I might ask... 1.) Umm What is your total Drive capacity? 2.) Of the total capacity how much is in use? 3.) IF say IN USE is say =/less then 40/80GB I would think it should fit. Note: Remember compression is a funny thing and often is not going to work the way you may think...i.e. somethings just dont compress..kinda 4.) have you worked with your block size in BE for the tape drive..etc..Ive found that can make a big diff in performance..etc... 5.) What is and is not backing up...I think maybe some more details might help others reading your post here. 6.) Is the box only exchange or is it say file and rpint too.??? 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick question re backup How big are the stores? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000: If I am backing up the microsoft information store but not microsoft exchange mailboxes or the M: drive then there is no point in backing up program files\exchsrvr is there? Or should I still backup the program files\exchsrvr directory but deselect the mdb data directory? I thought I had set up the backup procedure so that I wasn't doing BLB's but I had to examine the procedure closely as I am having trouble getting all our data onto a 40/80gb dltIV tape with hardware compression enabled (otherwise software). I've had a look at the faq and had a good search around the archives etc but cannot find a definitive answer on this. Thanks Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow posting to lists
I can say that my exchange server seems to dislike AOL addresses -Original Message- From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow posting to lists Silly thing - anyone else ever have messages take 2 hours to go to this list and other messages take no time...??? Other Internet mail for me flows quickly, but occasionally posting to this and the W2K list lag WY behind...although I get incoming and replies to other lists back quickly. Dave I don't think I'm SPAM Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial 503-675-5510 -Original Message- From: Lum, David Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 Disable account lockout is a band-aid and shouldn't be the fix. Do the event logs show where the lockout are coming from? The same PC's that have the problems? What e-mail client are you using? Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial 503-675-5510 -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 09:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 Thank god.. Now I know im not crazy.. I have tried to disable the account lockouts but due to audit purposes I cannot .. Have you ran into any fixes or workarounds until I convert to mapi -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and pop3 I've seen this with Exchange 5.5 as well. Never could figure out why it was happening. Why not just disable account lockouts? -Original Message- From: Hector Cortez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and pop3 hello.. I have been dealing with this issue ever since we moved to exchange 2000. We are running windows xp with the pop3 connector. several of my users accounts are getting locked out as if they are entering and incorrect password. The users account information (password) is not being recognized my the exchange server. Need to reset password and recreate account on local machine.. Any ideas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: postini spam control
The one strong point I always thought was good for the outsourcing part was that that much less stuff came over my link to the internet..thus idealy helping to manage bandwidth. Now on the other hand I could never find an out sourcer who could give me the granularity I needed/wanted 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: postini spam control At 08:38 21-03-2003 -0600, you wrote: anybody have any information or tried Postini for their spam control. we have looked at all the major players and we are thinking about surfcontrol but these people called us up and gave a good pitch. I guess we point our mx records to them, which i'm not sure I like, and then they scan it for spam and forward it on to us. I've looked through the archives and didn't find any info, which is probably all I need to know, but I thought I would present it again to see if anyone has any comments. This week we talked about putting a Linux box with Sendmail between you and the internet. You can use spamassasin and have everything in house. One of the advantages is that you do have full control about what gets caught and you can always access the probably spam mailbox to see if spamassasin was a bit 'trigger happy'. I did hear (on the SBS2K list) about gfi mailessentials which seem to have a pretty good anti spam util too.. it runs on Windows. B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: kind of OT: what's wrong with my HP server?
I had a LC3, with a RAID card directly from Mylex (same model as the one the LC3 could have come with) since the RAID card was NOT the one from HP the card firmware was not tweaked by HP thus the LC3 hated the card and was source of problems...it got replaced bill -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kind of OT: what's wrong with my HP server? I'd do all the firmware updates you can, specifically on the RAID controller. It sounds like that might be the source of the problem. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: kind of OT: what's wrong with my HP server? Hi all. one of my Exchange 2000 back-end servers is HP NetServer TC4100. It is pretty new, it only has been in production for a couple of months. Dual 1.4GHz CPUs and 4GB RAM. NetRAID-2M raid controller, RAID1 + RAID1 + RAID5. Onboard 100Mbs NIC. Currently there are about 350 mailboxes on it. OS is Windows 2000 SP3. Exchange 2000 is up to SP3. Every few days the POS freezes and I have to cold boot it. I think it usually does so when I back up Exchange with Legato networker. But the other day it froze in the middle of NTBackup. I hope that someone in here maybe has had good experience with HP Netserver machines to point me in the right direction. I myself is a Proliant type of a guy. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: kind of OT: what's wrong with my HP server?
do not forget to make sure you have sometype of backup. I find I usually hose myself this way when I think it will be a simple 2 second fix...then hours later. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kind of OT: what's wrong with my HP server? thank you everyone for great ideas! Gotta go put my flame retardant suit on and tell the users their server will be going down for 15 minutes or so :) -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kind of OT: what's wrong with my HP server? I used to work at a testlab that worked on prototype HP netservers and other products. Whenever we had a single problem we would swap out the NetRaid card. If you have a spare one give that a try. If not then I would recommend making sure the firmware was updated. If that doesn't work for you then what slot is it installed in? If it's in #5 move it over to a more reliable one like #3. (I don't know why this works but it does) Do you have any other HP cards installed in there? Some of them have a notorious history of not getting along. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: kind of OT: what's wrong with my HP server? Hi all. one of my Exchange 2000 back-end servers is HP NetServer TC4100. It is pretty new, it only has been in production for a couple of months. Dual 1.4GHz CPUs and 4GB RAM. NetRAID-2M raid controller, RAID1 + RAID1 + RAID5. Onboard 100Mbs NIC. Currently there are about 350 mailboxes on it. OS is Windows 2000 SP3. Exchange 2000 is up to SP3. Every few days the POS freezes and I have to cold boot it. I think it usually does so when I back up Exchange with Legato networker. But the other day it froze in the middle of NTBackup. I hope that someone in here maybe has had good experience with HP Netserver machines to point me in the right direction. I myself is a Proliant type of a guy. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wear a cup if you plan on posting questions
Ill stick with the ribbing I need the kick in the head once in a while -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: wear a cup if you plan on posting questions Yep. That's the word on the streets. I heard that too when I joined. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is a quote from a another list that I subscribe too describing this list.you guys and gals aren't that badI don't know about you all but I don't wear a cup just a saucer But..heed the warning. Do not post questions that you could/should have been able to answer yourself. Responses can be very humiliating if, for instance, you ask a question about something that is in the archives, or is very basic to messaging. It may be one of the most valuable lists, but wear a cup if you plan on posting questions. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Asking for Password
2 cent's I dont really know about w2k/e2k- AD for this yet...but for me still in my N4 domain on exch55 OL2K , w2k pro Sometimes when the user leaves changing their password to the last day..Ive found that even thought they changed it AND the system took it ..sometimes OL will ask for the user/pass/dom I usually have them reboot/logout totally log back in fixes it 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Asking for Password So far it DOESN'T happen to me when I manually change my password. It happened to the user when the password period was up and it forced him to change it. -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Asking for Password How do I tell which GC the exchange box is pointing to? Q317209 Does this happen when others change their password? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Asking for Password The E2K box is near a DC, but the root of my forest is in NJ and I am in MD. We are connected via a T1. I gave it enough time (20 minutes) to replicate, I thought. How do I tell which GC the exchange box is pointing to? -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Asking for Password Vincent, Where is the e2k server located with regards to your closest DC? What is your replication schedule set to? What GC is the outlook client pointing to? Is that the closest GC to your Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Asking for Password Please Help! I am running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2000 AD domain. Everything has been working great so far, until today. A user was asked to change their password by the systems. He did so and all of sudden Outlook is now asking for a password. He puts it in and it works fine. Why would he all of sudden need to put in his password? I have waited while and still the same results. Thanks. I will be searching the KB as well. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point about mail box limits cool thanks bill -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a delegate than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary reply to every message rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged unique messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. Darcy -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to every spammer's Gold List of valid e-mail addresses. There are also security issues and the occasional technical reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle any crucial issues that come up, including notifying legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of the office and will reply when they return. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? Thx for ideas... byron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
No I wasn't trying to raise a debate (I don't debate well..wish I could I might have a better chance against my better half)..though I knew someone might... I just get curious at peoples perceptions...and how much they buy into what is often a lot of media hype...info conveniently not mentioned etc... Like back when GM did the electric car thing..it was like 90' when I was back in engineering school some the other geeks and me did up a quick calc on cost.. initial cost of vehicle, amount of batteries the thing usedlife of batteries as stated in the article then...change over cycle..etc... we did not take into account back then the Fact that after the batteries are dead/beat the disposal cost due to the fact that batteries are hazardous waste..at least not from the monetary stand pointetc I'm not saying new technologies are good or bad...just curious what and how much people really take into accountabout stuff. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew somewhere we were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I should have said Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I made the statement. As far as the pollution: Fuel cells efficiently convert hydrogen fuel and oxygen from the air into electricity. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (HFCEVs) emit only water vapor from their exhaust pipes. Demonstrations of HFCEVs have been successful and this technology is expected to displace internal combustion engines in the 21st Century. Which I got from pretty much the first thing I could google up here: http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT Chris Im curious how do you figure this statement? Next thing you'll drag in Hybrids ... It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. While I agree hydrogen engines maybe more friendly...they do produce pollution AND the infrastructure you correctly point out which is not there really WILL in fact produce pollution to make the pieces/stuff required for the cleaner part. Let me ask this..IF say you put a refrigerator in a sealed room...plug it in...leave the Fridge door openwhat happens in the room? there no free lunch...just more healthy... ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Except that none of our clients have heard about PGP. That's one of the problems with HIPPA, the solutions they want don't exist for a device that was developed back in the 60's (I think I got the time right, I'm not going to check though). It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. Same thing with e-mail and encryption. That's one of the reasons HIPPA deadlines keeps getting pushed back. Then with a solution like PGP you have to teach the users how to use it. That's a nightmare that I don't ever want to repeat again. Hell half of the users I taught have a hard time figuring out what the start button is, and it's right there in front of their face. The big problem with HIPPA was that it was designed by bureaucrats (who BTW were probably the same users that have a hard time with the start button thing) that wanted to do something to protect the people that vote for them. Except there wasn't a major problem to begin with. Sure there were a few slight mishaps here and there, but the industry was doing a fine job of learning from those mistakes and creating new solutions to prevent those from happening again. In addition to the design problems with HIPPA, you have the fact that it's become so bloated that no one knows exactly what it is or what you need to do. While you run into some so called HIPPA expert that says you need to do one thing, you can always find another that says you don't need to do that. Flat out HIPPA needs to go, and be replaced by something that's a little more well thought out. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Yup. But PGP is one of the most widely deployed encryption packages and has software for various client and server packages
RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Chris Im curious how do you figure this statement? Next thing you'll drag in Hybrids ... It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. While I agree hydrogen engines maybe more friendly...they do produce pollution AND the infrastructure you correctly point out which is not there really WILL in fact produce pollution to make the pieces/stuff required for the cleaner part. Let me ask this..IF say you put a refrigerator in a sealed room...plug it in...leave the Fridge door openwhat happens in the room? there no free lunch...just more healthy... ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Except that none of our clients have heard about PGP. That's one of the problems with HIPPA, the solutions they want don't exist for a device that was developed back in the 60's (I think I got the time right, I'm not going to check though). It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. Same thing with e-mail and encryption. That's one of the reasons HIPPA deadlines keeps getting pushed back. Then with a solution like PGP you have to teach the users how to use it. That's a nightmare that I don't ever want to repeat again. Hell half of the users I taught have a hard time figuring out what the start button is, and it's right there in front of their face. The big problem with HIPPA was that it was designed by bureaucrats (who BTW were probably the same users that have a hard time with the start button thing) that wanted to do something to protect the people that vote for them. Except there wasn't a major problem to begin with. Sure there were a few slight mishaps here and there, but the industry was doing a fine job of learning from those mistakes and creating new solutions to prevent those from happening again. In addition to the design problems with HIPPA, you have the fact that it's become so bloated that no one knows exactly what it is or what you need to do. While you run into some so called HIPPA expert that says you need to do one thing, you can always find another that says you don't need to do that. Flat out HIPPA needs to go, and be replaced by something that's a little more well thought out. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Yup. But PGP is one of the most widely deployed encryption packages and has software for various client and server packages. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption Doesn't PGP suffer from the same problem, where the recipients need to have a PGP key set up? Erick - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 12:38 PM Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption I'll assume you are talking about SMIME encryption here. What you want to do is not possible in the general sense. You need the recipient's public key in order to encrypt their mail. You would have to have a predefined list of all possible recipients and their public keys. Even if you had this list, I know of no products that implement this (but then again, I've never looked) You could probably rig something up using PGP on a unix box as an outbound gateway. But then all your recipients would need PGP to read the mail. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
