RE: Full access
That's when Word search/replace comes in handy -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 April 2002 23:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :( I have to write batch files to parse the LDF exports This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
IIRC you can't use csvde to modify objects, it can only be used to create or delete. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 April 2002 01:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need? This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
LDIFDE does more things than CSVDE -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :( I have to write batch files to parse the LDF exports -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I've grown to love that Text to Columns feature... -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list. Excel is my first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should
RE: Full access
Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list. Excel is my first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy
RE: Full access
I've grown to love that Text to Columns feature... -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list. Excel is my first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information
RE: Full access
Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :( I have to write batch files to parse the LDF exports -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I've grown to love that Text to Columns feature... -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list. Excel is my first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: Full access
CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :( I have to write batch files to parse the LDF exports -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I've grown to love that Text to Columns feature... -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list. Excel is my first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design
RE: Full access
Any of a 100 spreadsheet apps do the same thing. :o) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list. Excel is my first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information
RE: Full access
Clue. You've either got it, or you think all your helpdesk staff need to log into everyone's account every time theres an email trouble ticket. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students
RE: Full access
And probably a cigarette afterwards. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700 From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Full access
Sure.. Give me a few minutes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Full access
That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Full access
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: Full access
ROFLMAO!!! Oh, jeez. . . that's an image I won't forget for a while. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access He is rather cute in those Panda overalls. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Full access
Roger.. you're keeping secrets. I didn't know you worked for Zoo Atlanta in your off hours. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access He is rather cute in those Panda overalls. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: Full access
Among other things ;o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access And probably a cigarette afterwards. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700 From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Full access
Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will suspect first? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Don Ely? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will suspect first? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: Full access
Heyy! I don't hack everyone's network... ;o) I'm very selective! Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Don Ely? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will suspect first? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
RE: Full access
What if I need to run ExMerge export every day? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ?!?! If and when that needs to occur, you set the permissions appropriately at that time. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
One of my customers wants to have their mailboxes exported to PSTs every day. They just want to keep these PSTs handy, just in case. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
So have I. Since the Exchange Beta, before the 4.0 version. Maybe you should practive doing ExMerge anyway. One day it may save you. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: Full access
Thats just plain sad. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:39:21 -0400 From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] One of my customers wants to have their mailboxes exported to PSTs every day. They just want to keep these PSTs handy, just in case. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Exchange 2000 does not have a service account like Exchange 5.5 does. The main administrative account in Exchange is explicitly denied from accessing other users' mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
I have used ExMerge to move mailboxes too. Before we went native mode, there was no other way to move mailboxes between servers if the servers belonged to different administrative groups. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Proactive Exmerge? Is that sort of like BLBs? Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:40:43 -0400 From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] So have I. Since the Exchange Beta, before the 4.0 version. Maybe you should practive doing ExMerge anyway. One day it may save you. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: Full access
Ya don't say... How will I ever manage? ;o) Actually, you should re-sort the threads. We already determined I was a dumba$$ for a moment and payment will be rendered at MEC2002. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Exchange 2000 does not have a service account like Exchange 5.5 does. The main administrative account in Exchange is explicitly denied from accessing other users' mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: Full access
::Great Minds:: You beat me to virtually the same reply. ;o) I practice Exmerge, maybe once in a Blue Moon. Usually, I only find a need for it when forklifting mailboxes to another server or while doing some DR work. Otherwise, I have no use for Exmerge. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Proactive Exmerge? Is that sort of like BLBs? Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:40:43 -0400 From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] So have I. Since the Exchange Beta, before the 4.0 version. Maybe you should practive doing ExMerge anyway. One day it may save you. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Full access
And we havent even gotten to discussing Arkanserve yet! ;) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you
RE: Full access
I am cute dammit! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you
RE: Full access
ok, I change that. If I was only allowed a single tool outside of the default Exchange install it would be the uninstall.exe needed to remove CA products. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access And we havent even gotten to discussing Arkanserve yet! ;) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send. I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like. If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it would probably be ExMerge. I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness. He is very capable. And I AM being mellow, Damnit! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly
RE: Full access
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Full access
Why would you want to do that? Anyway: Q262054 Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:46:09 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
That was answered this morning. Q258183 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Andy says it is Q262054. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access That was answered this morning. Q258183 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
www.dice.com -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
ShavedEskens.exe is more like it.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Whoopie, I have one. Me. I support 6 sites (soon to drop to 4) with about 5K mailboxes. I'm not saying don't ever do it, just don't make it a default. Make it so that the admin has to manually add his NT account to the box each and every time. Make your server update the directory perms every one minute. That's an FAQ. Get EVERYTHING in writing if you are asked to enter anyone else's mailbox. EVERY time. Maybe you need to rethink how you troubleshoot mailbox issues. I almost never have to actually go into anyone's mailbox. There's plenty of ways to figure things out without doing that. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Just make sure the forgetful Exec's give you permission in writing. As you point out, they won't remember they did. Then ponder what they'll think if a sensitive message from their sent ends up in the wrong hands...THEY know they couldn't have misclicked the recipient. And so forth... -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Make your ExchangeAdmin NT group the owner of all resources. Execs should be shot, and they will be the first one to take you to court. OOO? Who gives a rats ass -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
I'm not saying five is not enough. I'm saying there are only five who would have access and that would be easy to track. We also have a contract to sign every time someone gets a job here. It states that we can read your email if necessary. Anyway thanks for the info. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Whoopie, I have one. Me. I support 6 sites (soon to drop to 4) with about 5K mailboxes. I'm not saying don't ever do it, just don't make it a default. Make it so that the admin has to manually add his NT account to the box each and every time. Make your server update the directory perms every one minute. That's an FAQ. Get EVERYTHING in writing if you are asked to enter anyone else's mailbox. EVERY time. Maybe you need to rethink how you troubleshoot mailbox issues. I almost never have to actually go into anyone's mailbox. There's plenty of ways to figure things out without doing that. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Full access
You have a short memory, Scharff. Roger is definitely *not* shaven! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Full access Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Full access
I for one am proud of the fact I was able to block that particular memory from my mind. Gave me nightmares for weeks. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access You have a short memory, Scharff. Roger is definitely *not* shaven! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Full access Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Full access
SSM Status... thinks to self, do I REALLY want to know? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access You have a short memory, Scharff. Roger is definitely *not* shaven! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Full access Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Full access
For mailboxes, go to the properties of the information store, go to Security, explicitly allow the last two security options to the administrator's account (they are inherited as Deny). Wait 10 minutes or reboot the server. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
?!?! If and when that needs to occur, you set the permissions appropriately at that time. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Indeed a valid reason. I'd argue there should be a special account for that task and that account should not be a member of the domain admins group and should not be a member of the normal Exchange Admins group either, but should be in a special Exchange Service Account group. Knowledge and use of that account should also be limited to the smallest possible group. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Full access
Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Is this the 6'4 built-like-a-NFL-linebacker Mr. Seielstad you're talking about? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Knowing what she's doing. Missy? I want to see the test scores. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
I exmerged out of my production box twice to fix corruption problems, both times per PSS. No big deal. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Full access
Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
It's my brick-level backup solution [1] ;) [1] backup solution? sounds like something you drink for constipation relief. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Full access
Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
LOL! Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access It's my brick-level backup solution [1] ;) [1] backup solution? sounds like something you drink for constipation relief. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
I use it when toasting mailboxes. Then I burn the PSTs to CD and give it to HR. Also used it once to suck out a virus that got past our scanners. Also used it, as you say, to pull data out of a corrupt store. worked great. I said Missy knew what she was doing, not me...so I use it :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
HEH HEH, I was thinking 5.5. Don't mind me... ;o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Full access
Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Full access
OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
LOL Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Full access
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Full access
I believe that will work just fine... ;o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Full access
Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
