:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and SQL
We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3 raid
configurations with about 200 gb of hd space that's basically being used
to run a 2 gb database for about 20 users that will never grow. My boss
thinks we should
And remember time is money...
bill
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL
Sell the SQL box eBay.
Use the proceeds to buy two new servers that are more
'cause they will be fighting each other for memory
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and SQL
We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3
raid
(going to Exchange 2000 in a few months) because it's not being
utilized fully. Other than the if we lose SQL we lose Exchange theory,
why else is this a bad idea? Thanks in advance, Scott.
_
List posting FAQ: http
Move Exchange to this box, move SQL to the old Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and SQL
We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3
and SQL
Move Exchange to this box, move SQL to the old Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and SQL
We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram
Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:06 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Exchange and SQL
Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL
Move Exchange to this box, move SQL
was overkill to begin with now I'm going to have to live with SQL
and Exchange on one box. I was looking for known software related issues
that might help me with my argument but I couldn't find any. Thanks for
the help, Scott.
Move Exchange to this box, move SQL to the old Exchange server
Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL
The old Exchange box is a relic, it's going one way or the other and I
wouldn't use it for solitare at this point. This whole discussion arouse
when I put together a request for a new Exchange server. I don't think I am
going to be able to win the argument to keep them
Maybe you could request a relatively small server and move SQL to it and
then move Exchange to the old SQL box.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and SQL
The old Exchange box
Dear List Gurus,
I have been asked to design and implement a solution with Exchange and
SQL in a Windows 200 Adv Server Cluster. (Each of them running on a
separate node, with fail-over in case one node goes down). I've already
worked with this kind of solution but never implemented one right
/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/sql/deploy/depovg/cluster.asp
Note that if Exchange and SQL are going to be heavily used, you run the
risk of overburdening your cluster. Generally, Exchange and SQL server are
best implemented on separate boxes. In fact, you may get better
performance
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de Agosto de 2002 19:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OT - Exchange and SQL Clustering literature
Don't know about books, but here are some links to get you started:
http://www.microsoft.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
