That's when Word search/replace comes in handy
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 April 2002 23:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :(
I have to write batch files to parse
IIRC you can't use csvde to modify objects, it can only be used to create or
delete.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 April 2002 01:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Excel does not help
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.
I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or
suspected virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like.
If I were only
I've grown to love that Text to Columns feature...
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list.
Excel is my
Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :(
I have to write batch files to parse the LDF exports
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I've grown to love that Text
CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :(
I have to write batch files to parse
Any of a 100 spreadsheet apps do the same thing. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list.
Excel
Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 22:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing...
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
And probably a cigarette afterwards.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round.
-Original Message
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and
know that the giraffe label shirt will match it.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
My
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe
label pants
ROFLMAO!!! Oh, jeez. . . that's an image I won't forget for a while.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
Original
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange
]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
And probably a cigarette afterwards.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Have you never been mellow?
Have you never tried?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will
suspect first?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt
Don Ely?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will
suspect first?
-Original Message-
From
-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Don Ely?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
What if I need to run ExMerge export every day?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
?!?! If and when that needs to occur, you set the permissions appropriately
One of my customers wants to have their mailboxes exported to PSTs every
day. They just want to keep these PSTs handy, just in case.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
My guess is she has minions do it.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're
Thats just plain sad.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:39:21 -0400
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of my customers wants to have their mailboxes exported
to PSTs every
day. They just want
Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it
there.
And how often does one run Exmerge?
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It
is a valuable tool.
You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent
Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department
Proactive Exmerge? Is that sort of like BLBs?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:40:43 -0400
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So have I. Since the Exchange Beta, before the 4.0 version.
Maybe you
- Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Exchange 2000 does not have a service account
Subject: RE: Full access
Proactive Exmerge? Is that sort of like BLBs?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:40:43 -0400
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So have I. Since the Exchange Beta, before the 4.0
into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness.
He is very capable.
And I AM being mellow, Damnit!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Have you never been mellow
And we havent even gotten to discussing Arkanserve yet! ;)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.
I didn't even get
I am cute dammit!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.
I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages
Subject: RE: Full access
And we havent even gotten to discussing Arkanserve yet! ;)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.
I
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll
skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Why would you want to do that?
Anyway: Q262054
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:46:09 -0400
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to
all PFs and
That was answered this morning. Q258183
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full access
What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and
Mailboxes
Andy says it is Q262054.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
That was answered this morning. Q258183
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael
Why is this a bad design?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll
skip the diatribe on what
: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Why is this a bad design?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's
mailboxes then.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Runs counter to several things I would
www.dice.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's
mailboxes then.
-Original Message
ShavedSeielstad.exe?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-
level exec's
mailboxes
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
ShavedSeielstad.exe?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
ShavedSeielstad.exe?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's
:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my
boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM
status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Why is this a bad design?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Why do you constantly need access?
For what purposes? Just curious mind you.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
that.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else
could I go about it? We only have 5 people
...
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives
who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives
who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about
giving select few full access?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Whoopie, I have one. Me. I support 6 sites (soon to drop to 4) with about
5K mailboxes.
I'm not saying don't ever do it, just don't make it a default
Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my
You have a short memory, Scharff. Roger is definitely *not* shaven!
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test
I for one am proud of the fact I was able to block that particular memory
from my mind. Gave me nightmares for weeks.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
You
11, 2002 3:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
You have a short memory, Scharff. Roger is definitely *not* shaven!
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: RE
For mailboxes, go to the properties of the information store, go to
Security, explicitly allow the last two security options to the
administrator's account (they are inherited as Deny). Wait 10 minutes or
reboot the server.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you
need to have full access to everyone's mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Runs
?!?! If and when that needs to occur, you set the permissions appropriately
at that time.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Sometimes you need to export
of
that account should also be limited to the smallest possible group.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail
Subject: RE: Full access
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when
you
need to have full access to everyone's mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing...
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge
Is this the 6'4 built-like-a-NFL-linebacker Mr. Seielstad you're talking
about?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
The talented
Knowing what she's doing. Missy? I want to see the test scores.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing
I exmerged out of my production box twice to fix corruption problems, both
times per PSS. No big deal.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
Sometimes
My guess is she has minions do it.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing...
-Original Message-
From
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
My guess is she has minions do it.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing
://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you
need to have full access
It's my brick-level backup solution [1] ;)
[1] backup solution? sounds like something you drink for constipation
relief.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Then use
to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding.
William
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since
: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it
there.
And how often does one run Exmerge
: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
It's my brick-level backup solution [1] ;)
[1] backup solution? sounds like something you drink for constipation
relief.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11
it :)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It
is a valuable tool.
You've never walked into a client that had
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
Service account in E2K ?
I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a
production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The
previous
Recipient containers in E2K?
(sorry, I just had to...)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Full access
Subject: Re: Full access
Service account in E2K
OK, OK I need a beer.
Don, we have a draw here :)
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
Recipient containers in E2K?
(sorry, I just had
, April 11, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Recipient containers in E2K?
(sorry, I just had to...)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
OK, OK I need a beer.
Don, we have a draw here :)
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes we do! Beers all around! :o
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11
Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round.
/Peter
- Original
80 matches
Mail list logo