PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 06:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Mike,
I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com
~Jim
P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company block list.
Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0
Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Maybe it's just late but I don't understand how @ew01.com
would also block
the subdomains
.domain.com
4. It will now block those three domain names and let sub1.domain.com and
sub3.domain.com through.
~Jim
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Ben / Roger,
I can only take a guess that they set the logic up so that the entry
@domainname.com would by default block that domain
When I first started using that feature, the wildcard syntax is the way I
expected it to work at first as well.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
I guess I
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Roger,
I posted this earlier in the thread...maybe you missed it:
Paul Robichaux's Managing MS Exchange Server, Chapter 8, pg 294, bottom of
the page:
@foe.com - reject
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Jim,
Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it.
I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I
used ew01.com
and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have
blocked this junk mail
7:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Jim,
Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it.
I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I used ew01.com
and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have
blocked this junk mail
, 2003 7:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Jim,
Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it.
I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I used ew01.com
and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have
blocked this junk mail
My understanding of reading through the help file is that if you block
@ivy.net all of the subdomains are blocked as well.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
7:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
My understanding of reading through the help file is that if you block
@ivy.net all of the subdomains are blocked as well.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
You'd have to block it as 'ivy.net', not '@ivy.net'
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message
.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Check out Q245465 for Exchange 5.5. It backs up what I said
earlier. I
have used this successfully on the Exchange 5.5
10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Then can you explain why I can enter @fr or @biz and the server blocks
anything that ends with .fr or .biz. Doesn't this qualify as
blocking any
domain or subdomain that ends with these? It seems to me
that it does
was spot on.
Jim Blunt
E-mail Admin
Network Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Hmm - I have no problem with you saying
You can wildcard your filters for domains.
On the IMS under Message Filtering you can enter domains using the
@domain.com (.net, etc.)
You can filter a whole country in a similar fashion by using
@fr (for France)
For example.
Regards.
Nate Couch
EDS
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
You can wildcard your filters for domains.
On the IMS under Message Filtering you can enter domains using the
@domain.com (.net, etc.)
You can filter a whole country
Two stars (**) would be an overkill
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Nate,
I don't understand what you are saying? I know I can block full domains
.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Nate,
I don't understand what you are saying? I know I can block full domains
(@yahoo.com) but what I want is to block @**.ivy.net
I would say with a third party application.
- Original Message -
From: Diop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:27 AM
Subject: Message filtering
I´m runnning Exchange 5.5
How to prevent all uusers in specific domain from
Dont worry .. I worked it out for myself !
(Restart the IS if anyones interested !)
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 08:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message Filtering
Ex 5.5 SP4 NT4 SP6a
I had message filtering
Hey, only his *very* close friends get to call AB Martini!
-Original Message-
From: Tim Tullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 20:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
Very Good! Martini's @ Milliways after work?
-Original Message-
From
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
I do have anti-virus software and it is trapping and quarantining the
messages. But that doesn't stop the spoofed email from coming in.
I would like to find out the source
Thank you all for your contribution. Certainly helps...
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
Yes you can, at least up to a limit.
I usually go to
http
the first time a mail message matching the filtered list
comes in.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
Thank you all for your contribution. Certainly helps
Put it in as
@vsnl.net
That will chop everything from vsnl.net and any subdomains it might have.
Note: One thing I have found that appears to work like a champ is if you
want to kill all email from a country you can enter @ru and kill all email
from Russia. Make sure that you don't
First I'd change my DL SMTP addresses to something non-obvious. Then I'd
implement an antivirus solution which could be configured to drop worms.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
First I'd change my DL SMTP addresses to something non-obvious. Then I'd
implement an antivirus solution which could be configured to drop
Maybe I'm missing something here, but if there are people in that domain who work
closely with your company, how can you possibly get away with blocking the entire
domain?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:28
To:
Which AV package are you using? Perhaps it can be persuaded to stop the entire
message, rather than just the attachment.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
I
203.199.81.81
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
I do have anti-virus software and it is trapping and quarantining the
messages. But that doesn't stop
42
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
203.199.81.81
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:28
That might be the answer, but what is the question
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 19:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
42
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Very Good! Martini's @ Milliways after work?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
42
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Bombay sapphire anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Tullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message filtering
Very Good! Martini's @ Milliways after work?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Andy,
Based on one of the headers in a previous spam, I typed in
@210.73.88.134 (without the quotes of course) and
stopped/started my IMS.
I received another one on Thursday morning
the change.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Cool...thanks Andy. I figured it probably would, but I wasn't sure. I will
let you know in the next
Just curious, what exactly did you type in?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
I told you I would let you know if this works or not...looks like
Something like Bad Spammy go bye bye
Why that not work?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Just curious, what exactly did you type in?
-Original Message
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Just curious, what exactly did you type in?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:59 PM
How about just the IP address w/o the @ or perhaps in brackets? [ ]
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Andy,
Based on one of the headers in a previous
I'll give it a try.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
How about just the IP address w/o the @ or perhaps in brackets? [ ]
-Original Message-
From
If that doesnt work, Doug will buy you a beer.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
I'll give it a try.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
Andy,
Based on one of the headers in a previous spam, I typed in
@210.73.88.134 (without the quotes of course
, February 25, 2002 7:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
I think your problem is that the block by domains is looking at the FROM
address (the probably forged hotmail.com in this case) and not at the host
that actually sent you the e-mail message. What you probably want to do
]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Filtering
I think your problem is that the block by domains is looking
at the FROM address (the probably forged hotmail.com in
this case) and not at the host that actually sent you the
e-mail message
There's something fishy about those addresses...
But, to answer the question, you should only need @relayerone.com, not the subdomains.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Bollhofer, Mary I. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 14:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
47 matches
Mail list logo
