, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He
said that he
can't comment on it. But he did say that there are some wild
theories out
there. Some are crazy and some are more
. At the end of the day, sales drive everything.
3. How is it happening (solutions)? One desktop or mobile user at a time.
More later.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions.
One
from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater richness -
ie
text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater
thinness -
ie minimalism
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions.
One from Americans with Disabilities Act
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions.
One from Americans with Disabilities
.
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server
will
be providing
But,but! The magazine on the plane said that the next version will be SQL
based and wireless! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging
But will it warm the syrup for my waffles?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
But,but! The magazine on the plane said that the next
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity
Smith
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging
now get back to our daily work and stop feeding the rumor mill?
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I apologize
of Craig Dupler's famous Data Dumps
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you
as gospel either.
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html:
quote
really rely on, even a press announcement.
Sig /
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
=20
At ATE 2 years ago, we spent a lot
the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back
Maybe they will let you borrow one of their gags.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I am still waiting to hear from some other guys
there is
nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement.
Sig /
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
=20
At ATE 2
lol You made my day, Ed ;-)
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Gee, thanks for the insight! That certainly clears
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server
will be providing the next database engine for the next version
?
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He said that he
can't comment on it. But he
Why are giving her such a hard time?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back from one
I believe it falls under something like... Because he can :o)
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Why are giving her such a hard time
(Unified Messaging)
Why are giving her such a hard time?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard
what's a microsoft..?
-rdg
Motto: With Felicity, who misses Tener?
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Microsoft has from time to time
..and concurrent to this thread:
anyone catch any scuttlebutt on the venue for the next conference?
(cue Chris)
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging collaboration (Unified
ahem.. never mind..
http://www.microsoft.com/MSCorp/corpevents/mec2002/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
..and concurrent to this thread:
anyone catch
I worked with a couple of implentations of UM... It's great for those whom
travel a lot, or those that would rather not pick up a phone or go to a fax
machine -geeks and high level execs and sales critters are good candidates
for it. I have worked with Octel/Lucent, and also the Mitel version.
www.mail-resources.com | weblinks for some vendors... Their propaganda is
staggering on why you need it.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging collaboration (Unified
The POLITEST response I can think of is go and use Google.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Iam looking for information on:
1. Messaging
That's the POLITEST you could come up with??? VBG
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
The POLITEST response I can think of is go
Gary's so amusing when he tries to be nice.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
That's the POLITEST you could come up with??? VBG
collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you . . .
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Iam
:)
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you . . .
-Original Message
32 matches
Mail list logo
