folders and calendars.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server capacity
I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial
constraints, is it useable? I don't have
You will need to get new hardware. We just retired a dual Pentium 166
256 Mbytes RAM, NT 4.0; sp6a with Exchange 5.5 running strictly as an
OWA box. We constantly got complaints about slow response times, one
minute plus from the time you entered your password to the time the OWA
mailbox opened
]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:54 AM
Subject: RE: Server capacity
I think you will be OK, but if at all possible, add more RAM. I have run
win2k/E2k in 256MB and just logging in and running system administrator
thrashes the disk continuously
I think you can still buy external storage from HP/Compaq
Jake
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server capacity
With RAM prices where
Of Jacob Jeong
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server capacity
I think you can still buy external storage from HP/Compaq
Jake
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Thursday
I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server capacity
I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server
: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server capacity
I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Subject: RE: Server capacity
Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
you can get the funds for a server, or spend the money
on one now.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server capacity
I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server capacity
I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial
constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server capacity
I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial
constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper
stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load.
If it takes 45 seconds for a user
, 2003 7:23 PM
Subject: RE: Server capacity
I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so
outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using
Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc
for webmail? This would allow you to use
Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server capacity
I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial
constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper
stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50
: Jorge Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:23 PM
Subject: RE: Server capacity
I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so
outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using
Linux
14 matches
Mail list logo
