RE: Unable to access mail accounts using Outlook

2001-12-10 Thread rkk
im not sure but u can check in outlook 2000--- tools -optionsmail services-reconfigure mail supportand check if the corporate LAN acc is selected. just think u have the internet option selected there Rajeev Krishnan Tata Technologies, Mumbai Phone: 5837585 Fax: 5804021

Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread BY
Hello Group, If you have a choice as an Exchange Administrator, would you prefer to protect your Exchange environment by installing an e-mail filtering product (gateway) at the DMZ area instead of installing an anti-virus mail product on the machine running Exchange Server? I prefer an gateway

NDR for Calender meeting

2001-12-10 Thread Kiran, Murat
Brothers en Sisters, Env. Exchange 5.5 sp 4, Outlook 98, Problem: When users try to make an appointment via Calander they get an NDR but the destination user recieves the invitation. An a few seconds later the sender recieves a delivered message also. It is only for 5 recepients. Has someone

RE: NDR for Calender meeting

2001-12-10 Thread Joyce, Louis
Can you furnish us with the NDR? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2001 11:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR for Calender meeting

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Olds, Dominic
You can run AV scanning at the gateway; if you are using FW1 then TrendMicro works well with this but there is no real problem running a reputable AV product on the Exchange box either. Most on this list will tell you Trend is good as is Sybari's Antigen, and I have personal experience of

A Script to Archive Mailboxes

2001-12-10 Thread BY
Hi group, I have lots of old mailbox data need to be archived as PST data before deleting them from Exchange Server? Do you know any script that do it? BY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: A Script to Archive Mailboxes

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Harford
Exmerge? -Original Message- From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2001 13:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A Script to Archive Mailboxes Hi group, I have lots of old mailbox data need to be archived as PST data before deleting them from Exchange Server? Do you

RE: A Script to Archive Mailboxes

2001-12-10 Thread BY
That's right Mark. You have just reminded the existence of this tool! Thank you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Harford Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2001 12:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A Script to Archive Mailboxes

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Martin Blackstone
I use and prefer both. I let the mail hit the gateway for a preliminary scan, then on to the Exch server for a second scan. The gateway also can act as a holding area should the Exch server go down. If I had to choose one or the other, it would be a product that installs directly on my Exchange

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Allan Johnson
Virus software configured correctly (Trend or Sybari) on your Exchange server will run great and protect your mailboxes like a champ. Trend Scanmail - saving my butt for 3+ yrs. We are evaluating gateway scanning for content filtering as well as another layer of virus protection, call it a warm

Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
I am expereincing some time of mail loop and not sure how to get rid of it. I have 638 messages (so far) from Antigen like this: Antigen found ATT04643.TXT matching =*.txt file filter. The file is currently Removed. The message, DELIVERY FAILURE: User Postmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) not listed

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread Kevin Miller
Sounds like someone is sending you a message that your content filter is blocking. If you look at the message in the admin mail box what does it show? -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
You filter text files? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Loop?

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
I filter all files. I have to because my users rename their *.exe files and other stuff (change the extension) to try and bypass my firewall. (Admin Box) All reports go to a Postmaster Distribution List of which I'm a memember. Here's the deal. I have been filtering text file's for some time.

RE: Filter Sets and Users trying to bypass them.

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
Attempts to deliberately circumvent the security measures at my place of ork are punishable up to and including termination. It's a lovely policy, I suggest pushing for a similar one today. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage!

System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Tener, Richard
Hello all, I noticed my email server is hung up on a process that is taking up 99% of cpu time. The process is System idle process is it allright to end this process without interrupting the servers performance. Thanks Rich

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
Strange thing is that I don't appear to be getting anything to the postmaster distribution list related to this. I am logging smtp events and this is what shows up. Realtime scan found virus: Folder = ANTIGEN_SERVER\Inbox Message = DELIVERY FAILURE: User Postmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) not

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Aarts, Jan
This means that your server not doing anything, Idle. = nothing Jan -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Idle Process Hello all, I noticed my email server is

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Kevin Miller
Good luck trying.. It will not happen. -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Idle Process Hello all,

OWA -- No text

2001-12-10 Thread William Smith
Has any one seen an issue with OWA where a user can log in, view his/her message list, but when they click on a message to view the header shows up but now text shows up in the white space below the header? I am still looking through the technet articles with no luck. Also note this machine has

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Tener, Richard
I should just reboot right -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process Good luck trying.. It will not happen. -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
How can I black list this sender in Exch 5.5. I tried using Message Filtering on the Connections tab but this does not seem to work. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Douglas, Josh D.
I just looked at my Exchange server and it is doing the same thing. Is this a new virus :) -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Idle Process Hello all, I noticed my

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Hurst, Paul
I reckon you should buy a Pentium 66 PC that and move the services over that will get rid of 99% idle time -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process I should just

RE: OWA -- No text

2001-12-10 Thread Tener, Richard
Yeah there is KB on this look for it at technet. Also turn off the invisable ink checkbox in exchange admin. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA -- No text Has any one seen an

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread .DL Helpdesk
quick - forward this to everyone you know.. /snigger/ Regards James Johnston -Original Message- From: Douglas, Josh D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process I just looked at my Exchange

RE: OWA -- No text

2001-12-10 Thread Antony Slatcher
Had that problem after applying MS01-057. You need to update IE on the server to IE5.5 or IE6 Tony. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2001 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA -- No text Has any one seen an issue with OWA where

RE: OWA -- No text

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
It seems like I've seen this before. Try resetting the permissions on the Webdata directory to Everyone Full. Just add this for now and retest. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: OWA -- No text

2001-12-10 Thread Joyce, Louis
Have you installed the latest OWA patch? Does the OWA server have a version of IE older than 5.5? take a look at this: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-057.asp. Particularly the technical details Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT

RE: Disabling access to an Exchange 5.5 server programmatically

2001-12-10 Thread Stewart Jump
A trick we use is to put an MTA limit of a few K below the size of the virus. This doesn't work to well for users on the same store but if you have a large number of servers it limits a fair bit of the damage and leaves the users with some email functionality. This can be scripted with VBscript

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Joyce, Louis
Yes. Reboot then use fdisk and format. That should remedy things. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2001 15:48 To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
Turn up logging on your IMS? Can you disable notification to the sender of filtering at least temporarily? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
Did you stop and start the IMS? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Tener, Richard
Do you know where i can find that program called fdisk I want to do it on all my pcs. I heard it fixes everything -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process Yes.

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread .DL Helpdesk
aha, the comedian. mwahahahaha. JJ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process Do you know where i can find that program called fdisk I want to do it on all my

RE: NDR for Calender meeting

2001-12-10 Thread Lynne July
Destination user may have a delegate specified who is no longer with the company. -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR for Calender meeting Brothers en Sisters, Env. Exchange 5.5

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
I filter all files. I have to because my users rename their *.exe files and other stuff (change the extension) to try and bypass my firewall. Now that's just silly. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage!

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
Yeah. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far). Did you stop and start the IMS? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
I'm logging full on SMTP interface events. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far). Turn up logging on your IMS? Can you disable

RE: NDR for Calender meeting

2001-12-10 Thread Joyce, Louis
An NDR for us to see would still give us some better info. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2001 15:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Tener, Richard
lol -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process aha, the comedian. mwahahahaha. JJ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Roger Seielstad
That process safe to kill. However, the only effective way to kill it is to shut down the system. Pleast note that restarting the system will restart that process. Think about what that process is. Its name should give you a clue as to what it is.

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Jon Hill
We have MIMESweeper between our firewall and our Exchange server. It's great at protecting us from worms e-mailed to the firm. It works with third-party AV software (we use Sophos but if I had to choose today I'd probably go with Trend), plus we've set up rules to quarantine all files with

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread bmurphy
It's almost the equivalent of a DOS attack because the sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keeps sending this message: DELIVERY FAILURE: User Postmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IM NOT SENDING anything to this! Unless there is some type of

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Ken Davis
We Have a similiar set up to yours jon, And we also had a problem with Hotmail and the like. What we have done is implement WebSense and block all web-mail sites. -Original Message- From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange

Re: ESEUTIL /d does not defrag the PR1V.edb

2001-12-10 Thread Hong Bui
The database size reduced less than 400Kb (still about 15.5MB) after the compact, then immediately came back to 16MB. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).

2001-12-10 Thread Kelly_Borndale
Do you have it set up so that Antigen is sending a notification to the sender? Turn that option off for a little while. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Busby, Jacob
We have one virus scanner on the firewall, a different one for Exchange and a third for the OS. Hopefully somewhere along the line the virus should be zapped by one or more of our virus scanners. What it can't do is protect us from users with hotmail accounts, etc. Two users last week

RE: Disabling access to an Exchange 5.5 server programmatically

2001-12-10 Thread .DL Helpdesk
why dont you just write a script to shut down all the exchange services? JJ -Original Message- From: Stewart Jump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disabling access to an Exchange 5.5 server programmatically A

RE: Disabling access to an Exchange 5.5 server programmatically

2001-12-10 Thread Aguet, Pierre
Anyway, the Ed's method is the easiest Unpluging the box takes 2 seconds. Rgds Peter -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disabling access to an Exchange 5.5 server

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread John Matteson
This has *GOT* to be a joke question, right? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Dillon, Jeff
Waiting for the msg recall -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process This has *GOT* to be a joke question, right? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Barry Patterson
HEHE. Rich, if you sit there and move the mouse REALLY fast it will help keep that idle process usage down. Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E2000

2001-12-10 Thread Alverson, Thomas M.
MS is now saying that even the AVAPI mode of exchange 5.5 can let viruses slip through under load. The only solution is to upgrade to Exchange 2000. From NTBUGTRAQ: === Message from NTBUGTRAQ mailing

RE: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E20 00

2001-12-10 Thread Martin Blackstone
As far as I can tell MS is saying no such thing. Russ is saying it. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E2000 MS is

Q300048 MTA Event ID 57 on Bridgehead Servers

2001-12-10 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
Dear DL Members, Has anyone made this change to their IMC Exchange Servers? Did it work for you? Did you change it to 8 or some other value? Not always, but when we receive Event 57, this normally results in . 01. The IMC Exchange Servers stops communicating with

RE: Queueing incoming mail

2001-12-10 Thread Joe Pochedley
Ed, That sounds great. Will the IIS SMTP service care about holding mail for that much time before it can be delivered though? Joe Pochedley I like deadlines, cartoonist Scott Adams once said. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -Original Message-

RE: Queueing incoming mail

2001-12-10 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
It will hold as much mail as you have disk. Tom. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Queueing incoming mail Ed, That sounds great. Will the IIS SMTP service care about

RE: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E20 00

2001-12-10 Thread Martin Blackstone
OK, now I see it... Thank god I switched to ESE based scanning! Now, has anyone actually seen this happen when using AVAPI. We all know it will always happen with MAPI. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: inactive directory

2001-12-10 Thread Morrison, Gordon
Thanks, this site was handy. It turns out that the issues was with the initial AD replication from DCPROMO. When The initial replication happened, not all of the required information came through. From any GUI perspective everything was there, but if you dug down into the SPNs, you could see

RE: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E20 00

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
AFAIK none of the enhancements in AVAPI 2.0 were related to messages being allowed to slip through, but were to expose things such as the sender and recipient of the messages, the lack of inclusion in the 1.0 version being deemed a shortcoming by many customers. Even if the AVAPI in Exchange 5.5

RE: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E20 00

2001-12-10 Thread Dillon, Jeff
MS says (Q263949) and Russ repeats that MAPI-scanning has a potential hole, but the AVAPI x.0 and shim methods don't (depending of course upon the 3rd party shim or AVAPI process behavior). -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001

RE: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E20 00

2001-12-10 Thread Martin Blackstone
The MAPI hole is obvious to anyone who has ever used MAPI based scanning during a virus storm -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
If you have to choose one or the other, choose to load the anti-virus that goes directly on the server( ie. ScanMail) The reason you would want this instead of the gateway type of anti-virus product (ie. InterScan) is because the version that goes directly on the server would be able to clean a

Computer Associates update

2001-12-10 Thread Stevens, Dave
Hello allthis is not exactly off-topic as I know many of us poor individuals are using Arcserve. I found out this morning that Computer Associates is now charging $95 per incident for phone support. It doesn't matter to them that my company has purchased over $5,000 in their product this

OWA 5.5 - W2K

2001-12-10 Thread Wohlgemuth, Mike
Hi all I am running an Exchange 5.5 site (sp4) on NT4 (sp6) . My OWA server is a W2K (sp2) with only OWA (sp4) installed. After I first install my OWA server, it runs great! Then something happens (the network goes down, I install a hotfix, or it just breaks ... it has happened 3 times

Re: Computer Associates update

2001-12-10 Thread Paul Cummins
Hello allthis is not exactly off-topic as I know many of us poor individuals are using Arcserve. I found out this morning that Computer Associates is now charging $95 per incident for phone support. Use Independent support. Many companies in the UK (GST Group included) offer

RE: MS says antivirus not effective on Exchange 5.5: must buy E20 00

2001-12-10 Thread Grupe, Robert
I think that some people are jumping to some wrong conclusions here. First off the AVAPI 1.0 article talks about MAPI scanning occasionally missing viruses under load. Then the Exchange 2000 article points out that the VSAPI 2.0 is the next evolutionary that addresses some of the shortcomings of

RE: Computer Associates update

2001-12-10 Thread Stevens, Dave
We have things of that nature for hardware, but I am not aware of anything like that for software issues. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Computer

RE: Computer Associates update

2001-12-10 Thread Barry Patterson
We had a support contract with someone national, who I won't mention. Had both Novell NT support through them. Usually when we called it was something not so easy to figure out. They would be like, ummm we don't know... More than once they got a Microsoft or Novell tech on the phone. That was

Download IE6 for redistribution

2001-12-10 Thread William Smith
I've seen this site before, but can't remember where it is What is Microsofts web address for downloading IE so I can throw it onto a CD and load it onto another machine. I don't need the 468kb file that then downloads the real IE. Thanks, William L. Smith Systems Administrator Riptech,

RE: Download IE6 for redistribution

2001-12-10 Thread Stevens, Dave
You need to build it using the admin kit. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Download IE6 for redistribution I've seen this site before, but can't remember where it is What

RE: Directory change

2001-12-10 Thread tweid
OK got that part... Now how do you make that specific SMTP address the reply to? I know there are sample .csv files that come on the select CDs that have all of the attributes, does anyone have the master sample? _ List posting

RE: NDR for Calender meeting

2001-12-10 Thread Berquam, Paul
I'm actually having this exact problem. The NDR is for the former employee. I have gone into the delegates section and removed the name, but the error is still there. Any suggestions on how to get rid of this 'phantom' delegate entry? Thanks -Original Message- From: Lynne July

Migrating Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Public Folders to Exchange Serve r 2000

2001-12-10 Thread Sherwin Bouville
Hello, Does anyone know how to migrate public folders from exchange 5.5 to a completely different exchange 2000 organization. I have scoured the entire internet. ADC only works for replication within the same org. Migration wizard only handles mailboxes. Please help!! Sherwin

RE: Download IE6 for redistribution

2001-12-10 Thread Martin Blackstone
www.microsoft.com/ieak -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Download IE6 for redistribution I've seen this site before, but can't remember where it is What is Microsofts web

RE: Directory change

2001-12-10 Thread Greatlakes, Reebdnes
use the fields E-MAIL Addresses and Secondary Proxy Addresses fill the e-mail addresses field with the smtp address you want as the reply to address and the secondary proxy addresses field with the other (original) smtp address -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Exporting E2k GAL to csv

2001-12-10 Thread Melanie Rutberg
I did try to post this earlier, but I did not see it hit the list, so I am resending it. Hi There, I think that I may have found a way to export the E2k GAL to .csv. All I needed was to export a list of the users and their primary SMTP email address. As such this worked for my purposes.

Changing SMTP-OUT port number for Exchange 5.5

2001-12-10 Thread osman
Hi, I have a exchange 5.5 with S.P 4. I want to change the SMTP port number for outgoing mails from internet mail service.How can i do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

Exchange 2000

2001-12-10 Thread Ton Robbertsen
Hello, can anyone help me with the following problem, when i tried to replaced the database from THE FIRST STORAGE GROUP ( MAILBOX STORE ) the following files PRIV1.edb and PRIV1.stm every thing seem to go allright but afther 100 % copying , when i look in the task manager the program ( MAILBOX

RE: System Idle Process

2001-12-10 Thread Justin Milner-Walker
Cruel but fair -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2001 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Idle Process quick - forward this to everyone you know.. /snigger/ Regards James Johnston -Original Message-

test

2001-12-10 Thread Pomerantz, David S.
Sorry! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL

Exchange and Proxy delay

2001-12-10 Thread Dunkley Paul
Hi all, Right first off this is my first posting - so please treat me gently. Exchange 5.5 Proxy 2.0 NT4 SP6a etc etc. Exchange is behind Proxy using the Winsock client - standard config ISP connection is a LAN dial-up ISDN router I have noticed that when an outgoing message is sent from the

RE: Filter Sets and Users trying to bypass them.

2001-12-10 Thread Sauer, Steve
We use are using a product called Messaging Management System (MMS) from Tumbleweed Communications Corp (http://www.tumbleweed.com). This is a content scanner like Scanmail from Trend Micro. It checks the headers of the files rather than the file names so users can't circumvent the system. It

RE: Email Virus Protection

2001-12-10 Thread Osbond, Ben
We use the same scenario as Jon. MAILsweeper for SMTP protected us from all the major outbreaks, thanks to Sophos releasing their anti-virus ide files very quickly. Norton AV on the Desktop catches any virus that may get through. Jon - It is my impression that Websweeper cannot be run on the

RE: Download IE6 for redistribution

2001-12-10 Thread Alverson, Thomas M.
You don't need IEAK, you just need that 468kb file and some command line options to get the whole thing: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=%2fsearch%2fviewDoc.aspx%3fdo cID%3dKC.Q174680%26dialogID%3d5346466%26iterationID%3d1%26sessionID%3danonym ous%7c3650407 -Original

RE: Changing SMTP-OUT port number for Exchange 5.5

2001-12-10 Thread Stevens, Dave
Registry hack. -Original Message- From: osman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing SMTP-OUT port number for Exchange 5.5 Hi, I have a exchange 5.5 with S.P 4. I want to change the SMTP port number for outgoing

Re: no go-a !!

2001-12-10 Thread Tony Hlabse
What path did you follow. Sounds like an rights issue. - Original Message - From: Em [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:17 PM Subject: OWA: no go-a !! I upgraded from NT 4/Exch 5.5 a week ago to Win2K server/Exchange 2000 and

OT: Enhancing voting functionality...

2001-12-10 Thread Cook, David A.
Sorry for the off topic post but I have been asked about this due to the voting functionality in Outlook. I'm running Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2000 and have been asked how we could have advanced voting functionality using Outlook/Exchange. The requirements are listed below. Has anyone ever come

RE: Enhancing voting functionality...

2001-12-10 Thread Martin Blackstone
Use Chads -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Enhancing voting functionality... Sorry for the off topic post but I have been asked about this due to the voting

RE: Enhancing voting functionality...

2001-12-10 Thread Barry Patterson
Then if the voting isn't to your liking you can appeal for a recount. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Enhancing voting functionality... Use

RE: Enhancing voting functionality...

2001-12-10 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
You could do everything, except the last line item, with an Outlook form and some scripting. Take a look at cdolive and slipstick for some ideas. Pickup a copy of Thomas Rizzo's book if you don't already have a copy. If you don't have any experience, this could be a bit of an undertaking.

RE: Changing SMTP-OUT port number for exchange 5.5

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
Can't. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: osman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing SMTP-OUT port number for exchange

RE: Migrating Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Public Folders to Exchange S erve r 2000

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
3rd party tool such as Exchange Migrator from NetIQ? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Sherwin Bouville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange

RE: Exchange and Proxy delay

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
Take a look at this MS KB article, it may help: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q241/1/57.asp You can also get this article by sending an E-mail with a subject of Q241157 (without the quotes) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you

RE: Enhancing voting functionality...

2001-12-10 Thread John Matteson
Give it up, Bush won. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10,

RE: Enhancing voting functionality...

2001-12-10 Thread Barry Patterson
I think they should have had to fight over the title... Or just flip a freakin coin. It was that close anyway. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

Procmail

2001-12-10 Thread m2web
Would anyone know or used Procmail to do mail filtering for viruses, subjects, addresses etc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Procmail

2001-12-10 Thread Martin Blackstone
Used what? What is that? -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Procmail Would anyone know or used Procmail to do mail filtering for viruses, subjects, addresses etc.

RE: Procmail

2001-12-10 Thread Chris Scharff
Know of it, haven't used it... Plenty of info at procmail.org. Specific question? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:19 PM To:

  1   2   >