works marvelously.
Missy Koslosky
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: Inter organisation and scheduling
Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least
host some Exchange services...
It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no
way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three lines
(whatever) of code that control this were
No third-party monitoring/management tools are installed on the server?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher W. Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:45 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k Temp folder
The only thing
Well, to be fair, mailboxes aren't *activated* in E2K until the user logs
onto them the first time. But they're definitely already created.
Rant on, brother.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Aug
No.
Can you change the DL names to be more clear?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:20 AM
Subject: Wrong distribution lists
Hi,We have both firm and office distribution lists,
the mailbox as well and makes it
visible in the ESM :)
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook Profile Generator
Well, to be fair, mailboxes
That is not how it works for me.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Drewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: Attachments Storage locations
I was under the impression that when you open an attachment fro
mments on this one.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 9:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Attachments Storage locations
It isn't W2K
On a BDC
Copy of SAM exists so
Exchange is okay.
(in other words, the bigges problem is when you don't have an alternate copy
of the SAM. you do, so you could still recover if you lose the server.)
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Ghassan Hassan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discu
Never needed to do it. There are two articles by Tony Redmond in Windows
200 Magazine (or the Exchange Administrator journal - I don't remember which
they were published in) on the subject.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Bueffel, Scott M - CNF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discus
Add another column called "secondary-proxy-addresses" to the CSV and add the
addresses there. Use smtp: (lowercase) as the identifier.
Search TechNet for "Import Export FAQ exchange" (without the quotes) for
more info...
M
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
t it? Is there anything you wish
that you could change?
In order to save everyone else from boredom, send replies to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Unless you forget, in which case everyone will still
live...
Thanks,
Missy Koslosky
_
L
You forgot:
3. Explain why the attachments are missing and other things are fudged.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:52 AM
Subject: RE: Undelete command
What kind of backup are
I'll play. :)
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Scharff, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:09 PM
Subject: An Academic Exercise (was: RE: Minions (was RE: Undelete command) )
So I was wonder
Funny. People keep telling me that a second won't make things more
difficult.
I knew they were lying.
M
- Original Message -
From: "Neubauer, Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
iginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001
Funny. People keep telling me that a second won't make things more
difficult.
I knew they were lying.
Actually, what I think has been lost in this long, PITA thread, is that
Exchange uses Single Instance Storage, so only one copy of the file exists
in the database anyway. So it shouldn't be a big deal.
Let's think about that for a minute, shall we?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Byro
Ahhh...
I'm a versioning kinda gal.
You do need document management. Dpptu.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Shoemaker, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'missy koslosky'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Exchange Discussions"
<[EMA
A hardware problem?
Explain.
- Original Message -
From: "Ewart, Vicki L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:51 PM
Subject: Plain Text Only
I have a user who can't read HTML due to a hardware problem that is
unresolved.
Distribution List.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Ewart, Vicki L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:43 PM
Subject: RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders
#7 - What's a DL?
V. Ewart
-Original Message-
From: P
http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/zaphtml.htm
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Ewart, Vicki L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: Plain Text Only
This user is not competent enough to use OWA (really,
AFAIK, you can not do this.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Raji Arulambalam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:15 PM
Subject: Delivered/Read Notifications
Hi
When I request a delivery notification for a message sent
Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a "Duncan, Larry"
or a "Duncan, Lawrence" or a "Lawrence Duncan") in the archives that I
currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I
guess you've been lurking for a couple years.
Your answers below remind me of a
ist, I have always tried
to follow the advise found in JOB 13:5 "If only you would be altogether
silent, for you that would be wisdom." NIV
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice:
Search TechNet for "turfdir".
You need only ask once.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Karen Swart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:50 PM
Subject: I need to block messages from a spammer
Using Exchange 5.5, how d
List
Yeah, what ever happened to Mr. Woodrick? I miss his subtle approach to
exchange excellence :)
-----Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List
I know who you are
Now Don, that's close to abusive. Be gentle, my sweet...
- Original Message -
From: "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: I need to block messages from a spammer
Do you need to send three messa
IIRC, you need version 3.6 of NetBackup for Exchange 2000 compatibility.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Vinny Avallone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:35 PM
Subject: OT-Veritas Woes
Hello Everyone,
If this is too
7 AM
Subject: RE: OT-Veritas Woes
I think 3.4.1 works fine.
I am able to backup the IS just fine. The only problem I have is with
the mailboxes.
Again, Veritas says 3.4 should work. ;-)
-----Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:4
I'm not sure why you wouldn't use Exchange's IMS for all of your SMTP
trffic; you're going to add unnecessary complexity to your system.
In any case, in the IMS settings, there should be a "forward all messages to
host" option. I don't have 5.5 anywhere near, so I can't point out the
exact setti
Botp, you need to cal MS about this. We're not set up here to handle this
kind of thing.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Peña, Botp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:30 AM
Subject: Database resource failure error 0xff
You need to look into directory import and export. A change to a template
is not what you need to do.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Peoples" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:06 PM
Subject: GAL template change
Heh. You forgot Lori, Kim, and Darcy. :)
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 1:42 AM
Subject: Re: automated response
I had no idea that we were interested. Are they trying to
I'm assuming that the #EVERYONE group is a distribution list that contains
all users in the GAL in your environment. You most certainly may limit who
sends to this group - check out the "Delivery Restrictions" tab on the DL's
properties page.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Carine Lim,
Nada. But methinks the users will have an opinion when they can no longer
receive email...
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:55 AM
Subject: RE: x400 addressing
What does y
It won't be the services. In E2K the services run in the LocalSystem's
security context.
Andy, try uninstalling and reinstalling TCP/IP on the server. I'm assuming
that your DNS is working perfectly, is available, and that there are no
other services that are not starting on the server.
If the
"Suddenly"? What changed?
Exchange 5.5 doesn't really give a hoot about domains in terms of access to
PF's, so that isn't your issue. The default permissions will apply to all
users. If the servers are in the same site, there's not much need to create
replicas on the other server - remember, t
You need to do this by exporting, foobling the resultant file, and importing
the changes.
A couple cross-posts, eh?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Daniele Melo - Projetos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Exchange2000 (E-mail)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "E
I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized
the URL.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM
Subj
Okay. I love you all dearly. But please, let's cut this for a while and
get back to some sense of normalcy. Please.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Byron Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:51 PM
Subject: O
Interesting stuff there. Fun little tests to run. In any case, it speeds
things up a bit, but not to the extent I would have thought.
M
- Original Message -
From: "Scharff, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:54 P
An account with the Exchange Full Admin right is what he should need.
Shema, Domain, Enterprise, etc. don't matter to Exchange 2K - it's the
Exchange-specific rights he needs. Also, Admin rights on the local box.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ex
It's so only necessary to ask once (or are there three of you?). It was a
Good Thing that you changed the subject line this time, though, sol you get
credit there.
I'm not sure what the first sentence has to do with the second, but I'll
give it a stab.
Sure, you can integrate the GAL into a web
Sounds like you're being used as a relay. Make that stop. The FAQ has a
link to an article explaining how to do this, IIRC.
M- Original Message -
From: "Adil Azad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:04 AM
Subject: RE:
What version of Exchange? Do you have it set up to accept inbound
connections for that domain?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: unknown domain?
T
It's so only necessary to ask once (or are there three of you?). It was a
Good Thing that you changed the subject line this time, though, so you get
credit there.
I'm not sure what the first sentence has to do with the second, but I'll
give it a stab.
Sure, you can integrate the GAL into a web
Interesting stuff there. Fun little tests to run. In any case, it speeds
things up a bit, but not to the extent I would have thought.
M
- Original Message -
From: "Scharff, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:54 P
An account with the Exchange Full Admin right is what he should need.
Shema, Domain, Enterprise, etc. don't matter to Exchange 2K - it's the
Exchange-specific rights he needs. Also, Admin rights on the local box.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ex
I'd say it's darn close to impossible...
M
- Original Message -
From: "Peña, Botp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
Thanks, sir Andy.
I have seen firewalls
Dude, if IIS isn't on your E2K boxen, they won't be E2K boxen.
M
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA
so you then have to have IIS on that box as w
FAQ.
Clue: imsext.dll info is in TechNet.
M
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Seier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:52 PM
Subject: Appending messages in Exchange 2000
I have searched extensively to try and find a
My bad. I missed the "Exchange 2000".
Dpptu.
- Original Message -
From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: Appending messages in Exchang
No.
Then have management send a note to a DL the user belongs to announcing some
kind of sweet prize ("$100 to the first person who can tell me why X
happens").
After the mad rush, maybe they'll learn.
Or, simply, there are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural
problems.
M
- O
You missed the "good". You're getting there!
M
- Original Message -
From: "Bueffel, Scott M - CNF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Exch DL - Force to Place Member Name in TO field
Ooh. Ooh. Let
POP3 has no influence whatsoever upon OWA's functionality.
- Original Message -
From: "James Casstevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail
Woul
She did read them, she didn't commit them to memory. Neither did anyone
else. We do care, but we're not obsessive. And this is not the only
thread.
M
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 200
Thanks for the kind thoughts, Tim. They are very much appreciated.
I can't tell you how scary I thought it was to be in Washington, DC this
morning - I can't imagine what it was like in New York.
I hope we can find peace somewhere after this.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Tim John"
I heard it gas up to $5/gallon in some places.
One would think we're in Eurpoe.
BTW, AFAIK we're still at normal gas prices here in Maryland (DC/Baltimore
suburbs). And the grocery stores were, if anything, less crowded than
normal.
M
- Original Message -
From: "John Allhiser" <[EMAIL
Use a template with the DL as an attribute to create the new users. Or
write a script to export all mailboxes every night and automatically add the
mailboxes as members to the DL.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTEC
Call MS PSS and ask for the Bedlam tool. Make them explain how to use it.
It was created for this kind of scenario.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Malone, Barb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:21 AM
Subject: RE:
These are two issues.
TrendMicro's ScanMail and Sybari's Antigen are the favored A/V solutions for
this list.
Brick backups are dog slow by virtue of how they work - a MAPI call is made
to each item in a mailbox in order to gather the data that belongs to that
mailbox. You will never achieve a
OOF won't cause mail loops. They should only fire once per sender.
(They've broken before though...)
While I'd think this is due to a mail loop, I'd look for an auto-reply or
auto-forward rule. Check the NDR's to see if you can pick up a looping
message there, Nelson.
Missy
- Original Mess
A directory is just that -- a directory. You cannot stop items from
replicating throughout the directory within this organization.
Why would you want this to *not* happen anyway?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tu
What format are the messages being sent in?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "John Drago" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:58 PM
Subject: Email Attachments Disappearing
I have
The Swynk.com search kinda sucks, to be kind.
www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm works beautifully for answers to
questions such as this. And simple keywords work really well in TechNet, as
do words like AND NEAR and OR.
disclaimer NEAR message might work in TechNet.
Missy
- Original Mes
Really.
- Original Message -
From: "Ewart, Vicki L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:45 PM
Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER
Tried that. Got a bunch of jibberish.
ve
-Original Message-
From: Scharff, Chris [mailt
Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 7:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problem with Informa
Gotta ask her husband about that...
I think she's still giving bear hugs though.
- Original Message -
From: "Great Cthulhu Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: God Bless America
Can we have a
Urgh. Forgot that stupid thing existed...
2000 must rot the brain.
- Original Message -
From: "Great Cthulhu Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:49 PM
Subject: RE: Directory replication help
A 100% foolproof
Oh goody. My husband's laptop is on the fritz and it's URGENT that it be
fixed immediately! When can you show up to fix it?
Thanks so much you super dude!
I love you all
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Ahhh... She is. But, being the goddess of wisdom, she's kind and
forgiving. Unless you don't buy her a beer (and if you can't find her, I'm
sure she won't mind me proxying for her).
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL
t MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Begging
Oh
11 Exchange servers for 5K users? Unnecessary.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Razler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:35 PM
Subject: TCO - Linux vs. Exchange
Hello:
I am not advocating either side. I am j
ook?
-----Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Begging
1-800-YOU-DO-IT
It's URGENT!
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q164/8/05.asp
- Original Message -
From: "Chinnery Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: data restore to diff srvr results in server error 1276
Well,
Directory import.
What do you want to do?
- Original Message -
From: "Mellott, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: GAL mod's by reg user for ALL users info
Ok ready for the flaming over this:
is the
Someone failed to tell you...
It is my experience that you cannot have the recovery server on the same
network as the original server if you're doing this type of restore. The
backup programs I've dealt with in the past will always redirect the restore
to the original server if they can find it.
Unfortunately, that doesn't work. An admin I once worked with found this
out the hard way... The recovery server needs to be on a different network
than the original server.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "John Matteson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
actice?
But isn't that only in certain instances? I recovered a public folder (with
the generous help/advice of some of the people on this list) last week. The
recovery server was on the network and I simply redirected the store to that
server.
-----Original Message-
From: missy kos
Desktop will work.
- Original Message -
From: "Joyce, Louis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:22 AM
Subject: RE: ims queues
Just out of interest.
Do you have to do the 'nslookup'from your exchange server or can you d
Probably Raptor, as he cites their mailing list...
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony L. Sollars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus
what firewall do you use Les, I ha
_The Elements of Style_ by Strunk and White wouldn't hurt him either.
M
- Original Message -
From: "Scharff, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: Removing Exchange 2000 after abortive install
>
Would someone please let my husband know this? He hasn't caught onto the
idea yet, and I'm sick of coming up with dinner ideas...
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Hampshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:48 AM
Subj
You add a column to the CSV with a header of Secondary-Proxy-Addresses and
add the SMTP values in the format of smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
appropriate rows.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursda
I resemble that remark. Except the guy part.
Missy Koslosky
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
- Original Message -
From: "Bauer, Mr. Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 5:02 PM
Subject
How about this: What are you trying to do?
- Original Message -
From: "The Geek Q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:44 PM
Subject: RE: Moving Xchange database to a network Storage location
Chris,
First thank you fo
Have you checked your PIX?
:)
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: test
Our system replaces the word "xx" with a series of x characters.
We refuse to hav
You forgot "don't chew ice; it's bad for your teeth".
Or is ice considered a drink? After all, it's made from water...
- Original Message -
From: "Great Cthulhu Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: RE
The \imcdata\in directory is exactly what it advertises itself to be -the
incoming mail queue.
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:46 PM
Subject: RE: Tech Buddies
does anyone kno
Yes. No. Personal folders won't be reported by Exchange. They're located
wherever the user tells them to go. Personal folders do NOT belong on file
servers. If the data is important enough to back up, it's important enough
to keep in its proper place, in the Exchange databases.
- Origina
No.
- Original Message -
From: "Van Huissteden, Adriaan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:18 AM
Subject: Defrag Drives
Is it a good Idea to defrag drives on exchange!
Thanks All
Adriaan Van Huissteden
Network Admin
DNS.
Errors in the event logs?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Evan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:50 AM
Subject: RE: instant response required, external mail down exchange 5.5
It seems our mail server has ma
Yes. No.
- Original Message -
From: "Van Huissteden, Adriaan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:38 AM
Subject: RE: Defrag Drives
Do I have to schedule Exchange IS Maintenance period? Does it stop the
service?
Cheers
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 08:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Defrag Drives
Yes. No.
- Original Message -
From: "Van Huissteden, Adriaan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Dis
This is an Exchange list. The MS newsgroups for IE would be a more
appropriate place to ask this question.
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: # of folders in
Search technet for "ports exchange" without quotes.
Who is asking, BTW?
- Original Message -
From: "Exchange NewsGroups" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:30 AM
Subject: How does outlook 2000 connect to internal exchan
What's he risking by not having file-based A/V on his Exchange server?
There shouldn't be anything other than Exchange on the server, so Antigen
should protect his server quite nicely.
I'm not a proponent of file-based scanners on servers that aren't file
servers.
Missy
- Original Message --
The problem with restoring the last backup is that the -1018 errors are
caused by hardware (drives or controllers, usually) and that, if the
underfying hardware problem isn't fixed, you're likely to see the errors
again...
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Linton Smith (WBTQ)" <[EMAIL PRO
You can have Hanji.
- Original Message -
From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: MEC
Can I also take on a tech buddy even though I am the recipient of a tech
buddy?
Maybe I can b
You can still go - it's next week.
- Original Message -
From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: MEC
I'm wishing I went to the MEC just to see what the hype is about these darn
fish
1 - 100 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
