RE: mailbox not creating
I never talk about the Special Boat Service either Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating I never talk about SBS. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Ed, I would agree with you in principle. But the argument doesn't stand when you talk about a product like Small Business Server. They are catering for a market that doesn't accept buy hardware is cheap, philosophy. The people in the lower tier obviously want the toys but cannot afford the infrastructure and we have seen the results and to be honest; some work and some don't!. Few thoughts and its back to the horses for courses scenario. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Rachel, > > From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at > the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 > world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits > of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it > residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you > have some rational business decision that your organization can > justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right > click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is > nothing more to it. > > Sean McGilligan > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the > exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look > there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does > not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If > anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _
RE: mailbox not creating
I never talk about SBS. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Ed, I would agree with you in principle. But the argument doesn't stand when you talk about a product like Small Business Server. They are catering for a market that doesn't accept buy hardware is cheap, philosophy. The people in the lower tier obviously want the toys but cannot afford the infrastructure and we have seen the results and to be honest; some work and some don't!. Few thoughts and its back to the horses for courses scenario. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Rachel, > > From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at > the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 > world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits > of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it > residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you > have some rational business decision that your organization can > justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right > click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is > nothing more to it. > > Sean McGilligan > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the > exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look > there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does > not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If > anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:
RE: mailbox not creating
Ed, I would agree with you in principle. But the argument doesn't stand when you talk about a product like Small Business Server. They are catering for a market that doesn't accept buy hardware is cheap, philosophy. The people in the lower tier obviously want the toys but cannot afford the infrastructure and we have seen the results and to be honest; some work and some don't!. Few thoughts and its back to the horses for courses scenario. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Rachel, > > From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at > the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 > world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits > of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it > residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you > have some rational business decision that your organization can > justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right > click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing > there is nothing more to it. > > Sean McGilligan > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the > exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look > there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does > not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If > anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:
RE: mailbox not creating
The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller generally focused on two issues, load and recovery. A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually gains weight with Windows 2000 because Active Directory uses more cycles, though cycles are cheaper than they used to be. Putting an Exchange Server on a DC (especially on a Windows NT PDC) makes it take longer to recover, mainly because there are more steps. With Windows 2000, you'll also have replication delays. I agree with Chris that most people won't find these arguments too compelling, but with what computers cost nowadays, having a couple of dedicated machines for domain conrtrollers shouldn't be a big deal. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Rachel, > > From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at > the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 > world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits > of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it > residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you > have some rational business decision that your organization can > justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right > click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing > there is nothing more to it. > > Sean McGilligan > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates > the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system > manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to > properties for the user, it does not show the email address. > I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a > releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
I think it really depends on the organization in question. Certainly if I were Sprint or BT I wouldn't have Exchange on a DC, but for other organizations it might be appropriate. Certainly if I had my druthers, I'd not have my FSMO roles handled by the same server... Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Chris, > > Your right. > I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and > that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup > strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as > witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 > on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of > destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole > new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. > > Sean mcgilligan > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a > BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. > > Chris > -- > Chris Scharff > Senior Sales Engineer > MessageOne > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > > > > Rachel, > > > > From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at > > the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the > Exchange 2000 > > world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on > the merits > > of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it > > residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking > unless you > > have some rational business decision that your organization can > > justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly > you right > > click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing > > there is nothing more to it. > > > > Sean McGilligan > > -Original Message- > > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates > > the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system > > manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to > > properties for the user, it does not show the email address. > > I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a > > releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > > > thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Chris, Your right. I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a personal choice. As long as your whole backup strategy was sound. But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3 years ago. But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it has the five roles of destiny; makes life interesting and NTDSUTIL takes on a whole new meaning. I prefer the member server approach in that instance. Sean mcgilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Rachel, > > From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would > look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into > the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a > huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now > with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain > controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some > rational business decision that your organization can justify > On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right > click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing > there is nothing more to it. > > Sean McGilligan > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates > the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system > manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to > properties for the user, it does not show the email address. > I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a > releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Well, one assumes she meant DC or GC but even so, I don't think it matters much. > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Chris, > > I would agree with you but saying Exch2k resides on a BDC. > Sounds like a configuration issue unless that was a freudian slip. > > Sean McGilligan > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 31 2001 11:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > And addresses don't appear until after the RUS has applied > the recipient policy. If you wait 15 minutes does the account > get an address? > > Chris > -- > Chris Scharff > Senior Sales Engineer > MessageOne > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:20 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > > > > The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens > their mailbox > > for the first time or an email is sent to that user. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates > > the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system > > manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to > > properties for the user, it does not show the email address. > > I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a > > releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > > > thank you > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual > > or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this > message is > > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly > > prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please > > immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & Associates, Inc. by telephone > > (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > == > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't really matter 1 way or another IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > Rachel, > > From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would > look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into > the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a > huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now > with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain > controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some > rational business decision that your organization can justify > On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right > click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing > there is nothing more to it. > > Sean McGilligan > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates > the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system > manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to > properties for the user, it does not show the email address. > I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a > releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Chris, I would agree with you but saying Exch2k resides on a BDC. Sounds like a configuration issue unless that was a freudian slip. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 31 2001 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailbox not creating And addresses don't appear until after the RUS has applied the recipient policy. If you wait 15 minutes does the account get an address? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens > their mailbox for the first time or an email is sent to that user. > > > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates > the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system > manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to > properties for the user, it does not show the email address. > I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a > releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & > Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and > delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
Rachel, >From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world. That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of putting exchange on a BDC. Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a Domain controller is not the modern thinking unless you have some rational business decision that your organization can justify On the question about users; if it set up correctly you right click on the UserID and configure them to support mailing there is nothing more to it. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 30 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
And addresses don't appear until after the RUS has applied the recipient policy. If you wait 15 minutes does the account get an address? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: mailbox not creating > > > The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens > their mailbox for the first time or an email is sent to that user. > > > -Original Message- > From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: mailbox not creating > > > I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. > I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. > When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates > the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system > manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to > properties for the user, it does not show the email address. > I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a > releavant article # I would appreciate it. > > thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & > Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax > (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and > delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox not creating
The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens their mailbox for the first time or an email is sent to that user. -Original Message- From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox not creating I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server. I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller. When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no mailboxes. When I go to properties for the user, it does not show the email address. I will continue searching the faq. If anyone knows a releavant article # I would appreciate it. thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
