[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] New: Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 Bug ID: 2273 Summary: Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery Product: Exim Version: 4.91 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: bug

[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 --- Comment #1 from Tim Stewart --- Maybe this bug is related to bug 1322? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev

[exim-dev] [Bug 2269] protect against large number of DKIM sig headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2269 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2272] better handling for multiple, multiline headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION

[exim-dev] [Bug 2266] TLS SNI should default set

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2266 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris --- We used to do a new TLS conn for every message, within a continued SMTP conn. To the extent that still holds, the multi-domain changes in the proposed coding might not be needed. On the other

[exim-dev] [Bug 2265] TLS SNI not auto-set for DANE clients

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2265 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgh146...@wizmail.org

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 --- Comment #1 from Nigel Metheringham --- This sounds like it is an selinux policy issue. The selinux policy for Fedora is written by the Fedora folks, and fixing it is outside our skillset. Exim is a setuid program for good reason,

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] New: Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 Bug ID: 2276 Summary: Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system Product: Exim Version: 4.91 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 --- Comment #4 from Tim Stewart --- I will test this and reply soon, likely tomorrow. Thanks for the patch! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 Phil Pennock changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@exim.org --- Comment #2 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2264] DNS lookups should not chase CNAME chains

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2264 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris --- Created attachment 1084 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1084=edit proposed patch This needs testing against a real resolver, unlike the facilities of the Exim test-harness.

[exim-dev] [Bug 2264] DNS lookups should not chase CNAME chains

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2264 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ni...@exim.org |jgh146...@wizmail.org

[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 --- Comment #5 from Tim Stewart --- I did the sleep() test after getting your patch and all looks well. I also appreciate the extra return value checks. I will deploy this to a few of our servers and do some heavier testing.

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] New: exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 Bug ID: 2274 Summary: exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so Product: Exim Version: 4.91 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: bug

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris --- To get more info, configure your system to take corefiles (see "man core", including the setuid specifics), and install the debuginfo package for glibc. Once you have a coredump, run (as root)

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #5 from Alex --- Hello Heiko, Thanks for your reply. (In reply to Heiko Schlittermann from comment #1) > So, the next time the same message is delivered via the same transport, it > does not segfault? Yes, as soon as we

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #2 from Heiko Schlittermann --- Do you know how to enable core dumps on set-uid binaries? This could help for further tracing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 Heiko Schlittermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #6 from Alex --- Hello Jeremy, Thanks for your reply. (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #4) > To get more info, configure your system to take corefiles (see "man core", > including the setuid specifics), and install

[exim-dev] [Bug 2272] New: better handling for multiple, multiline headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 Bug ID: 2272 Summary: better handling for multiple, multiline headers Product: Exim Version: 4.91 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: wishlist

[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 --- Comment #6 from Tim Stewart --- While testing this fix, I also found bug 2275. I still believe this bug is legitimate and the fix is correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] New: MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 Bug ID: 2275 Summary: MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock Product: Exim Version: 4.91 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: bug

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #10 from Simon Arlott --- I want to be able to do verify checks in the DATA ACL and then log additional information about the message if the outcome is defer/fail before deferring/rejecting the message. I

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #12 from Simon Arlott --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #11) > Using a warn verb will only log an additional warning if you put a logging > modifier on it, so I don't understand your "not only" point.

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #15 from Simon Arlott --- (In reply to Simon Arlott from comment #14) > (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #13) > > > Yes, the user message is impossible to reconstruct. > > > > What did it say, and why

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #13 from Jeremy Harris --- > it logs on any warn verb that defers. There is no message or log_message on > it. So I'm confused. I had the impression that you had a warn verb, which would not result in a defer, and

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #14 from Simon Arlott --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #13) > > it logs on any warn verb that defers. There is no message or log_message on > > it. > > So I'm confused. I had the impression that

[exim-dev] [Bug 177] Distinguishing between different temporary callout errors

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #11 from Jeremy Harris --- Using a warn verb will only log an additional warning if you put a logging modifier on it, so I don't understand your "not only" point. With your final, eventual, defer verb you get the

[exim-dev] [Bug 2137] Temporary rejection of the random callout check causes actual callout to be skipped

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2137 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #16 from Jeremy Harris --- What I meant by reconstruct was something along these lines: ${if eq {$sender_verify_failure}{postmaster} \ {Postmaster verification failed while checking <$sender_address>} \

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #17 from Jeremy Harris --- For interest, what do you find in $acl_verify_message ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 423] callout verify failure message as a variable

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 --- Comment #18 from Simon Arlott --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #16) > What I meant by reconstruct was something along these lines: > > ${if eq {$sender_verify_failure}{postmaster} \ >

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|t...@duncanthrax.net |jgh146...@wizmail.org

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 --- Comment #2 from Tim Stewart --- Ah, I see, so MIME ACLs can still be useful. Thanks for the examples. I admit I didn't think too hard about it :) I'm happy to help test any fixes. I found the issue rather easy to

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- Created attachment 1085 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=1085=edit Possible fix, for testing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ##

[exim-dev] [Bug 2265] TLS SNI not auto-set for DANE clients

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2265 --- Comment #5 from Jeremy Harris --- You're right about $tls_out_dane not being set early enough, and I do see the simplicity point. It does see a shame to lose the flexibility of being able to set an SNI to something

[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2265] TLS SNI not auto-set for DANE clients

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2265 --- Comment #4 from Phil Pennock --- (Patch is reversed.) The issue I see is that we don't switch transports based upon DANE or not, or have a way to skip a router if DANE fails (since that's something for later, at SMTP time, when

[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #3 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris --- I don't think the solution was wrong, but I wanted to keep open the possibility of dealing more fully with an error from the fclose(), so I complexified it somewhat. If it's possible to do

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #14 from Alex --- Will the following help? [root@server ccpp-2018-05-15-15:38:54-18615]# gdb /usr/sbin/exim coredump GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-110.el7 Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #15 from Alex --- > Perhaps if os_getcwd() fails? Could it be that the spam-checker has > chdir()'d to a directory which it unlinks, but calls Exim from inside, > so that Exim's os_getcwd() fails? It seems:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #17 from Phil Pennock --- https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commitdiff/805fd869d551c36d1d77ab2b292a7008d643ca79 Alex, does applying this as a patch solve your problem? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 Phil Pennock changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|t...@duncanthrax.net |p...@exim.org

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #13 from Alex --- Hello Phil, Directadmin manages Exim the following way: 1. at a moment of installation of a new server a pre-compiled package is installed from DA's repository, it's called da_exim for CentOS. 2. then

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 --- Comment #5 from Tim Stewart --- This patch looks good so far after testing for ~3 hours on a relatively busy system. I left our MIME ACL in place and verified that rejects the message back to the sender and cancels the

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #18 from Alex --- Hello Phil, Thanks for the patch, it's applied now. I will let you know results. It might take a while. Regards, Alex. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ##

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 --- Comment #4 from Simon Arlott --- This can be fixed for 4.86 using ea18931d9b1e9b73b699a2f3eb661d70b7f52fab: Index: exim4-4.86.2/src/pdkim/pdkim.c ===

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] New: Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Bug ID: 2278 Summary: Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature Product: Exim Version: 4.86 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: bug Priority:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Phil Pennock changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@exim.org --- Comment #2 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Simon Arlott changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |high --- Comment

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 --- Comment #5 from Simon Arlott --- (In reply to Phil Pennock from comment #2) > Per the RFC, `b=;` and `b= ;` at the end are equivalent and anything > assigning semantic value to the whitespace there, and failing

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID -- You are

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Simon Arlott changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED Target

[exim-dev] [Bug 2278] Invalid outgoing DKIM header signature

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION |RESOLVED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #8 from Jeremy Harris --- Unhelpful. We need the stack trace. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #9 from Alex --- Do you mean the one that attached as an attachment 1086? Or something else different? Regards, Alex. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #10 from Jeremy Harris --- Something else; that doesn't include a stack trace -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #11 from Alex --- So in this case I need to start a gdb session and feed the process of `/usr/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS` with an email which caused the crash. If this is the case... we don't have the email

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #6 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2273] Queue runners race with cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2273 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[exim-dev] [Bug 177] Distinguishing between different temporary callout errors

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #3 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2275] MIME ACL prematurely releases spool data file lock

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Å karvada --- (In reply to Phil Pennock from comment #2) Thanks for response. > There are two distinct areas here: logs and spool. > > Logs: wontfix, we write as root, if there's any kind of

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 --- Comment #6 from Phil Pennock --- Er, in the second paragraph I meant *readable* as group Exim, which is all that's required here. Sorry, mis-wrote. The points stand. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 --- Comment #7 from Phil Pennock --- Hrm, we _always_ open the spool data file O_RDWR. That's slightly disconcerting. I've just pushed an untested "this couldn't possibly go wrong, could it?" code-change, specifying O_NOFOLLOW if that

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris --- The spool error is for opening the -D file, but we also open the -H right after that. We need to be root at some point after reading the -H file, from which we get the recipients, in case we

[exim-dev] [Bug 2276] Exim triggers DAC_OVERRIDE when running on SELinux enabled system

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 Phil Pennock changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2277] DNS error causes router to fail

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2277 Marc Perkel changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low --- Comment #2 from Marc

[exim-dev] [Bug 2277] New: DNS error causes router to fail

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2277 Bug ID: 2277 Summary: DNS error causes router to fail Product: Exim Version: N/A Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: bug Priority: medium

[exim-dev] [Bug 2277] DNS error causes router to fail

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2277 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris --- The manualroute router has an option "host_find_failed"; does this control what you need? http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-the_manualroute_router.html#SECTprioptman --

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 Phil Pennock changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@exim.org --- Comment #12

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #21 from Git Commit ---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #20 from Jeremy Harris --- (In reply to Alex from comment #15) > > Perhaps if os_getcwd() fails? Could it be that the spam-checker has > > chdir()'d to a directory which it unlinks, but calls Exim from inside, > > so that Exim's

[exim-dev] [Bug 2264] DNS lookups should not chase CNAME chains

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2264 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #2 from Git Commit ---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2260] Means for setting timestamp and expiry on signing

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2260 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #4 from Git Commit ---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2282] Support HTTP-based & JSON-parsing content scanning (rspamd)

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2282 vsevo...@highsecure.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vsevo...@highsecure.ru --- Comment #1

[exim-dev] [Bug 2280] New: Allow INET socket for dovecot auth server_socket

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2280 Bug ID: 2280 Summary: Allow INET socket for dovecot auth server_socket Product: Exim Version: N/A Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: wishlist

[exim-dev] [Bug 2280] Allow INET socket for dovecot auth server_socket

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2280 Heiko Schlittermann changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jgh146...@wizmail.org |h...@schlittermann.de -- You are

[exim-dev] [Bug 2281] New: DSN charset should allow non-ASCII

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2281 Bug ID: 2281 Summary: DSN charset should allow non-ASCII Product: Exim Version: N/A Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: wishlist Priority:

[exim-dev] [Bug 2282] New: Support HTTP-based & JSON-parsing content scanning (rspamd)

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2282 Bug ID: 2282 Summary: Support HTTP-based & JSON-parsing content scanning (rspamd) Product: Exim Version: N/A Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2272] better handling for multiple, multiline headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAIT_FIX_CONFIRMATION

[exim-dev] [Bug 2246] utf8_downconvert as a transport option

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2246 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ni...@exim.org |jgh146...@wizmail.org Status|NEW

[exim-dev] [Bug 2277] DNS error causes router to fail

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2277 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- You say "route_list" but that is not documented as being expanded. So I assume you mean "route_data". Is "hosts_randomize" set? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ##

[exim-dev] [Bug 2274] exim 4.91: segfault ... error 4 in libc-2.17.so

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2274 --- Comment #19 from Alex --- Sorry to say that, the patch did not help. Another crash happened recently on - 2018-06-04 12:00:10 at 14:27 Seems to be all the same: [root@server ccpp-2018-06-04-12:00:10-14027]# gdb /usr/sbin/exim coredump GNU gdb

[exim-dev] [Bug 2282] Support HTTP-based & JSON-parsing content scanning (rspamd)

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2282 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #4 from Git Commit ---

[exim-dev] [Bug 1802] Rspamd scan should not use shutdown call

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1802 --- Comment #16 from Git Commit --- Git commit: https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commitdiff/dd0b893238d03a9bb38e793f3d935272ed73da6d commit dd0b893238d03a9bb38e793f3d935272ed73da6d Author: Jeremy Harris AuthorDate: Sat Jun 16 14:45:40 2018 +0100

[exim-dev] [Bug 1802] Rspamd scan should not use shutdown call

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1802 --- Comment #17 from Jeremy Harris --- The above was part of a general removal of rspamd support, it apparently being nonfunctional against current rspamd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details

[exim-dev] [Bug 1802] Rspamd scan should not use shutdown call

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1802 --- Comment #18 from vsevo...@highsecure.ru --- This commit likely changes nothing but a whitespace after comma. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at

[exim-dev] [Bug 2260] Means for setting timestamp and expiry on signing

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2260 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[exim-dev] [Bug 2272] better handling for multiple, multiline headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #1 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2272] better handling for multiple, multiline headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 Lena changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@lena.kiev.ua --- Comment #2 from

[exim-dev] [Bug 2272] better handling for multiple, multiline headers

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris --- Yes, they're actually expansion items, though there isn't much difference. I'll change the one comment I found; thanks for spotting this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[exim-dev] [Bug 2271] Domain callout cache dysfunction in recipient's verification produces the rejection of all domain's existing addresses

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2271 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[exim-dev] [Bug 2267] Contradictory error/no error logged to paniclog for ratelimit options in QUIT/NOTQUIT ACLs

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2235] CVE-2018-6789

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2235 Heiko Schlittermann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2

[exim-dev] [Bug 2239] segfault when processing control = utf8_downconvert

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239 --- Comment #3 from Gedalya --- Yes. The documentation could be read as suggesting the flag is stored with the message, not with a recipient address item. Coming to think of it, it would fit better in many configurations if this

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >