Re: [exim] tls_certificate weirdness

r readers, you may need to use o=r for the permissions. For delivery it may be necessary to add init_groups to the options, I think, if the cert read access is controlled via some 'ssl-cert' group). Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- S

Re: [exim] Forged FROM

alidation), this way you can tell which bounce is in response to one of your mails and which bounce is in response to a faked message. Check the spec file for BATV and PRVS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Address_Tag_Validation Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße au

Re: [exim] optimizing a condition

if match{ SQL }{TXT(A|B)}} Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted mes

Re: [exim] Need some help with Exim LDAP lookups, please?

Gary Perkins (Fr 01 Jul 2016 19:06:24 CEST): … > > > ${lookup ldap > > > {user='uid=ldapauth,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=company,dc=co,dc=uk' > > > pass='somepassword' > > > ldap:///cn=groups,cn=accounts,dc=company,dc=co,dc=uk?member?sub?(cn=everyone)}} > > > > Try

Re: [exim] Need some help with Exim LDAP lookups, please?

rch -x \ -D uid=ldapauth,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=company,dc=co,dc=uk \ -w somepassword \ -H ldap://ipa0.company.co.uk \ -b cn=groups,cn=accounts,dc=company,dc=co,dc=uk \ cn=everyone member Best regards from Dresden/Germany

Re: [exim] Router or ACL - Deny all but one domain for specific IPs

Peter Leeman (Do 30 Jun 2016 13:43:48 CEST): > Heiko > > Thanks for the response. I'll test this out so I can get to grips with the > AND aspect. Chris suggested a different solution which I am going to use, as > it looks more efficient than the one I was trying to

Re: [exim] Retry settings not apply some times

r.com: retry timeout > exceeded Can you dump the retry hits and check for proskauer.com? exim_dumpdb retry Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Sc

Re: [exim] Help using cutthrough_delivery

… Rob Szarka <szli...@szarka.org> (Mi 29 Jun 2016 23:24:28 CEST): > On 6/29/2016 5:01 PM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > >How many recipients does the message in question have? The cutthrough > >delivery works only if all the recipients have the same destination. To make sure y

Re: [exim] Router or ACL - Deny all but one domain for specific IPs

_host_address}{net-iplsearch;/etc/exim4/conf.d/tmc-config/relay_from_xerox}}\ {match_domain {$domain}{! thisdomain.com}}\ }\ }\ Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- S

Re: [exim] Help using cutthrough_delivery

question have? The cutthrough delivery works only if all the recipients have the same destination. Can you tcpdump your connection to check if there is at least the cutthrough attempt? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -

Re: [exim] Is not honoring bounces-to violation of RFC?

; Envelope-to: l...@restaurantloot.com > From: Stan <s...@restaurantloot.com> > Bounces-To: bar...@restaurantloot.com They're free to use any header they want… Maybe some broken mail sysstems even hounour Bounces-To. But please, show me, which relevant RFC mentions this header.

Re: [exim] On host lookup fail connect if on blacklist

hosts. And, please, start a new thread for a new question next time. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.8

Re: [exim] Decipher this one-line snippet of exigrep?

ot; in the SMTP or LMTP dialogue for outgoing messages is added to delivery log lines in the form "C=". A number of MTAs (including Exim) return an identifying string in this response. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- S

Re: [exim] Help me understand exigrep very short snippet output

nt "google.com!bla.com > This form of attachment has been used by > recent viruses or other malware. > If you meant to send this file then please > package it up as a zip file and resend it. Your exim created that bounce, after accepting the message first. You should avo

Re: [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

fixups log submission mode message fixups on a separate line fixed_message_id log submission mode fixed message id as id= But I do not see any harm in logging the fixed message id w/o a new log selector. What reason do we have not the use id=… even for a generated (fixed) id? Best rega

Re: [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

Jeremy Harris <j...@wizmail.org> (Mo 13 Jun 2016 22:40:23 CEST): > On 05/06/16 23:09, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > >> I did some coding and tested it in a very limted way. If you're > >> interested, I can share the patch. > > > I'd appreciate your feed

Re: [exim] - local user emails checked by the outgoing spamassassin

bmitter. But the envelope From is supplied by Exim, as the Sender: is, if necessary. You're free to replace the From: with whatever you want. But think twice. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- in

Re: [exim] Exim4 route based on senders IP address

Mike Brudenell <mike.bruden...@york.ac.uk> (Di 07 Jun 2016 10:42:02 CEST): > On 6 June 2016 at 15:46, Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> wrote: > > > from_rfc1918: > > > > driver = manualroute > > condition = $

Re: [exim] Exim4 route based on senders IP address

rom Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID: F69376C

Re: [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

Hi, Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Fr 03 Jun 2016 13:31:36 CEST): > > I did some coding and tested it in a very limted way. If you're > interested, I can share the patch. At git://git.exim.org/~heiko/exim.git you'll find two branches: exim-4_87

Re: [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Fr 03 Jun 2016 13:31:36 CEST): > > I did some coding and tested it in a very limted way. If you're > interested, I can share the patch. You'll find it in git://git.exim.org/~heiko/exim.git Branch: log-message-id Best regar

Re: [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

m Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID: F69376CE

Re: [exim] Logging username with client SMTP AUTH

Frank Elsner (Do 02 Jun 2016 14:56:21 CEST): … > > You are using 'PLAIN' auth, there $auth2 contains the username. > > > > $auth1\0$auth2\0$auth3 > > userpass > > > > is sent by the client. $auth1 is empty. > $auth2 seems to be empty too, as your

Re: [exim] Logging username with client SMTP AUTH

$auth1\0$auth2\0$auth3 userpass is sent by the client. $auth1 is empty. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing

Re: [exim] Expansion weirdness

rmany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID: F69376CE - ! key

Re: [exim] Expansion weirdness

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Mi 01 Jun 2016 18:01:52 CEST): .. > > Maybe I got something fundamentally wrong regarding expansions, but I am > > It's exim -bV: Exim version 4.87_51-e37f8a8 #12 built 24-May-2016 23:01:22 > The 4.87 (git 74d8288d7a8fa839899

Re: [exim] Expansion weirdness

ta 127.0.0.1=local4 ::1=local6}{$value}fail}}fail}' local4 (expected) It's exim -bV: Exim version 4.87_51-e37f8a8 #12 built 24-May-2016 23:01:22 The 4.87 (git 74d8288d7a8fa83989968647149ae47ba10194f8) exposes the behaviour you describe. Git 1cf59ee7f68960237ad5cd3d599512fdbe5b3954 fixes it (Bug 1815)

Re: [exim] Exim's smtp_active_hostname option

Hi, Sven Eschenberg (Di 24 Mai 2016 16:59:29 CEST): > The documentation states (v4.87) for smtp_active_hostname: > At the start of an incoming SMTP connection, its value is expanded and used > instead of the value of $primary_hostname in SMTP responses. … >

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 - mail delivery or logging failure?

d to the "defect" log files? (use eximstat for getting a histogram about processed messages) Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Di

Re: [exim] Help with body_deny

deny condition = ${if match {$message_body}{(?i)make money fast}} Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.3

Re: [exim] SRS with Exim: feelings regarding srs_alt?

ut to do some kind of "native" SRS integration, without using any external libraries, but please don't hold your breath… In production environment I use (Perl) Mail::SRS and it's command line interface currently. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dre

Re: [exim] conditional transport filters?

if def:authenticated_id ...}" in transport > filter failed: condition name expected, but found "" I get the same, with 4.84. I'll need to investigate it. Seems odd. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -

Re: [exim] Need help with hostlist

r words, you expect *.vpn.tu-berlin.de to be include in the above host list (by using * as an item in the list?) Where do you try to apply that condition? In some ACL? How? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -

Re: [exim] tls_advertise_hosts

this (insecure) default by putting it into your configuration, the warnings will go away, no matter whay value you put there. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix suppor

Re: [exim] tls_advertise_hosts

built-in default. Maybe we *could* check if there is at least something configured for tls_{certificate,privatekey} and suppress the STARTTLS offer if these global options are missing (but continue to issue the warning.) Jeremy? What do you think? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele

Re: [exim] Exim 4.84_2 #1 : WARNING: purging the environment.

> That's life ! Yes, sorry for that. But we had to introduce that incompatible change. And you should upgrade your version, for security reasons. Or try some MACRO magic .ifndef VERY_OLD_EXIM keep_environment = .endif And for your old Exim you add -DVERY_OLD_EXIM to the command line. Be

Re: [exim] Ignoring SSL-Errors on self signed certificates

I'd like to suppress this warning, in order > to have a cleaner log. > How can I disable the verification of the certificates on sending E-Mails? Try log_selecor = … -tls_certificate_verified Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlitte

Re: [exim] 4.87 and acl_check_data

keep_environment thing, there we *had* to change the behaviour (and we had long discussions about that). Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing.

Re: [exim] 4.87 and acl_check_data

Jeremy Harris <j...@wizmail.org> (Mi 13 Apr 2016 12:27:57 CEST): > On 13/04/16 11:12, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: … > > I can imagine an option to force proper formatting of the message that > > is included in the bounce. I'm not sure if this was discussed already. > >

Re: [exim] :fail: vs SMTP error message

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Mi 13 Apr 2016 12:17:40 CEST): > Frank Elsner <frank.els...@tu-berlin.de> (Mi 13 Apr 2016 12:11:10 CEST): > > > … > > > > denydomains = +local_domains > > message = Unknown mailbox > &

Re: [exim] :fail: vs SMTP error message

den/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID: F69376CE - ! key

Re: [exim] 4.87 and acl_check_data

ils were dropped. With the above configuration it's not your system sending the bounces! So it's not your problem, but the senders problem, isn't it? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- inter

Re: [exim] 4.87 and acl_check_data

e. I'm not sure if this was discussed already. a) cut the overlong lines and add some note for the recipient b) convert the to-be-bounced message body to some MIME format Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de --

Re: [exim] Question about ClamAV

rough as .js packed in .zip. So - depending on your situtation - you may block some extensions after unpacking the mime parts. Search the archives for 'lena kiev' for possible solutions. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHL

Re: [exim] Spool file not found

re messages mentioned which are not there anymore. This should not happen, it looks indeed like a corrupted retry database (or is it *_wait, having the message ids for a specific destination?) Try, if an exim_tidydb … helps. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dres

Re: [exim] Spool file not found

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (So 10 Apr 2016 16:59:32 CEST): … > > reference to an email in the database that no longer exists in the spool. > > As far as I know these databases are not used to identify messages. > They are used to lookup data for a gi

Re: [exim] Spool file not found

esden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID: F69376CE - ! key

Re: [exim] Exclude host from sender verification

192.168.1.1 !verify = sender Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encryp

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 reports no server certificate but appears to work?

u're talking about the warning you find in your panic log, than it's the leftover from the installation (check the time stamps at the log lines) Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet &

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 reports no server certificate but appears to work?

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Do 07 Apr 2016 08:59:08 CEST): > Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Do 07 Apr 2016 08:39:03 CEST): > … > > While we suppress warnings in the test/check modes (-bt, -bv, …), we do > > not suppress warnin

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 reports no server certificate but appears to work?

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Do 07 Apr 2016 08:39:03 CEST): … > While we suppress warnings in the test/check modes (-bt, -bv, …), we do > not suppress warnings for -bV, since this is used for verification > purposes of your configuration. And while /dev/

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 reports no server certificate but appears to work?

from the installation step, it went into your paniclog (compare the timestamps: 00:16:35). If you - after the installation - call exim -bV, no warning should appear anymore. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 RC7 uploaded

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Sa 02 Apr 2016 11:02:01 CEST): > Yes, but the Symbol __STDC_VERSION doesn't seem to have the right value in > SRC/buildconfig.c (where I took the code for my short test from). It's set for clang, or if we use gcc -std=c99 (or some ot

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 RC7 uploaded

Yes, but the Symbol __STDC_VERSION doesn't seem to have the right value in SRC/buildconfig.c (where I took the code for my short test from). -- Heiko Schlittermann (unterwegs) -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 RC7 uploaded

tform. (Different platforms, different formats for displaying an size_t/ssizt_t value). For you platform it seems to be broken. Plaese try to compile and run the attached short program. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de --

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 RC7 uploaded

inter target type >gcc dbmdb.c >... Can you, please, provide me your Local/Makefile? Thx -- Heiko Schlittermann (unterwegs) -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Re: [exim] TLS packets error

olve this problem. It's in the source since 4.80 RC2, so 4.80 should contain that option already. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 RC7 uploaded

Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Fr 01 Apr 2016 18:55:32 CEST): > Hi, > > Odhiambo Washington <odhia...@gmail.com> (Fr 01 Apr 2016 09:18:45 CEST): > > I have been running these RCs on a few servers, all FreeBSD, and I was > > wondering if I should be

Re: [exim] Exim 4.87 RC7 uploaded

le Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and

Re: [exim] Warnings even in testing modes

Hi, Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> (Mo 14 Mär 2016 22:37:23 CET): > Andreas M. Kirchwitz <a...@spamfence.net> (Mo 07 Mär 2016 02:03:52 CET): > > Unfortunately, it looks like this warning message also has the > > potential to break existing installations

Re: [exim] MUA sends in envelope addresses in "user@host"@host form when using authentication

in". Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome

Re: [exim] Connection not timing out

Michael Fischer v. Mollard (Di 22 Mär 2016 11:02:13 CET): > > > other PIDs, but same situation: > # strace -p 18619 > Process 18619 attached > select(8, [7], NULL, NULL, {17, 252791}) = 0 (Timeout) > wait4(-1, 0x7ffe6b2aef8c, WNOHANG, NULL) = 0 > select(8, [7], NULL, NULL,

Re: [exim] Connection not timing out

mation, + the item size being so much larger. Found and fixed by Wolfgang Breyha. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) -

Re: [exim] Connection not timing out

t log line shows a forceful closed connection, but we've no idea if this is the same process as started just after the messages came in. You may add the +pid log_selector to get an idea about the processes (not) handling a message. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Hei

[exim] Suppress warnings in tool/list modes (Was: Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5)

ut any notice. But you're encouraged to give it a try, if all that testing/listing/checking modes work as expected and without the warnings. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -------- internet &

Re: [exim] How to disable spamassassin for outgoing messages?

* accept hosts = +trusted_hosts warn spam = … Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351

Re: [exim] How to disable spamassassin for outgoing messages?

lease re-post with proper formatting. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted mes

[exim] Warnings even in testing modes (Was: Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, ) 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5

Andreas M. Kirchwitz <a...@spamfence.net> (Mo 07 Mär 2016 02:03:52 CET): > Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> wrote: > > > New options > > --- > > > > We had to introduce two new configuration options: > > &g

Re: [exim] Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5

t privileges before reading the configuration. For the Configs of the built in list Jeremy explained, why it can be considered safe. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix

Re: [exim] Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5

ore save, you may let keep_environment untouched (empty list) and add the variables and values you need with add_environment. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support -

Re: [exim] Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5

Heiko Schlichting <exim-us...@fu-berlin.de> (Di 08 Mär 2016 10:29:51 CET): > Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > > keep_environment = TZ : LANG : ^LC_ : ^LDAP > > add_environment = <; PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin > > > > could be a good startin

Re: [exim] Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5

Hi, Andreas M. Kirchwitz <a...@spamfence.net> (Mo 07 Mär 2016 02:03:52 CET): > Heiko Schlittermann <h...@schlittermann.de> wrote: > Thanks for the security updates! Highly appreciated. > > Unfortunately, it looks like this warning message also has the > potential to b

Re: [exim] different acl data malware settings per recipient domain?

g_dir/skip_scan malware = * DRAFT, not tested! Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{

[exim] Older versions of Exim (CVE-2016-1531)

. Older versions of Exim don't understand these options and just die. Maybe I'm the only stupid one, maybe someone else got bitten too :) Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix supp

Re: [exim] Missing normal message delivery logs

following entries: > 1aZKh4-0004z4-FG == . > 1ab40O-0005ES-RC <= . Do you see them containing just that single dot? Or is this a result of the obfuscation? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de

Re: [exim] Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5

root bit from the binary. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are we

Re: [exim] Use uname() in exim configuration file

Nicolas Dorfsman (Mi 02 Mär 2016 21:28:13 CET): > > > > So, if you leave this unset and then refer to $primary_hostname in sections > > of your configuration it will pull in from a call uname() and do exactly > > what you specify. > > > Sure…but I need to set it to a

[exim] Security release for CVE-2016-1531: 4.84.2, 4.85.2, 4.86.2, 4.87 RC5

pts an absolute configuration file path now, when using the -C option. Thank you for your understanding. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlitterman

Re: [exim] Commercial Antivirus

Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID

Re: [exim] Quota Problem

${quote_mysql:$domain}' \ > > and users.domain_id = domains.domain_id}{${value}M}} > ---^ Was was looking for such typo, but didn't see it. Thank you for pointing it out. Best regards from Dresden/Germany

Re: [exim] http://exim.org/ broken since Monday

tly no intention of changing this unless there is a strong > argument to do so (argument to not do so is key management is a pain). It would cost us two certs. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -

Re: [exim] Benchmarking an MTA?

vered at any given time. That is, the impact of a huge queue … Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +

Re: [exim] Benchmarking an MTA?

Viktor Dukhovni <exim-us...@dukhovni.org> (Mi 03 Feb 2016 09:20:49 CET): > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:33:06AM +0100, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > Does anybody know anything about benchmarking an MTA? > > What do we count as performance? > > > > e.g.:

Re: [exim] Benchmarking an MTA?

gards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --- key ID: F69376C

Re: [exim] can I suppress the "message frozen by system filter" log line?

can (eg: retry time not > reached). Can't you implement the new requirement in the DATA acl or even in the QUIT acl? (About QUIT I'm not sure if it fires even on connection loss after the final dot.) Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann --

Re: [exim] Finding largest senders

mtrai...@cloud-free.com (Mi 03 Feb 2016 09:49:07 CET): > We are currently using the command below to find the 30 largest > authenticated senders on our exim mta's so we can check if it is valid > email or spam: … > The problem with this is that it only counts emails and

Re: [exim] Slow email sending and spool file not found

as much as possible checking is good to avoid bounces. BUT as a probably authenticated MUA is talking to you, you might accept the message first and then bounce later to that authenticated user. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.d

[exim] Benchmarking an MTA?

: messages/time the MTA can accept¹ Any other suggestions? Would anybody be willing to share performance stats? (In a first step: submit the results from a tailored eximstats output?) Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de

Re: [exim] route to smarthost only emails that would be send to MX dns ending with .google.com

${if forany{<\n ${lookup dnsdb{mxh=$domain}}}{match{$item}{\N(?i)\.google\.com$\N}}}' Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Di

Re: [exim] freeze instead of bounce on specified remote response?

.* > abcd". or "550 defg" I *think* so, after what I understood from a short talk with jgh. You should read about the EXPERIMENTAL_EVENTS feature. It should be suiteable for exactly that. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Hei

Re: [exim] Exim proliferation

only 20% of exim servers are up to date :( What range of versions do you count as "up to date"? Viele Grüße Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de -------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.35

[exim] New Commit for exim-4_86+fixes

erized testsuite for {debian7,debian8,fedora{21,22},opensuse}-{openssl,gnutls} with the usual failures. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann,

Re: [exim] Help with log message: failed to find host name

st matching forced to fail: failed to find > host name for 14.175.26.108 14.175.26.108 -> N.A. Probably you do host list matching. How does the list you use for matching look like? Because the steps involving DNS depend on the list you check against. Best regards from Dresden/Germany

Re: [exim] Exim misses some attachments.

cab|chm|cmd|com|\ {\\.(?i:ace|bat|btm|cab|chm|cmd|com|\ I'd use case insensitive matching or convert the mime file name to lower case in the first place. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlitt

Re: [exim] Debugging .forward

e bounce. Therefore this should be the account of a person taking care about the sending system (often postmas...@example.com). But as always, it's my understanding of what's going on, it might be completly wrong. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Hei

Re: [exim] exim4, gmail and 550-5.7.1

t as I'm much more familiar with the native configuration I can't do that job, as most of the other supporters, I suppose. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Hei

Re: [exim] Debugging .forward

ss) somebody > may > have access to their systems. Meanwhile it's spread around the globe via this mailing list :) Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support -

Re: [exim] Debugging .forward

645 <= <> H=(115.73.55.172) > [115.73.16.126] P=smtp S=2605 Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49

Re: [exim] Cannot send specific attachment from my domain to anybody except ours.

re there any rewrite rules? Or does your MUA set different senders, depending on the destination? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-

Re: [exim] acl_check_content doesn't get applied to all mails

> accept It should work. Maybe you can keep such message that should have be rejected. (See the 'no_mbox_unspool'). And, maybe you should move to acl_smtp_mime, instead of using the obsoleted demime extension. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlitter

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >