Ok, I'm not a very good listener :-)
I backed up my /var/lib/rpm and tried rpm --rebuilddb despite
the warning.
So far, I think it worked. I haven't noticed any problems yet.
Steve
A V Flinsch writes:
>
> >
> > Somehow my rpm has been corrupted. Every time I install a package I
> > get th
>
> Somehow my rpm has been corrupted. Every time I install a package I
> get this message:
>
> error getting record libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) from
> //var/lib/rpm/requiredby.rpm
>
I get the same message on a Mandrake 7.2 box. The rpm seems to install
correctly however . Well not entirely correctly,
I haven't been able to upgrade this machine to 7.2 yet due to
DiskDrake problems, so I am still running 7.1. Not sure I want to
upgrade given the problems that I am having at home with 7.2. CUPS is
awful!!
Somehow my rpm has been corrupted. Every time I install a package I
get this message:
erro
I am not able to install any RPMs!!! please help!!
Here is the output of some commands...
[root@vx15 kde2]# rpm --rebuilddb
error creating directory /var/lib/rpmrebuilddb.22878: No space left on
device
[root@vx15 kde2]# rpm -Uvh kdesupport-1.94-14mdk.i586.rpm
kdesupport unpackin
One word: Doh! =:)
*Maybe* I'll try to upgrade the RPM package to the cooker version...
Thanks all for the help.
--Clorden
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
I think that you might find the same problem with RH. I have pinstripe
installed on one of my machines, and it looks good. On another of my machines I
get configuration problems .. well, it IS beta. But they both use the new RPM
format. FWIW, Mandrake beta looks pretty good too, and I haven't
However, Abe, at the moment the vast majority of hardware configs still
don't get along too well with XFree 4.0. There in lies the problem.
--
Mark
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299
** <_||_> in the mak
abe wrote:
>
> Xfree 4.0 is pretty universally understood to be unstable in a variety
> of ways. I've been using 4.0.1 for about a month and it is fine. As
> stable as 3.3.6. Even the Xfree developers say to not use 4.0.
[...]
Did you, by chance, compile your own XFree86-4.0.1 src rpm or did y
Xfree 4.0 is pretty universally understood to be unstable in a variety
of ways. I've been using 4.0.1 for about a month and it is fine. As
stable as 3.3.6. Even the Xfree developers say to not use 4.0.
Abe
Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> Apparently XFree86-4.x still has bugs in it. When I first inst
Submitted 18-Sep-00 by tommiy:
> The problem is with the comand %make world <.> in the spec file.
> According to a nice 'man bash' this command attempts to bring to the
> foreground a running process with make as a name.
That *would* be true if the spec file were run strictly as a script. I
Apparently XFree86-4.x still has bugs in it. When I first installed
Mandrake I tried this version of XFree, and found it to be more than a bit
strange so I installed and began using the older version. I think it's
3.3.x or something like that. At any rate the older version is stable and
the system
OK after looking at this for 5 minutes it appears that Fred was
attempting to name a process??? I'm a bit lost here but obviously he is
compiling on a version of bash different to what comes with 7.1.
The problem is with the comand %make world <.> in the spec file.
According to a nice 'man ba
Submitted 18-Sep-00 by tommiy:
> Just racking up the stats for what appears to be another mandrake config
> problem.
It's not a "mandrake config problem" it's an "I'm using the wrong version of
rpm problem." The 4.0.1 SRPMS were designed to work with *current* versions
of RPM (i.e. the version i
Just racking up the stats for what appears to be another mandrake config
problem.
I have just reinstalled 7.1 from scratch and I get the same error ;(
RH is looking better all the time!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I tryed to compile the XFree86 4.0.1 SRPM from cooker but as soon
Well, this is a stupid and useless post perhaps, but I'm getting the same errors
as well. Haven't really looked into it, but what seems to cure my problems is
replacing "%configure" with "./configure" (of course, I loose the extra options
that are contained in the "%configure" call). So my wild gu
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, you wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > I tryed to compile the XFree86 4.0.1 SRPM from cooker but as soon as the
> > "build" phase starts, I get the error: "FG: no job control".
> >
> Ah! This happened to me as well, but I got around it.
Ah, well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I tryed to compile the XFree86 4.0.1 SRPM from cooker but as soon as the
> "build" phase starts, I get the error: "FG: no job control".
>
Ah! This happened to me as well, but I got around it.
First, did you upgrade gcc? Perhaps to 2.1.3-16mdk? Compile
Hello.
I tryed to compile the XFree86 4.0.1 SRPM from cooker but as soon as the
"build" phase starts, I get the error: "FG: no job control".
This also happens with many other SRPMS. I never got such a problem with
previous MDK distros. I am now running a clean (and updated) MDK7.1...
Please hel
18 matches
Mail list logo
