ver entered into a single poem of his.
Nagel and Stevens: two beautiful extremes for me.
See you, Emily.
Robin
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yaho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > > Speaking as a lifelong Guitar Freak, to compare Jimi
> > > Hendrix with Stevie Ray Vaughn i
To His Daughter
Hartford, Conn.
Oct. 7, 1941
Dear Holly:
I cannot well dictate this.
Yr. mother has written to you and I do not now what she has said. For my own
part, I think you already have the independence you desire. No parents could be
less authoritarian than we have been. You have alwa
Paul Claudel to Andre Gide
Tientsin, 10th May 1909
I have just received the third number of the *N.R.F.* [French Review], in which
I find the last part of *La Porte Etroite*[*Narrow is The Gate*]. I am still
suffering from the emotional shock (and the great perplexity) which its perusal
provo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> A five-and-a-half minute video to promote a coffee-table book published by
> the Cornell Lab of Orinthology.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTR21os8gTA&sns=em
>
> Pretty spectacular.
Wonderful experience seeing this. Almost a
MIND AND COSMOS: WHY THE MATERIALIST NEO-DARWINIAN CONCEPTION OF NATURE IS
ALMOST CERTAINLY FALSE by Thomas Nagel
On a purely materialist understanding of biology, consciousness would have to
be regarded as a tremendous and inexplicable extra brute fact about the world.
If it is to be explained
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" wrote:
ROBIN1: If you don't have the hair stand up on your back of your head
after reading the book, I will personally refund the cost of
the book. ;-)
PALIGAP1:I'm beginning to get the impression you like this book Robin. OK
already - I'm buy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> Juliette got her membership card for USA Gymnastics in the mail yesterday.
> Membership allows her to compete in USGA meets anywhere in the country. USAG
> keeps track of scores for meets and ranks skill levels. Her first official
Since we are evidently the products of evolution, and ultimately of a cosmic
process that led to the developments first of unicellular organisms and then of
conscious agents before eventually producing intelligent beings capable of
value judgments, the conception of the natural order that made t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > wrote:
> &
SALYAVIN TO ROBIN: I didn't read it* actually, and I call it like I see it, if
your
> friends want to carry on like whooping teenagers on facebook
> (was that it?) it's up to them. If it irritates me I'll say so,
> just like anyone else would.
>
> Don't worry old chap you'll hear from me, ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > wrote:
> &
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
> > >
> &g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
> > >
> &g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> >
> > MIND AND COSMOS: WHY THE MATERIALIST NEO-DARWINIAN CONCEPTION OF NATURE IS
> > ALMOST CERTAINLY FALSE by Thomas Nagel
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> wrote:
>
> > All life on this planet is descended from one cell, a
> > hybrid between two types of bacteria - which is all there
> > was for billions of years - there would b
MIND AND COSMOS: WHY THE MATERIALIST NEO-DARWINIAN CONCEPTION OF NATURE IS
ALMOST CERTAINLY FALSE by Thomas Nagel
Modern evolutionary theory offers a general picture of how the existence and
development of life could be just another consequence of the equations of
particle physics. Even if no
not flat, and has motions not covered by the
> > > flat Earth theory, but if you take a walk in the early morning, the sun
> > > rises is a perfectly satisfactory explanation.
> > >
> > > Darwin's theory, and its revisions provides an explanation for the
nce of existing as a human being inside the
universe--that makes of your book a kind of philosophical miracle.
Very sincerely yours,
Robin Carlsen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> FWIW, Nagel is the chap who wrote that famous essay,
> &quo
n
> > > one discovers the Earth is not flat, and has motions not covered by the
> > > flat Earth theory, but if you take a walk in the early morning, the sun
> > > rises is a perfectly satisfactory explanation.
> > >
> > > Darwin's theory,
ng, the sun rises is a
> perfectly satisfactory explanation.
>
> Darwin's theory, and its revisions provides an explanation for the morphology
> of living systems and the appearance of order and complexity in such systems.
> It does not deal with consciousness at all, alth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
> Dear Judy, I think you and I were the only ones that knew where that line
> really came from. Jack, when he shouted that, conveyed the best of who
> Nicholson is as an actor.
I really liked that second sentence.
> --- In Fairfi
MIND AND COSMOS: WHY THE MATERIALIST NEO-DARWINIAN CONCEPTION OF NATURE IS
ALMOST CERTAINLY FALSE by Thomas Nagel
On the other side there are doubts about whether the reality of such features
of our world as consciousness, intentionality, meaning, purpose, thought, and
value can be accommodated
inscrutable. Faulconer thinks this
> materialism cashes out in at least two ways. First, he sees it as explaining
> why Utah "produces a disproportionate number of scientists," and why his own
> university supports scientific inquiry so enthusiastically. Second he thinks
> i
MIND AND COSMOS: WHY THE MATERIALIST NEO-DARWINIAN CONCEPTION OF NATURE IS
ALMOST CERTAINLY FALSE by Thomas Nagel
The argument from the failure of psychophysical reductionism is a philosophical
one, but I believe there are independent empirical reasons to be skeptical
about the truth of reducti
te:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
> > > > > > >
ell me what the
> > > > > > > 'truth' is for whatever it's worth.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > --- "authfriend" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!
27;truth' is for whatever it's worth.
> > > > >
> > > --- "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
> > &
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > --- "Jason" wrote:
> >
> > > Am I oblivious to the truth? Atleast tell me what the
> > > 'truth' is for whatever it's worth.
> > >
> --- "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!
> >
> >
> > (Sorry, coul
;
> > > If Maharishi is a fraud and he still loves this fraud and
> > > has fond memories of this fraud?
> > >
> > > That means Robin is in the same boat as Barry who has fond
> > > memories of this 'Cheater cunt Rama' and brags over and over
&g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > His philosophy is his own, not "borrowed," first of all, as
> > Barry would know if he'd been reading Robin's posts. Second,
> > given that he has concluded Maharishi was fundamentally a
> > fraud--
JASON: Could it be that the "relationship" with Maharishi mattered
> more to Robin than Unity state or 'seeking enlightenment'?
>
> Deepak Chopra and few others did walk away without too much
> emotional hangups about this "relationship". Why can't
> Robin?
BARRY: An excellent question, one that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> Replying to the only part I saw flash past in Message View:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 wrote:
KHAZANA2: I forgot something, your praise of my video about dome restrictions.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
> ROBIN2: You see, Khazana, you have to take a particular post of mine an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
BARRY1: For some reason, I find myself still tripping on a phrase used on FFL
yesterday. *Not* on the person who wrote it, but on the content, the
idea expressed. The phrase was "Now my love for Maharishi was of course
the highest love I h
e analyst? I would suggest that was a
sign of improvement in my condition--and I am going to celebrate by doing some
cruising tonight.
> If others are impressed by your stories, that is their business. I just
> thought it might be interesting for you to hear from someone who isn't.
> lifelong Narcissistic Personality Disorder. None of this is a "lie" on
> my part, or in any way intended as an attempt to "get" you. This is how
> I really see you. Live with it.
>
> If others are impressed by your stories, that is their business. I just
>
ch
> falls completely within the diagnosis of someone struggling with
> lifelong Narcissistic Personality Disorder. None of this is a "lie" on
> my part, or in any way intended as an attempt to "get" you. This is how
> I really see you. Live with it.
>
> If othe
onality Disorder. None of this is a "lie" on
> my part, or in any way intended as an attempt to "get" you. This is how
> I really see you. Live with it.
>
> If others are impressed by your stories, that is their business. I just
> thought it might be interesting f
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
> >
> > I think a lot of us had this same experience with Maharishi. That's why his
> > own recounting of his first exposure to Guru Dev had such resonance; we
> > co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ultrarishi wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought it was a terrific read. Since I'm 58 and have been meditating
> > > since 1975 I have read / study / visited many of the visionaries and
> >
Dear Buck,
I began posting on FFL in order to learn something more about the world and
about myself. So one of my motives in writing is to figure things out. I would
like you to make me less stupid about something than I am right now: I think I
can understand theoretically what you are doing he
A thing whose existing is other than its essence has its existence caused by
another. God is the first efficient cause, and therefore his essence cannot be
distinct from his existence.
Existence is the actuality of every form and nature. Goodness and humanity do
not signify actual things unless
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 wrote:
> >
> > Look, you are annoying. Don't you realize that.
>
> They're trying to be. Don't you realize that? :-)
>
> The Judy-Robin-raunchy-oxcart game yesterday was to
> KEEP YO
> Directions: Answer True or False or Can't Decide (CD). 1 point for T; -1 point
for F; 0 for CD
>
RAUNCHY: O.K. Robin, enough lazy screwing around for RD. Out of respect for
your deep
reflection in writing this post, I'll answer as best I can. I'll admit a lot of
my thinking is founded on a "Mah
An extraordinary experience reading this. Some subjectivities don't need to be
objectified.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > Directions: Answer True
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
> Read each statement. Answer True (T), False (F), or Can't Answer (CA)
>
> 1. I always get where David Letterman is coming from in his monologues.
>
> 2. The best tweets in the world are usu
Read each statement. Answer True (T), False (F), or Can't Answer (CA)
1. I always get where David Letterman is coming from in his monologues.
2. The best tweets in the world are usually ironic.
3. I understand appreciation for irony to be somewhat involuntary and almost
automatic. It can ambush
Directions: Answer True or False or Can't Decide (CD). 1 point for T; -1 point
for F; 0 for CD
1. I seek a truth beyond merely my own subjective comfort.
I . I like to know what is right, not just that I am right.
3. I force myself to look at different points of view other than my own, in
orde
32
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> For those interested in empathy and whether they are or
> not, here's an easy test you can take to find out:
>
> http://glennrowe.net/baroncohen/faces/eyestest.aspx
>
> This test, developed by Cambridge psychologist Simon
> Baron-C
t; You know if this was not a sincere endeavor for you from the beginning, you
> > really could have saved me a lot of fucking time upfront Robin.
> >
> > Message received loud and clear. Over and out.
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlgfdTm7c1I
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > An Open Letter to Robin Carlsen
> >
> > Dear Robin,
> >
> > Why are you so afraid of being criticized, that when you are, you just
&
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
>
> > Thank for weighing in on this discussion Xeno. I think you are adding a
> > much needed perspective. There seems to be an attempt to water down
Poem: A Baby is Born, Anonymous, 15th century
A baby is born us bliss to bring;
A maiden I heard lullay sing:
`Dear son, now leave thy weeping,
Thy father is the king of bliss.'
`Nay, dear mother, for you weep I not,
But for the things that shall be wrought
Or that I have mankind i-bought:
Was th
A POSTCARD FROM THE VOLCANO
Children picking up our bones
Will never know that these were once
As quick as foxes on the hill;
And that in autumn, when the grapes
Made sharp air sharper by their smell
These had a being, breathing frost;
And least will guess that with our bones
We left much
think your letter coming right after mine will tend to have the salutary
effect we both would pray for when it comes to Robin. This was much needed,
Ravi. Thank you.
Most sincerely yours,
Louis
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
&g
An Open Letter to Robin Carlsen
Dear Robin,
Why are you so afraid of being criticized, that when you are, you just attack
your critic? In this case Curtis. If you really believed in your ideas, Robin,
you wouldn't feel so insecure in your first person ontology to have to attack
reality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEiGS2dBbxg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CawVaHxWvnA
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Do you know the difference between the video I posted and the one you
> did in reply?
>
> On 10/03/2012 04:40 PM, Robin Carlsen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mg8SyAJfaw
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cAD68ISy6k
>
> On 10/03/2012 11:44 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU98KwL_pQ8&feature=related
> &
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU98KwL_pQ8&feature=related
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > So you missed my "Looper" micro review? I won't try to guess
> > if you'll like it but you might like it better th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > Share:> > AND disagreeing with Robin does not equal being compliant
> > > > with Curtis.
The Sick Rose
O Rose thou art sick.
The invisible worm,
That flies in the night
In the howling storm:
Has found out thy bed
Of crimson joy:
And his dark secret love
Does thy life destroy.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroup
TO HIS CONSCIENCE.
by Robert Herrick
CAN I not sin, but thou wilt be
My private protonotary ?
Can I not woo thee to pass by
A short and sweet iniquity ?
I'll cast a mist and cloud upon
My delicate transgression
So utter dark as that no eye
Shall see the hugg'd impiety ;
Gifts blind the wi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lordknows888" wrote:
>
> YES! YES! YES!
> I know from my experience of being in Robin's cult that what Share and
> Curtis found objectionable in Robin's post to Share carried the
> unmistakeable feel and energy of just the very beginning of what in the
> da
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKKDKAKNH-k&feature=related
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lordknows888" wrote:
>
> YES! YES! YES!
> I know from my experience of being in Robin's cult that what Share and
> Curtis found objectionable in Robin's post to Share carried the
> unmistakeable feel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbjMVpK_utU&feature=related
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > Share1 for this post and other posts below that.
> > . . .
> > In a earlier post to Curtis you mention my pastor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jftOwxJWdRc&feature=related
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lordknows888" wrote:
>
> YES! YES! YES!
> I know from my experience of being in Robin's cult that what Share and
> Curtis found objectionable in Robin's post to Share carried the
> unmistakeable fee
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbjMVpK_utU&feature=related
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > Share1 for this post and other posts below that.
> > . . .
> > In a earlier post to Curtis you mention my pastoral
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kMyom2sHyA
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> I'm posting this because, as I suggested in my last post, I enjoy
> talking more about ideas than people. And I've noticed that many people
> on this forum -- supposedly composed of seasoned spi
'Marriage' by Gregory Corso
Should I get married? Should I be good?
Astound the girl next door with my velvet suit and faustus hood?
Don't take her to movies but to cemeteries
tell all about werewolf bathtubs and forked clarinets
then desire her and kiss her and all the preliminaries
and she going
LINES FROM "SOMEONE PUTS A PINEAPPLE TOGETHER"
by WALLACE STEVENS
...
He must say nothing of the fruit that is
Not true, nor think it, less. He must defy
The metaphor that murders metaphor.
He seeks as image a second of the self.
Made subtle by truth's most jealous subtlety.
Like the true light
ost. Being psychologically raped didn't feel
> good then just as it doesn't feel good now.   Â
>
>
>
> ____
> From: curtisdeltablues
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 5:09 PM
> Subject: [Fair
This is a unverified assertion Maharishi has made. And Rick's final sentence
says it all. The good vibrations in a house--anywhere--do not materially
influence, much less determine, behaviour--or what happens to one in one's life.
Even on Teacher-Training, Advanced Teacher Residence, and Six Mon
ut of your own subjectivity. Ann has written you a post that,
taken in context, presents you with everything you need to know. That is, in
what she is asking you to think about.
> ________
> From: Robin Carlsen
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
>
> > I dare you to TRY to understand the post, Share. Show it to your pastoral
> > counsellor.
> >
> &g
rfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qle1OrunKnE&feature=player_embedded
> >
>
> Robin, why did you post this vid
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 10/01/2012 05:43 AM, Jason wrote:
> >
> >
> > S & T » Technology
> >
> > Microsoft's last Window of hope
> >
> > Deepa Kurup
> >
> > The past decade saw Microsoft Corporation, the company that
> > two decades ago gave us the propri
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qle1OrunKnE&feature=player_embedded
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> No and you shouldn't but it is amusing to watch a bunch of "supposedly
> evolved" folks bicker on redundantly like teenagers as they have for
> years. :-D
>
> How was yo
you to TRY to understand the post, Share. Show it to your pastoral
counsellor.
She'll get it. And she might even have the courage to make you understand it.
Of course, it is beside the point that it comes from my own bitter heart.
Robin
> ____
> From
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> I see myself as someone who recognizes that everybody is a mix of developed
> and developing aspects; and that as such everybody makes mistakes; and that a
> way to have worthwhile relationships is to proceed on that basis with a
> w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul3vRfw_1qE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> This thread about comments f
ently. You embodied yourself in what got into that word.
It was pure Barry.
357 ain't bad. And you hate those knuckleballs, right, Barry? They move around
pretty good, right?
Robin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
> BARRY: Might I suggest,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > You come across like a completely u
How to Know Reality's Point of View
There is a notion of life that many posters on FFL have never considered once
they are engaged in argument, insult, and acrimony. And what is that notion of
life?
Well, for me, it seems very empirical and experimental. It is this: truth is an
objective thing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote:
> Yes, of course. "I also get that his connections can have
> an edge to them, or be rough." My take is that he is often
> being intentionally up front about the things and people
>
.
Robin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
> > No, Curtis, you feel my sincerity--it is a passion in me. It is the
> > sincerity that you abhor.
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" maskedzebra@
> wrote:
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> From what I'm told,> the new hip club drink is Red Bull and absinthe.
>
> M: Nice catch. And it makes sense I guess. Instead of doing the more
> pretentious but
ere.
> > > >
> > > > You can't really feel safe, if you are on shaky ground here. Kind of
> > > > like
> > > >
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xITBwnlbO6s
> > > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xITBwnlbO6s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
RAUNCHY: Women who stand up to Barry, especially anyone who
contradicts his belief that Sal is *good* and raunchydog,
Judy and those who support us are *bad* causes Barry to
fly into a rage about cunts.
BARRY: Ahem. Is there anyone here
he pure energy of truth in your
> argument. So how does it feel on this day when I guess you might say
> your being faithful to the truth has helped bring about your public
> reconciliation with Ann.
>
> Lord Knows
>
> PS. I just had to comment on this event, but don'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
ROBIN1: What I find remarkable here--besides the fact that Steve chooses to
ignore a datum like this one--is the utter and complete f
RESPONSE: What I find remarkable here--besides the fact that Steve chooses to
ignore a datum like this one--is the utter and complete failure of either
Curtis or Barry to demonstrate that AWB's responses to Curtis are anything but
entirely reasonable, commonsensical, and appropriate.
If you d
Robin: No, Steve. Your question is rhetorical, but I would like to answer it.
First of all, I agree in *this* particular instance, Curtis scored a bull's
eye. Everyone knows that. Even me, and I admit that I am green with jealousy.
But the question remains: "Jesus Christ, how do you pull this of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen"
> wrote:
Dear Steve,
ROBIN1:No worries. I think you right in all that you say here. I always fear
that whirring of the arrow that Curtis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
> > wrote:
> > >
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > > > I can
e, Steve (and Curtis):
"Perfect enjoyment demands intelligence."
It's harder than I thought knowing I was wrong. But I still love it. :-)
Robin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
wrote:
>
> Hey Robin,
> I'm not really getting it this time
Dear Steve,
Let us say that I hate Raunchy and authfriend (Judy). I think Share very brave
and true and strong. You are my best friend. I read through the correspondence
among you, Raunchy, and Judy.
Now recollect: I am much more disposed to take your part* in all this, given
the biasses of m
301 - 400 of 837 matches
Mail list logo
