On 10/27/2013 6:05 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Patanjali said the /pranava /was the name/designation of Ishvara.
Repetition of the pranava and contemplation of it leads to realization
of its meaning.
Repetition of OM as the nickname of the demi-god Krishna and
concentrating on OM does NOT
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
uh, Barry, you should know that some ten year old kid, just posted to FFL,
while you were in the men's room...
Post of the moment. I love it...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the most
reviled in FFL history.
On Mon, 10/28/13, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh
Oh, Barry, by a long shot. Richard is annoying, but most people figure him out
quickly and stop paying much attention to him. Barry is malicious, vicious, and
genuinely sadistic, absolutely determined to cause damage (even if he isn't
anywhere near as successful at it as he'd like to believe).
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:
I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the most
reviled in FFL history.
Well I don't revile anyone here. There are some who I might find interesting
to interact with in 'real' life to see if they are
Judy Koan: If Barry was talking to himself while walking alone in the woods is
he still lying?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Oh, Barry, by a long shot. Richard is annoying, but most people figure him out
quickly and stop paying much
It sure didn't take long for this thread to go to shit. LoL!
On 10/28/2013 11:30 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:
I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the
most reviled in FFL history.
Well I don't
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
So, let's sum up what we know ...
This is the sure sign of a scammer.
And trying to argue with him about what
View Source
Card, maybe they made a typo and yom should really be yum. As in yummy soma.
Also not to be taken seriously (-:
Well, to change 'yom' to 'yum' one only needs to move the dot
of the nikkud 'cholem vav' (o) inside the 'vav' , and it becomes
a shureq (u)... ???
It is a fact that here are no bija mantras mentioned in the Rig Veda.
So, how would the SSRS know any bijas from being a Vedic Pandit?
There are no bija mantras mentioned by Patanjali. The historical Buddha
doesn't mention any bija mantras. So, the bija mantras usage must have
come AFTER the
Prairie Dog Troll
You are such an ignorant, pseudo-intellectual bullshitter that you'll make any
kind of claim just to appear like you know something. I would call you a liar
but in actuality you are just arrogantly stupid.
Patanjali talks extensively about OM you fool. He uses the
So, let's sum up what we know ...
This is the sure sign of a scammer.
You are so ignorant you don't even know the basic stuff. Any self-respecting
Indian (who isn't a communist) always has 20-30 mantras on-hand just in case
there is need to get the gods favor for something.
Maybe
It is said that Narayana mantra can take you all the way - Maharishi Mahesh
Yogi.
there is versions that do not include om.
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Under whose authority would the SSRS be giving out any bija mantras? If you
can't reveal where MMY got
SSRS, although a mahapundit of the four vedas, should have asked you first.
Although he had a number of teachers other than MMY, he obviously never asked
permission from you - the punditster. I'm sure he regrets the omission to
this day.
I'm also sure you could clarify his pronunciation of
Under whose authority would the SSRS be giving out any bija mantras? If
you can't reveal where MMY got the bijas, so how could you say SSRS got
any bijas? There aren't any bijas mentioned in the Vedas. From what I've
read, SSRS, like Deepak Chopra and Charlie Lutes, never became TM
teachers by
So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to
everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave.
Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around
Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India
...@yahoo.com dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013, 11:07 AM
So[m], what was Maharishi's
SSRS, a vedic pandit, has given out OM as part of traditional
maha-mantras. After receiving one from him, I asked the OM
question to a sankhya-yoga scholar, a former TMer and student of SSRS. He said
No possible problem if included within a traditional maha-mantra ... like om
namo bhagavate
'OM it is of relatively recent oirgin, from the time of Pannini, who
arranged Sanskrit into a written language. OM is a symbol that was
invented by the Indian alchemists much later than Pannini, in order to
make their system seem profound and esoteric.
'Om is nothing more than a phoneme, or a
Yeah, all those god men can't compare to all the good you've done for
India. LoL!
On 10/24/2013 7:42 AM, Michael Jackson wrote:
Whomever gave you the dressing down only needs to look at a few news
articles about the current state of India to know that neither Marshy
nor any of these other
SSRS teaches techniques that are very similar to the TM practice of
MMY. It's a matter of positioning and placement, Sudarsha Kriya is a
hatha yoga asana and involves rhythmic breathing techniques in Vajrasana
and Sukhasana. It's not complicated.
The similarity to Buddhist Yoga is obvious.
A-U-M is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end of all creation.
MMY once described AUM (paraphrased) like hearing a City from a distance, you
can hear the drone of the City, only when you get up close can you distinguish
the individual sounds. These individual sounds are the
Authfriend: Today at 8:16 AM
So what would the problem be if OM wasn't included in a maha-mantra but
rather along with, say, a bija mantra like what TM uses? Did Sri Sri give out
bija mantras, or just the maha-mantras?
SSRS does indeed give out bija-mantras for meditation.
23 matches
Mail list logo
