-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
>
> Curtis, I am making the point that AT LEAST no one here on FFL came anywhere
> near any direct evidence of what is being alleged, book or not.>
Like any topic discussed, other than ourdirect experience. And of course due
to the pri
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> > > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> >
> > "If the mind does not need transcendence, is it not a good thing for the
> > body ?" Each is a product of the other. Yes, transcendence is always a good
> > t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
>
> "If the mind does not need transcendence, is it not a good thing for the body
> ?" Each is a product of the other. Yes, transcendence is always a good thing.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> >
>
"If the mind does not need transcendence, is it not a good thing for the body
?" Each is a product of the other. Yes, transcendence is always a good thing.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> >
> > I en
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
>
> I enjoy that expression attributed to the Buddha, "Believe nothing that you
> hear and only half of what you see". Books fall into the first category.
> Entertaining perhaps and definitely distracting, but at BEST a rough pointer
>
I enjoy that expression attributed to the Buddha, "Believe nothing that you
hear and only half of what you see". Books fall into the first category.
Entertaining perhaps and definitely distracting, but at BEST a rough pointer to
truth, after crawling somewhat laboriously through the viewpoint of
Curtis, I am making the point that AT LEAST no one here on FFL came anywhere
near any direct evidence of what is being alleged, book or not. I have an
opinion on all of this, though I didn't want to lead with it, because that is
all it is, just like everyone else's, an opinion (damn I sound like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> > >
> > > Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness"
> > > cliqu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> > >
> > > Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness"
> > > cliqu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> > >
> > >Using logic and reason to "confirm" an inner feeling.
> >
> > Confirmation bias (CB) may include
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> >
> > Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness"
> > clique here continuously claims that those who make positive claims about
> > Mahari
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> >
> >Using logic and reason to "confirm" an inner feeling.
>
> Confirmation bias (CB) may include this but in itself much broader -
> A series of experiments in the 1960s sug
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
>
> Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness" clique
> here continuously claims that those who make positive claims about Maharishi,
> the TMO and enlightenment are doing so to garner attention and feel special
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
>
> Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness" clique
> here continuously claims that those who make positive claims about Maharishi,
> the TMO and enlightenment are doing so to garner attention and feel speci
Yes, an amazing transformation, right between our eyes. "The world is as you
are". Using logic and reason to "confirm" an inner feeling. We have all done
it, but to pretend it is objective and leads to The Truth is baloney on white
bread.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" wrote
Spot on Jim, it's total rejection of anything positive, post after post,
question after question and total acceptance of everything negative, no
questions asked. If someone talks positive it's all subjective
experience, opinion, mind control, lacking any benefit to the world,
trying to feel specia
17 matches
Mail list logo
