agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as bad publicity. and that
goes for the TM and MMY bashers here too- just by criticizing and bashing TM
they continue to keep it alive in the minds of those who read these posts.
after some time all people remember was a discussion on TM, not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@... wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as
bad publicity. and that goes for the TM and MMY bashers
here too- just by criticizing and bashing TM they continue
to keep it alive in the minds of those who
On Apr 10, 2009, at 6:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Judy and Raunchydog have stated that they
feel that revealing information about the
puja and the nature of the mantras, etc.
could be confusing to new meditators and
spoil the innocence of their experience
of TM. They have put themselves on the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Apr 10, 2009, at 6:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Judy and Raunchydog have stated that they
feel that revealing information about the
puja and the nature of the mantras, etc.
could be confusing to new meditators and
spoil
On Apr 10, 2009, at 8:26 AM, raunchydog wrote:
Project JADED INNOCENCE:
What would be nice would be to put up a video of the puja on YouTube,
and simply label it as what it is and what it is used for. The person
performing the puja could wear a mask to conceal identity. Then the
video could
What you put your attention on grows.
Is it just me, or does ED make some sense below?
To me, if the world had ignored Ann Coulter, instead of paying attention to her
dysfunctions, we'd not have the likes of Rep. Michele Bachmann. I mean, how
many more pretty women are going to say to
thanks for your post! please keep the controversy going!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_reply@ wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as
bad publicity. and that goes for
yep- the way i look at it is not whether TM is a panacea for all (it does work
spectacularly well for me, and a lot of others though...), but to just keep
getting the name out there legitimizes it in the [spiritual] marketplace.
for example with cars, i've never much cared for Chryslers- never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I don't like O'Reilly's schtick,
but so what? They
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@... wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as bad publicity. and that
goes for the TM and MMY bashers here too- just by criticizing and bashing TM
they continue to keep it alive in the minds of those who read
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
What you put your attention on grows.
Is it just me, or does ED make some sense below?
To me, if the world had ignored Ann Coulter, instead of paying attention to
her dysfunctions, we'd not have the likes of Rep. Michele
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_re...@... wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say TM is
a good thing, even if he's not too sattvic a guy -- even as anybody even in
the worst health can sell stuff at a health food store.
But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say TM
is a good thing, even if he's not too sattvic a guy -- even as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_reply@ wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such
thing as bad publicity. and that goes for the
TM and MMY bashers here too- just by
criticizing and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say TM
is a good thing, even if he's not too sattvic a guy -- even as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But
? I
doubt it!
- Original Message -
From: bob_brigante no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:55 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMers are so desperate for praise they accept
it from Bill O'Reilly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Message -
From: ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 9:41 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMers are so desperate for praise they accept
it from Bill O'Reilly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
wrote:
From: sparaig lengli...@cox.net
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TMers are so desperate for praise they accept it
from Bill O'Reilly
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 3:53 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, TurquoiseB no_re...@.. . wrote:
One
So silly that I won't even bother to offer evidence to contradict it.
Well you should have bothered because you would have found out that he was
right. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_Act on the Neutrality Acts
of the '30s pushed by the Repubs and opposed by Roosevelt.
The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I don't like O'Reilly's schtick,
but so what? They both are displaying an enthusiasm for TM, and I like that.
Like MMY always
On Apr 9, 2009, at 5:21 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I don't like O'Reilly's
schtick, but so what? They both are displaying an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Apr 9, 2009, at 5:21 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, guyfawkes91 guyfawke...@... wrote:
So silly that I won't even bother to offer evidence to contradict it.
Well you should have bothered because you would have found out that he was
right. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_Act on the
AUM consists of the Akara, Ukara, and Makara. The Trinity.
Simply explained in this link:
http://www.dattapeetham.com/india/datta/DattaLarg.html
Jaya Guru Datta
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2cz3vd
Very nice trilled r-sound, soft and relaxed voice, and stuff.
http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/12/12-57.html
First, the question of practical advice on learning to pronounce [r].
I got
Kind of the same in everyone, n'est pas?
Isn't the divine within evryone? Don't you try to, or naturally, focus
on that?
And find some pesky mud of personality mucking up your expectations
of the Divine in everyone.
Maybe its not the Divine nor the mud of personality that mucks things up.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is of the Shristava family compound near Jalapur, Madhya Pradesh is the *VERY SAME* property the agents of the tax office of the Indian Goverment raided in 1987. Hey, The TM-org link with the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is
of the Shristava family compound near Jalapur, Madhya Pradesh
is
the
*VERY SAME* property the agents of the tax office of the
Indian
Goverment raided in 1987.
Hey, The TM-org link
Great article. When I see his face on kid's T-shirts it makes me want
to puke.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Che Guevara: 39 Years of Media Hype
by Humberto Fontova
DIGG THIS
Thirty-nine years ago this week, Ernesto Che Guevara
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great article. When I see his face on kid's T-shirts it makes me
want
to puke.
My brother wore one last time I saw him. I asked him if he was going
to wear his Adolf Hitler T-shirt next.
--- In
sparaig spare egg/Lawson English wrote:
Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted
language of the Indian Courts properly,
or maybe I
simply can't understand your points
(or both),
Namaste Sir Lawson,
Then please allow to clarify, and give you the gest of the
tired Old Anoop Chandola
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig spare egg/Lawson English wrote:
Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted
language of the Indian Courts properly,
or maybe I
simply can't understand your points
(or both),
Namaste Sir Lawson,
sparaig sparaig/Lawson English wrote:
coldbluiceman wrote:
sparaig spare egg/Lawson English wrote:
Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted
language of the Indian Courts properly,
or maybe I
simply can't understand your points
(or both),
Namaste Sir Lawson,
Then
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig sparaig/Lawson English wrote:
coldbluiceman wrote:
sparaig spare egg/Lawson English wrote:
Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted
language of the Indian Courts properly,
or maybe I
sparaig spare egg / Lawson English wrote:
Jeffrey initiate22000@ wrote:
HOw could Maharishi be run out of India?
Did he commit a crime?
snip
Namaste Lawson Ji,
The same tired *OLD ANOOP CHANDOLA STORY* you rely so very heavily
upon.
It truly is something that after 35 years.., all
coldbluiceman wrote:
sparaig spare egg / Lawson English wrote:
Jeffrey initiate22000@ wrote:
HOw could Maharishi be run out of India?
Did he commit a crime?
snip
Namaste Lawson Ji,
The same tired *OLD ANOOP CHANDOLA STORY* you
rely so very heavily
upon.
It truly is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig spare egg / Lawson English wrote:
Jeffrey initiate22000@ wrote:
HOw could Maharishi be run out of India?
Did he commit a crime?
snip
Namaste Lawson Ji,
The same tired *OLD ANOOP CHANDOLA
sparaig spare egg/ Lawson English wrote:
coldbluiceman sperino wrote:
sparaig spare egg / Lawson English wrote:
Jeffrey wrote:
snip
Namaste Lawson Ji,
The same tired *OLD ANOOP CHANDOLA STORY*
you rely so very heavily
upon.
It truly is something that after 35 years..,
Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted language of the Indian Courts properly,
or maybe I
simply can't understand your points (or both), but it seems to ME that you're
arguing
something that isn't supported by what the court actually SAID as I quoted at
the bottom
of this article...
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the pictures! They look fascinating. It isnt a home for
Maharishi's family, although I wouldnt doubt that they could be
living there. It looks like a big spiritual center. What are all
those differnt building
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the pictures!
The place is WAAAY bigger than I realized:
http://www.maharishi.org.ua/india2006/pano2.jpg
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
sparaig spare egg wrote:
Jeffrey wrote:
Thanks for the pictures!
They look fascinating.
snip
Does Maharishi go there ever?
Not since 1989 when he was run out of India for the final time by
P.M. Rajiv Gandhi, and the legimate Shankaracharyas of Puri
Dwarka/Jyosimutt.
It looks
HOw could Maharishi be run out of India? Did he commit a crime? It
looks like he is doing alot of good there. Besides the brahmastan
compound, I also saw pictures of his Vedic School. Very impressive
looking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I heard it had something to do with, what else, money.
--- Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HOw could Maharishi be run out of India? Did he
commit a crime? It
looks like he is doing alot of good there. Besides
the brahmastan
compound, I also saw pictures of his Vedic School.
Very
Jeffrey wrote:
HOw could Maharishi be run out of India?
Did he commit a crime?
..The Swiss government, according to some reports, had made things
difficult for him, allegedly for not paying taxes in full and also
for transferring large sums of his money in the accounts there to
other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard it had something to do with, what else, money.
I've heard lots of things. Does anyone actually have any facts? URLs to
newspaper articles
(plural) would be nice, even. URLs to court documents would be nice also.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HOw could Maharishi be run out of India? Did he commit a crime? It
looks like he is doing alot of good there. Besides the brahmastan
compound, I also saw pictures of his Vedic School. Very impressive
looking
Anoop
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more in you are, the more consolidated you are, in the very
core
of your Being, the center of your Being, the more you speak the
language of the Existence. You do so much good; you do so many
wonderful
things
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more in you are, the more consolidated you are, in the very
core
of your Being, the center of your Being, the more you speak the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The more in you are, the more consolidated you are, in the very
core of your Being, the center of your Being, the more you speak
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The more in you are, the more consolidated you are, in the very
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The more in you are, the more consolidated you are, in the
101 - 162 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
