--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Few people are aware that any suggestion for the elimination of
the
estate tax comes with the elimination of the stepped-up basis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Few people are aware that any suggestion for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@
wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
[...]
If anything they need a serious course in meditation as they are too
attached to their wealth.
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
[...]
If anything they need
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
[...]
If anything they need a serious course in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
[...]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
[...]
If anything they need
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
snip
Concentrated wealth in the hands of those responsible for
creating
it is a GREAT thing and should be encourated.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
snip
Concentrated wealth in the hands of those
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
who care little about their fellow humanity. People like Bill Gates
are
a rare exception
Well 280 billion annually in american philanthropy sort
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
package.
At some point in the accumulation of wealth,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain
Original posts
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
package.
At some point in the accumulation of wealth, money
ceases to be a medium of exchange and becomes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
When rich people talk about money, they're talking
about something entirely different from what poor and
middle-class people mean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
When rich people talk about money, they're talking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Few people are aware that any suggestion for the elimination of the
estate tax comes with the elimination of the stepped-up basis for
capital gains. Currently, all capital gains get stepped-up of
their cost basis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation with causation with regards
to being rich and empathy towards the 'non-rich' -- is a minor and
not substantive one, and focuses on my poor traits -- not a critique
of the thesis
new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation with causation with regards
to being rich and empathy towards the 'non-rich' -- is a
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
who care little about their fellow humanity. People like Bill Gates
are
a rare exception
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work
this
way: once you had an estate valued at 12
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and adopt
it. I think through each issue and decide on the merits. My views
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
who care little about their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation with
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and adopt
it. I think through each
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
who care little about their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
[...]
If anything they need a serious course in meditation as they are too
attached to their wealth.
A point that MMY has used
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Interesting thing to say about Gates. His stated goal in life
for several decades
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Interesting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
incomes below say $15,000) would eliminate all the inefficiencies,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to have
more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
incomes below say $15,000) would eliminate all the
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
starting at incomes over $30-50,000,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 4:57 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to
have
more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to
have
more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Its a matter of social and collective values. I dream of a day when
kids grow up wanting to make billions so they can make a transform
world health, nutrition, shelter, education, spirituality, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work this
way: once you had an estate valued at 12 million the progressive tax
would kick in.
At what rate(s)? At the current 35-60% (aproximate numbers)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17%
new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work this
way: once you had an estate valued at 12 million the progressive tax
would kick in.
At what rate(s)? At the current 35-60%
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work
this
way: once you had an estate valued at 12 million the progressive
tax
would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In 2006, the estate tax exemption is $2,000,000 per person
($4,000,000 for a married couple) and that's going up to $3,500,000
per person in a few years.
ok. thanks It was 1 or 1.1 mil in 2004 (for single). I thought
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
snip
Concentrated wealth in the hands of those responsible for creating
it is a GREAT thing and should be encourated.
Bhairitu, if you tax it, it goes to government which will NOT use
it wisely.
76 matches
Mail list logo
