--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> isn't it much more profitable to initiate 1000 people
> for a $250 fee than 10 people for a $2500 fee?
Yes By a factor of 10. ; )
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > ...Yes, but isn't he doing neither? You don't move
> > Rolls Royces
> > out of the showroom by blocking the sale of Fords.
> > Uns
>
> You don't move Fords out of the showroom by pricing
> them like a Rolls.
>
> ...Yes, but isn't he doing neither? You don't move
> Rolls Royces
> out of the showroom by blocking the sale of Fords.
> Uns
You don't move Fords out of the showroom by pricing
them like a Rolls.
--- uns_tressor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
> <[
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shukra69"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > are you sure these Indian's are poor? I would imagine they are
> > probably wealthy either by Indian standards or even otherwise
> > in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shukra69" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_world_beings"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible f
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > MMY has madeit very clear that he's not trying to reach the largest
> > number of people at the moment, but rather to initiate the m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MMY has madeit very clear that he's not trying to reach the largest
> number of people at the moment, but rather to initiate the most
> influential (wealthiest), who seldom shop for luxury items at
> Walmart.
...Yes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shukra69" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> are you sure these Indian's are poor? I would imagine they are
> probably wealthy either by Indian standards or even otherwise
> in India.
AFAIK, the only people who pay to learn TM in India are employers who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_world_beings"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > For without that cloning the teach
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > For without that cloning the teaching is
> > > small scale and
> > > ineffective in the long-term.
> >
> > The TMO's initiati
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > For without that cloning the teaching is
> > small scale and
> > ineffective in the long-term.
>
> The TMO's initiation level is small scale and
> ineffective now.
>
> One of the main points brought up in t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> > My point to you was your insistance that everyone should teach
for
> > free, and your criticism of Maharishi's methods. You have a
chance
> > now to actually think it through.
>
> As do you. Please read my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > isn't it much more profitable to initiate 1000 people
> > > for a $250 fee than 10 people for a $2500 fee?
> >
> > Yes, as I have suggested many times.
> > My only point is to question the smale scale and short-te
TurquoiseB wrote:
> As far as I can tell from my short time on
> this forum, *most* of us here have been
> taught how to teach basic meditation.
> That's a cool thing, a WAY cool thing.
>
> I'm just suggesting an alternate way of
> DOING SOMETHING, one in which one pays
> for favors receiv
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't exist.
A few weeks ago, when this issue came up on another
forum, I entered "learn to meditate" into Google and
checked what it costs to learn, from the first page
of sites found that listed prices
Dear Lupidus.
As a "so-called independent TM-Teacher", I do not earn money by
initiating. The costs is higher than the incomes - that has been for
years. Luckily, I have my income from other things that I work with -
so I am not depending of initiating.
Ingegerd
>
> To some of the so-called in
> My point to you was your insistance that everyone should teach for
> free, and your criticism of Maharishi's methods. You have a chance
> now to actually think it through.
As do you. Please read my other post about your claim
about my 'insistence' above and do some thinking of your
own. T
> > isn't it much more profitable to initiate 1000 people
> > for a $250 fee than 10 people for a $2500 fee?
>
> Yes, as I have suggested many times.
> My only point is to question the smale scale and short-term
> thinking when people here are going around saying it should
> be completely free
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you can find one single TM-Teacher that have earned money in
> > teaching TM through the years, I would like to shake hands with
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > I was *very much* engaged in the lifelong mission of
> > > teaching that Maharishi is engaged in. I still am.
> > > I choose to pay for it myself. So do many of the
> > > monks I studied with. We teach because we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > For without that cloning the teaching is
> > small scale and
> > ineffective in the long-term.
>
> The TMO's initiation level is small scale and
> ineffective now. >>>
Understood.
However, my understanding
> > I was *very much* engaged in the lifelong mission of
> > teaching that Maharishi is engaged in. I still am.
> > I choose to pay for it myself. So do many of the
> > monks I studied with. We teach because we consider
> > what we have managed to learn along the Way valuable
> > enough that we
> For without that cloning the teaching is
> small scale and
> ineffective in the long-term.
The TMO's initiation level is small scale and
ineffective now.
One of the main points brought up in this thread is
that, even if the organization needs initiation fee
income to maintain itself and pr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can find one single TM-Teacher that have earned money in
> teaching TM through the years, I would like to shake hands with
> the person.
Pleased to meetcha.
I earned a living as a full-time TM teacher for sev
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > It doesn't exist.
> > > > The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the
> > > > student, novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the
cause,
> > > > usually for years, before any SIGNIFICANT tea
If you can find one single TM-Teacher that have earned money in
teaching TM through the years, I would like to shake hands with the
person. As the most of us, I have paid all my courses in the TMO,
paid all the expenses for the courses I have held, lost income from
ordinary work - lost some pen
> > > It doesn't exist.
> > > The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the
> > > student, novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the cause,
> > > usually for years, before any SIGNIFICANT teaching was given
> > > to them. It is a way to assess the worthiness of a student.
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > It doesn't exist.
> > The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the
student,
> > novice, devotee, to devote his/h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It doesn't exist.
> The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the student,
> novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the cause, usually for
> years, before any SIGNIFICANT teaching was given to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It doesn't exist.
> The age-old traditions in East and West, always expected the student,
> novice, devotee, to devote his/her self to the cause, usually for
> years, before any SIGNIFICANT teaching was given to
30 matches
Mail list logo
