I once posted a commentary that author and scientist
(he's a
Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global
warming.
Putting aside what you or I may feel about the issue,
the
facts or the arguments of the piece weren't important to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I once posted a commentary that author and scientist
(he's a
Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global
warming.
Putting aside what you or I may feel about the issue,
On May 24, 2006, at 3:17 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I once posted a commentary that author and scientist
(he's a
Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global
warming.
Putting
On May 23, 2006, at 5:03 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
She's a scientist and
On May 23, 2006, at 5:06 PM, sparaig wrote:
Insomuch as humans show the same patterns of behavior in every
society, the analogy
with Christian Fundamentalism may be useful. However, since
Hinduism is usually a far
more flexable and accomidating religion or set-of-religions than
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 5:03 PM, sparaig wrote:
snip
There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in
Indian Studies (I believe)
who did his PhD work pointing out the cultural origins of the TM
movement.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 5:06 PM, sparaig wrote:
Insomuch as humans show the same patterns of behavior in every
society, the analogy
with Christian Fundamentalism may be useful. However, since
Hinduism is usually a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 5:06 PM, sparaig wrote:
Insomuch as humans show the same patterns of behavior in every
society, the analogy
with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 5:03 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 5:06 PM, sparaig wrote:
Insomuch as humans show the same patterns of behavior in every
society, the analogy
with Christian Fundamentalism may be useful. However, since
Hinduism is usually a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 5:03 PM, sparaig wrote:
snip
There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in
Indian Studies (I believe)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
And again, what Nanda calls Vedic Creationism does
not appear to be what MMY teaches in that it doesn't
propose to replace Darwinian evolution with
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd certainly
say she does. esp. given her masterful overview of the development of
this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd
certainly say she
On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
She's a scientist and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd certainly
say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
snip
Not to mention killing the messenger.
And that killing of the messenger in this specific context is an
artifact of clinging to the idea that the vedas and science go
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
OK, Vaj, I've now read both parts of the two-parter you
posted here by Nanda, as well as the additional essay
you just put up.
Your subject heading is misleading in several different
ways.
First, Vedic Creation Science is your term, not
Nanda's. You created it with the intention of
conveying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a
Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming.
Putting
aside what you or I may feel about the issue, the facts or the
arguments of
On May 23, 2006, at 12:53 PM, authfriend wrote:
OK, Vaj, I've now read both parts of the two-parter you
posted here by Nanda, as well as the additional essay
you just put up.
Your subject heading is misleading in several different
ways.
First, Vedic Creation Science is your term, not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a
Harvard grad) Michael Creighton had made on global warming.
Putting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 12:53 PM, authfriend wrote:
OK, Vaj, I've now read both parts of the two-parter you
posted here by Nanda, as well as the additional essay
you just put up.
Your subject heading is misleading in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
She's a scientist and someone raised in that culture--I'd certainly
say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
snip
Not to mention killing the messenger.
And that killing of the messenger in this specific
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
snip
Not to mention killing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
I once posted a commentary that author and scientist (he's a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she doesn't seem to have the
requisite credentials to trash Vedic science.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 7:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
snip
Not to mention killing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:47 PM, authfriend wrote:
The point is that she
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
There's a guy who used to lecture at MUM/MIU who has a PhD in
Indian Studies (I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
There's a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meera Nanda debunks Vedic Creation Science.
It's interesting to read the user reviews on Amazon
of Nanda's major book, Prophets Looking Backward,
which deals with the same topic as this essay.
Of eleven reviews, five give it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Meera Nanda debunks Vedic Creation Science.
It's interesting to read the user reviews on Amazon
of Nanda's major book, Prophets Looking Backward,
On May 22, 2006, at 9:47 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meera Nanda debunks Vedic Creation Science.
It's interesting to read the user reviews on Amazon
of Nanda's major book, Prophets Looking Backward,
which deals with the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 9:47 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Meera Nanda debunks Vedic Creation Science.
It's interesting to read the user reviews on Amazon
of
On May 22, 2006, at 1:46 PM, authfriend wrote:
Yeah I saw that. Amazon's rating system is notoriously manipulated
to people who want to trash books, which in some cases they've not
even read.
Manipulated how, and by whom? Seems unlikely that Amazon
itself would do this, given that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 1:46 PM, authfriend wrote:
Yeah I saw that. Amazon's rating system is notoriously
manipulated to people who want to trash books, which in some
cases they've not even read.
Manipulated
44 matches
Mail list logo