--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You truly have to be mentally insane to call someone a
terrorist for disagreeing with you on a forum. Truly,
the man is mad, and anywhere in the noraml world he
would be ridiculed into oblivion for such
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
wrote:
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vaj:
I second that, moderating is needed by someone otherwise
this list is down the tubes.
Rick:
How would you suggest it be moderated? If someone volunteered
to do it, what criteria would they follow?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where are you going to find someone whose
personal interests aren't involved, so that
you can count on their being objective?
I would be happy to if I were
retired, but as it is, I wouldn't have the time.
Who
Since the subject of moderation of this forum has
come up, might I suggest a different *form* of
moderation, one that I have seen work on other
spiritual forums? It's a kind of group moderation,
one that definitely WORKS to keep the overall
state of attention high and flaming to a minimum.
The English are feeling the pinch in relation to
recent terrorist threats and have raised their
security level from Miffed to Peeved. Soon,
though security levels may be raised yet again
to Irritated or even A Bit Cross Londoners
have not been A Bit Cross since the blitz in
1940 when tea
A really interesting guy, who seems to have solved
many of the mysteries of how things like Stonehenge
and the Pyramids were built. Wally's moved whole barns
using his techniques. Perhaps those of you who have
South-facing entrances can contact him.
http://tinyurl.com/2jlkrv
When it comes to moderation, the way it should be is this: people from FF or
with ties to FF only. The rest of you fuck off.
-Original Message-
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 4:47 AM
To:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
You truly have to be mentally insane to call someone a
terrorist for disagreeing with you on a forum. Truly,
the man is mad, and anywhere
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Where are you going to find someone whose
personal interests aren't involved, so that
you can count on their being objective?
I would be happy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since the subject of moderation of this forum has
come up, might I suggest a different *form* of
moderation, one that I have seen work on other
spiritual forums? It's a kind of group moderation,
one that definitely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
You truly have to be mentally insane to call someone a
terrorist for disagreeing with you on a forum. Truly,
the man is mad, and anywhere
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
steve.sundur@ wrote:
Vaj:
I second that, moderating is needed by someone otherwise
this list is down the tubes.
Rick:
How would you suggest it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4
Cool machine - wish I had one
Can't quite follow his explanations regarding zero values
Is that what tm would also look like on his machine? I thought with TM
the whole brain showed activity, but with unusual synchrony.
Remarkable how quickly he
Its all where your head is at. Current statistics on the following
searches:
panic AND TurquoiseB - 41 posts
small self AND TurquoiseB - 62 posts
negativity AND TurquoiseB - 75 posts
True Believer AND TurquoiseB - 159 posts
True Believers AND TurquoiseB - 253 posts
argue AND TurquoiseB - 301
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4
Cool machine - wish I had one
Can't quite follow his explanations regarding zero values
Is that what tm would also look like on his machine? I thought with TM
the whole
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4
Cool machine - wish I had one
Can't quite follow his explanations regarding zero values
Is that what tm would also look like on his machine?
Nope.
I thought with TM
the
On Mar 18, 2007, at 7:39 AM, claudiouk wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4
Cool machine - wish I had one
Can't quite follow his explanations regarding zero values
Is that what tm would also look like on his machine? I thought with TM
the whole brain showed activity, but with
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:28 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sorry Rick but maybe I had something to do with
FFL going pearshaped
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:41 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Misrepresention by twisting the truth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Now lets ban someone who calls people pure evil for dis-agreeing
with him.ie: Paul Mason. Please ban this person.
Paul has unsubscribed from FFL.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 6:24 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sorry Rick but maybe I had something to do with
FFL going pearshaped
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 18, 2007, at 7:39 AM, claudiouk wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4
Cool machine - wish I had one
Can't quite follow his explanations regarding zero values
Is that what tm would also look like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:28 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sorry Rick but maybe I had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
[...]
[hey Rick, have you ever wondered at your exceptionally precise filter where
you can
criticize me for one-line me too posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shucktipat no_reply@ wrote:
Thanks for the keen insight, Jim Bob... :] I'll think about it.
Actually I decided to drop into this nuthouse to see if I could
stand
being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
[snip]
Now lets ban someone who calls people pure evil for dis-agreeing
with him.ie: Paul Mason. Please ban this person.
Paul has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shucktipat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shucktipat no_reply@
wrote:
Thanks for the keen insight, Jim Bob... :] I'll think about
it.
Now you seem to be confused. Me thinks thou doth protest too much!
if only they had let you be an initiator... Time to
grow
up Jim Bob!
I have NO DESIRE to be an initiator.
What's wrong with the Brits? If MMY was going to curse an entire
nation, why not curse the Germans, Syrians, Israelis, or the Texans?
The Brits have given the world so much. Without them we would not have
blue grass music! Lay off the Brits, man! Bite some kraut!
jim flanegin wrote:
We have been exposed recently to selected
TMer quotes from a prominent Buddhist...
What exactly, Jim, is a Buddhist? Also, please
define what a TMer is. Is Maharishi a Buddhist
or a TMer?
But again, someone would
have to spend a lot of
time monitoring and counting posts
Rick, we already have subscribers who would love to do
some of the monitoring. No one needs to count all of
the posts by all of the posters daily, but if an AMTer
goes over the daily limit, someone will be
gullible fool wrote:
...but if an AMTer goes over the daily limit,
someone will be eager to report it.
What, exactly, is an AMTer?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the key question. I regard my co-moderators, Alex Stanley
and Gullible Fool, as being fair and objective, but I don't know
if either wants to take on this task. It might not be too hard,
as you can count the
I may be considered a lurker. I enjoy learning more of TM the mantras the
sidhis related fields topics on the nature of life the Univ. or our
evolution etc. I also post @ times oin soime inside news from MUM to answer
specific questions of a higher nature. I do NOT enjoy bad language or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I've been intentionally staying out of this,
because I'm just back from a fun mini-vacation
and don't feel like diving back into the mud,
but I'll make two comments and then post a few
examples and then bow out.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of gullible fool
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 9:22 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sorry Rick but maybe I had something to do
with FFL going pearshaped
But again, someone would
have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Bottom line is their own words. I'm really tired of
collecting all the THINGS TMers BELEVE quotes; just
cutting and pasting them is an afront to the senses,
but here are the last of them. Lets' allow those
who are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Where are you going to find someone whose
personal interests aren't involved, so that
you can count on their being objective?
I would be happy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the subject of moderation of this forum has
come up,
You mean, the subject you said you were going to
stay out of after your latest compilation post?
snip
The effectiveness of this approach is in its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
[snip]
Now lets ban someone who calls people pure evil for dis-agreeing
with him.ie: Paul Mason. Please ban this person.
Paul has
I have NO DESIRE to be an initiator.
Why not Jim, it's a perfect activity.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim flanegin wrote:
We have been exposed recently to selected
TMer quotes from a prominent Buddhist...
What exactly, Jim, is a Buddhist? Also, please
define what a TMer is.
A Buddhist is a person who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I like [Ken Wilber's] take on science spirituality:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wX_W1BB_0Mmode=relatedsearch=
Oooh, I'm so glad you found this one! I had posted
about this take of his recently, that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim flanegin wrote:
You said that the pro-TMers called others 'rakshasas'...
So, it's all about Bhairatu.
Stop it. You're cracking me up.
lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have NO DESIRE to be an initiator.
Why not Jim, it's a perfect activity.
I already have a career, and have just never had the desire for that-
not TM specific- I just don't see myself as any kind of
What I've Learned: Neil Young, Legend, 60, Woodside, California
· A best moment in music? Sometimes when I'm playing my guitar, I get
to a point where it gets very cold and icy inside me. It's very refreshing.
Every breath is like you're at the North Pole. Your head starts to freeze.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:28 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sorry Rick but maybe I had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But again, someone would
have to spend a lot of
time monitoring and counting posts
Rick, we already have subscribers who would love to do
some of the monitoring. No one needs to count all of
the posts by all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have NO DESIRE
HE'S ARRIVED, HE'S ARRIVED!
lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be considered a lurker.
But I'm Mr. Lurker to you.
I enjoy learning more of TM the mantras the sidhis related
fields topics on the nature of life the Univ. or our evolution
etc. I also post @ times oin soime inside
jstein wrote:
How's that been working for you, Barry?
So, it's all about Barry.
This is from a friend who goes to our Wednesday Night satsangs here in FF:
Yes. The rules I am suggesting is kind of like what we have on Weds. No
arguing, no lectuirng no debating. Keep it civil. With a low number of posts
allowed in 24 hours it could be monitored. ALso would make them think and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like MMY's:
Spiritual and Material Values
Every experience has its level of physiology, and so unbounded
awareness has its own level of physiology which can be measured.
This is where I just don't grok the TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have NO DESIRE
HE'S ARRIVED, HE'S ARRIVED!
lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is from a friend who goes to our Wednesday Night satsangs here
in FF:
Yes. The rules I am suggesting is kind of like what we have on
Weds. No
arguing, no lectuirng no debating. Keep it civil. With a low number
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
We have been exposed recently to selected TMer quotes from a
prominent Buddhist here on Fairfield Lifean effort which I have
consistently
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to think this [setting a limit on
the number of posts a person can make] is a good
idea. Whether 3 posts or 5 or 10 - but some limited
number. This could be implemented without having to
put people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
I like MMY's:
Spiritual and Material Values
Every experience has its level of physiology, and so unbounded
awareness has its own level
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shucktipat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now you seem to be confused. Me thinks thou doth protest too much!
You probably would've been right, about 25 or so years ago, but it
honestly has been that long since I've had such a desire, or any
sustained contact
What exactly, Jim, is a Buddhist?
jim flanegin wrote:
A Buddhist is a person who calls themselves a Buddhist.
So, a Buddhist is a Buddhist.
Also, please define what a TMer is.
A TMer is a person who practices TM.
So, what is TM?
Is Maharishi a Buddhist or a TMer?
What does he
jim flanegin wrote:
You said that the pro-TMers called others 'rakshasas'...
So, it's all about Bhairatu.
lurk wrote:
Stop it. You're cracking me up.
So, what's it all about?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly, Jim, is a Buddhist?
jim flanegin wrote:
A Buddhist is a person who calls themselves a Buddhist.
So, a Buddhist is a Buddhist.
Also, please define what a TMer is.
A TMer is a
He feels compelled to respond to ever
post and his responses often consist
of a two or three word comment.
jstein wrote:
A me too post is quite different from the
kind of thing Lawson posts.
So, now it's all about Lawson.
Rick, we already have subscribers who would love to do
some of the monitoring. No one needs to count all of
the posts by all of the posters daily, but if an AMTer
goes over the daily limit, someone will be eager to
report it.
jstein wrote:
(Non-AMTers, of course, will be exempt.)
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:11 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Fairfield Life suggestion from a friend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
I like MMY's:
Spiritual and Material Values
Every experience has its level of physiology, and so unbounded
awareness has its own level of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
He feels compelled to respond to ever
post and his responses often consist
of a two or three word comment.
jstein wrote:
A me too post is quite different from the
kind of thing Lawson posts.
Rick Archer wrote:
A more important point would be to restrict
posters who can't refrain from bad-mouthing
each other.
Well, that would certainly include Judy and the two Barrys, and Jim,
Vaj, Kirk, and just about everyone else lately. I can't recall a
single person here who hasn't bad
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:11 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Fairfield Life suggestion
I have NO DESIRE
lurk wrote:
HE'S ARRIVED, HE'S ARRIVED!
Lurk no more!
Wouldn't you agree that Maharishi is a Buddhist?
jim flanegin wrote:
No clue.
So, I'll clue you in, Jim - Maharishi is a Buddhist and the Buddha was
a TMer. What do you think?
So, now it's all about Lawson.
Well, yeah.
Me too!
TurquoiseB wrote:
I'd set the daily limit to five posts...
Apparently you've got a life and a job over there in sunny France, and
a cozy cafe to sit in that has WiFi. Some of us live in Fairfield or
Austin or New Orleans or Phoenix or New York and we've got nothing
better to do than read and
sparaig wrote:
Imagine if the court jester was limited to
5 barbs a day. His usefulness to the king
would end immediately.
So, it's all about jesting.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
sparaig wrote:
Imagine if the court jester was limited to
5 barbs a day. His usefulness to the king
would end immediately.
So, it's all about jesting.
Well, yeah...
I vote for 4 posts in every 24 hour period - anything over that goes directly
into the trash.
Then, let's reevaluate things in a month. If there are still people bashing
and getting
angry, then let's think about what to do then. I for one am so sick of the
Barry,Judy
situation i would be
Regarding this earth shaking matter, here's a photo:
http://www.maharishiphotos.com/bpics73.jpg. Jerry is behind Maharishi, on
the left.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't you agree that Maharishi is a Buddhist?
jim flanegin wrote:
No clue.
So, I'll clue you in, Jim - Maharishi is a Buddhist and the Buddha
was
a TMer. What do you think?
I am sure it can be
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of wayback71
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 1:27 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Fairfield Life suggestion from a friend
I vote for 4 posts in every 24 hour period - anything over that
Sorry, but though I'm sure we'd all like to be vegetarians our ancestors
determined long ago what diet we should follow. To have to eat animal
protein is the curse of our ancestors. I've pretty much been into
biochemical individuality since the early 1970s when a naturopath hipped
me to it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
I have NO DESIRE
HE'S ARRIVED, HE'S ARRIVED!
lurk
Ha-Ha!
Richard J. Williams wrote:
Rick Archer wrote:
A more important point would be to restrict
posters who can't refrain from bad-mouthing
each other.
Well, that would certainly include Judy and the two Barrys, and Jim,
Vaj, Kirk, and just about everyone else lately. I can't recall
And that *includes* me leaving the group
entirely, if you want.
Thanks. That would be much appreciated.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
Wouldn't you agree that Maharishi is a Buddhist?
No clue.
Since he is a living Buddha, of course he is.
Any opinions on this plan? Any
votes on 5 vs. 10 vs. alternate suggestions?
After we tackle the quantity issue, we'll tackle the more thorny
quality
issue.
This is very healthy thinking. The only way to save FFL. In my opinion
5 posts per day is more than enough.
Then like I said, maybe neither of us is as big an asshole as we appear
to the other. Adios, Jim, and best wishes...
Come on people, let's beat up on each other
some more and bash the Maharishi to no end.
Bhairitu wrote:
I don't think anyone would disagree with me
that you bring it on yourself.
You just used up one of your alloted posts to beat up on me.
Hello,
This is an automated email message to let you know that sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribed from your FairfieldLife group.
nablusoss wrote:
In my opinion 5 posts per day is more than enough.
But, you've used up 6 today already without saying much of anything.
Maybe he felt the 5 messages a day idea was aimed at him since he
seems to make many brief messages.
BTW, I like 6 messages a day, but 5 is fine, whatever you guys decide
I'm sure will be fine.
On Mar 18, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Hello,
This is an automated email message
Just a suggestion on how the spirit of our house can be
conducted...
Recent Activity
11
New Members
Visit Your Group
New business?
Get new customers.
List your web site
in Yahoo! Search.
Y! GeoCities
Share Interests
Connect with
Vaj wrote:
Maybe he felt the 5 messages a day idea was aimed
at him since he seems to make many brief messages.
All he wanted was someone to talk to.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is an automated email message to let you know that sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribed from your FairfieldLife group.
Congratulations, Rick, one down.
Lawson was perhaps the brightest person on
my 2 cents:
1) one per day
2) always remind yourself,
whatever you do, it's only worthwile,
if you do it with love with the intention of
possible benefit to someone.
Whenever you benefit someone, you benefit yourSelf.
3)also, it's not necessary to respond to everything in words;
take it into
You are right, Judy. Lawson is very bright, from what I could gather. He can
always return
if he wants to limit the number of posts as everyone else does.
What's with the proa and anti TM thing? Most people are a good deal more
complex than
that black and white take. There are lots of
On Mar 18, 2007, at 4:31 PM, amarnath wrote:
1) one per day
2) always remind yourself,
whatever you do, it's only worthwile,
if you do it with love with the intention of
possible benefit to someone.
Whenever you benefit someone, you benefit yourSelf.
3)also, it's not necessary to respond to
Wow, I leave town for a weekend and...
My interactions with Spraig were positive, he will be missed if he
doesn't just rejoin when he feels like it.
There have been many calls for posting limits since I have been
posting here, why would this one be the straw?
I don't get the Rick connection
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You are right, Judy. Lawson is very bright, from what I
could gather. He can always return if he wants to limit
the number of posts as everyone else does.
He's tired of constantly being the target of
putdowns because
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
