Although, I have no intention, Shem(?) of bowing out or being censored. my
yahoo group for anyone open to some really smart kind open people is
'superconsciousn...@yahoogroups.com' The only rules are limit judgment
and arguing needlessly and then their is compassion. I suspect many here
feel the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
wrote:
>
> Curtis
> Telling me I'm not wanted here is fine. No need to say 'scoot'! It's
not exactly
> the way the Mararishi would respond.
[snip]
Uh, I wouldn't be too sure of that...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Arhata Osho
wrote:
>
> > Canned, self promoting, and, spiritual pamphlets?? I've been
doing
> > this for 15 years
> > with millions of people purely from truth and a passion and, this
> > jud
The consensus of this group, Arhata, is, unfortunately, that they
want to censor posts.
Although I disagree with their rules, it is their right to do it.
For example, I believe MY free expression has been curtailed here
because I like to post a lot of one or two line responses. But the
consen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn8b1DL8NGo
Thank you for your interest
I haven't your name?
Just a brief response here until later.
Brief outline of my background:
Graduated at University of Oregon
20 years on Wall st. primarily as an Account Executive in the Financial Field
Had a vision to start a spiritual community/center which I did fr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
wrote:
>
> Curtis
You are responding to the wrong person. "I am the eternal" wrote the
post you are responding to.
> Telling me I'm not wanted here is fine. No need to say 'scoot'! It's
not exactly
> the way the Mararishi would respond. You ma
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
wrote:
>
> Curtis
>
> It's ok if you're judgmental, but I haven't the time to go round and
round> about misinterpretations that give you away.
Again with the putdowns. You have a great rapport technique.
I'm sure you mean to be > producti
hi arhata,
i just read some of your billboards on your website, to see what all
the fuss is about. what i read were some basic statements about
mindfulness and witnessing. what i read were attempts by you to wake
people up to a new way of seeing the world. what i read were various
essays about
Curtis
Telling me I'm not wanted here is fine. No need to say 'scoot'! It's not exactly
the way the Mararishi would respond. You may
be representative of consciousness here because of a collective 'belief
system' that engenders fear that cloaks as judgment. I get who you are,
I'm just into dialog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > I know you have given this topic some deep thought Judy and it
shows.
> > Interesting response. You put your finger on where the line is
drawn
> > between
--Sorry - first "learned" about Muktananda. The Mahareeshee uses the
term "God"; but Willytex says people can't use that term. Lakshmanjoo
uses it.
Swami Lakshmanjoo on karma:
"The first difference, therefore, between Kashmir Saivism and
Vedanta is in their different understanding of karmay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> I know you have given this topic some deep thought Judy and it shows.
> Interesting response. You put your finger on where the line is drawn
> between believing that such a non-dual state is possible and not.
>
> > Gee, I have
Curtis
It's ok if you're judgmental, but I haven't the time to go round and round
about misinterpretations that give you away. I'm sure you mean to be
productive in what you
write and if others feel so or not, let them speak up. I only dialog from
the heart and awareness as much as possible.
--Venice Beach, the Rose Cafe, circa early 70's; the place where I
first about Swami Muktananda.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
> wrote:
> >
> > Canned, self promoting, and, spiritual pamphlets?? I've been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
wrote:
>
> Not trusting the TMO or even myself because of my two years of med
school (I
> didn't go on because I just couldn't take being around sick people) and
> loads of science training, I decided that the experiences I've been
having
>
Sal
Zeit Gesundheit!!
On Jan 7, 2009, at 10:21 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>> Arhata
>
> Gesundheit!
LOL!
Sal
On Jan 7, 2009, at 10:21 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>> Arhata
>
> Gesundheit!
LOL!
Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
wrote:
> Curtis
> The judgments you make below are fine, but they do befuddle dialog
> a bit.
Asking you to tell your story befuddles you?
< My writing is NOT intended as anything but what I feel to espress>
So you are not trying to communic
Curtis
The judgments you make below are fine, but they do befuddle dialog
a bit. My writing is NOT intended as anything but what I feel to espress..
I love to comment on others if I see the opportunity
Anyone who sees it as other has made their own misinterpretation of any
intentions. You see
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:20 PM, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
>
> >
> > I feel blessed to have received hugs from Ammachi every year since
> > 1988.
>
>
> Must find infidel. Must report infidel to Development of
Consciousness
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:20 PM, raunchydog wrote:
>
> I feel blessed to have received hugs from Ammachi every year since
> 1988.
Must find infidel. Must report infidel to Development of Consciousness
office. Infidel has not been assimilated. Infidel is dangerous to the
collective. Infidel m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
> wrote:
> >
> > I remember MMY talking about "free will" he said
> > we have free will when we are no longer a "football"
> > of life and our will becomes the will of God. The
> > en
> > Is the syllable 'Om' mentioned in the Rig
> > Veda, the Brahma Sutra, Bhagavad Gita, or
> > in Patanjali's Yoga Sutras?
> >
BillyG wrote:
> "All this is OM, that hum, which is the first
> silent sound, first silent wave that starts
> from that silent ocean of unmanifested life."
> MMY
>
A
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
wrote:
>
> Some of you can't be reached any other way then blasting out to the
whole
> group. Please pardon me if you have no interest in this post.
>
> My friend the citizen sidha appears to have been doing his program
right or
> having m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
wrote:
>
> Canned, self promoting, and, spiritual pamphlets?? I've been doing
> this for 15 years
> with millions of people purely from truth and a passion and, this
> judgment is
> a new one! Thank you! Something I've wrote has provoked
> i
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Arhata Osho wrote:
> Canned, self promoting, and, spiritual pamphlets?? I've been doing
> this for 15 years
> with millions of people purely from truth and a passion and, this
> judgment is
> a new one! Thank you! Something I've wrote has provoked
> insecuritie
Canned, self promoting, and, spiritual pamphlets?? I've been doing
this for 15 years
with millions of people purely from truth and a passion and, this
judgment is
a new one! Thank you! Something I've wrote has provoked
insecurities and that's
good as it's an opportunity for those who see it
Some of you can't be reached any other way then blasting out to the whole
group. Please pardon me if you have no interest in this post.
My friend the citizen sidha appears to have been doing his program right or
having me in IA (where things magically appear) has helped get some results.
First a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
wrote:
>
> The easy, instantaneous in-flight correction of a bird in response
to
> wind turbulence is a wonderful analogy, and thanks for that.
>
> It would seem to me that very few animals (if any, but perhaps
some of
> the large primat
800 bus atheist ad campaign in London.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/world/europe/07london.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, arhatafreespe...@... wrote:
>
> Maharishi Group:
> Ref.: to my daily I page consciousness messages,
> the last 2 being 'Old People' and
> 'Reinvent Yourself'
> If this is the kind of participation that goes on in this group,
> and who don't even know the mean
The easy, instantaneous in-flight correction of a bird in response to
wind turbulence is a wonderful analogy, and thanks for that.
It would seem to me that very few animals (if any, but perhaps some of
the large primate cousins) besides humans have the sense of separation
that characterizes h
Maharishi Group:
Ref.: to my daily I page consciousness messages,
the last 2 being 'Old People' and
'Reinvent Yourself'
If this is the kind of participation that goes on in this group, and who
don't even know the meaning of 'spam' or 'click off', you should count
me out
or, offer an explanation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
wrote:
>
> Comment below:
>
> **
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
> wrote:[in reply to:] Do you think that the
> universe has a way that we have to behave and then it approves
> and gives us "nature support"?
>
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): Sat Jan 03 00:00:00 2009
End Date (UTC): Sat Jan 10 00:00:00 2009
562 messages as of (UTC) Wed Jan 07 23:25:27 2009
53 Robert
43 enlightened_dawn11
37 curtisdeltablues
37 TurquoiseB
33 I am the eternal
29 authfriend
26
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, michael wrote:
>
> https://vedicpandits.org/Video/INTRO9/Creating_World_Peace.html
>
Do I get a photo and letter from my pundit every month telling me how
he is doing?
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
wrote:[in reply to:] Do you think that the
universe has a way that we have to behave and then it approves
and gives us "nature support"?
**snip
> unmistakably. however most people understand that to be a code of
> b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
wrote:
>
> Bizarre response!
Thanks, I hope it was entertaining.
Yes.
> That's an interesting speculation! Then why respond as such?
Because you were preaching to the choir.
> Is there judgment here?
Yes.
interpretation.>
Wh?
I know you have given this topic some deep thought Judy and it shows.
Interesting response. You put your finger on where the line is drawn
between believing that such a non-dual state is possible and not.
> Gee, I have a hard time imagining a *more*
> mysterious statement than that! A world whic
https://vedicpandits.org/Video/INTRO9/Creating_World_Peace.html
Thanks for this. I like to read these first-hand experiences.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "I am the eternal"
wrote:
>
[snip]
> With the massive ego that grows
> more each day and the realization
>that I know God, that I look out and see
> myself looking back at me, I think I can
> u
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > -snip-
> > > you are talking about an organization
> > > that believes to its core that an enlightened
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> "curtisdeltablues" wrote:
> Some of us already know who we REALLY are. It isn't that big a deal.
>
>
> Curtis, you're talking about the spectrum called "personality," right?
> Not something beyond the physical, right?
Isn't our persona
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It is an unresolved issue in philosophy. It is
> > > mostly used as a way to tr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Questions: when did you finally become you? when did you finally
> conclude that you had finally concluded about who you are? how does
> change impact your certainties? aging must mellow all so how does
> that jibe witcha? do you have
"curtisdeltablues" wrote:
Some of us already know who we REALLY are. It isn't that big a deal.
Curtis, you're talking about the spectrum called "personality," right?
Not something beyond the physical, right?
Word schmerds, eh?
If you have the time, I would dwell with a serious intent on your
Bizarre response! Most in this group know who they are beyond polarity?
That's an interesting speculation! Then why respond as such?
Is there judgment here? Dialog would better find a more accurate
interpretation.
Arhata
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, arhata
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, arhatafreespe...@... wrote:
>
> An ad? That's a new one!
I'm with Bhairitu on this one, his feedback was valid.
I'm glad you are happier surfing then whatever you did on Wall Street.
That doesn't mean that I am in some box just because you finally
really GOT
An ad? That's a new one!
Now this is an ad, IMO. Arhata, I would suggest being more discrete like
just having a link to your website as part of your signature or if
someone asked then explaining what you offer and a link. This however,
if I were a moderator, looks more blatant. Of course othe
> Not a chance in hell that Curtis can define "resolved," but at least
> when he tries, we all get closer to what our own private definitions
> really are by comparing our POVs with his.
That is a nice reputation to try to live up to Edg. This is my goal:
to articulate where I stand on issues and
Now this is an ad, IMO. Arhata, I would suggest being more discrete like
just having a link to your website as part of your signature or if
someone asked then explaining what you offer and a link. This however,
if I were a moderator, looks more blatant. Of course others might say
there is TMO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
> >
> > But if MMY was a philosopher, wouldn't we have to say his position
> > was ("officially"): Try to obtain enlightenment; but in the meantime
> > "follow the dictats of you
> This is because (philosophically speaking) he was an ethical
> pessimist: the reasoning mind is inadequate to figure out real moral
> dilemmas. MMY follows Plato (Socrates): good acts are based on good
> knowledge (bad acts are based on ignorance, not "evil tendencies").
> Without Knowledge, your
Not trusting the TMO or even myself because of my two years of med school (I
didn't go on because I just couldn't take being around sick people) and
loads of science training, I decided that the experiences I've been having
over the years might just be the result of neurological or mental defect.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
>
> > It is an unresolved issue in philosophy. It is
> > mostly used as a way to train philosophical
> > reasoning but the question itself is not
> > answered by sa
"authfriend" wrote:
> How could a question that is resolved only in UC be resolvable in
philosophy when philosophy itself is dualistic?
Edg:
Words, words, words. Are we really still battling to be the ultimate
definer of words?
Like: resolvable.
What COULDN'T that mean? My contentment that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
>
> But if MMY was a philosopher, wouldn't we have to say his position
> was ("officially"): Try to obtain enlightenment; but in the meantime
> "follow the dictats of your religion (or whatever)".
>
> This is because (philosophically spea
Coulter vs. the Counter-Coulters
By L. Brent Bozell III
CNSNews.com | Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Ann Coulter's new book "Guilty" is out and two things are certain: It
will surely be another best-seller, and she will once again drive the
Left bonkers. No institution will be more offended tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
> It is an unresolved issue in philosophy. It is
> mostly used as a way to train philosophical
> reasoning but the question itself is not
> answered by saying "the guy is in UC."
How could a question that is resolved only in
UC
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I reme
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
wrote:
>
> I remember MMY talking about "free will" he said
> we have free will when we are no longer a "football"
> of life and our will becomes the will of God. The
> enlightened person's will becomes "Thy will be done,"
> and this is right act
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> > You certainly can assume that. But my point is that
> > you can believe the enlightened person is acting in
> > accord with the laws of nature and still choose not
> > to do what the person says--just as if you made the
> > assu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
wrote:
> > >
> > > I remember MMY talking about "free will" he said we have free will
> > > when we are no lon
> You certainly can assume that. But my point is that
> you can believe the enlightened person is acting in
> accord with the laws of nature and still choose not
> to do what the person says--just as if you made the
> assumption you cite--without being inconsistent.
>
> In other words, it makes no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > I remember MMY talking about "free will" he said we have free will
> > when we are no longer a "football" of life and our will becomes the
> > will of God. The enl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> >
> >
> > > As long as you are talking about an organization
> > > that believes to its core that an enlightened
On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Peter wrote:
>>> "In tune with the universe" What does that even
>>> mean?
>>>
>>> How can you be out of tune with it? Do you think that the
>>> universe has a way that we have to behave and then it
>>> approves
>>> and gives us "nature support"? is TM the best way
>>>
Om. Good observation Pete,
About TM crap research.
790 research papers `justifying' TM. A year ago the PR on TM was
parading 300. Few months ago it was 600. Is probably 800 today now.
If only half or even just a third of these papers weren't crap
research as Pete points out here, they coul
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> I remember MMY talking about "free will" he said we have free will
> when we are no longer a "football" of life and our will becomes the
> will of God. The enlightened person's will becomes "Thy will be done,"
> and this is right action
Dairy farmers in New Jersey and Pennsylvania face a new tax owing to
the noxious gasses from the rear ends of their cows.
As we all know, we are all going to hell in a handcart owing to our
emissions of *toxic* CO2. However, farts being high in methane, and
methane being a significantly more power
Dr. King, McKinney and Obamaþ
Glen Ford - glen.f...@blackagen daReport. com
Wed 1/07/09
Black Agenda Report
The global reputation of Black America has suffered greatly under
George Bush, who deployed Black faces as fronts for his vicious brand
of U.S. imperiali
--- On Wed, 1/7/09, Hugo wrote:
> From: Hugo
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Ethical behavior (was Re: spirituality spot found in
> brain)
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 11:25 AM
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
> wrote:
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" wrote:
>
> It's this idea that "nature" wants us to do *anything
> at all* that baffles me.
Me, too.
> I think it comes from the same place that the ten
> commandments and all other religious edicts come from.
> No, not God but *claimed* to come fro
I remember MMY talking about "free will" he said we have free will
when we are no longer a "football" of life and our will becomes the
will of God. The enlightened person's will becomes "Thy will be done,"
and this is right action. If anyone else remembers this chime in.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
>
> > As long as you are talking about an organization
> > that believes to its core that an enlightened being
> > is "in tune with the laws of nature" and that such
> > an en
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > Massachusetts is arguably the most liberal
> > state in the union. After all, it has gay
> > marriage and sends the likes of Ted Kennedy, John
> > Kerry, and Ba
> Longer mantras (e.g. the Great Compansion
> Mantra of Kwan Yin, the Surangama Sutra
> mantra,...etc) ime, are more suitable for
> chanting...
>
In Buddhist practice, some longer mantras
are called 'dharanis', but you don't really
need to memorize long dharanis or sutras - a
short tantric 'b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Hugo wrote:
>
> > "In tune with the universe" What does that even mean?
> >
> > How can you be out of tune with it? Do you think that the
> > universe has a way that we have to behave and then it approves
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> As long as you are talking about an organization
> that believes to its core that an enlightened being
> is "in tune with the laws of nature" and that such
> an enlightened being cannot possibly perform "wrong
> action," then there is NO
On Jan 7, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Hugo wrote:
> "In tune with the universe" What does that even mean?
>
> How can you be out of tune with it? Do you think that the
> universe has a way that we have to behave and then it approves
> and gives us "nature support"?
Cmon, Hugo, haven't you ever heard the u
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> -snip-
> > you are talking about an organization
> > that believes to its core that an enlightened being
> > is "in tune with the laws of nature" and that such
> > an enl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
-snip-
> you are talking about an organization
> that believes to its core that an enlightened being
> is "in tune with the laws of nature" and that such
> an enlightened being cannot possibly perform "wrong
> action,"
-snip-
so if we throw
http://goldendome.org/transcript.htm#Henry%20Clark
It is funny how it seems to work out like that. About 108 days ago, we
decided to build two domes instead of one and decided what size they
were, and every one told us that this normally would take at least two
and half years to construct. Maybe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > Massachusetts is arguably the most liberal
> > state in the union. After all, it has gay
> > marriage and sends the likes of Ted Kennedy, John
> > Kerry, and Bar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> >
> > > From: David Orme-Johnson [mailto:davi...@]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 4:10 PM
> > > To: Da
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard Williams
wrote:
>
> > Like many mantras, this one begins with
> > "Om". Om has no meaning, and its origins
> > are lost in the mists of time...
> >
> Probably the first mention of the esoteric
> syllabe 'Om' is found in the Mandukhya
> Upanishad (cir
> Like many mantras, this one begins with
> "Om". Om has no meaning, and its origins
> are lost in the mists of time...
>
Probably the first mention of the esoteric
syllabe 'Om' is found in the Mandukhya
Upanishad (circa 800 AD), where it is said
by Gaudapada to be a meditation symbol.
http://en
I take the below as a serious in-your-face-take-that-science challenge
to today's understandings about how "mind" can be found operative in
existence's subtlest realms.
Even if it is only a case of some sort of radiation between molecules
that has yet to be measured by a refined measuring device
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> Massachusetts is arguably the most liberal
> state in the union. After all, it has gay
> marriage and sends the likes of Ted Kennedy, John
> Kerry, and Barney Frank to Congress.
>
> That's why I find it ironic that it is the
> onl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
>
> with no control group you demonstrate nothing
> other than symptoms of ADHD were reduced, but
> you do not isolate the causal variable without
> a frigging control group.
I've understood that the purpose of exploratory
studies is to justif
Alex wrote:
> > I checked the logs, and you did delete two
> > posts, but that still leaves you at 51.
> >
shemp wrote:
> If one could get under the wire by deleting
> the overage, we all should have been informed
> of this loophole.
>
> Cut his balls off.
>
What? You mean you can delete the ove
When John talks about "moral reasoning" improving, I'm sure he's talking about
some sort of assessment utilizing Kohlberg's model of moral reasoning. The
irony is that there is a poor correlation between moral reasoning and moral
behavior. For most of us, research indicates that we have morals o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5"
wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, thank you Ruth. I was wondering given
> > > the record. Improved 'moral
> > > reasoning' is solemnly pointed to by
> > > the Dr. in Hagelin's powerpoint
> > > present. Moral reasonging. It is a
> > > mouthful as he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
>
> Miraculous competence!
Amazing!
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6q6weu
>
95 matches
Mail list logo
