Going deeper within is the same as going earlier in one's experience
as experiences seem to layer. It may be that before transcendence one
is experiencing before their current life or even before the life of
the universe.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
> > wrote:
> > > Q's lesson: think twice before messing with the past. an
> > > alternative pas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
> wrote:
> > Q's lesson: think twice before messing with the past. an
> > alternative past may turn out worse than the "real" past.
>
> It's occurred to me to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
> wrote:
> >
> > ->
> > > Unlike the MMY/Hagelin/Chopra "Unified Field" hypothesis which
> any
> > > reputable physicist with half a brain would find laughab
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ->
> > Unlike the MMY/Hagelin/Chopra "Unified Field" hypothesis which
any
> > reputable physicist with half a brain would find laughable;
Like Sparaig, I'd be interested to know *why* you find
it laughable (no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Q's lesson: think twice before messing with the past. an
> alternative past may turn out worse than the "real" past.
It's occurred to me to wonder (fancifully) whether
the fact that we never seem to be able to na
