---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
snip
So that you can respond to me with greater precision subsequently, I have a
non-theistic view of the world, care about facts and scientific reasoning, and
to the extent I am able, logic. I do think there is something to spirituality,
but
I wasn't really complaining. Sparring with Judy is a unique challenge. I do not
think I ever quite got the hang of it, it is an ongoing learning process
dealing with other minds, or what appears to be other minds (y'all could be
robots or zombies). I do think your arguments tend to be spongy, an
Also funny is that if you were to tell him he was being antagonistic, he'd
immediately reply that the only antagonism was a reflection of your reactive
state of mind, not anything for which he was responsible.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Xeno, you have to admit, this is sort
Xeno, you have to admit, this is sort of funny.
For the last few months, we've had to hear how much you've missed sparring
with Judy, and how inadequate those of us who you describe as being in that
"other " camp of FFLers are, in engaging in intellectual discussions.
But now you have you
I meant your "extend this discussion interminably, a [sic] per your previous
custom" hypothesis.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Your hypothesis is once again way off base. You've picked up that canard from
Barry, but it's never be
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Your hypothesis is once again way off base. You've picked up that canard from
Barry, but it's never been true. What I was attempting to point out is that the
whole notion of the "stupidest" (or "smartest") person on FFL is, well, just
stupid.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
No, you have not got it right, period. My hypothesis is your asking about how
I was parsing levels of intelligence was simply to extend this discussion
interminably, a per your previous custom. My bringing up the subject of 'the
stupidest perso
No, you have not got it right, period. My hypothesis is your asking about how I
was parsing levels of intelligence was simply to extend this discussion
interminably, a per your previous custom. My bringing up the subject of 'the
stupidest person on FFL' was simply a device to bring up issues rel
WR, to this whole thread, It's so annoying, all this clever disguising of
intentions, and innuendo.
And yes, to try to rate someone here on their IQ?
I mean, wouldn't that be a candidate for stupidest idea?
Just sayin'
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
OIC. So you're ju
I'm sorry you were antagonized by my asking about your thought processes
concerning your new "smartest/stupidest" kick. It didn't occur to me that you
would consider it intrusive.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
No, I am not going to think about it. I probably would not score al
OIC. So you're just guessing as to IQ scores when you talk about "the stupidest
person" and "the smartest person" on FFL. Have I got it right now?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, w
And here I thought your criteria was whether someone could write a
graduate level academic essay as a post. You must have grown up in an
academic environment. And the TMO wouldn't have helped because they
seemed to be able to publish something that could be explained in a
paragraph or two if
Sorta of busy today, but I will try o find some time to do so.
It often takes the form of asking your opinion about something, and getting a
reply that is so riddled with qualifications that it become meaningless, IMO.
Okay, one example, and I hope I'm not violating the guidelines.
You
No, I am not going to think about it. I probably would not score all that high
anyway. Too bad there isn't an inventory for antagonism. I bet you would get a
very high score on that. You are really back in form. The long vacation from
here must have restored something that was depleted. Or perha
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) as determined by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence
Scale. That should be sufficient.
And you propose to determine this measurement for FFL members (especially for
thos
Thanks, I think...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Judy at her finest!!
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
---In Fai
P.S.: You may also want to think about justifying the use of the Wechsler IQ
scale (assuming it can be determined for each FFL member) for evaluation of
members, given the questions that have been raised about its utility (e.g., "to
base a concept of intelligence on IQ test scores alone is to ig
Judy at her finest!!
From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Intelligence Quotie
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) as determined by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence
Scale. That should be sufficient.
And you propose to determine this measurement for FFL members (especially for
those no longer posting here) how?
Can you give me a
/He should probably define the term n"spiritual" and the cult word acronym
"TM" as well./
Quoting "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
:
I note that while you frequently demand that other people define
their terms, you have not been willing to define "stupidest" (and now
"smartest")
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I must say that I've observed the same tendency in xeno.
He has often asked me (in a rather pointed way) to define some terms I use, to
which I happily oblige his request.
But when I make the same request of him, the response goes silent.
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) as determined by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence
Scale. That should be sufficient. Can you give me a recent example where I
asked someone to define a term? I don't recall doing this 'frequently' but also
my memory is not particularly good at this stage in my life. If
I must say that I've observed the same tendency in xeno.
He has often asked me (in a rather pointed way) to define some terms I use, to
which I happily oblige his request.
But when I make the same request of him, the response goes silent.
What I have done, is just to lower the expectati
I note that while you frequently demand that other people define their terms,
you have not been willing to define "stupidest" (and now "smartest") that
you've been harping on recently. Why would that be, I wonder?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I was not around today, but we wa
til then, you may expect me to keep commenting on
them to help you put them into a perspective that represents a larger slice of
the population of Fairfield Life than the voices attempting to use you to "get"
people they don't like.
From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]"
Some people, Jason, just have very weird sexual fantasies.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
In case you missed some of the old stuff that was in your
absence, here it is,
11. It was a medical issue. The constant presence of Jim's, Nabby's, Steve's,
and Ann's tongues up Judy's
In case you missed some of the old stuff that was in your
absence, here it is,
11. It was a medical issue. The constant presence of Jim's, Nabby's, Steve's,
and Ann's tongues up Judy's ass was aggravating her Crohn's Disease and giving
her constant diarrhea. The only way she could get rid of
r an entire group and claims that
the entire group was "insulted" just because one person says so -- would be one
of those errors.
I hope that you will prove yourself wise enough in the future to figure these
things out for yourself. Until then, you may expect me to keep comme
g on
them to help you put them into a perspective that represents a larger slice of
the population of Fairfield Life than the voices attempting to use you to "get"
people they don't like.
From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
ors.
I hope that you will prove yourself wise enough in the future to figure these
things out for yourself. Until then, you may expect me to keep commenting on
them to help you put them into a perspective that represents a larger slice of
the population of Fairfield Life than the voices attempti
Thanks, Authfriend your post here seems a fair brief of a time on FFL. I will
keep it at hand as a reference going forward.
Fairfield Life
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/416559
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messag
Just thought I'd respond to mention that I like this story (below). As it turns
out, this is exactly what my strategy was when I was still competing in martial
arts competitions (non-contact karate back in the 60s). I would just watch and
wait, and then respond only when the other person had com
If one were to be actually honest, instead of just pretending to be, two points
would need to be made:
1. The "insult" wasn't really to Maharishi; it was to those who revere him. It
was said that if they had witnessed him sexually abusing a baby, they would
nevertheless continue to maintain
wrote :
From: "anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Does the term 'unkindness' ever refer to a dead person?
Great opening line. It's a
Hi Barry,
Listen, I know that for all kinds of reasons, you need to make this all about
"you".
But it's not about "you", or trying to get "you".
In fact, should you ever choose to adopt a more typical mode of interaction,
one that does not involve the incessant, manic pushing of button
From: "anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Does the term 'unkindness' ever refer to a dead person?
Great opening line. It's a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I have found it is not particularly useful to me to consider peoples'
motivations on this forum, though I sometimes do formulate ideas in that
category. In particular, when those who post speak of their own motivations, I
am suspicious, being w
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
How very interesting Xeno. Let's leave the-peak out of it for a moment.
That would be awesome, if what you say is correct. This bit about Barry being
creative and a good writer, etc., and giving the new regime an honest try.
I see differ
oups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Dear MJ; Son, I have not problem with your content here. My moderating
interests are in the parity of the use and impact of words within the
Yahoo-groups guidelines. Shocking as your co
rfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Dear MJ; Son, I have not problem with your content here. My moderating
interests are in the parity of the use and impact of words within the
Yahoo-groups guidelines. Sh
to do so
I may not read it till tonight. Happy Sheep Shearing! Or does that take place
in the fall?
From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The
FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Dear MJ; Son, I have not problem with your content here. My moderating
interests are in the parity of the use and impact of words within the
Y
rom: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Dear MJ; Son, I have not problem with your content here. My moderating
interests are in the parity of the
From: "anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
And you [steve] are on the playground complaining about what? I find this
all rather interesting. It
How very interesting Xeno. Let's leave the-peak out of it for a moment.
That would be awesome, if what you say is correct. This bit about Barry being
creative and a good writer, etc., and giving the new regime an honest try.
I see different mechanics at play here.
I don't think Barry
And you [steve] are on the playground complaining about what? I find this all
rather interesting. It would seem Barry is faced with a potential unknown
obstacle. But he is creative and a good writer, he should be able to weave
around this if Doug remains a model of restraint. The guidelines are
fieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine.
-JaiGuruYou
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sad news.
Might I propose, before Doug
Doug, you realize that Barry is throwing one helluva of a tantrum, right now.
Maybe like a six year old, if that makes any sense.
Give him time, maybe he'll get over it.
Maybe not. (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "jamesalan735@... [Fa
From: "jamesalan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
If this wordy, badly written, convoluted, and incoherent paragraph below is
a sign of what's to come - and I think it is exactly what we can expect - then
let the fun begin!
Hell and Handbasket come to mind.
I've been trying to be gracious, bu
. I'm just
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically
From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 6:43 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In moderation at this point I feel “the past is a lesser state of
evolution” and I am going forw
Marshy was a liar, cheat, fraud and con artist and that he
was a serial womanizer? Just figured I would test how deep or shallow the newly
moderated waters are, you see.
From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 8
e, you see.
From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine.
-Jai
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically the ca
ne 8, 2015 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine.
-JaiGuruYou
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sad news.
Might I propose, before Doug starts banning people, that you
Xeno, I admit, I'm having a gas thinking about this new period of FFL. Call it
"The Buck Period", or I know, "Passing the Buck to Buck". I think it's
fantastic.
Has anyone checked the Leiden Dailies to see if Barry has posted an obituary
for FFL.
Jesus, how I felt some compassion for hi
This doesn't seem to me like a good way to welcome the new moderator, to
suggest he might go "off his rocker" because he is religious.
Obviously you're interested in religion and the spiritual movement in
Fairfield, otherwise you wouldn't even be here.
All Doug is asking you to do is be
y@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically the case these days, I am completely out of the loop with
respect to Rick's handling of FFL. Doug's posts thi
No, no, ... you need some restraints on your mental excesses. It was an
alternative suggestion if Doug went off his rocker, but so far we have no
evidence of what might happen, which is pretty much the way life is anyway. Now
that Doug has assumed this office, for which he has been campaigning s
Please ignore what he says about me. He has it completely wrong.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Serious_Richard brings up in this particular thread an important point about
privacy on FFL. From the beginning Rick has been intent on creating a
safe-space of privacy for folks to
know what he will do with them. I'm just
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating Th
at insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically the case these days, I am completely out of the lo
, wrote :
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 7:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine.
–JaiGu
dom. I think we also all know what he will do with them. I'm just
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLif
o: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically the case these days, I am completely out of the loop with
respect to Rick's handling of FFL. Doug's posts this morning piqued my
curi
I think we also all know what he will do with them. I'm just
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
*From:*"j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:j_alexander_stanley@...%20[FairfieldLife]>"
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>>
airfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 7:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine.
–JaiGuruYou
It was a wedd
alexander_stanley@...%20[FairfieldLife]";
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically the case these days, I am completely out of the loop with
respect to Rick's handling of FFL. Doug's posts this morning piqued my
Life@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along with their
handles, unles
015 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Doug Hamilton has volunteered to moderate and to limit his moderation to
ensuring adherence to Yahoo’s guidelines and no more.
ell 'cognitive dissonance'. You
are holding two or more contradictory beliefs and thinking everything is OK?
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife]"
Barry's method, it seems to me, was similar to the way one would handle
dealing with ISIS effectively. I am all for ISIS being neutralised.
Exactly. organizations like ISIS -- and individual narci
uot;
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along with th
Good Advice. Although ISIS does have rather bad manners, and firearms.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife]"
Barry's method, it seems to me, was similar to the way one would handle
dealing with ISIS effectively. I am all for ISIS being neutr
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Doug Hamilton has volunteered to moderate and to limit his moderation to
ensuring adherence to Yahoo’s guidelines and no more.
He will not moderate with his purita
From: "anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
Barry's method, it seems to me, was similar to the way one would handle
dealing with ISIS effectively. I am all for ISIS being neutralised.
Exactly. organizations like ISIS -- and individual narcissistic psychopaths --
want more than anything
#x27;cognitive dissonance'. You
are holding two or more contradictory beliefs and thinking everything is OK?
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
just
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]
mailto:j_alexander_stanley@...%20[FairfieldLife]";
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
o: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along with their
h
nt: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along with their
handles, unless they had specified when
nday, June 8, 2015 9:58 AM
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
*/Thanks for responding, Rick. While you're still here, can you please
explain to us exactly HOW Doug will enforce the sentence I've
highlighted below in red? Wha
quot;dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
TO: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
SENT: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:57 AM
SUBJECT: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It
will be fine. -JaiGuruYou
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 9:58 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
Thanks for responding, Rick. While you're still here, can you please explain t
fe@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine.
–JaiGuruYou
It was a wedding. Ordinarily you wouldn’t find me in church.
Almost daily, various people urge me to moderate FFL or get someone to do
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 7:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine. –JaiGuruYou
It
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along with their
ing two or more contradictory beliefs and thinking everything is OK?
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to
ieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts,
Seems to me we're starting right out with abuse of Doug, before he's done
anything at all.
Nobody, of course, will "fall off the radar" if they're banned. They can
always email Rick (or Alex, if he's still functioning in the moderator realm).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wr
: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled
differently. People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along
with their handles, unless they had specified when registering for Yahoo! that
only their h
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along with their
handles, unless they had specified when registering for Yahoo! that only their
handles be used. I did not so specify, and my real name appeare
nt: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
We sat over this together in church the other day. It will be fine.
-JaiGuruYou
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Sad news.
Might I propose, before Doug starts banning people, th
Good and Evil Shaking Hands. The following is from the MUM website:
Resilience and the Coexistence of Opposites
Resilience is most powerful when opposites are harmonized in a system. Peters
and Waterman expressed this idea in their seminal book In Search of Excellence
(1982) as the concept of
all know what he will do with them. I'm just
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The
just been handed the keys to the
kingdom. I think we also all know what he will do with them. I'm just
suggesting a procedure that insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8,
at insures he can't do it in secret.
From: "j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically the case these days, I am completely out o
day, June 8, 2015 2:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moderating The Peep Show
As is typically the case these days, I am completely out of the loop with
respect to Rick's handling of FFL. Doug's posts this morning piqued my
curiosity, and it turns out that Rick made Doug a
As is typically the case these days, I am completely out of the loop with
respect to Rick's handling of FFL. Doug's posts this morning piqued my
curiosity, and it turns out that Rick made Doug a moderator yesterday
afternoon. I have no idea what Doug is supposed to do in terms of enforcement.
A
Thanks R-V, I appreciate the perspective of your enlightened high-minded
empathy in experience for the well-being of FFL.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Cute. When do you get to be a full moderator for this site, Doug? Is this your
first official attempt? It seems you are
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I think you need to figure out why you have issues with damned near everything
I write. Not my problem, Xeno.
I like to comment on things like everyone else. It is not necessarily an issue
with me. People on FFL rea
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
