--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi may never have proclaimed directly that he was a Guru,
although that is subject to argument (I contend that he has only I
cannot remember any specific instances of this), however, his actions-
many many many of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
Ha, ha, ha, yes, I prefer the 'old coke', God help us all! Thank
God
I got TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
He himself as a 'Guru' is still there. He is the cosmic Guru, not a
persona (Dakshinamurty), always available and guiding those serious
about their soul-commitment. Everybody else may just speculate, or
find his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
He himself as a 'Guru' is still there. He is the cosmic Guru, not a
persona (Dakshinamurty), always available and guiding those serious
about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
He himself as a 'Guru' is still there. He is the cosmic Guru,
not a
Maharishi may never have proclaimed directly that he was a Guru,
although that is subject to argument (I contend that he has only I
cannot remember any specific instances of this), however, his actions-
many many many of his actions-clearly indicate that he considers
himself a Guru and the actions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi may never have proclaimed directly that he was a Guru,
although that is subject to argument (I contend that he has only I
cannot remember any specific instances of this), however, his actions-
many many many of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi may never have proclaimed directly that he was a Guru,
although that is subject to argument (I contend that he has only I
cannot remember any specific instances of this), however, his
actions-
many many many of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bmorry2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: scozzari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:16:03 -0500
Mike Scozzari
2241 SW 15 St., Deerfield Beach 33442
561-392-5418 Home
RE:
I thought that TMO issues had priority here, sorry...
Guess that I was mistaken...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bmorry2000 bmorry2000@
wrote:
From: scozzari tm@
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bmorry2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought that TMO issues had priority here, sorry...
Guess that I was mistaken...
Uh, bmorry, I'm pretty sure the comment by mrfishey
was sarcastic. Apparently he has problems with
discussions that aren't about the
on 2/27/06 3:00 PM, bmorry2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that TMO issues had priority here, sorry...
Guess that I was mistaken...
Whatever people want to talk about has priority. Inevitably, we keep coming
back to TMO issues. If there's something you want to discuss that isn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha, ha, ha, yes, I prefer the 'old coke', God help us all! Thank God
I got TM when I did!! BillyG.
But the new Coke was better. That's what independent tests had shown.
People just wanted to buy the old image. Same
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
Ha, ha, ha, yes, I prefer the 'old coke', God help us all! Thank
God
I got TM when I did!! BillyG.
But the new Coke was better. That's what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
Ha, ha, ha, yes, I prefer the 'old coke', God help us all! Thank God
I got TM when I did!! BillyG.
But the new Coke was better. That's what
In a message dated 2/27/06 6:16:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I
remember about the new Coke is that it was sweeter and had lessbite. I.e.,
it sucked.
It tasted like Pepsi to me
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bmorry2000 bmorry2000@
wrote:
I thought that TMO issues had priority here, sorry...
Guess that I was mistaken...
Uh, bmorry, I'm pretty sure the comment by mrfishey
was sarcastic.
I think you ought to move on and stop wasting your energy on the TMO
just call it something else and do your own thing. I heard that all
the meditators are going to the Rothenbergs so dont fight them they
wont last and will be gone as soon as Stuarts aging mom passes or
another project comes
Ha, ha, ha, yes, I prefer the 'old coke', God help us all! Thank God
I got TM when I did!! BillyG.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bmorry2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: scozzari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
Date: Sat, 4
19 matches
Mail list logo
