[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
Some here were a bit skeptical that the Bush administration would be so cynical as to try to manipulate the British terrorist arrests in order to use them against Democrats immediately following Lieberman's embarrassing loss to Lamont in Connecticut. Sorry, guys, that's *exactly* what they did: Source: U.S., U.K. at odds over timing of arrests British wanted to continue surveillance on terror suspects, official says By Aram Roston, Lisa Myers, and the NBC News Investigative Unit NBC News Updated: 8:13 p.m. ET Aug 12, 2006 LONDON - NBC News has learned that U.S. and British authorities had a significant disagreement over when to move in on the suspects in the alleged plot to bring down trans-Atlantic airliners bound for the United States. A senior British official knowledgeable about the case said British police were planning to continue to run surveillance for at least another week to try to obtain more evidence, while American officials pressured them to arrest the suspects sooner. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the case. In contrast to previous reports, the official suggested an attack was not imminent, saying the suspects had not yet purchased any airline tickets. In fact, some did not even have passports. The source did say, however, that police believe one U.K.-based suspect was ready to conduct a "dry run." British authorities had wanted to let him go forward with part of the plan, but the Americans balked. Read more at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14320452 To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 12:13:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [MDixon wrote:] > > All the programs the Bush Administration was using like the NSA > > and Banking program of following money transactions were used > > in Great Britain to bust them. > > You know all these details? > > No, not all. But these were covered yesterday on many different > news stories on NBC, CNBC, CNN, and FOX. The British had been > watching these 24 and I think they said others for quite some time > and they had been using the same program the NSA has been running > and also observing their banking transactions between Great Britain > and Pakistan and some other countries. The United States had > offered the British information on this group in the past two weeks > also. I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about this > before the bust. An update on this. According to a story in today's Washington Post, neither the Brits nor the Americans utilized a warrantless wiretapping program to track down the terrorist plotters: http://tinyurl.com/o2p2e So all the right-wing ranting and raving about how these arrests showed that warrantless wiretrapping was essential to prevent terrorist attacks was a complete crock: we do NOT have to choose between the rule of law and fighting terrorism. We do NOT have to give the executive unlimited, unrestrained power in order to be protected. The arrests also explode another right-wing myth, that what the Times revealed about the warrantless eavesdropping program damaged national security by letting terrorists know they were being surveilled, and that they would immediately change the way they communicated so they couldn't be detected. And once again, just for the record: Republican attempts to mislead and deceive the voters notwithstanding, Democrats do NOT oppose secret wiretapping or money-tracking in the interests of national security. To the contrary, they *advocate* these measures as long as there is oversight--as there was in the case of the British bombers. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened > with > > > the > > > > > JFK > > > > > > > assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people > > > believed > > > > > > > there was more than one shooter. And then new > > sophisticated > > > > > > > computer models became available proving beyond a shadow > of > > > a > > > > > doubt > > > > > > > that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any > > > more > > > > > > > theories about there being multiple shooters. > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a > > > > > > doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of > > > > > > books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came > > > > > > out last year, and at least one more is scheduled > > > > > > for October of this year. > > > > > > > > > > > > You "don't hear any more theories about there being > > > > > > multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > > > > > > > > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > > > > > > > > Nut cases continue to speculate. > > > > > > > > Um, nope, not nutcases, sorry. > > > > > > > > For example, here's a brief CV of the guy who wrote > > > > the book coming out in October: > > > > > > > > http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Depts/HIPS/kurtz.html > > > > > > > > Link to his testimony before the Assassination Records > > > > Review Board (an independent federal agency established > > > > in 1992 by George H.W. Bush): > > > > > > > > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arrb/index28.htm > > > > > > > > He's been researching the assassination for 30 years. > > > > He doesn't claim to have proved there was a > > > > conspiracy, but he can document that a great deal > > > > of the evidence in the case has been covered up, > > > > and he observes: "If Oswald did it all by himself > > > > as just a lone nut, there's no reason for national > > > > security or anything else to cover up anything in > > > > the case. But there has been a massive cover-up." > > > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/l6ek6 > > > > (Press release from Southern Louisiana University) > > > > > > I haven't looked at or had the time to look at the links you > kindly > > > provided; however, let me reiterate that my comments were > > > specifically for the more-than-one-shooter theory and not the > more- > > > than-one-conspiractor theory. > > > > No need to backpedal, Shemp. This "nut case" > > believes there was more than one shooter. > > Well, you're half right. Be *real* careful not to read any of the links I gave you. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with > > the > > > > JFK > > > > > > assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people > > believed > > > > > > there was more than one shooter. And then new > sophisticated > > > > > > computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of > > a > > > > doubt > > > > > > that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any > > more > > > > > > theories about there being multiple shooters. > > > > > > > > > > Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a > > > > > doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of > > > > > books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came > > > > > out last year, and at least one more is scheduled > > > > > for October of this year. > > > > > > > > > > You "don't hear any more theories about there being > > > > > multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > > > > > > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > > > > > > Nut cases continue to speculate. > > > > > > Um, nope, not nutcases, sorry. > > > > > > For example, here's a brief CV of the guy who wrote > > > the book coming out in October: > > > > > > http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Depts/HIPS/kurtz.html > > > > > > Link to his testimony before the Assassination Records > > > Review Board (an independent federal agency established > > > in 1992 by George H.W. Bush): > > > > > > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arrb/index28.htm > > > > > > He's been researching the assassination for 30 years. > > > He doesn't claim to have proved there was a > > > conspiracy, but he can document that a great deal > > > of the evidence in the case has been covered up, > > > and he observes: "If Oswald did it all by himself > > > as just a lone nut, there's no reason for national > > > security or anything else to cover up anything in > > > the case. But there has been a massive cover-up." > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/l6ek6 > > > (Press release from Southern Louisiana University) > > > > I haven't looked at or had the time to look at the links you kindly > > provided; however, let me reiterate that my comments were > > specifically for the more-than-one-shooter theory and not the more- > > than-one-conspiractor theory. > > No need to backpedal, Shemp. This "nut case" > believes there was more than one shooter. Well, you're half right. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > Have they been concerned yet? All they do is say its freedom of > > the press and the people have a right to know and then become > > heroes to the left who support them.. > > As I said, the NYT held off on publishing Abu Ghraib details at he > request of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. You said *Sy Hersh* did. Hersh's report was published in The New Yorker, not The New York Times. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with > the > > > JFK > > > > > assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people > believed > > > > > there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated > > > > > computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of > a > > > doubt > > > > > that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any > more > > > > > theories about there being multiple shooters. > > > > > > > > Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a > > > > doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of > > > > books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came > > > > out last year, and at least one more is scheduled > > > > for October of this year. > > > > > > > > You "don't hear any more theories about there being > > > > multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > > > > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > > > > Nut cases continue to speculate. > > > > Um, nope, not nutcases, sorry. > > > > For example, here's a brief CV of the guy who wrote > > the book coming out in October: > > > > http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Depts/HIPS/kurtz.html > > > > Link to his testimony before the Assassination Records > > Review Board (an independent federal agency established > > in 1992 by George H.W. Bush): > > > > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arrb/index28.htm > > > > He's been researching the assassination for 30 years. > > He doesn't claim to have proved there was a > > conspiracy, but he can document that a great deal > > of the evidence in the case has been covered up, > > and he observes: "If Oswald did it all by himself > > as just a lone nut, there's no reason for national > > security or anything else to cover up anything in > > the case. But there has been a massive cover-up." > > > > http://tinyurl.com/l6ek6 > > (Press release from Southern Louisiana University) > > I haven't looked at or had the time to look at the links you kindly > provided; however, let me reiterate that my comments were > specifically for the more-than-one-shooter theory and not the more- > than-one-conspiractor theory. No need to backpedal, Shemp. This "nut case" believes there was more than one shooter. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > shempmcgurk wrote: > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > >wrote: > > > >> You "don't hear any more theories about there being > > >> multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > > > > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > > > > Nut cases continue to speculate. > > > > > So you are continuing to speculate. > > These thorny questions that bedevil most people > are no problem for Shemp. He just defines his > terms to yield an unequivocal answer. In this > case, he defines as "nut cases" those who continue > to speculate, and "reasonable people" as those > who accept the Official Version. > > I mean, that's really convincing, isn't it? > For Shemp... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > > > this before the bust. > > > > How do you know it didn't? > > > ...because they didn't let the cat out of the bag... > When do they do that with matters of national security? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 9:26:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > It probably would have been on their front pages today saying they > > did know but held it back for the sake of all the people. > > And be threatened with an investigation and > prosecution if it didn't reveal its sources? > Are you kidding? > > > > > Have they been concerned yet? All they do is say its freedom of the press > and the people have a right to know and then become heroes to the left who > support them.. > As I said, the NYT held off on publishing Abu Ghraib details at he request of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > > this before the bust. > > How do you know it didn't? > Sy Hersch delayed his publication of details on the Abu Ghraib probe at the request of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Guess he didn't know that. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > > > > > this before the bust. > > > > > > > > How do you know it didn't? > > > > > > > > > ...because they didn't let the cat out of the bag... > > > > Another variation on the Anticult Fallacy. > > Well, gee, what's the Times' record on exposing state secrets? You mean, how many times has the Times refrained from publishing sensitive information? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > shempmcgurk wrote: > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > >wrote: > > > >> You "don't hear any more theories about there being > > >> multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > > > > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > > > > Nut cases continue to speculate. > > > > > So you are continuing to speculate. > > These thorny questions that bedevil most people > are no problem for Shemp. He just defines his > terms to yield an unequivocal answer. In this > case, he defines as "nut cases" those who continue > to speculate, and "reasonable people" as those > who accept the Official Version. > > I mean, that's really convincing, isn't it? I'm an answer in search of an explanation. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > shempmcgurk wrote: > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > >wrote: > > > > > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the > >>> > >>> > >JFK > > > > > >>>assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed > >>>there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated > >>>computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a > >>> > >>> > >doubt > > > > > >>>that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more > >>>theories about there being multiple shooters. > >>> > >>> > >>Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a > >>doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of > >>books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came > >>out last year, and at least one more is scheduled > >>for October of this year. > >> > >>You "don't hear any more theories about there being > >>multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > >> > >> > > > > > >Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > >Nut cases continue to speculate. > > > So you are continuing to speculate. > Oh, what a comeback! You're a comedic genius, Bhairitu! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the > > JFK > > > > assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed > > > > there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated > > > > computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a > > doubt > > > > that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more > > > > theories about there being multiple shooters. > > > > > > Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a > > > doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of > > > books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came > > > out last year, and at least one more is scheduled > > > for October of this year. > > > > > > You "don't hear any more theories about there being > > > multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > > Nut cases continue to speculate. > > Um, nope, not nutcases, sorry. > > For example, here's a brief CV of the guy who wrote > the book coming out in October: > > http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Depts/HIPS/kurtz.html > > Link to his testimony before the Assassination Records > Review Board (an independent federal agency established > in 1992 by George H.W. Bush): > > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arrb/index28.htm > > He's been researching the assassination for 30 years. > He doesn't claim to have proved there was a > conspiracy, but he can document that a great deal > of the evidence in the case has been covered up, > and he observes: "If Oswald did it all by himself > as just a lone nut, there's no reason for national > security or anything else to cover up anything in > the case. But there has been a massive cover-up." > > http://tinyurl.com/l6ek6 > (Press release from Southern Louisiana University) I haven't looked at or had the time to look at the links you kindly provided; however, let me reiterate that my comments were specifically for the more-than-one-shooter theory and not the more- than-one-conspiractor theory. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > > > > this before the bust. > > > > > > How do you know it didn't? > > > > > > ...because they didn't let the cat out of the bag... > > Another variation on the Anticult Fallacy. Well, gee, what's the Times' record on exposing state secrets? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > shempmcgurk wrote: > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > >wrote: > >> You "don't hear any more theories about there being > >> multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > > > Nut cases continue to speculate. > > > So you are continuing to speculate. These thorny questions that bedevil most people are no problem for Shemp. He just defines his terms to yield an unequivocal answer. In this case, he defines as "nut cases" those who continue to speculate, and "reasonable people" as those who accept the Official Version. I mean, that's really convincing, isn't it? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 12:13:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Very serious. They were days away from doing it. They were getting ready for > > > a test run. The same plan Al Qaeda attempted but failed over the Pacific > > from the Philippines before 911. All the programs the Bush Administration > was > > using like the NSA and Banking program of following money transactions > were used > > in Great Britain to bust them. > > You know all these details? > > No, not all. But these were covered yesterday on many different news stories > on NBC, CNBC, CNN, and FOX. The British had been watching these 24 and I > think they said others for quite some time and they had been using the same > program the NSA has been running and also observing their banking transactions > between Great Britain and Pakistan and some other countries. The United States > had offered the British information on this group in the past two weeks also. Oh, BTW, the Brits were first tipped off to the plot by a British *Muslim* who had become concerned after the July 7 subway bombings about the activities of some people he knew in the Muslim community. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
shempmcgurk wrote: >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" >>wrote: >> >> >> >>>These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the >>> >>> >JFK > > >>>assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed >>>there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated >>>computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a >>> >>> >doubt > > >>>that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more >>>theories about there being multiple shooters. >>> >>> >>Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a >>doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of >>books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came >>out last year, and at least one more is scheduled >>for October of this year. >> >>You "don't hear any more theories about there being >>multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. >> >> > > >Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > >Nut cases continue to speculate. > So you are continuing to speculate. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the > JFK > > > assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed > > > there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated > > > computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a > doubt > > > that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more > > > theories about there being multiple shooters. > > > > Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a > > doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of > > books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came > > out last year, and at least one more is scheduled > > for October of this year. > > > > You "don't hear any more theories about there being > > multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. > > Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". > > Nut cases continue to speculate. Um, nope, not nutcases, sorry. For example, here's a brief CV of the guy who wrote the book coming out in October: http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Depts/HIPS/kurtz.html Link to his testimony before the Assassination Records Review Board (an independent federal agency established in 1992 by George H.W. Bush): http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arrb/index28.htm He's been researching the assassination for 30 years. He doesn't claim to have proved there was a conspiracy, but he can document that a great deal of the evidence in the case has been covered up, and he observes: "If Oswald did it all by himself as just a lone nut, there's no reason for national security or anything else to cover up anything in the case. But there has been a massive cover-up." http://tinyurl.com/l6ek6 (Press release from Southern Louisiana University) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 9:26:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > It probably would have been on their front pages today saying they > > did know but held it back for the sake of all the people. > > And be threatened with an investigation and > prosecution if it didn't reveal its sources? > Are you kidding? > > Have they been concerned yet? All they do is say its freedom of the > press and the people have a right to know and then become heroes to > the left who support them. *Of course* they're concerned. And what do you mean "yet"? This attempt to throttle the press through prosecution is brand new. Of course they're going to defend what they've already done; the question is whether they have the intestinal fortitude to do it again knowing the likely consequences. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > > > this before the bust. > > > > How do you know it didn't? > > > ...because they didn't let the cat out of the bag... Another variation on the Anticult Fallacy. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the JFK > > assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed > > there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated > > computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a doubt > > that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more > > theories about there being multiple shooters. > > Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a > doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of > books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came > out last year, and at least one more is scheduled > for October of this year. > > You "don't hear any more theories about there being > multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. Reasonable people accept and close the book on "one shooter". Nut cases continue to speculate. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > > this before the bust. > > How do you know it didn't? ...because they didn't let the cat out of the bag... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 9:26:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > It probably would have been on their front pages today saying they> did know but held it back for the sake of all the people.And be threatened with an investigation andprosecution if it didn't reveal its sources?Are you kidding? Have they been concerned yet? All they do is say its freedom of the press and the people have a right to know and then become heroes to the left who support them.. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 8:08:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > > this before the bust. > > How do you know it didn't? > > It probably would have been on their front pages today saying they > did know but held it back for the sake of all the people. And be threatened with an investigation and prosecution if it didn't reveal its sources? Are you kidding? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the JFK > assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed > there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated > computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a doubt > that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more > theories about there being multiple shooters. Well, no, there was no "proof beyond a shadow of a doubt," and the controversy continues. A bunch of books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came out last year, and at least one more is scheduled for October of this year. You "don't hear any more theories about there being multiple shooters" only if you aren't listening. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The speculation has already been made that Lieberman probably would > have one his primary had this happened before voters in > Connecticut went to the polls so the timing theory is all wet. Not necessarily. Lieberman is at least as useful to the administration and Republicans as a symbol of extreme left-wingers having purportedly taken over the Democratic Party and proceeding to "purge" all those who support the Iraq war. Never mind that a significant majority of the American people agree with those "extreme left- wingers." Never mind that there are other Democrats who support the war who aren't being "purged." Never mind that the Iraq war has nothing to do with this terrorist plot having been busted. And never mind that most experts on terrorism think the Iraq war has made us *more* vulnerable to terrorism, not less. The Republican Party is desperate. Its only hope for 2006 (and 2008) is to try to make voters believe the Democrats are "soft" on national security. With regard to the timing, from the Washington Post today: "Some U.S. counterterrorism officials said plans originally were to allow the conspiracy to develop even further. But U.S. and British investigators made a sudden decision this week to close down the operation after they became increasingly worried that there were other bombers they had been unable to locate or identify, U.S. officials said." http://tinyurl.com/o7qse Uh-huh To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 8:08:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about> this before the bust.How do you know it didn't? It probably would have been on their front pages today saying they did know but held it back for the sake of all the people. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 2:13:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the JFK assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more theories about there being multiple shooters. Yes, I think conspiracy theories usually are for people with too much time on their hands. They can be entertaining. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about > this before the bust. How do you know it didn't? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 12:13:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Very serious. They were days away from doing it. They were getting ready for > a test run. The same plan Al Qaeda attempted but failed over the Pacific > from the Philippines before 911. All the programs the Bush Administration was > using like the NSA and Banking program of following money transactions were used > in Great Britain to bust them.>You know all these details? No, not all. But these were covered yesterday on many different news stories on NBC, CNBC, CNN, and FOX. The British had been watching these 24 and I think they said others for quite some time and they had been using the same program the NSA has been running and also observing their banking transactions between Great Britain and Pakistan and some other countries. The United States had offered the British information on this group in the past two weeks also. I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about this before the bust. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >In a message dated 8/10/06 9:03:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >That's why I don't trust this alert > >especially due to it's timing. > > > > > > > >What about the timing? > > > 1. BP in trouble for screwing up the Alaskan pipeline. They've > had record profits and it certainly wouldn't have hurt them at all > to keep that system up. They have a special robot to check the > pipeline but they hadn't used it in 14 years! That will cause a > rise in gas prices that is unnecessary and people are pissed about > it and it wouldn't take much to either a) demand a big fine on BP > for their screw-up or b) break up the company or c) nationalize > it. That sentiment is rising in this country and this alert took attention on that off track. > > 2. Lieberman losing the election in Connecticut which could result > in a snowball effect where the house and senate would be cleaned of > Republicans. The alert distracts from that. > > 3. Distracts from the failure in Iraq. > > 4. Distracts from the Israeli fiasco in Lebanon. > > 5. Tom Ridge said the alerts were at the request of the White House > and most were fake and made no sense. I don't trust the Bush crime > family one bit. Mainly #2, which is closely related to #3. The Republican strategy is to turn the Lieberman fiasco into a symbol of the Democrats' purported opposition to the "war on terror." The administration knew about this plot for some time. The remarks of Cheney and Bush and other Republicans on Lieberman's defeat were clearly coordinated with the leaks of the plot. Almost certainly, the leaks to the news media were timed to reinforce the notion that Democrats are "soft" on national security in light of Lieberman's defeat. Which is, of course, a load of crap. The plot was uncovered by police work, which is what Democrats advocate as the primary weapon against terror, as opposed to war and "regime change." Plus which, the Democrats have been pushing for measures to protect against this kind of terrorism (as opposed to the idiotic "take the fight to the terrorists") and have been blocked by the Republicans almost every time. > > And remember: > "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little > security will deserve neither and lose both." > - Benjamin Franklin > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > scienceofabundance wrote: > > > >But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming > > >the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under > > >the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that > > >the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of > > >course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least > > >I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true > > >regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an > > >inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? > > > > > Cute obfuscation. Let's see if you can write that more > > straightforward. Maybe Judy can help you. :) > > Sorry, I've read it three times, and I haven't > a clue! He's funnin' ya! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > scienceofabundance wrote: > >But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming > >the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under > >the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that > >the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of > >course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least > >I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true > >regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an > >inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? > > > Cute obfuscation. Let's see if you can write that more > straightforward. Maybe Judy can help you. :) Sorry, I've read it three times, and I haven't a clue! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >In a message dated 8/10/06 9:03:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >That's why I don't trust this alert > >especially due to it's timing. > > > > > > > >What about the timing? > > > 1. BP in trouble for screwing up the Alaskan pipeline. They've had > record profits and it certainly wouldn't have hurt them at all to keep > that system up. They have a special robot to check the pipeline but > they hadn't used it in 14 years! That will cause a rise in gas prices > that is unnecessary and people are pissed about it and it wouldn't take > much to either a) demand a big fine on BP for their screw-up or b) break > up the company or c) nationalize it. That sentiment is rising in this > country and this alert took attention on that off track. Nationalize a private company? In America? Where do you live...Cuba? Quebec? > > 2. Lieberman losing the election in Connecticut which could result in a > snowball effect where the house and senate would be cleaned of > Republicans. The alert distracts from that. > > 3. Distracts from the failure in Iraq. > > 4. Distracts from the Israeli fiasco in Lebanon. > > 5. Tom Ridge said the alerts were at the request of the White House and > most were fake and made no sense. I don't trust the Bush crime family > one bit. > > And remember: > "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little > security will deserve neither and lose both." > - Benjamin Franklin > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > MDixon6569@ wrote: > > ---snip--- > > > > > >No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been > successful you > > >would have been demanding another investigation as to how this > could happen, as > > >you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 > investigation > > >was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a > setup but I'm > > >sure you are going to wish it were. > > > > > No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 > investigation. I > > think the "official story" is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside > job and > > a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this > alert > > especially due to it's timing. > > > But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming > the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under > the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that > the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of > course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least > I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true > regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an > inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? > I think you know what I think you said...but I'm not sure that you know that what I said was not what I meant... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > Very serious. They were days away from doing it. They were > > getting ready for a test run. The same plan Al Qaeda attempted > > but failed over the Pacific from the Philippines before 911. All > > the programs the Bush Administration was using like the NSA and > > Banking program of following money transactions were used in > > Great Britain to bust them. > > You know all these details? I've read everything he says except for the last sentence; I haven't seen anything yet about what the means were of uncovering the plot. There is some disagreement about just how close they were to carrying it out; some of the folks leaking this stuff are contradicting each other. The media generally are playing up the idea that they were "days away" from implementing it, but of course that's more sensational. Apparently a lot of the specific information came from arrests made in Pakistan, but it's not clear yet how the Pakistanis knew to arrest the guys. BTW, nobody *objects* to the NSA program or the banking program, of course, only to their being used without proper judicial oversight. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/10/06 8:33:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >>So you weren't pulling for an independent investigation of 911? > >> > >> > >> > >An independent investigation of 9-11 would be great and is very needed. > > > > > > > >My point > > > And so you don't believe the "official version" either and also admit > that this alert might be bogus or a setup? > > > > > No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been successful you > would have been demanding another investigation as to how this could happen, as > you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 investigation > was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a setup but I'm > sure you are going to wish it were. > These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the JFK assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more theories about there being multiple shooters. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have > guessed > > > it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the people > in fear > > > to control them. So how many days until we learn this plot was > bogus? > > > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids, lipstick, > chapstick. > > > I'm surprised they don't take away your car keys. I learned how > slit an > > > attackers throat with a car key in a corporate defense class that > many > > > have taken nationwide. Oh well, better not give them any ideas. > > > > > > We know who the real terrorists are anyway: the ones in the White > House. > > > > > > > We were listening to NPR this morning. 21 alleged terrorists with a > sophisticated plan with > > the earmarks of Al Qaeda? Talk about a wag-the-dog scenario. > > > > I mean, the news said everyone was "home-grown." That's not Al > Qaeda. The news said > > they had the ring-leaders in custody (meaning THEY were home- > grown). That's > > DEFINITELY not Al Qaeda. > > > > There may or may not be some link, but it's sure not a solid one or > they wouldn't be so > > wishy-washy in what they told the press... > > Expertise and financing, perhaps, from al Qaeda, > with the planning and execution done by the > homegrown guys? > Perhaps, but something smells funny, IMHO... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/10/06 6:04:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > While some of the previous alerts appeared on the > surface to be a bit questionable or perhaps overdone, > this seems to quite serious. > > > > > Very serious. They were days away from doing it. They were getting ready for > a test run. The same plan Al Qaeda attempted but failed over the Pacific > from the Philippines before 911. All the programs the Bush Administration was > > using like the NSA and Banking program of following money transactions were > used > in Great Britain to bust them. > You know all these details? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have > > > > > guessed it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the > > > > > people in fear to control them. So how many days until we learn > > > > > this plot was bogus? > > > > > > > > This one was almost certainly for real. It'll be > > > > *exploited* up the wazoo, though. > > > > > > > > > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids > > > > > > > > Supposedly the explosives that were to be used were > > > > in liquid form. There was one plot to blow up planes > > > > awhile back that planned on using an explosive liquid > > > > in a bottle of contact lens cleaning solution. > > > > > > > > > lipstick, chapstick > > > > > > > > And you could easily disguise plastic explosive as > > > > lipstick and Chapstick, so that makes sense too. > > > > > > > > The real idiocy is the administration's attempt to > > > > use this plot to justify the Iraq war. These > > > > terrorists were home-grown Brits, for pete's sake. > > > > > > > > For the cost of a couple of days' worth of the war > > > > in Iraq, we could outfit all our airports with > > > > scanners that detect explosives (only a few have > > > > them now). > > > > > > > > > > Kinda like the TMO wasting their time creating, marketing and > > > distributing MAPI products. For all the time and effort put into > > > it, thousands could have been taught TM. > > > > > > > MAPI turns a profit and these days, most US MAPI employees are > probably non-TMers. > > How is this a waste of TMO time, etc? > > > > They can't afford TM? They always want to take side trips to titty bars? > > JohnY>> More Roos should take side trips to titty bars. It will relax them. OffWorld To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
scienceofabundance wrote: >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > >---snip--- > > >>>No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been >>> >>> >successful you > > >>>would have been demanding another investigation as to how this >>> >>> >could happen, as > > >>>you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 >>> >>> >investigation > > >>>was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a >>> >>> >setup but I'm > > >>>sure you are going to wish it were. >>> >>> >>> >>No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 >> >> >investigation. I > > >>think the "official story" is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside >> >> >job and > > >>a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this >> >> >alert > > >>especially due to it's timing. >> >> >> >But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming >the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under >the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that >the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of >course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least >I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true >regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an >inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? > Cute obfuscation. Let's see if you can write that more straightforward. Maybe Judy can help you. :) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/10/06 9:11:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED].> wrote:>> [EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote:---snip---> >> >No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been successful you > >would have been demanding another investigation as to how this could happen, as > >you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 investigation > >was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a setup but I'm > >sure you are going to wish it were.> >> No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 investigation. I > think the "official story" is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside job and > a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this alert > especially due to it's timing.>But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? ? __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ---snip--- > > > >No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been successful you > >would have been demanding another investigation as to how this could happen, as > >you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 investigation > >was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a setup but I'm > >sure you are going to wish it were. > > > No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 investigation. I > think the "official story" is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside job and > a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this alert > especially due to it's timing. > But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have guessed > > it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the people in fear > > to control them. So how many days until we learn this plot was bogus? > > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids, lipstick, chapstick. > > I'm surprised they don't take away your car keys. I learned how slit an > > attackers throat with a car key in a corporate defense class that many > > have taken nationwide. Oh well, better not give them any ideas. > > > > We know who the real terrorists are anyway: the ones in the White House. > > > > We were listening to NPR this morning. 21 alleged terrorists with a sophisticated plan with > the earmarks of Al Qaeda? Talk about a wag-the-dog scenario. > > I mean, the news said everyone was "home-grown." That's not Al Qaeda. The news said > they had the ring-leaders in custody (meaning THEY were home- grown). That's > DEFINITELY not Al Qaeda. > > There may or may not be some link, but it's sure not a solid one or they wouldn't be so > wishy-washy in what they told the press... Expertise and financing, perhaps, from al Qaeda, with the planning and execution done by the homegrown guys? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > > > > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have > > > > guessed it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the > > > > people in fear to control them. So how many days until we learn > > > > this plot was bogus? > > > > > > This one was almost certainly for real. It'll be > > > *exploited* up the wazoo, though. > > > > > > > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids > > > > > > Supposedly the explosives that were to be used were > > > in liquid form. There was one plot to blow up planes > > > awhile back that planned on using an explosive liquid > > > in a bottle of contact lens cleaning solution. > > > > > > > lipstick, chapstick > > > > > > And you could easily disguise plastic explosive as > > > lipstick and Chapstick, so that makes sense too. > > > > > > The real idiocy is the administration's attempt to > > > use this plot to justify the Iraq war. These > > > terrorists were home-grown Brits, for pete's sake. > > > > > > For the cost of a couple of days' worth of the war > > > in Iraq, we could outfit all our airports with > > > scanners that detect explosives (only a few have > > > them now). > > > > > > > Kinda like the TMO wasting their time creating, marketing and > > distributing MAPI products. For all the time and effort put into > > it, thousands could have been taught TM. > > > > MAPI turns a profit and these days, most US MAPI employees are probably non-TMers. > How is this a waste of TMO time, etc? > They can't afford TM? They always want to take side trips to titty bars? JohnY To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have > > > guessed it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the > > > people in fear to control them. So how many days until we learn > > > this plot was bogus? > > > > This one was almost certainly for real. It'll be > > *exploited* up the wazoo, though. > > > > > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids > > > > Supposedly the explosives that were to be used were > > in liquid form. There was one plot to blow up planes > > awhile back that planned on using an explosive liquid > > in a bottle of contact lens cleaning solution. > > > > > lipstick, chapstick > > > > And you could easily disguise plastic explosive as > > lipstick and Chapstick, so that makes sense too. > > > > The real idiocy is the administration's attempt to > > use this plot to justify the Iraq war. These > > terrorists were home-grown Brits, for pete's sake. > > > > For the cost of a couple of days' worth of the war > > in Iraq, we could outfit all our airports with > > scanners that detect explosives (only a few have > > them now). > > > > Kinda like the TMO wasting their time creating, marketing and > distributing MAPI products. For all the time and effort put into > it, thousands could have been taught TM. > MAPI turns a profit and these days, most US MAPI employees are probably non-TMers. How is this a waste of TMO time, etc? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have > > guessed it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the > > people in fear to control them. So how many days until we learn > > this plot was bogus? > > This one was almost certainly for real. It'll be > *exploited* up the wazoo, though. > > > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids > > Supposedly the explosives that were to be used were > in liquid form. There was one plot to blow up planes > awhile back that planned on using an explosive liquid > in a bottle of contact lens cleaning solution. > > > lipstick, chapstick > > And you could easily disguise plastic explosive as > lipstick and Chapstick, so that makes sense too. > > The real idiocy is the administration's attempt to > use this plot to justify the Iraq war. These > terrorists were home-grown Brits, for pete's sake. > > For the cost of a couple of days' worth of the war > in Iraq, we could outfit all our airports with > scanners that detect explosives (only a few have > them now). > Kinda like the TMO wasting their time creating, marketing and distributing MAPI products. For all the time and effort put into it, thousands could have been taught TM. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/10/06 3:18:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > In a message dated 8/10/06 2:25:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: > > > > > > > >>And had the plot not been foiled and had succeeded you would be the very > >> > >> > >one > > > > > >>demanding an investigation as how this could have happened and why > >>passengers weren't warned and searched better. Damn those terrorists! They > >> > >> > >just screw > > > > > >>everything up! > >> > >> > >> > >Nonsense, I'm smarted than that. > > > > > > > > > >No you're not. > > > How would you know? You're just be pretentious and not very smart yourself. > > > > > > So you weren't pulling for an independent investigation of 911? > You've you've heard about the new book by the Republican and Democratic head of the 9/11 Commission, right? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14191255/ ""Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11, but it could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident investigations and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue," the book states." To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have guessed > it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the people in fear > to control them. So how many days until we learn this plot was bogus? > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids, lipstick, chapstick. > I'm surprised they don't take away your car keys. I learned how slit an > attackers throat with a car key in a corporate defense class that many > have taken nationwide. Oh well, better not give them any ideas. > > We know who the real terrorists are anyway: the ones in the White House. > We were listening to NPR this morning. 21 alleged terrorists with a sophisticated plan with the earmarks of Al Qaeda? Talk about a wag-the-dog scenario. I mean, the news said everyone was "home-grown." That's not Al Qaeda. The news said they had the ring-leaders in custody (meaning THEY were home-grown). That's DEFINITELY not Al Qaeda. There may or may not be some link, but it's sure not a solid one or they wouldn't be so wishy-washy in what they told the press... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
authfriend wrote: >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have >>guessed it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the >>people in fear to control them. So how many days until we learn >>this plot was bogus? >> >> > >This one was almost certainly for real. It'll be >*exploited* up the wazoo, though. > > > >>And such mindless security, not allowing liquids >> >> > >Supposedly the explosives that were to be used were >in liquid form. There was one plot to blow up planes >awhile back that planned on using an explosive liquid >in a bottle of contact lens cleaning solution. > > > >>lipstick, chapstick >> >> > >And you could easily disguise plastic explosive as >lipstick and Chapstick, so that makes sense too. > >The real idiocy is the administration's attempt to >use this plot to justify the Iraq war. These >terrorists were home-grown Brits, for pete's sake. > >For the cost of a couple of days' worth of the war >in Iraq, we could outfit all our airports with >scanners that detect explosives (only a few have >them now). > It's hard to convince me that any of these plots are real. If they are they were probably tricked by black ops. They are going to make traveling so inconvenient that you will probably check in at the airport and then be locked into some kind of cage and loaded on to the plane. All this because of the hysteria and gullibility of the American sheeple. Maybe they will make us all fly nude, perish the thought. :) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have > guessed it another ridiculous "terrorist" alert. Gotta keep the > people in fear to control them. So how many days until we learn > this plot was bogus? This one was almost certainly for real. It'll be *exploited* up the wazoo, though. > And such mindless security, not allowing liquids Supposedly the explosives that were to be used were in liquid form. There was one plot to blow up planes awhile back that planned on using an explosive liquid in a bottle of contact lens cleaning solution. > lipstick, chapstick And you could easily disguise plastic explosive as lipstick and Chapstick, so that makes sense too. The real idiocy is the administration's attempt to use this plot to justify the Iraq war. These terrorists were home-grown Brits, for pete's sake. For the cost of a couple of days' worth of the war in Iraq, we could outfit all our airports with scanners that detect explosives (only a few have them now). To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
