--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy for the record, your objections to my other post
> > > were either based on
It was Alex not me who made most of those specific points. I'm not sure what
building you are referring to that the DAC wanted to erect in its place, since
no building has replaced it. It didn't really make economic sense for the
university to keep pouring money into a shifting, sinking building
@ "feste37": Sorry, but this is what people have been complaining about. Those
in the TMO believe everything they are told. To completely re-roof a building
the size of the chapel, especially at the time it was supposed to have been
re-roofed, would not have cost $100,000. Foundation repairs mig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
(snip)
> One of the biggest problems of discussing Maharishi's teaching
> with Judy is that she lacks the full context of it because she
> was not trained in it. She did not sit through the 696 hours
> of instruction including a mo
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:27 PM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > It's not benign, it's a form of cheating. (Your purported
> > explanation above, BTW, *is an example of it*.) I've
> > nev
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > It's not benign, it's a form of cheating. (Your purported
> > explanation above, BTW, *is an example of it*.) I've
> > never seen anybody, here or anywher
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
> It's not benign, it's a form of cheating. (Your purported
> explanation above, BTW, *is an example of it*.) I've
> never seen anybody, here or anywhere else, who does what
> you do as a tactic to skew arguments your way. It's
> de
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy for the record, your objections to my other post
> > > were either based on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008
Me:
>
> Sometimes you post links to music and often combine it with a "your music has
> poopy pants" swipe at me.
>
Nabbie:
It's understandable that you become upset when your howling in the streets are
posted here from youtube side b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Ha-Ha! I recalled something like that after I posted. So, you only top
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy for the record, your objections to my other post
> > were either based on your lack of familiarity with
> > Maharishi's experiential goals for his programs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> > >
> > > snip
> >
> > Teachers do not make the best practitioners or necessarily garner bet
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > wrote:
> > (snip
Yeah, the whole "I am enlightened" thing really bugs you, huh? It is not
something I mention, except to both state that it is possible, and not
lifetimes away, or particularly complex, and to disturb those like you, living
in a dream.
There is a fear and mystique most people associate with the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Like I said, beliefs are bad news. Yeah, I am an
> experience guy. Glad you got that. ZERO experience
> equals ZERO credibility.
This explains why no one on this forum believes
that you are enlightened. You clearly have none
of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> (snip>
> > I see traditional systems as an attempt to define that
> > mystery within their
"And I'm sorry that I don't believe that you have to watch out with the powers
of your magical fulfillment of desires because things can get out of hand."
Like I said, beliefs are bad news. Yeah, I am an experience guy. Glad you got
that. ZERO experience equals ZERO credibility. I sincerely hope
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> > snip
>
> Teachers do not make the best practitioners or necessarily garner better
> results from practicing what they teach. For example, there are plenty of
> good r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> This is SUCH bullshit Curtis. You cannot both denigrate TM, calling it
> unknown in terms of benefit, which destroys its place alongside any
> legitimate discipline, and at the same time claim that Barry is somehow
> anointed by
This is SUCH bullshit Curtis. You cannot both denigrate TM, calling it unknown
in terms of benefit, which destroys its place alongside any legitimate
discipline, and at the same time claim that Barry is somehow anointed by his
extra knowledge, of it - something that, according to you, has no val
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> >
> > Ha-Ha! I recalled something like that after I posted. So, you only top
> > Barry's zero TM meditations by twenty thousand, or so. A pretty impressive
> > delta
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Ha-Ha! I recalled something like that after I posted. So, you only top
> > > Barry'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> >
> > Ha-Ha! I recalled something like that after I posted. So, you only top
> > Barry's zero TM meditations by twenty thousand, or so. A pretty impressive
> > de
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Ha-Ha! I recalled something like that after I posted. So, you only top
> Barry's zero TM meditations by twenty thousand, or so. A pretty impressive
> delta, regardless. Let's watch Curtis wriggle, shall we?
Indeed. To sugg
Ha-Ha! I recalled something like that after I posted. So, you only top Barry's
zero TM meditations by twenty thousand, or so. A pretty impressive delta,
regardless. Let's watch Curtis wriggle, shall we?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> "This is compared to [Judy's] nemesis Barry who was not only certified to
> teach it, but promoted through the ranks to supervise other teacher's
> presentation of the programs."
>
> Your statement above, Curtis, is both disin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> > EM: Interesting. Judy may disagree with you here also -
> > but I don't know for sure, as it is outside my realm of
> > experience. Smiley face.
>
> Judy's view of what I write is too agenda driven to be a
> reliable refl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> Judy for the record, your objections to my other post
> were either based on your lack of familiarity with
> Maharishi's experiential goals for his programs beyond
> the beginner level of instruction, (never attended an
> experie
"This is compared to [Judy's] nemesis Barry who was not only certified to teach
it, but promoted through the ranks to supervise other teacher's presentation of
the programs."
Your statement above, Curtis, is both disingenuous, and pretty arrogant.
Doesn't begin to approach the standards of your
otta get back to the "real" world.
Smile. Signing off, Emily
>
> From: curtisdeltablues
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:23 AM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Take two:Everything below is my POV
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> >
> > Most of what you say here is irrelevant, having much more to do with your
> > inner story, than any tangible effects, pro or con, regarding meditation.
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
(snip>
> I see traditional systems as an attempt to define that
> mystery within their POV. I believe it is premature to
> buy into that. Not to ignore their in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Most of what you say here is irrelevant, having much more to do with your
> inner story, than any tangible effects, pro or con, regarding meditation.
>
> Anything we appropriate for our lives, appears to have a benefit for us
>
Most of what you say here is irrelevant, having much more to do with your inner
story, than any tangible effects, pro or con, regarding meditation.
Anything we appropriate for our lives, appears to have a benefit for us
initially. Its continued benefit, or not, can easily be measured. Not by wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> I don't have a view that includes "higher states" as a
> useful term anymore. I believe that some states of mind
> are more appropriate for different tasks. I view the
> shifted states from your usual internal stasis as versi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > Excellent response Emily. There is some meat on this bone.
>
> EM: Nice of you to say Curtis. More than a quick quip, but not much more. I
> kno
Judy for the record, your objections to my other post were either based on your
lack of familiarity with Maharishi's experiential goals for his programs beyond
the beginner level of instruction, (never attended an experience grading
group), your confusions concerning different aspects of the tea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> Excellent response Emily. There is some meat on this bone.
EM: Nice of you to say Curtis. More than a quick quip, but not much more. I
know little about meditation states and I am an escape artist, when it comes to
realit
Curtis, for the record, while there's a lot in this post
I *disagree* with rather strongly, there isn't a thing
in it that I object to the way I did with your other post.
As far as I'm concerned, no one has any need to cover
their ears.
You will no doubt continue to insist that I criticized
your
Excellent response Emily. There is some meat on this bone.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
> Curtis, I always enjoy what you write - creative writer that you are.
>
> And, in terms of your POV - I am but a babe in the woods re: your topic andÂ
> I do not have an answe
Thanks Barry. I am not convinced there is not some new information about life
contained in these states of mind, I am just not sure how we could know. And
as long as those most into it are too convinced to care, this will continue to
be a tiny subculture perspective.
I am hoping that Sam Harr
Whoa. What he said.
Really. That's as clear an exposition of it as I've ever heard here,
Curtis.
Deep bow.
I was particularly fond of "People who are naturally creative continue
to be as they meditate, even as they attribute it to their practice,
and
boring people who are not creative are just
45 matches
Mail list logo
