On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
> on 4/26/06 7:02 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> Seems like Tom and Jim have both commented on "the knowledge of the
> >> nature
> >> of all things." what's the "Raincloud of virtue?" Is it like the
> >> raincloud
> >> that's alwa
on 4/26/06 7:02 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Seems like Tom and Jim have both commented on "the knowledge of the
>> nature
>> of all things." what's the "Raincloud of virtue?" Is it like the
>> raincloud
>> that's always above the head of that kid in the Peanuts strip?
>
> It's th
On Apr 25, 2006, at 10:35 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> on 4/25/06 6:28 PM, t3rinity at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> Since you've experienced the Self dwelling in Itself (atma-
> kalpena a
> >> la Vyasa) would you
on 4/25/06 6:28 PM, t3rinity at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
>> Since you've experienced the Self dwelling in Itself (atma-kalpena a
>> la Vyasa) would you please share your experience of the raincloud of
>> virtue and of
On Apr 25, 2006, at 10:24 PM, authfriend wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Apr 25, 2006, at 9:02 PM, authfriend wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.co
On Apr 25, 2006, at 9:15 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Jim, would be able and willing to talk a bit about what it was
> like to have Guru Dev appear
> > to you? I am especially interested in what he seemed like
On Apr 25, 2006, at 9:02 PM, authfriend wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Since you've experienced the Self dwelling in Itself (atma-kalpena
> > > a la Vyasa) would you pl
On Apr 25, 2006, at 6:36 PM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
> Jim Flanegin writes: snipped
> It is at that time, that our desires are transformed from the
> machinery necessary for us to permanently awaken unto our Selves,
> into the machinery for us to expand our awake Selves further
On Apr 25, 2006, at 9:38 AM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:
> Jim Flanegin writes:
> Hey Tom, I am curious about the relationship your levitation
> experience you shared here, and having slipped onto a different
> stage as you mention above. Did the levitation serve (1) as that
> las
on 4/25/06 11:12 AM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The one thing I must be careful about now are my
> desires, because they have a funny way of all coming true, quckly.
Rick should win the lottery...
Rick should win the lottery...
Rick should win the lottery...
To subscribe
It seems to me when one first integrates with the non-dual state
there is a state of total relaxation and all the muscles in the body
just open up as all tension is gone. The funny thing that happens is
the mind realizes *something* has changed: wow, all This is me? As
soon as that happe
On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:52 AM, sparaig wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > In regards to siddhis, as I believe I indicated already, that's more
> > about yoga-darshana, i.e. not Advaita Vedanta.
> >
>
> So you believe that Patanjali made thi
On Apr 23, 2006, at 7:27 PM, t3rinity wrote:So Ramana was not in favor of testing, thats for sure. I also don'tthink he thought that a Jnani had to manifest siddhis. OTOH thescriptures make it clear that the manifestation of siddhis are noindication of enlightenment. They could be accomplished by
On Apr 23, 2006, at 6:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
> > As far as I know only Maharishi has ever asserted that levitation is
> > an objective manifestation of unity. I've never heard him say it,
> > either live or on tape. I've only heard others report that he has. I
> > certainly don't know if that a
On Apr 23, 2006, at 9:04 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
> I enjoyed getting turned on to his "thing". I found it
> quite refreshing and genuine. Then again, thanks for turning me on to
> Mother Meera. I have enjoyed getting acquanited with her "thing".
>
Careful, Lurk, or you'll get us pu
On Apr 23, 2006, at 5:45 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
> > As was shared on here a while back, even in recent times when
> masters
> > have claimed enlightenment, the test almost always involved some
> > performance of siddhi.
> >
> > Since yogic flying belongs to yoga-darshana, it's only sens
But if they didn't run into a phone booth beforehand to change their
clothes, it doesn't count.
On Apr 23, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Vaj wrote:
> As was shared on here a while back, even in recent times when masters
> have claimed enlightenment, the test almost always involved some
> performanc
On Apr 23, 2006, at 4:40 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
> Because its inconvenient? To have some non-subjective
> non-self-interpreative means to point to higher states?
>
> Objective reality gets in the way of some story-tellers -- which to
> them [the stories] form a higher truth than measureme
Multi-party verification or repeatability is what brought the world out of the Dark Ages? Funny, all this time I was sure it was Fred and his gear.
Sal
On Apr 23, 2006, at 3:40 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
Its not clear why Fred and his gear are not invited to Satsangs. Maybe
he has been. Or may
On Apr 23, 2006, at 11:23 AM, authfriend wrote:
> How could I? He has vowed (again) to ignore me.
> Surely you can't be suggesting that he doesn't
> have the self-control to resist?
Of course, that' s exactly why you keep prodding him, attempting to
annoy him, make jabs, etc.
>
> I will c
On Apr 23, 2006, at 11:03 AM, authfriend wrote:
> Not as Barry told it, at least initially. He admitted
> some who were watching did not see Lenz levitate, and
> he claimed to be supremely unconcerned with whether a
> camera could have captured the feat; he thought objective
> proof was irrel
21 matches
Mail list logo
