Björn Persson wrote:
A program similar to Jigdo could speed this up. Transfer only the RPM
packages
(taking advantage of hard links) and information on what packages are in each
ISO image, and then recreate the ISO images at the destination. That way each
package would only be
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
What about dropping hierarchical mirroring altogether? Why hasn't
someone developed a distributed (i.e. bittorrent-like) system for mass
mirroring? :-)
Already discussed[1][2] on the fedora-test-list.
[1]
James Laska wrote:
1. How did you find out about Fedora Test Days?
Mailing list posting.
2. Was sufficient documentation available to help you participate in a
Fedora Test Day? If not, what did you find missing or in need of
improvement?
Yes, I found everything I needed on the
Ben Boeckel wrote:
userbase with extra codec messes. I'm sure IE will just play by
itself in the corner and Safari will play Apple's game no
matter what happens.
/s/by/with/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Mike McGrath wrote:
Can anyone with F11 installed look at what is in their /etc/fedora-release
and tell me which one you have, and how you installed? Also what version
of fedora-release you have.
F10 to F11 system using preupgrade here.
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 11
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
F10 to F11 system using preupgrade here.
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)
$ rpm -q fedora-release
fedora-release-11-1.noarch
When I brought up smolt the OS is Fedora 11 Leonidas so is this a
smolt issue?
It seems smolt is under stress
G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
That's what they wanted to use :-) besides it was quicker to gen
them than to download the live CDs or DVDs.
CDs will be much slower than a DVD in terms of read speed. You'll also
have to swap disks out during install (hello 1998). Why do they want
to use CDs?
In
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
I wonder, Would there be a reliable way to separate out emulated
hardware inside the smolt database reliably so we can get a better
statistical survey of in-service physical hardware devices?
QEMU inserts its name into the CPU string does it not? It could be
sorted that
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL customers
being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386 would still be in
RHEL, it would worry me that it would only be a secondary arch in
Fedora. . .
Can the myth of RH controls Fedora's direction
Thomas Janssen on 06/17/2009 03:19 AM wrote:
Ubuntu Alternative Thats not a LiveCD. It's just a install CD. No Live.
So? Your point? A Fedora LiveCD is an install CD.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Thomas Janssen on 06/17/2009 03:25 PM wrote:
My point.. It is/was obviously that you dont know what an alternative
CD is. So i explained it to you. But i failed. Maybe you grab one in
your spare time and check out the alternative installation
possibilities, compared to a LiveCD. VM`s are
My random thought for today:
Thunderbird is listed under the Internet sub-menu. Evolution is listed
under the Office sub-menu. Why are they in different places?
Ah...
mozilla-thunderbird.desktop:
Categories=Email;Network;
evolution.desktop:
On 06/24/2009 08:21 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
If you look at the three things evolution does: mail, contacts and
calendar, two out of three fit very well into office. Its the nature of
categorization that 'relatively similar' things eventually end up in
different buckets. One of the many
Adam Miller on 06/29/2009 11:31 AM wrote:
Now its just getting silly... What a support nightmare that would be.
user I need help
fedora-member What desktop are you running?
user I dunno ... I just downloaded the default
fedora-member .
Enjoy DE Russian Roulette :)
What if the
On 06/29/2009 05:21 PM, King InuYasha wrote:
I was reading an article today in ComputerWorld about something called
KSplice, which allows Linux users to install critical updates and
patch in without rebooting the computer. I tried it and while it was a
bit odd for installing (not
On 06/29/2009 09:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It actually can't and this is why it isn't very useful within Fedora, as we
get big updates, not just minimal security patches. KSplice can't handle
that kind of updates. It can only handle small patches which don't change
any data structures. So the
On 06/29/2009 09:42 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Well, Ubuntu will have a problem at that point as well (see Kubuntu and
Xubuntu). ;-) Maybe we should write a U Desktop Environment just to give
them trouble. ^^
梁穗隆 on 06/30/2009 10:51 AM wrote:
So I really hope that solang will replace f-spot soon. And solang has
more new features than f-spot.
I don't see a package review request or any koji builds. Are you sure
it's coming to Fedora?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Stepan Kasal on 07/01/2009 05:05 AM wrote:
I apologize for that. I got bored writing three-word nonsenses so I
tried the null string. I will do better now when I know that it
might be read by someone in certain cases.
Fedora 11 brings a PackageKit that actually promotes and accentuates
Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
how do I do that?
Since you have not submitted it for stable I do not see any problem.
Don't do anything. :)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Martin Sourada on 07/14/2009 01:17 PM wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Unblocked orphan gtk-murrine-engine
I'm taking over this one. Co-maintainers welcomed.
Could you post an update to 0.9.x for F11? I see one in rawhide, but
there's some themes that need 0.9.x
Thomas Janssen on 07/17/2009 10:56 AM wrote:
Patch would be welcome. Would make my life easier in #fedora helping
people with that problem.
The patch should have been attached to the original post. Did you see it?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Daniel P. Berrange on 07/17/2009 11:10 AM wrote:
Why not do a patch for VirtualBox to make it look in the right place
first ? We've just done that for QEMU too, changing its search order
to be /sys/bus/usb, /dev/bus/usb and only then /proc/bus/usb. Removing
the whole /proc/bus/usb mount to
Daniel P. Berrange on 07/17/2009 11:10 AM wrote:
Why not do a patch for VirtualBox to make it look in the right place
first ? We've just done that for QEMU too, changing its search order
to be /sys/bus/usb, /dev/bus/usb and only then /proc/bus/usb. Removing
the whole /proc/bus/usb mount to
Bill Nottingham on 07/17/2009 11:30 AM wrote:
mkinitrd does; that being said, that's only in the initramfs.
OK, anything else?
If mkinitrd bites the bullet in the new F12 feature then usbfs could be
deprecated as well?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Enrico Scholz on 07/17/2009 12:14 PM wrote:
Is there some upstream (linux kernel) discussion to remove usbfs? If
not, it should stay as-is.
Fedora/RHEL are the last major distros to retain usbfs support apparently.
Why not patch VirtualBox to do it correctly?
Why not patch your utilities?
Matthias Clasen on 07/17/2009 12:42 PM wrote:
Do you feel like writing up a use case involving a UPS ?
As Adam stated in his reply, there is really nothing we can do since UPS
devices are not supported at all.
I haven't gotten around to bug hunting, but is there a bug for UPS
support in
Enrico Scholz on 07/17/2009 03:41 PM wrote:
Which initial comment? That you want to remove a feature to workaround
bugs in an application?
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Fedora/RHEL are the last major distros to retain usbfs support apparently.
Sorry; you must be subscribed to another
Richard Hughes on 07/17/2009 02:07 PM wrote:
It should work fine with 009. If it doesn't work, and it used to work
with HAL (without nut installed) then please file bugs. I've recently
been regression testing with my APC UPS, and this seems to work fine
now.
009 displays my UPS's again. I
Fulko Hew on 07/21/2009 08:29 AM wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl ?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Ahmed Kamal on 07/23/2009 04:54 PM wrote:
Exactly the point, the user shares his desktop, or starts some service
using the services GUI, and FireKit should offer to help. Moreover, this
actually would improve desktop security, since without FireKit, a
typical user after wasting half an hour,
Ahmed Kamal on 07/24/2009 10:12 AM wrote:
I agree a long running daemon would best be written in C, perhaps pyGtk
would be good enough for only the GUI config dialogs. I will start a
request for a fedorahosted project, then I'll work on recruiting
developers yes.
GUI? What GUI? You don't
Jussi Lehtola on 07/31/2009 10:06 AM wrote:
so there is a 50x speed difference in favor of solv.
F13 feature?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Richard Hughes on 07/31/2009 10:43 AM wrote:
Not really. If you're running an old version of gimp, you can restart
[snip]
Fedora 10 and 11 support only 2,3
Unfortunately there's a bug somewhere then. I've been meaning to file
another bug report on this. The PackageKit applet tooltip will
On 07/31/2009 05:27 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Which is what I was trying to communicate... Should I file a bug then?
Yes, please. CC me, too, or link me.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 07/31/2009 05:30 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
And this is specifically PackageKit, and not some break out from it
like an applet or something?...
Yes, this is PackageKit. PackageKit contains an applet that appears in
your notification area on your panel when there are updates or
Nathanael D. Noblet on 07/31/2009 05:27 PM wrote:
Which is what I was trying to communicate... Should I file a bug then?
Bug[1] had been filed in Rawhide during F11 cycle.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502138
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Rahul Sundaram on 08/10/2009 10:08 AM wrote:
Please edit the wiki directly for any improvements if you can or reply
with suggestions. Thanks.
Why are some internal Fedora wiki links set as external links?
For example:
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dracut Dracut]
instead of
[[Dracut]]
--
For those of us that have pitivi installed and want the pitivi update,
we need the new gstreamer-plugins-base update. The gstreamer packages
are still sitting in updates-testing (after several updates pushes).
Needless to say, dep resolving is failing.
Mike
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
After a recent xorg bug[1] with intel chips, I had to question the use
of bodhi for karma/comments after an update has been pushed to updates.
Should the comments and karma for packages be closed after an update
leaves updates-testing? I don't see any value and it seems the wrong
place to have
On 09/27/2009 10:13 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
Well someone I know has had dreadful problems with the x64 version of
b4 build for F11 from updates-testing - with huge memory usage and
never completed the re-indexing process - in the end it hung the
machine completely. He took 3.0pre from the
On 09/27/2009 10:15 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
I do know that the 64 bit fedora beta 4 (there is no 64 bit
mozilla.org as, last I read a while ago, they are not comfortable the
code is 64 bit clean) had terrible problems from beta 4 (tho beta 3 was
fine).
I switched to 32 bit mozilla.org
On 10/10/2009 11:07 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Just upgraded my F11 workstation, which included an upgrade to
thunderbird-3.0-2.7.b4.fc11.x86_64
Without any prompting or warning, my email layout -- a key interface
into my open source development workflow -- was changed to use
something called
On 10/11/2009 03:41 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
I don't think so. Not willing to put words in Jeff's mouth, but I don't
think he was discussing the UI changes of Thunderbird. I took it as he was
rather
discussing the upgrade process within Fedora.
So never ship beta software? That nixes
On 10/11/2009 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Whether to include a beta or not should be decided on a case by case
basis. It is a good idea to avoid those but if there are substantial
benefits, it is fine. The focal point of the discussion isn't what it
originally include but how the software
On 10/11/2009 11:46 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Oh please. Expecting all Fedora thunderbird users to keep track of
upstream development of software included in Fedora is totally
ridiculous. The package maintainer made the judgement to include a beta
release of thunderbird. If major UI or other
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Global indexing introduces legal issues, disk space requirements and CPU
requirements that extend beyond F11...
Maybe I'm a bit stupid, but what is the significance of how many files
your emails are stored in? Separating them out provides some sort of
security advantage?
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Legally speaking, it is important, if I am ever called into court, to be
able to show a distinct separation between my personal email and my
NDA-heavy Red Hat email. And, bboth of which must be separate from my
micro-micro-corporation.
If one does not demonstrate
Joost van der Sluis on 10/26/2009 01:42 PM wrote:
Those files are not architecture independent. They are somewhat similar
to .o files. They contain the run time library for the language,
compiled to native windows object files. If you want to compile your own
program with them afterwards,
Phil Knirsch wrote:
All in all the whole test day was a real success. Especially the great
idea of Marcela, Jan and Petr to make a rpm for the testday which
automated a lot of the work that needed to be done.
For the next testday we already plan to expand that idea and include the
Marcela Mašláňová on 10/29/2045 08:17 AM wrote:
We were thinking about some image, but for measurement we
needed installed system. Anyway requirements for tests were huge
e.g. openoffice, kernel-debuginfo.
When you use a USB drive you can install any number of packages. Just
set your
Adam Williamson on 10/29/2009 01:13 PM wrote:
Not exactly, you need enough spare memory and/or swap space, because
they get installed into 'memory'.
Not when you use persistent storage... I have an updated F11 USB stick
that would like to meet you. :)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Duane Smith on 11/04/2009 02:13 PM wrote:
You don't wanna change something on the harddisks, but wanna safe the
changes. So you boot from Live-CD and the changes are redirected to
the USB-Stick. Puppy Linux does it that way*. I wanna see it in
Fedora. :D
Already possible I believe. I think
On 11/16/2009 11:30 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
[1] http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot-Software%20Update.pn
Hm... I'm not Richard, but I bet he'll want you to supply some pkcon output.
Try pkcon -v get-updates and attach the output.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
(Yes, the irony of a talk on software patents being offered in MP3
format is not lost on me.)
Just think... one more year... one more year...
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Are there any legitimate reasons why the atd and sendmail services
are enabled by default? A default install is for a desktop and they
are quite useless in that regard.
Sendmail only stores the logwatch output, which actually accumulates
after a period of time because no normal desktop user
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Hopefully, a Fedora is not going to be a new Linux user, or at least
an above average computer users, there are probably going to be
several cron jobs that send mail to other places. For example, if
you are a registered Linux user, you are probably going to be
sending
Les Mikesell wrote:
If you don't use email, why are you using computers again? And if you
do, you've provided exactly this information to one or several email
client programs. Doing it once for sendmail lets any number of users
run any number of email clients that just hand off to sendmail
Chris Tyler wrote:
For sure. But the original statement it is true when configuration
means configuration of the MTA or MUA.
Let me clarify: In my case, on my desktop at work and on my home
machines, I can do a default installation of Fedora and then send mail
without knowing anything about the
Original Message
Subject: Re: RPM Fusion repo?
From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/07/2008 12:05 AM
Tim:
I'm quite surprised that there was a free WMA plug-in.
Rahul Sundaram:
Ed Greshko wrote:
3. Created a DVD in live mode on Vista and v2.5 UDF *not* readable on
RHELv4.
Could not test with F9.
UDF 2.5 is only readable with kernel 2.6.26 and higher. The latest
kernel update from Fedora 9 should read a UDF 2.5 disc.
Armin Moradi wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering if there is any way to enable desktop effects on a rawhide box.
Apparently there are no kmods for nvidia in the rpm-fusion for rawhide.
Thank you,
You should install the akmod packages so that you do not have to wait
on the repo to produce
Fred Silsbee wrote:
using yum, will it be possible to go from F9 to F10 without downloading an F10
iso image and going through an update
Yes,
There is a preupgrade package that does just what you want. Fedora 9
will be getting an updated PackageKit that will automagically use
Original Message
Subject: Re: F9 to F10 without downloading an F10 iso image
From: Fred Silsbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/14/2008 12:11 PM
is this right?
yum install preupgrade
Original Message
Subject: Re: F9 to F10 without downloading an F10 iso image
From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/14/2008 04:06 PM
No, you are mistaken.
If you do nothing special, yum update will continue to update to F9.
It will
Original Message
Subject: Re: F9 to F10 without downloading an F10 iso image
From: Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/14/2008 04:30 PM
Yum update will not automatically
Original Message
Subject: Re: F9 to F10 without downloading an F10 iso image
From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/14/2008 04:54 PM
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 16:42 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Your post in answer to Fred Silsbee says
Dave Feustel wrote:
Is there a non-graphical version of preupgrade that can be run from
a text-only console?
Thanks.
preupgrade-cli
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
M. Fioretti wrote:
There is no initrd for 2.6.27 (the other files are there). So it looks
like the rpm install of 2.6.27 was corrupted for some reason. How do I
manage to make yum understand that that version isn't properly installed
and it should update the kernel to 2.6.27?
TIA,
Marco
Jerry Feldman wrote:
Be wary of hyperthreading. AFAIK, Intel no longer supports this
feature in their processors. First, there are a number of applications
that actually suffer from hyperthreading. For instance, my company's
product runs significantly slower on a system with hyperthreading
Original Message
Subject: Re: Turbo Memory
From: Robert L Cochran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: For users of Fedora fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/16/2008 03:52 PM
It is just about a year ago that Claude submitted the inquiry below. I'm
seriously looking at the Lenovo ThinkPad T500,
Original Message
Subject: any drawbacks to 64-bit versus 32-bit install?
From: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fedora List fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/17/2008 08:27 AM
perhaps a dumb question but i have to toss together a temporary
linux box for someone to take to
Original Message
Subject: Which filesystem for SSD in F10?
From: Steve Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fedora Mailing List fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/17/2008 06:32 AM
Shortly after it's released, I'll be doing a clean install of Fedora 10
on a solid-state disk (SSD). This
Original Message
Subject: Re: f9 Preupgrade stalled?
From: Aaron Konstam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/17/2008 09:11 AM
Thanks for the link. I think I have also used Cheapbytes but it
Original Message
Subject: Re: any drawbacks to 64-bit versus 32-bit install?
From: Tom Horsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/17/2008 10:05 AM
I don't know about safer, but firefox 32
Original Message
Subject: Re: any drawbacks to 64-bit versus 32-bit install?
From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/17/2008 11:03 AM
Well, maybe.
There is no maybe.
The full browser crashes you are experiencing have nothing to do
Original Message
Subject: Sound card permissions
From: James Allsopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/17/2008 09:28 AM
How can I make udev make /dev/snd/* group audio always?
You will
Original Message
Subject: Re: any drawbacks to 64-bit versus 32-bit install?
From: Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/18/2008 03:39 PM
On Tue, Nov
Original Message
Subject: Re: good cordless mouse?
From: Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/19/2008 10:26 AM
Does the middle wheel both scroll
Original Message
Subject: Re: Moving Fedora 9 Hard Disk To Another System
From: Mikkel L. Ellertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/19/2008 08:08 PM
What is more likely is that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, how can we disable the password request of BB user ?
SSH only allows passwordless access with SSH keys without passphrases.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you means we can't disable the password request for using SSH-telnet ?
You can, but it requires you to generate an SSH key without a passphrase.
The server's ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file must have the client's key you
generate inside.
Once you have this setup,
Original Message
Subject: Re: Preupgrade problems
From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/24/2008 12:25 PM
What do I need to do to put in Grub2 in FC8 ??
You will have to install
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fedora install on a 1 GB CF card
From: Steve Repo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/25/2008 04:53 AM
Any reason why you want fedora and not puppy linux/damn
Original Message
Subject: weigh in if you have or have had the iso dvd burn no verify problem
From: Fred Silsbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fedora List fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 11/26/2008 01:04 PM
after the burn/write, the DVD is ejected and then swallowed up again
only to be
Paul W. Frields wrote:
There used to be a Release Notes button in Anaconda. However, very
few people used it, and the amount of code that we had to carry in the
installer image to support it (like an HTML viewer) was large and
unwieldy, especially hurting people who were trying to download a
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
+1
rant
I hate the increasing use of HTML docs instead of man pages. In old Unix
systems, man pages were concise, accurate and complete. Now we have
bloated, inaccurate, incomplete documentation that is hard to read and
hard to search. Large subsystems such as KDE
Peter Boy wrote:
I just upgraded my Thinkpad T40p from F9 to F10.
I suffer from the well known USB bug. Each time I connect a memory stick
I get the message
usb 1-4: new high speed USB debice using ehci_hcd ...
hub 1-0:1.0 unable to enumerate USB device on port 4 (repeated)
and device is
Original Message
Subject: Where is libflashsupport.i386?
From: Vivek J. Patankar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fedora Users List fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/01/2008 01:40 PM
Fedora 10 release notes say Users of Fedora x86_64 must install the
nspluginwrapper.i386 package to enable
Original Message
Subject: Re: some feedback on fedora 10
From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/01/2008 04:32 PM
These list messages are archived publicly, and that any mail addresses
in the message bodies, including yours if present,
Original Message
Subject: Which package for gstreamer?
From: Colin Paul Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/02/2008 09:18 AM
Which rpm provides gstreamer-0.10.pc for Fedora 10?
# yum provides */gstreamer-0.10.pc
gstreamer-devel-0.10.20-1.fc9.i386 :
Original Message
Subject: fedora 9 live firewall
From: Eric Penrose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/02/2008 11:52 AM
I find it confusing that the settings on fedora 9 live for firewall are
such that we tick the options that we trust such as secure http or
Original Message
Subject: How to install sun JRE (for mozilla plugin) on Fedora 10
From: Kevin Kempter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/02/2008 11:10 PM
Hi All;
I need to access java (the
Original Message
Subject: Re: f10.x86_64: laptop HP: Problem to see all 4Gb of memory
From: Kevin J. Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/03/2008 11:10 AM
On an x86_64 system?
Original Message
Subject: Re: f10.x86_64: laptop HP: Problem to see all 4Gb of memory
From: Dario Lesca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/04/2008 03:04 AM
I am the user of this thread,
but
Original Message
Subject: Re: f10.x86_64: laptop HP: Problem to see all 4Gb of memory
From: Linuxguy123 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/04/2008 10:15 AM
The reason I ask is that I am
Original Message
Subject: Re: Current state of multi-core awareness
From: Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/05/2008 10:26 AM
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:43 -0900, Jeff Spaleta
Original Message
Subject: Re: Parsing Digital Audio Files:
From: stan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/05/2008 02:39 PM
You want audacity, a sound editor. I think the latest version has
I've been noticing Xorg has been taking a nice chunk of RAM after
upgrading to Fedora 10. I decided to start up xrestop and see what's up:
xrestop - Display: localhost:0
Monitoring 35 clients. XErrors: 0
Pixmaps: 95419K total, Other: 219K total, All: 95639K
total
Original Message
Subject: Re: Mysterious update error messgae corrected.
From: Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: 12/08/2008 09:25 AM
See
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
