On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 7:22 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-08):
> > I did. I simplified it right from start. But I kept it for myself as It
> is
> > not really relevant.
>
> It is very relevant for reproducing the problem and reviewing the patch.
> Please show what you have,
Considering the marginality of the measured performance gains (3-4%),
I suppose that we should not merge this. Furthermore those measurements
are not expected to improve with large vector sizes, since the code
uses only 32 bits per vector no matter what.
deemphasis_c: 7703.2
deemphasis_rvv_f32:
On 11/11/2023 3:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:02:05AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Hi all,
as previously discussed, we need to re-elect the members of the
Technical and Community Committees. As a reminder - the Technical
Committee (TC) resolves technical disputes,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 12:06:03AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 11/10/2023 11:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:30:15PM
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:52 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> itself), but I remember observing that several members were in fact very
> biassed.
>
[citation needed]
--
Vittorio
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 2:04 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> > I said don't reply to me!
>
> Fortunately you have no authority over me.
>
I said that to avoid ridiculing yourself any more
> > I'm not biased,
>
> You are. In this message
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Hi,
> after ~2 years of work and ~700+ preparatory commits, here is finally
> the first "fully functional" version of multithreaded ffmpeg CLI. In
> quotes because due to the scale of the changes I'm sure some things got
> broken and
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 7:27 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-11):
> > I waited enough, applied, now for 100% true statement.
>
> Your teacher called, you forgot your pacifier in class yesterday.
>
> I am still expecting you to share the test cases you have so that the
> bug can
Michael Niedermayer (12023-11-11):
> Also iam not sure resending mails to different addressed when they bounce is
> safe
> Lets just consider i receive a mail at niedermayer.cc, i could construct a
> bounce and
> send it back while still voting with the token in it. If i now get a mail at
>
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 6:29 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 12:06:03AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 11/10/2023 11:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, at 17:58, Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12023-11-11):
>> Lets just consider i receive a mail at niedermayer.cc, i could construct a
>> bounce and
>> send it back while still voting with the token in it. If i now get a mail at
>> gmx.at
>> i could vote
On 11/11/2023 3:02 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 6:29 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 12:06:03AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 11/10/2023 11:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Thu,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 11:45 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 12:39:45PM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> wrote:
> > > The list does not match your list, for example Gautam is on your list
> > > but not on joshs
> > >
> > > So my question is still standing, can
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:27 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-11):
> > I waited enough, applied, now for 100% true statement.
>
> Your teacher called, you forgot your pacifier in class yesterday
>
No, bad Nicolas, stop this language, it's unacceptable and unbecoming. You
can
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 05:58:43PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12023-11-11):
> > Also iam not sure resending mails to different addressed when they bounce
> > is safe
> > Lets just consider i receive a mail at niedermayer.cc, i could construct a
> > bounce and
> > send it
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> I said don't reply to me!
Fortunately you have no authority over me.
> I'm not biased,
You are. In this message again.
> reread what you wrote and think
> if "pacifier" belongs on a technical
On 11/11/2023 4:11 PM, Diederik de Haas via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Fix spelling issue as reported by Debian's lintian tool:
accomodate -> accommodate
addtional -> additional
auxillary -> auxiliary
avaliable -> available
bellow -> below
betweeen -> between
Calulate -> Calculate
charactor ->
Fixes ticket #10660.
---
thanks to the mysterious 'ami_stuff'.
libavcodec/leaddec.c | 38 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/leaddec.c b/libavcodec/leaddec.c
index fd2018256d..4f2cc03e65 100644
---
Fixed ticket #10656.
---
libavcodec/leaddec.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/leaddec.c b/libavcodec/leaddec.c
index ede52fba5a..fd2018256d 100644
--- a/libavcodec/leaddec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/leaddec.c
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static int
Paul B Mahol (12023-11-11):
> I waited enough, applied, now for 100% true statement.
Your teacher called, you forgot your pacifier in class yesterday.
I am still expecting you to share the test cases you have so that the
bug can be properly fixed.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:02:05AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Hi all,
> as previously discussed, we need to re-elect the members of the
> Technical and Community Committees. As a reminder - the Technical
> Committee (TC) resolves technical disputes, while the Community
> Committee (CC) resolves
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 03:37:38PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 11/11/2023 3:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:02:05AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > as previously discussed, we need to re-elect the members of the
> > > Technical and Community
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:21 AM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 9 novembre 2023 12:16:28 GMT+02:00, "Dawid Kozinski/Multimedia (PLT)
> /SRPOL/Staff Engineer/Samsung Electronics" a écrit :
> >Hi,
> >
> >Both, the implementation of the EVC encoder and decoder for FFmpeg depend on
>
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-11-11 18:28:54)
> There was a swift and defensive reaction from multiple people when
> i suggested to nominate several of the main authors of FFmpeg to the GA.
> (Who many people have had no contact with for many years and many probably
> never had)
>
> People
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 2:22 AM Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in [1] JB listed his list of authorized voters for the "GA voters list
> updates"
> vote.
>
> This list does not correlate with the list Josh provided in [2].
> Neither does this list of 51
Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> No, bad Nicolas, stop this language, it's unacceptable and unbecoming. You
> can ask for more time in a kinder manner.
> No, don't reply to me with insults or excuses, just take a walk outside and
> reflect on your mistakes.
Address your reproaches to the person
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:42 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12023-11-11):
> > No, bad Nicolas, stop this language, it's unacceptable and unbecoming.
> You
> > can ask for more time in a kinder manner.
> > No, don't reply to me with insults or excuses, just take a walk outside
> and
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 12:39:45PM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> > The list does not match your list, for example Gautam is on your list
> > but not on joshs
> >
> > So my question is still standing, can you explain how your list was created?
> > or where its from?
>
> How was
Michael Niedermayer (12023-11-11):
> Forming a new CC doesnt prevent teh old one from doing its job
> there is no relation.
The previous CC had lost its mandate two years before.
Also, I cannot easily find the list of members (which is a problem in
itself), but I remember observing that several
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:52:24PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12023-11-11):
> > Forming a new CC doesnt prevent teh old one from doing its job
> > there is no relation.
>
> The previous CC had lost its mandate two years before.
But that doesnt matter
if someone insults
Fix spelling issue as reported by Debian's lintian tool:
accomodate -> accommodate
addtional -> additional
auxillary -> auxiliary
avaliable -> available
bellow -> below
betweeen -> between
Calulate -> Calculate
charactor -> character
coefficents -> coefficients
commerical -> commercial
Defalt ->
> I think you where root on the trac server you provided and where hosting
> for us.
> but you kicked FFmpeg out and shut that down around the time of the
> vote to ban carl. But its long ago and maybe i misremember. We had a backup
> server and recovered with noone noticing the trac server moved.
Rémi Denis-Courmont (12023-11-11):
> 1) As far as was communicated, the total of alleged discrepancies in the
> voter
> list could not affect the result. That makes the vote valid in my book, and
> also in the legal or predecential standards in democracies: if elections were
> overturned for
Le lauantaina 11. marraskuuta 2023, 13.15.37 EET Nicolas George a écrit :
> Rémi Denis-Courmont (12023-11-11):
> > 1) As far as was communicated, the total of alleged discrepancies in the
> > voter list could not affect the result. That makes the vote valid in my
> > book, and also in the legal or
On 11/11/2023 4:22 AM, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Hi,
in [1] JB listed his list of authorized voters for the "GA voters list
updates"
vote.
This list does not correlate with the list Josh provided in [2].
Neither does this list of 51 people [1] correlate to the 54 authorized
Le sunnuntaina 5. marraskuuta 2023, 12.02.05 EET Anton Khirnov a écrit :
> Anyone else wishing to volunteer for TC or CC, please reply to this
> email.
I hereby "volunteer" for the CC.
For those who don't know me, I am a research engineer in system software
working for a large telecommunication
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Anton
> Khirnov
> Sent: 2023年11月11日 15:58
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Repeat vote: GA voters list updates
>
> Quoting Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel (2023-11-11
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, at 08:22, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote
> The authorized voters for the repeated vote [2] reads as follows:
>
> mich...@niedermayer.cc
> one...@gmail.com
> jamr...@gmail.com
> andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com
> s...@jkqxz.net
> c...@passwd.hu
> ceffm...@gmail.com
>
Le lauantaina 11. marraskuuta 2023, 9.22.19 EET Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel
a écrit :
> As the admin responsible of the votes it is my duty to have supervision of
> all polls and thus it is my duty to declare this vote null and void for the
> flaws given above.
As noted several times by
Nov 11, 2023, 08:58 by an...@khirnov.net:
> Also as I said before, option A won its contests against options B/C/D
> by 17/7, 23/1, and 17/7, respectively. You would thus need to change 10
> votes to have any chance of a different result. As the number of
> disputed voters is nowhere near 10,
See the comment block at the top of fftools/ffmpeg_sched.h for more
details on what this scheduler is for.
This commit adds the scheduling code itself, along with minimal
integration with the rest of the program:
* allocating and freeing the scheduler
* passing it throughout the call stack in
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-11-04 19:30:39)
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 08:56:29AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > ---
> > fftools/ffmpeg.c | 22 ---
> > fftools/ffmpeg.h | 13 +-
> > fftools/ffmpeg_dec.c | 315 ++-
> > 3 files changed, 70
With explicit unrolling, we can skip half of the sign bit flips, and
the compiler is then better able to optimise the scalar loop:
predictor_c: 31376.0 (before)
predictor_c: 23703.0 (after)
---
libavcodec/exrdsp.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
Hi jb and everyone else
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 10:54:20AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, at 08:22, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> > Neither does this list of 51 people [1] correlate to the 54 authorized
> > voters
> > (distinct email addresses) the CIVS
Hi all
CIVS has a feature that allows you to pair a number with your ballot.
The more people use this, and check this after the vote, the more
certain it is that all votes have been counted correctly!
So when you vote, pick a random number and write it down then put it in that
field.
After the
45 matches
Mail list logo
