On 5/5/19, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 05.05.2019, at 18:04, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
>> On 5/5/19, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>>> On 04.05.2019, at 15:40, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Hi,
I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
with minor changes.
On 05.05.2019, at 18:04, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 5/5/19, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>> On 04.05.2019, at 15:40, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
>>> with minor changes.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Why is there a need to vote?
On 5/5/19, Nicolas George wrote:
> Marton Balint (12019-05-05):
>> I don't think you can insist on waiting for a review unless you plan to
>> do
>> it yourself in a reasonable time frame.
>
> Do you really think I have a duty to help Paul after all the insults he
> have subjected me? Really?
>
>
Marton Balint (12019-05-05):
> I don't think you can insist on waiting for a review unless you plan to do
> it yourself in a reasonable time frame.
Do you really think I have a duty to help Paul after all the insults he
have subjected me? Really?
I am not the only developer here. Paul could, for
On Sun, 5 May 2019, Nicolas George wrote:
Paul B Mahol (12019-05-05):
Because Nicolas objected on initial implementation. Dunno if he still
object something on current updated patch.
Did it have a proper review on the mailing list? If yes, then I do not
oppose it. If no, then I oppose it.
On 5/5/19, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12019-05-05):
>> Because Nicolas objected on initial implementation. Dunno if he still
>> object something on current updated patch.
>
> Did it have a proper review on the mailing list? If yes, then I do not
> oppose it. If no, then I oppose it.
>
Paul B Mahol (12019-05-05):
> Because Nicolas objected on initial implementation. Dunno if he still
> object something on current updated patch.
Did it have a proper review on the mailing list? If yes, then I do not
oppose it. If no, then I oppose it.
Also, I would like to emphasize that you
On 5/5/19, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 04.05.2019, at 15:40, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
>> with minor changes.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Why is there a need to vote?
Because Nicolas objected on initial implementation. Dunno
On 04.05.2019, at 15:40, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
> with minor changes.
>
> Thanks.
Why is there a need to vote?
What would be the objections existing or expected that would make a vote
necessary vs. the normal
On 5/4/19, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 5/4/19, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
>> with minor changes.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> See: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-May/243481.html
>
And I vote for inclusion.
On 5/4/19, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
> with minor changes.
>
> Thanks.
>
See: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-May/243481.html
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
Paul B Mahol (12019-05-04):
> I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
> with minor changes.
See:
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-May/243478.html
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I open voting for 7 days, for inclusion of colorhold filter in FFmpeg,
with minor changes.
Thanks.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
13 matches
Mail list logo
