On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:13:48AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >> On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael
Le duodi 22 fructidor, an CCXXII, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
> May I ask out of curiosity, what in FFmpeg actually uses libpostproc
> other than than libavfilter/vf_pp.c? You said that you prefer to
> maintain libpostproc inside FFmpeg because that way you can apply the
> FFmpeg test system on it.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:13:48AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
[..]
> May I ask out of curiosity, what in FFmpeg actually uses libpostproc
> other than than libavfilter/vf_pp.c? You said that you prefer to
> maintain libpostproc inside FFmpeg because that way you can apply the
> FFmpeg test syst
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>> On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> >>> At the end of the day, I need a source t
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >>> At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains
> >>> maintained sources of a stand-alone lib
L'octidi 18 fructidor, an CCXXII, wm4 a écrit :
> And in general, it's a good idea to move optional libraries out of
> ffmpeg.git. (In fact, ffmpeg.git should be split into several git
> repos, one for each lib.)
That is a terrible idea. We already have too many difficulties maintaining
binaries c
On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains
>>> maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much
>>> how it is created, as long as it doesn't re
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains
>> maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much
>> how it is created, as long as it doesn't result in code-duplication
>> with existing sources in De
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:42:00PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi Reinhard
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:23 AM, wm4 wrote:
> And in general, it's a good idea to move optional libraries out of
> ffmpeg.git. (In fact, ffmpeg.git should be split into several git
> repos, one for each lib.)
That idea seems very interesting to me. If coordinated and implemented
well, it could p
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi Reinhard
>
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 3,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:23:12PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:30:14 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400
> > > Reinhard Tartler wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Iam not saying iam against it, jus
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:30:14 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400
> > Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:2
On 9/4/2014 4:33 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> So the promise given in
> https://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-devel/2012-February/020712.html
> doesn't hold anymore?
>
> Any chance to make you reconsider reviving the standalone libpostproc.git?
Guilty party here.
I kinda just neglected it bec
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400
> Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM,
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06
Hi Reinhard
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Se
On 04.09.2014, at 05:33, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Th
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> as discussed in
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port
> >> libpostproc (the
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port
>> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not
>> test it (for lack of a stand-al
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port
> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not
> test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at
> least I got it to build.
>
> As r
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port
> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not
> test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at
> least I got it to build.
you coul
Hi,
as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port
libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not
test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at
least I got it to build.
As requested, the patch I used is attached. It’s not optimal
as the arch could use th
24 matches
Mail list logo
