This is a bit OT but most of the folks here are probably familiar with
MPV...
Regarding ffprobe & MPV's File, Video, and Audio properties (keyboard
'Shift I'),
If ffprobe shows
'23.98 fps, 23.98 tbr' and
MPV shows
'FPS: 23.976 (specified) 23.976 (estimated)'
(i.e., ffprobe & MPV agree),
I
, but I've successfully changed the names of '.mkv'
audio & subtitle streams with a tool named MKVToolNix.
HTH,
Mark Filipak.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit
Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.windows+ffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not getting my own posts. No one is responding. I think no one is
getting them.
Please, if you see this, respond so that I know my messages are being seen.
Thanks.
___
ffmpeg-user m
On 12/15/2019 02:38 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 15. Dez. 2019 um 16:50 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
-snip-
Thanks, Carl. I'm going to respond first to the most global
architectural issue (as I'm able to recognize issues and discriminate
between them).
FFmpeg (and digital transcoders
On 12/15/2019 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.12.19 um 20:35 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 15.12.19 um 20:01 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Also, if some one replies both to the list and to you directly, you
only get the direct copy, because it arrives faster than the list
copy, which it considers a
I'm not getting my own posts. No one is responding. I think no one is
getting them.
Please, if you see this, respond so that I know my messages are being seen.
Thanks.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Thanks Wayne & John. I guess I only have to find out why I'm not getting
them even though I set up the list server to echo my own posts. Then I
have to figure out why no one responds to my questions. Ah, well...
On 12/15/2019 11:50 AM, Enrico Vittorini wrote:
Hello Gents,
i would need an
On 12/15/2019 01:43 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/12/2019 17.44, Mark Filipak wrote:
I'm not getting my own posts. No one is responding. I think no one
is getting them.
Please, if you see this, respond so that I know my messages are
being seen
I run this command:
ffmpeg -ss 30.0 -i %1 -hide_banner -filter:v idet -frames:v 900 -an -f
rawvideo -y NUL
to gather data on multimedia source files (passed in via %1).
I've run it against a wide mix -- close to a hundred -- sources:
- 24 FPS,
- 25 FPS,
- soft telecined,
- hard telecined, and
On 12/15/2019 02:38 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 15. Dez. 2019 um 16:50 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I run this command:
ffmpeg -ss 30.0 -i %1 -hide_banner -filter:v idet -frames:v 900 -an -f
rawvideo -y NUL
to gather data on multimedia source files (passed in via %1).
When asking
On 12/16/2019 05:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 09:03 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
- Vintage "PAL" Cinematic Source -- Purely 24 FPS content (no VBR) in an
25 FPS container (that plays at 25 Hz with 4% speedup).
Just search for a a pal vob file of a movie.
I
On 12/15/2019 06:58 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 15. Dez. 2019 um 22:20 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 12/15/2019 02:38 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 15. Dez. 2019 um 16:50 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
FFmpeg (and digital transcoders in general) doesn't know about fields,
it can
On 12/16/2019 05:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 09:03 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
I knew that ffmpeg encoders output solely frames, but I assumed that,
I may misunderstand but this is at least misleading, could be considered
wrong.
when an interlaced container
On 12/16/2019 06:06 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 12:05 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 12/16/2019 05:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 09:03 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
- Vintage "PAL" Cinematic Source -- Purely 24 FPS content (no VBR) in
In this ffmpeg output listing:
Stream #0:1[0x1e0]: Video: mpeg2video (Main), yuv420p(tv, top first),
720x480 [SAR 32:27 DAR 16:9], Closed Captions, 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 90k
tbn, 59.94 tbc
what does "tbr", "tbn", and "tbc" mean?
I've searched the documentation but have not found Joy.
ffmpeg related (I hope)...
The Problem.
Traditional notation (example: 2-3 pull-down telecine) denotes sets of 4
film frames & 8 fields thus:
...frames... fields.
[1][2][3][4] --> [1][2][2][3][4]
[1][2][3][4][4]
Better, including time sequence, would be:
Oops: "10 fields" was "8 fields".
ffmpeg related (I hope)...
The Problem.
Traditional notation (example: 2-3 pull-down telecine) denotes sets of 4
film frames & 10 fields thus:
...frames... fields.
[1][2][3][4] --> [1][2][2][3][4]
[1][2][3][4][4]
Better,
On 10/29/2019 09:15 PM, Mike M wrote:
Greetings all from Australia.
A new member here.
I want to use ffmpeg to clean up PVR files which have frame errors.
The are in the format: *NAME.TSV* (mpeg-ts)
The command for ffmpeg is:
*ffmpeg -i "NAME.TSV" -c copy "NAME.TSV_"*
Now, I want to run this
Oops. Sent too soon. Had an extra '\'.
What I do, Mike, is simpler. I add the ffmpeg command to the 'Send to'
context menu. To do that, all you need is to put the line
D:\Videos\_APPS\fmpeg-421\bin\ffmpeg.exe -i "%1" -c copy "%1_"
into a batch file, and put the batch file in
On 02/25/2020 03:48 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
Mark Filipak (12020-02-24):
Since the concat protocol basically works
No, it doesn't. Not for that:
Thank you, Nicolas,
It does work. I'm watching it via MPV right now. The full line is:
ffmpeg -i
"concat:i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_1.
On 02/24/2020 06:16 PM, Lou Logan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 8:28 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Just now, after clicking it dozens of times and after several hours, I
clicked the "Resend Email" button and promptly received the confirmation
email. I guess I'm now registered.
Thanks,
The concat protocol command at the end of this message works, but with
limits. Since the concat protocol basically works, it seems logical to
me to simply expand its capability. To that end, I now have 3 objectives.
Objective 1: Expand it to include all 4 audio streams, not just the
first 5.1
: Mark Filipak ',
whereas for 'markfilipak.windows+ffmpeg', my 'From' address is not spoofed:
'From: Mark Filipak '.
I didn't think about it before, but perhaps the spoofing is the reason
'markfilipak.mozilla' is echoed back, eh?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
On 02/24/2020 04:28 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 02/24/2020 06:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
> :
>
>> If I understand correctly, you th
On 02/28/2020 07:10 PM, Lou Logan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Is there some way I can fund development? Is there some way I can fund
support? Perhaps as a subscription? (And, Yes, I'm aware of the "Donate"
options.)
PayPal is listed on the D
On 02/28/2020 08:00 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I would think that Liberapay would be ideal for ffmpeg. I've sent an
email to Liberpay requesting their contributor-disclosure policies.
The founder of Liberapay contacted me. "Donations are always anonymous
on Liberapay."
On 03/01/2020 04:37 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote> FFmpeg is not for you.
Who is it for?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
On 03/01/2020 04:53 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 01.03.2020 um 10:42 schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 03/01/2020 04:37 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote> FFmpeg is not for you.
Who is it for?
(Your quoting looks off)
Ha ha. It's my email client that's a little bit off.
It is - sa
On 03/01/2020 05:39 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 01.03.2020 um 11:30 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Then please test the following (assuming your input is actually
telecined, if it is not the command is slow and makes little sense.
Remember that soft-telecined is progressive and not telecined from
On 03/01/2020 06:24 AM, Christian David wrote:
Em dom., 1 de mar. de 2020 às 06:45, Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.windows+ffm...@gmail.com> escreveu:
On 03/01/2020 04:29 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 01.03.2020 um 07:47 schrieb Christian David
:
Hi everyone, i was reading abou
On 03/01/2020 08:30 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:>
Why are you spreading FUD here?
FUD? Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or
On 03/01/2020 03:55 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/1/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
I have been looking for months, on and off. Is there any place that
shows how to form a working ffmpeg command line? I'm trying to figure
out how to use a fieldmatch filter.
There is clear documentation explanation
On 03/01/2020 04:27 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 01.03.2020 um 08:12 schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I have been looking for months, on and off. Is there any place that shows how
to form a working ffmpeg command line? I'm trying to figure out how to use a
fieldmatch filter.
It’s a good idea
On 03/01/2020 05:42 AM, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
I think your intervention would have been more efficient if you had
chosen to make it in direct response to one of these rude behaviors.
I have tried to do this. I have been trying to do this for years. It doesn't
work; overtures
On 03/01/2020 04:48 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 01.03.2020 um 10:38 schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 03/01/2020 04:27 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 01.03.2020 um 08:12 schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I have been looking for months, on and off. Is there any place that shows how
to form a working ffmpeg
On 03/01/2020 04:29 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 01.03.2020 um 07:47 schrieb Christian David :
Hi everyone, i was reading about FPGA solutions against traditional
solutions with GPUs (Nvidia at most times) for live video transcoding..
I was under the impression that all GPU encoding happens
I have been looking for months, on and off. Is there any place that
shows how to form a working ffmpeg command line? I'm trying to figure
out how to use a fieldmatch filter.
Thanks,
Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
. Some you direct at each other, but some you direct at
newcomers. I received some when I first attempted to contribute to
ffmpeg. I have seen some on the ffmpeg-users and ffmpeg-dev lists.
Case in point: On 2020-02-29 17:27, the very perceptive Mark Filipak wrote:
> I would like to don
On 02/29/2020 07:37 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 09:54:30 -0900, Lou Logan wrote:
Donation of your time is more appreciated than funds...
...there are people who have wishes, but cannot contribute themselves...
I would like to donate documentation work, but there's
What argument(s) does 'ashowinfo' take?
>ffprobe -ashowinfo -i g:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.VOB
ffprobe version N-94664-g0821bc4eee Copyright (c) 2007-2019 the FFmpeg
developers
built with gcc 9.1.1 (GCC) 20190807
configuration: --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --enable-sdl2
--enable-fontconfig
On 03/01/2020 06:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 2. März 2020 um 00:12 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
What argument(s) does 'ashowinfo' take?
No arguments, see:
$ ffmpeg -help filter=ashowinfo
>ffprobe -ashowinfo -i g:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.VOB
ffprobe doesn't know about filters.
C
On 03/01/2020 11:01 PM, Ted Park wrote:
Hi,
So codec engineering companies like NGCodec, MainConcept, Beamr and MulticoreWare
turn open source-based, ffmpeg workflows into FPGAs that, when mature firmware
implementations, chip companies like Intel & NVIDIA turn into real hardware:
masked
I'm not sure I'm hijacking this thread. The subject is actually quite
related.
Welcome to The Matrix. I had no idea.
So codec engineering companies like NGCodec, MainConcept, Beamr and
MulticoreWare turn open source-based, ffmpeg workflows into FPGAs that,
when mature firmware
On 03/04/2020 05:52 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Hi,
is there any known workaround for making a red-shift or a blue-shift? I
mean shifting the visible spectrum towards red or blue. In the middle of
the spectrum this can be realized by the "hue" filter, but at the end of
the spectrum I want a
On 03/04/2020 06:42 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 05:34 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 04:57 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Is this a showinfo bug, or am I misinterpreting the results
I thought further and decided to redo my FPGA presentation with better
analogies. I hope you enjoy it.
Starting with the basics: Logic gates come in 2 flavors: AND and OR; and
it's from them, alone, that all other digital elements are made.
FSMs (finite state machines) are complex
On 03/04/2020 07:05 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 04.03.2020 um 12:44 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 03/04/2020 05:52 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Hi,
is there any known workaround for making a red-shift or a blue-shift?
I mean shifting the visible spectrum towards red or blue. In the
middle
On 03/04/2020 06:51 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 06:42 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 05:34 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 04:57 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark
On 03/04/2020 05:02 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Not 100% correct
On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Not 100% correct.
Which part? (And does it need to be, anyway? Analogies often aren't but
still get the points across.)
CPU and GPU...
Hi, and thanks for the criticism,
I
On 03/04/2020 05:12 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 05:02 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Carl
On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Not 100% correct.
Which part? (And does it need to be, anyway? Analogies often aren't but
still
On 03/04/2020 05:34 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/04/2020 04:57 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Is this a showinfo bug, or am I misinterpreting the results?
For VOBs that are known to be 23.976 FPS, soft-telecined, this command
On 03/04/2020 05:52 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Hi,
is there any known workaround for making a red-shift or a blue-shift? I
mean shifting the visible spectrum towards red or blue. In the middle of
the spectrum this can be realized by the "hue" filter, but at the end of
the spectrum I want a
On 03/04/2020 06:06 AM, James Darnley wrote:
On 2020-03-04 01:02, Mark Filipak wrote:
Kindly disregard the last message. I don't know how 'metadata' got left
out of the command line...
To me, metadata is such MPEG settings as 'progressive_sequence',
'top_field_first', 'frame_pred_frame_dct
On 03/02/2020 07:24 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 04:57:23 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
I used to work at Intel as a product line architect. I sat on 3
divisional planning councils, including graphics processors, and
co-chaired one.
[OT, sorry]
OT, eh? Just like
On 03/02/2020 03:56 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 2. März 2020 um 03:48 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
So codec engineering companies like NGCodec, MainConcept, Beamr and
MulticoreWare turn open source-based, ffmpeg workflows into FPGAs that,
when mature firmware implementations, chip
On 03/02/2020 05:12 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 2. März 2020 um 10:57 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I used to work at Intel as a product line architect. I sat on 3
divisional planning councils, including graphics processors, and
co-chaired one. Later, I represented Wyse Technology
On 03/01/2020 06:47 PM, Dan Bridges wrote:
On 2/03/2020 9:12 am, Mark Filipak wrote:
ffprobe -ashowinfo -i g:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.VOB
According to
https://hhsprings.bitbucket.io/docs/programming/examples/ffmpeg/audio_visualization/ashowinfo.html
I used this format for showinfo and ashowinfo
On 03/02/2020 09:35 AM, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 02-03-2020 06:24 pm, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 03/01/2020 06:47 PM, Dan Bridges wrote:
On 2/03/2020 9:12 am, Mark Filipak wrote:
This:
C:\CMD & tiny apps\ffmpeg >ffprobe -f lavfi
amovie=G:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.VOB,ashowinfo
--note current
On 03/02/2020 11:14 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 2. März 2020 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
That is not what I meant. What I'm getting at is that it appears that
the latest streaming protocols & methods are being developed via ffmpeg,
then being tested-debugged-retested-etc.
Is this a showinfo bug, or am I misinterpreting the results?
For VOBs that are known to be 23.976 FPS, soft-telecined, this command:
'ffprobe -f lavfi movie=VTS_01_1.VOB,showinfo'
reports that they're 59.94 FPS.
The first & last lines of output show this:
"[Parsed_showinfo_1 @ 01d381f6dc80]
Kindly disregard the last message. I don't know how 'metadata' got left
out of the command line...
To me, metadata is such MPEG settings as 'progressive_sequence',
'top_field_first', 'frame_pred_frame_dct', 'concealment_motion_vectors',
'q_scale_type',
'intra_vlc_format', 'alternate_scan',
On 03/04/2020 04:57 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Is this a showinfo bug, or am I misinterpreting the results?
For VOBs that are known to be 23.976 FPS, soft-telecined, this command:
'ffprobe -f lavfi movie=VTS_01_1.VOB,showinfo'
reports that they're 59.94 FPS
On 02/24/2020 07:29 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
The concat protocol command at the end of this message works, but with
limits. Since the concat protocol basically works, it seems logical to
me to simply expand its capability. To that end, I now have 3 objectives.
Objective 1: Expand it to include
On 02/24/2020 11:59 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 2/24/2020 4:29 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Regarding Objective 3: Though a subtitle stream is not reported, the 5
concatenated sources do have subtitles. However, I think I have to get
a matroska container working before attempting to include
On 02/24/2020 06:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
If I understand correctly, you think I should do this:
copy /b
i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_1.VOB+i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_2.VOB+i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_3.VOB+i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_4.VOB+i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_5
On 02/24/2020 06:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
> :
>
>> If I understand correctly, you think I should do this:
>>
>> copy /b
>>
i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_1.VOB+i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_2.VOB+i:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02
On 02/23/2020 09:48 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 2/23/2020 5:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Past: I received echoes of my own posts.
Now: I do not receive echoes of my own posts.
Kind of surprised you were seeing them before, it's a known problem (in
the mailing list community) that goog will try
On 02/23/2020 11:47 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 2/23/2020 7:29 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
There are 3 reasons why that can't be correct and that the problem is
with the ffmpeg-user list server (probably configuration):
1, Other lists that use mailman work as intended (i.e., I get my own
posts
On 02/23/2020 09:23 PM, Lou Logan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 1:00 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Sorry for the interruption but I have no choice.
Can anyone contact the folks at trac.ffmpeg.org?
I'm trying to register, but I get no confirmation email -- I've tried 4
times. There's no way I can
On 02/24/2020 05:50 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 01:45 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 02/23/2020 07:05 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 00:42 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
Here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Concatenate
I see this:
ffmpeg -i
I hope what the analogies below will help folks better understand the
technology we use.
Transistors are to logic gates as quarks are to electrons, protons, and
neutrons. Logic gates come in 2 flavors: AND and OR, and it's from them
alone that all other digital elements are made.
Logic
Or am I misinterpreting the results?
Regards,
Mark.
This command:
'ffprobe -f lavfi movie=VTS_01_1.VOB,showinfo'
claims that the VOBs (which definitely contain 24/1001 FPS,
soft-telecined video) are 59.94 FPS.
The first & last lines of output show this:
"[Parsed_showinfo_1 @
On 02/27/2020 06:02 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 27.02.2020 um 11:27 schrieb Mick Finn:... on
Paul Bourke's website: www.paulbourke.net/dome/
--> Paul
totally understood, I know that you are doing this in your free time,
and we all have the same problem that money must come from somewhere.
On 01/26/2020 07:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
This all matters. It matters a lot. It creates confusion in users
and I can only imagine what it has done to ff libraries (and
how they have been patched to compensate for this bug
On 01/26/2020 08:26 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 02:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 08:08 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 22:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
(hard-telecine encoding and decoding is - of course - supported
by FFmpeg
On 01/26/2020 09:02 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 02:42 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
What I'd prefer is to encode the NTSC TV sections as 30i and encode
the movie clips as 24p.
Isn't that what happens if you do the following?
$ ffmpeg -i input out.mkv
(You may need
On 01/26/2020 08:04 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 07:32 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 07:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um
On 01/26/2020 03:51 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 21:50 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos
:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 21:19 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 03:03 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
For soft
On 01/26/2020 05:28 PM, Ted Park wrote:
Assumptions:
1, ffprobe's 'interlaced_frame' is the inverse of MPEG2's 'progressive_frame',
and
2, ffprobe's 'repeat_pict' is identical to MPEG2's 'repeat_first_field', and
3, ffprobe's quirks are also ffmpeg's quirks, so this problem applies also to
On 01/26/2020 07:32 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 07:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
This all matters. It matters a lot. It creates confusion in users
and I can
On 01/26/2020 04:46 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 22:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
ffmpeg makes only frame pictures, not field pictures. Hard telecine
is an interlaced format and ffmpeg doesn't make interlaced output.
field encoding is not the only way producing
On 01/26/2020 07:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
This all matters. It matters a lot. It creates confusion in users
and I can only imagine what it has done to ff libraries (and
how they have been patched to compensate for this bug
On 01/26/2020 08:08 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 22:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
(hard-telecine encoding and decoding is - of course - supported
by FFmpeg)
No, it's not. ffmpeg makes only frame pictures, not field pictures. Hard
telecine is an interlaced format
On 01/26/2020 03:50 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 21:19 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 03:03 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
For soft telecined videos, all frames have
'progressive_frame' = 1
I may miss
On 01/26/2020 07:32 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 07:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 01:21 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
This all matters. It matters a lot. It creates confusion in users
and I can
On 01/26/2020 04:04 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 22:00 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 03:50 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 21:19 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 01/26/2020 03:03 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 20:51
e:
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
For soft telecined videos, all frames have
'progressive_frame' = 1
I may miss something but since FFmpeg does not "support" soft-telecine
why should there be an interlaced frame?
Yes, ffmpeg does not make soft telecined st
For soft telecined videos, all frames have
'progressive_frame' = 1
(source: T-REC-H.262-201202-I, confirmed via VOBEdit).
However, the frames that ffprobe marks 'repeat_pict' = 0 have
'interlaced_frame' = 1.
Assumptions:
1, ffprobe's 'interlaced_frame' is the inverse of MPEG2's
On 01/27/2020 05:14 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 05:07 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I'm using HandBrake.
At some point you will have to decide if you need support for using
HandBrake or support for using FFmpeg.
My postings and my questions have been entirely about
On 01/27/2020 05:59 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020, 11:07 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.windows+ffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, whenever I transcode from h262 source to h265 target I invariably
get a reduction of almost 50%. So, why not go with h265? What modern
I'm sorry I have to ask such a basic question. I use VOBEdit to examine
VOBs, but it is not batch and it will not dump an entire 'VTS_xx_x.VOB'
file and it doesn't allow for selective metadata sampling.
Is there anything in ffmpeg or ffprobe that will, for every frame in a
single VOB (or
On 02/05/2020 09:37 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
Hi, Moritz, and Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 23:17:28 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
This:
>ffmpeg -ss 2:00 -i g:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_2.VOB -filter:v idet -frames:v
900 -an -f rawvideo -y NUL
produces the listing at the bottom -- it is that list
On 02/05/2020 08:12 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
Hi, Moritz, and Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 16:58:07 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
Is there anything in ffmpeg or ffprobe that will, for every frame in a
single VOB (or preferably, all VOBs in an entire TS:
'VTS_xx_1.VOB'+'VTS_xx_2.VOB
On 02/05/2020 08:12 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
Hi, Moritz, and Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 16:58:07 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
Is there anything in ffmpeg or ffprobe that will, for every frame in a
single VOB (or preferably, all VOBs in an entire TS:
'VTS_xx_1.VOB'+'VTS_xx_2.VOB
On 02/05/2020 08:12 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
Hi, Moritz, and Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 16:58:07 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
Is there anything in ffmpeg or ffprobe that will, for every frame in a
single VOB (or preferably, all VOBs in an entire TS:
'VTS_xx_1.VOB'+'VTS_xx_2.VOB
The command line below creates 'foo.txt' but the file is empty (i.e.,
zero length).
Any clues why?
Thanks,
Mark
C:\CMD & tiny apps\ffmpeg>ffmpeg -i G:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_02_2.VOB -vf
metadata=mode=print:file=foo.txt -f rawvideo -y NUL
ffmpeg version N-94664-g0821bc4eee Copyright (c) 2000-2019
On 02/06/2020 03:35 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 2/6/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
The command line below creates 'foo.txt' but the file is empty (i.e.,
zero length).
Any clues why?
Because your file does not have any _frame_ metadata.
What am I missing here? The file is VTS_02_2.VOB. It contains
On 02/06/2020 06:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 2/6/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 02/06/2020 03:35 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 2/6/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
The command line below creates 'foo.txt' but the file is empty (i.e.,
zero length).
Any clues why?
Because your file does not have any
1 - 100 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
