threads here, and I'm sorry about that. The 55-telecine works so well with short
videos and it fails with full length movies, all full length movies, and in the same places, and in
the same ways.
On 04/24/2020 09:56 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/24/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/24/2020 09:46 AM
On 04/24/2020 05:10 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Hello,
I've been told that, for soft telecined video
|<--1/6s-->|
[A/a__][B/b__][C/c__][D/d__] source
the decoder is fully compliant and therefore outputs
On 04/24/2020 09:56 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/24/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/24/2020 09:46 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/24/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/24/2020 05:01 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
What's going wrong with my
On 04/24/2020 09:46 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/24/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/24/2020 05:01 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
What's going wrong with my remux?
I believe that you have already been told that you cannot generally
On 04/24/2020 05:01 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
What's going wrong with my remux?
I believe that you have already been told that you cannot generally
concatenate vob files as you did, use mplayer -dumpstream.
I downloaded mplayer
On 04/24/2020 05:42 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/24/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/24/2020 05:01 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
What's going wrong with my remux?
I believe that you have already been told that you cannot generally
On 04/24/2020 05:01 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
What's going wrong with my remux?
I believe that you have already been told that you cannot generally
concatenate vob files as you did, use mplayer -dumpstream.
Carl Eugen
Okay. What
Hello,
I've been told that, for soft telecined video
|<--1/6s-->|
[A/a__][B/b__][C/c__][D/d__] source
the decoder is fully compliant and therefore outputs 30fps
What's going wrong with my remux? '-dn' tells ffmpeg to ignore data (stream 0, i.e., nav packets)
yet I get "Timestamps are unset in a packet for stream 0".
Thanks,
Mark.
ffmpeg -i "concat:VTS_01_1.VOB|VTS_01_2.VOB|VTS_01_3.VOB|VTS_01_4.VOB|VTS_01_5.VOB|VTS_01_6.VOB"
-map 0 -codec:v copy
On 04/22/2020 10:59 AM, John Riselvato wrote:
After receiving feedback from this email forum and Reddit. I've decided to
remove the book from Amazon and will rebrand it as a beginner's guide. I
never meant to be disingenuous and it seems calling it a *bible* has pissed
off a lot of people...
On 04/21/2020 04:40 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/21/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
doG bless you, Jim.
Not again.
Well, may doG bless you also, Paul.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Hi, Michael,
On 04/21/2020 02:16 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 21.04.2020 um 01:39 schrieb Mark Filipak:
To submit a trac ticket on the 'pp' filter, I need a p24 video that's over 10 minutes, I need to
test using that video, and then upload the file and update the ticket to 'reopen'.
It has
On 04/21/2020 02:12 AM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2020-04-20 22:55, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 21.04.2020 um 04:09 schrieb Mark Filipak:
I've seen where some use the term "keyframe" but I've never seen a definition.…
I think this is correct, see also here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Hey, Michael,
On 04/21/2020 01:55 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 21.04.2020 um 04:09 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Hey,
I have a question for you knowledgeable folks.
I've seen where some use the term "keyframe" but I've never seen a definition. It's not terribly
important, but here goes
Hey,
I have a question for you knowledgeable folks.
I've seen where some use the term "keyframe" but I've never seen a definition. It's not terribly
important, but here goes...
I've assumed -- you know how good I am at that! -- that a keyframe is the I-frame that's at the
beginning of a
On 04/20/2020 07:47 PM, Simon Brown wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 00:40, Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.windows+ffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
To submit a trac ticket on the 'pp' filter, I need a p24 video that's over
10 minutes, I need to
test using that video, and then upload the file and
To submit a trac ticket on the 'pp' filter, I need a p24 video that's over 10 minutes, I need to
test using that video, and then upload the file and update the ticket to 'reopen'.
It has to be non-copyrighted material.
Any ideas?
___
ffmpeg-user
Hi, Adam,
On 04/20/2020 10:28 AM, adam smith via ffmpeg-user wrote:
Hi you lovely people,
I am trying to output a sequence of jpeg images from a video file. The command
does indeed output a sequence of images, but the first and second are always
duplicates, while the rest run in sequence
Hi, Ted,
On 04/20/2020 06:20 AM, Edward Park wrote:
Hey,
I don't understand what you mean by "recursively".
Haven't you heard? There's no recursion. There's no problem. The 'blend' filter
just has some fun undocumented features. Hours and hours, days and days of fun.
So much fun I just
Hi Michael,
On 04/19/2020 03:31 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 19.04.2020 um 20:44 schrieb Mark Filipak:
I'm hooking into this to reply in order to get the message below into the
thread.
But first, I'd like to say that I had no idea this would be controversial. I asked whether ffmpeg
traversed
I'm hooking into this to reply in order to get the message below into the
thread.
But first, I'd like to say that I had no idea this would be controversial. I asked whether ffmpeg
traversed filter complexes recursively because that was not happening. Apparently it does recurse,
but only if
On 04/19/2020 12:31 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 19. Apr. 2020 um 18:11 Uhr schrieb pdr0 :
In his specific situation, he has a single combed frame. What he chooses for
yadif (or any deinterlacer) results in a different result - both wrong - for
his case.
If the selects "top" he gets
Upon rereading this thread, I see an error early on. I correct it, below.
On 04/19/2020 02:56 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak wrote
I would love to use motion compensation but I can't, at least not with
ffmpeg. Now, if there was
such a thing as smart telecine...
A A A+B B B -- input
A A B B
pdr0,
I think you're a champ.
I can tell you're academic. Well, in addition to engineering for 25 years, I also taught: For 3-1/2
years in the U.S. Air Force. and for 1/2 year at a university.
Give the students one good example. That's all it generally takes. Then, when they run into a
On 04/19/2020 02:56 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak wrote
I would love to use motion compensation but I can't, at least not with
ffmpeg. Now, if there was
such a thing as smart telecine...
A A A+B B B -- input
A A B B -- pass 4 frames directly to output
A A+B B -- pass 3 frames
On 04/19/2020 02:08 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak wrote
My experience is that regarding "decombing" frames 2 7 12 17 ...,
'pp=linblenddeint' (whatever it is) does a better job than 'yadif'.
"lb/linblenddeint
"Linear blend deinterlacing filter that deinterlaces the given bl
On 04/19/2020 12:26 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak wrote
Deinterlacing does not necessarily have to be used in the context of
"telecast". e.g. a consumer camcorder recording home video interlaced
content is technically not "telecast". Telecast implies "broadcast on
te
On 04/18/2020 10:36 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 19. Apr. 2020 um 04:12 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
On 04/18/2020 10:02 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 19. Apr. 2020 um 03:43 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
My experience is that regarding "decombing" frames 2 7 12 1
Hello,
I've done a 55-telecine and got errors. I don't really know, but they appear to be related to the
input, not the 55-telecine.
Some samples follow, and the full log is attached as a zip due to its size.
The command line was:
ffmpeg -report -ss 2:58 -analyzeduration 50
Oops. "(n+1)%5=3" should have been "(n+1)%5==3".
"On 04/18/2020 10:02 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 19. Apr. 2020 um 03:43 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
My experience is that regarding "decombing" frames 2 7 12 17 ...,
'pp=linblenddeint' (whatever i
On 04/18/2020 10:02 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am So., 19. Apr. 2020 um 03:43 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
My experience is that regarding "decombing" frames 2 7 12 17 ...,
'pp=linblenddeint' (whatever it is) does a better job than 'yadif'.
(Funny that while I always strongly disa
On 04/18/2020 08:44 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 21:32 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
Regarding deinterlace, Carl Eugen, I'm not trying to deinterlace.
pp=linblenddeint is a (very simple) deinterlacer, once upon a
time it was the preferred deinterlacer for some users
On 04/18/2020 07:16 PM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak wrote
Deinterlacing is conversion of the i30-telecast (or i25-telecast) to p30
(or p25) and, optionally,
smoothing the resulting p30 (or p25) frames.
That is the description for single rate deinterlacing. But that is not what
a flat panel TV
On 04/18/2020 05:35 PM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2020-04-18 13:06, Mark Filipak wrote:
Forgive me if this subject seems pedantic to you. I think it's important and the source of a lot
of misunderstanding.
As always, correct me if I'm wrong.
According to the MPEG spec, interlace relates
On 04/18/2020 06:30 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 02:07 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
Never mind. MPV was able to tell me that the pcm_bluray is big endian.
While this is technically true, note that it has absolutely no relevance
for users of FFmpeg (including library
Forgive me if this subject seems pedantic to you. I think it's important and the source of a lot of
misunderstanding.
As always, correct me if I'm wrong.
According to the MPEG spec, interlace relates to fields that are temporally offset by 1/60th second
(NTSC) or 1/50th second (PAL) that
On 04/18/2020 01:01 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 00:53 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I'm not using the 46 telecine anymore because you introduced me to
'pp=linblenddeint'
-- thanks again! -- which allowed me to decomb via the 55 telecine.
Why do you think that pp
Sorry, the previous post got sent accidentally by my email program. Kindly
ignore it.
On 04/18/2020 01:01 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 00:53 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I'm not using the 46 telecine anymore because you introduced me to
'pp=linblenddeint'
-- thanks
Never mind. MPV was able to tell me that the pcm_bluray is big endian.
Cheers,
Mark.
On 04/17/2020 07:50 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 01:42 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I know that PCM was never used for DVDs
DVDs with PCM audio exist.
Cool! I've never seen one
On 04/17/2020 07:50 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 01:42 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I know that PCM was never used for DVDs
DVDs with PCM audio exist.
Cool! I've never seen one but, cool. What flavor of PCM? BE or LE
On 04/17/2020 06:51 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 18:13:22 -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
[matroska @ 028fabd7b040] No wav codec tag found for codec pcm_bluray
Does this means I did something wrong (would be the first time in ...about the
last 2 minutes), or
MKV doesn't
On 04/17/2020 06:51 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 18:13:22 -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
[matroska @ 028fabd7b040] No wav codec tag found for codec pcm_bluray
Does this means I did something wrong (would be the first time in ...about the
last 2 minutes), or
MKV doesn't
On 04/17/2020 06:19 PM, pdr0 wrote:
Paul B Mahol wrote
Interleave filter use frame pts/timestamps for picking frames.
I think Paul is correct.
@Mark -
Everything in filter chain works as expected, except interleave in this case
The only problem I have with 'interleave' is that it doesn't
[matroska @ 028fabd7b040] No wav codec tag found for codec pcm_bluray
Does this means I did something wrong (would be the first time in ...about the last 2 minutes), or
MKV doesn't support LPCM, or sumtinelse?
D.A..S pcm_bluray PCM signed 16|20|24-bit big-endian for Blu-ray
On 04/17/2020 02:35 PM, Ted Park wrote:
Hi,
"split[A][B],[A]select='eq(mod((n+1)\,5)\,3)'[C],[B]datascope,null[D],interleave"
Though the [B][D] branch passes every frame that is presented at [B], datascope
does not appear for frames 2 7 12 17 etc.
That reveals that traversal of ffmpeg
On 04/17/2020 02:46 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Another cogent point:
Suppose I put 'datascope' before a filter that would pass the original frame
(say, based on a
color), but that the filter won't pass the 'scope' image (because it doesn't
contain that color). I
Another cogent point:
Suppose I put 'datascope' before a filter that would pass the original frame (say, based on a
color), but that the filter won't pass the 'scope' image (because it doesn't contain that color). I
haven't tried it, but I'll bet that the 'scope' image doesn't appear at all
Another revealing example:
"split[A][B],[A]select='eq(mod((n+1)\,5)\,3)'[C],[B]datascope,null[D],interleave"
Though the [B][D] branch passes every frame that is presented at [B], datascope does not appear for
frames 2 7 12 17 etc.
That reveals that traversal of ffmpeg filter complexes is not
For example,
In the select branch that contains
datascope=size=1920x1080:x=45:y=340:mode=color2,not(eq(mod((n+1)\,5)\,3))
datascope appears for frames 0 1 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 18 19 etc.
whereas in the select branch that contains
On 04/17/2020 11:23 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
datascope appears if you switch order of interleave pads, or use
hstack/vstack filter instead of interleave filter.
Thank you, but I've had no difficulty using datascope. It does not appear in the output video if no
frames flow through it.
I reran the tests with these command lines:
SET FFREPORT=file=FOO-GH.LOG:level=32
ffmpeg -i %1 -filter_complex
On 04/17/2020 08:35 AM, Mick Finn wrote:
They wouldn’t; but it seems appropriate to return sine of the profits for a how
to book gleaned from this newsletter and free publications by ffmpeg developers
to the people/organization who maintain ffmpeg - just a suggestion
Everyone needs to make
On 04/17/2020 06:34 AM, Monex wrote:
On 17/04/2020 11:52, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/17/2020 05:48 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/17/2020 05:38 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/17/2020 05:03 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip
Argh! I keep making mistakes. I'm working too quickly. You see, I had 2 differing versions: one
using 'telecine=pattern=5' and one using 'telecine=pattern=46'. They tried to do the same thing, but
by differing methods (differing filter graphs). It's really easy to get them mixed up.
Here is a
On 04/17/2020 03:56 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 17.04.2020 um 09:44 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 04/17/2020 02:41 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 17.04.2020 um 08:02 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Thanks to pdr0 -at- shaw.ca, My quest for the (nearly perfect) p24-to-p60
transcode has concluded.
But remaining
On 04/17/2020 03:56 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 17.04.2020 um 09:44 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 04/17/2020 02:41 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 17.04.2020 um 08:02 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Thanks to pdr0 -at- shaw.ca, My quest for the (nearly perfect) p24-to-p60
transcode has concluded
On 04/17/2020 05:48 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/17/2020 05:38 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/17/2020 05:03 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
That is not filter graph. It is your wrong interpretation of it.
I can not dechiper
On 04/17/2020 05:38 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/17/2020 05:03 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
That is not filter graph. It is your wrong interpretation of it.
I can not dechiper it at all, because your removed crucial info like ','
My filtergraph is slightly
On 04/17/2020 05:33 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 05:10:36 -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
I believe that ffmpeg doesn't have a DTS coder (output) -- only a DTS decoder
(input).
Please don't give advice based on beliefs, especially if they are wrong
and easy to prove wrong
On 04/17/2020 05:03 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
That is not filter graph. It is your wrong interpretation of it.
I can not dechiper it at all, because your removed crucial info like ','
My filtergraph is slightly abbreviated to keep within a 70 character line limit.
The important thing is
On 04/17/2020 05:13 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/17/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
-snip-
I believe that ffmpeg doesn't have a DTS coder (output) -- only a DTS
decoder (input).
You are wrong.
Oh, sorry. I'm just repeating what others have written. If it is wrong, I regret it. Good thing you
On 04/17/2020 04:33 AM, kaled wrote:
thank you both and thanks for the code Moritz
I tried the following
ffmpeg -i x.mkv -map 0:0 -map 0:2 -map 0:1 -map 0:3 -c:v copy -c:a:2 copy
-bsf:a:2 dca_core -c:a:1 copy -c:s copy output.mkv
and it converts the dts audio track to vorbis
I also did this
On 04/17/2020 04:25 AM, Ted Park wrote:
Hey,
What do you mean?
split[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))' [C]interleave
[B]split[D]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,2)'[F]blend[D]
[E]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)'[G]
I created the filtergraph by hand. I don't know what folks
Hey, Ted,
On 04/17/2020 03:52 AM, Ted Park wrote:
Hi,
What do you mean?
split[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))' [C]interleave
[B]split[D]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,2)'[F]blend[D]
[E]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)'[G]
I created the filtergraph by hand. I don't know what
On 04/17/2020 02:39 AM, Mick Finn wrote:
Does any of the $30 for ebook make it back to ffmpeg development community?
Why would a member of the ffmpeg development community buy a book on ffmpeg?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
On 04/17/2020 02:41 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 17.04.2020 um 08:02 schrieb Mark Filipak:
Thanks to pdr0 -at- shaw.ca, My quest for the (nearly perfect) p24-to-p60
transcode has concluded.
But remaining is an ffmpeg behavior that seems (to me) to be key to understanding ffmpeg
architecture
Thanks to pdr0 -at- shaw.ca, My quest for the (nearly perfect) p24-to-p60
transcode has concluded.
But remaining is an ffmpeg behavior that seems (to me) to be key to understanding ffmpeg
architecture, to wit: The characteristics of frame traversal through a filter chain.
From a prior topic:
Hey, Ted,
On 04/16/2020 12:11 PM, Ted Park wrote:
Huh, I didn't know you could reuse filter pad labels.
What do you mean?
split[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))' [C]interleave
[B]split[D]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,2)'[F]blend[D]
[E]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)'[G]
I
On 04/16/2020 12:20 PM, pdr0 wrote:
This doesn't answer the question in this thread directly; but was the idea
still to blend deinterlace the combed frame from telecine selectively ?
Yes! (I'm like a terrier with a sock, aren't I? -- mind your feet, Paul. ;-)
If the problem is getting the
To overcome a problem, I'm trying to understand the propagation of frames in a
filter complex.
Filter graph:
split[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))' [C]interleave
[B]split[D]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,2)'[F]blend[D]
[E]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)'[G]
What I
Hello!
On 04/15/2020 07:13 PM, pdr0 wrote:
On 04/15/2020 00:25 AM, I wrote:
This:
ffmpeg -i IN -filter_complex
"telecine=pattern=5,split[A][B],[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))'[C],[B]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)',split[E][F],[E][F]blend[D],[C][D]interleave"
OUT
outputs 598 frames. 'blend'
On 04/15/2020 06:16 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/15/2020 05:38 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/15/2020 05:00 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/15/2020 04:25 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20
This:
ffmpeg -i IN -filter_complex
"telecine=pattern=5,split[A][B],[A]select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))'[C],[B]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)',split[E][F],[E][F]blend[D],[C][D]interleave"
OUT
outputs 598 frames
This:
ffmpeg -i IN -filter_complex
On 04/15/2020 05:38 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/15/2020 05:00 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/15/2020 04:25 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Request for bug confirmation is included.
Correction: I had
On 04/15/2020 05:00 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/15/2020 04:25 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Request for bug confirmation is included.
Correction: I had datascope in #2 just 1 time. I don't know how it got
into
the original post
On 04/15/2020 04:25 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/15/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Request for bug confirmation is included.
Correction: I had datascope in #2 just 1 time. I don't know how it got into
the original post twice.
Sorry. - M.
On 04/14/2020 10:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark
On 04/15/2020 03:40 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 18:46:27 -0700, Michael Glenn Williams wrote:
-snip-
ffplay doesn't support position coordinates, as far as I know. While it
is a good player, it is quite basic regarding some features. You may
want to choose a more
Request for bug confirmation is included.
Correction: I had datascope in #2 just 1 time. I don't know how it got into the original post twice.
Sorry. - M.
On 04/14/2020 10:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
In the command line below,
I
Request for bug confirmation is included.
On 04/14/2020 10:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
In the command line below,
I will eventually insert a screen maker --+
¦
separatefields,scale
On 04/14/2020 02:40 PM, Ted Park wrote:
Hi,
The filter is not in the version of ffmpeg you are using, you will need to get
a more recent version for it to be there. Try downloading a recent static build
from the website or try compiling it yourself. (It's not in any release version
as far as
In the command line below,
I will eventually insert a screen maker --+
¦
separatefields,scale=height=2*in_h:sws_flags=neighbor,--HERE--,tblend=normal[D]
but first, I need to persuade 'tblend' to accept the 2 frames made by
On 04/14/2020 06:43 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/14/2020 05:26 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/14/2020 04:23 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
Also, a method to zoom pixels in the output so I can
On 04/14/2020 05:26 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 04/14/2020 04:23 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
How do I combine two combed half-pictures so that the resulting picture
is screened?
Combed input frame:
1...
2...
Desired output
On 04/14/2020 04:23 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/14/20, Mark Filipak wrote:
How do I combine two combed half-pictures so that the resulting picture is
screened?
Combed input frame:
1...
2...
Desired output frame:
12121...
21212...
It occurs to me that I need to unweave the half
On 04/14/2020 01:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote> Am 13.04.20 um 22:52 schrieb Mark
Filipak:
Are you saying that if someone wants to run a program that has
dependencies that aren't accommodated by their version of Linux, they
have to install a different version of Linux to run it?
if you are
How do I combine two combed half-pictures so that the resulting picture is
screened?
Combed input frame:
1...
2...
Desired output frame:
12121...
21212...
It occurs to me that I need to unweave the half-pictures, line-double both, screen both via
pixel-sized screens that are offset
On 04/13/2020 09:08 AM, System Administrator wrote:
On 13/04/2020 12:04, Nicolas George wrote:
Mark Filipak (12020-04-13):
Thanks, Kieran. I've given up. I have faith that the person who calls
himself richardpl will never allow me to submit a valid ffmpeg trac ticket.
For those who might
offlist
Tips:
Ask questions. Don't make statements.
Make the questions short. If the issue is complex, ask many questions.
On 04/13/2020 11:49 AM, atticus via ffmpeg-user wrote:
I'm not quite sure if my previous message was sent (it doesn't appear on
ffmpeg-archive.org so I'll write this
On 04/13/2020 06:28 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.04.20 um 11:02 schrieb Mark Filipak:
I downloaded & installed the latest meson package and it flagged an
unsatisfied dependency: python3. So I downloaded & installed the latest
python3 and that trashed my system -- I can only think
On 04/13/2020 05:32 AM, Kieran O Leary wrote:
Hi Mark,
I usually just grab the latest build from Zeranoe, it's usually just a few
days old.
When I have to compile on windows, I use this for windows computers at work
because the update script is very handy when I want to upgrade a bunch of
On 04/13/2020 04:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.04.20 um 03:37 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 04/12/2020 09:02 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 13.04.2020 um 02:24 schrieb Mark Filipak
:
[Note 1] I'm pretty sure that a git project requires continuous
access to the Internet.
No, you can always
On 04/13/2020 04:11 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
Mark,
cross compiling FFmpeg for Windows is -- in my opinion -- very difficult. That's something for
people who have a lot of experience.
There is no binaries at ffmpeg.org.
https://ffmpeg.org/download.html links to
On 04/13/2020 12:27 AM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2020-04-12 18:37, Mark Filipak wrote:
-snip-
What happens if you move this repository to the machine which you want to keep free of an internet
connection, and attempt to build from source there?
I can't build, Jim. The build system, meson
On 04/12/2020 11:33 PM, ffmpeg-de...@talkvideo.net wrote:
A cross-compile targeting Windows.
I get it.
If the problem is with Synaptic, maybe their support forum can help.
Well, been there done that. Maybe sometime in 2022, probably never. I complained about it for years.
There have been
On 04/12/2020 11:00 PM, ffmpeg-de...@talkvideo.net wrote:
I apologize if I misread your situation.
If it is a Linux compile, I will cover that and post
a link to the video.
Perhaps I can save you some effort.
It's a Linux cross-compile targeting Windows. I'm stuck at this step:
On 04/12/2020 10:28 PM, ffmpeg-de...@talkvideo.net wrote:
Mark,
I know I can help you with this.
I have built FFMPEG zillions of times. Mostly on Slackware.
What was said above about clang and msvc is true, and probably best.
I think MSVC is Microsoft Visual C. I don't have it. I'm unsure
On 04/12/2020 09:02 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am 13.04.2020 um 02:24 schrieb Mark Filipak
:
[Note 1] I'm pretty sure that a git project requires continuous access to the
Internet.
No, you can always download current FFmpeg and move it wherever you need it:
http://ffmpeg.org/releases/ffmpeg
Preface:
This is a resubmittal of a prior request that provoked a shit-storm. Shit-storms discourage replies
from people who might otherwise reply. I have carefully outlined all my steps and have endeavored to
outline my rationales. Kindly trust that I have good reasons for cross-compiling. My
On 04/12/2020 08:01 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020 um 02:00 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
I really don't understand why you insist that I justify everything.
I am just a curious developer.
Curiousness is good; it's wonderful. Oh, how I wish I could write and understand
On 04/12/2020 07:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020 um 01:46 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
:
Sorry, but I will not connect Windows to the Internet. It's not safe. So, if
building on a Windows
box implies doing a 'git sync' implies connecting Windows to the Internet, it's
a non
601 - 700 of 944 matches
Mail list logo
