I don't know how "DTS" became "000". Sorry. It's 3AM and I'm a little punchy.
I found the problem. FFmpeg is corrupting the last B-frame at the end of cuts. It shows up during
subsequent concatenation. Why it's happening is unknown of course.
There is no workaround that I can conceive of.
--M
Gyan, Paul, Devin, Jim, anyone. Help!
You folks have been following my trim+concat adventure. I think I may have found the problem, not
just for me. It's a general problem.
"N" signifies one frame time. All times are relative to ptsA.
__DTS__ _PTS__
ptsA-2N ptsAI-frame with DTS-to-PTS=2
On 21/02/2024 05.20, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:12 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
Gyan, Paul, Devin, Jim, anyone. Help!
You folks have been following my trim+concat adventure. I think I may have
found the problem, not just for me. It's a general problem.
"N" sign
On 29/02/2024 12.19, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
The following command will show all key frames and they're time in the video.
ffprobe -loglevel error -skip_frame nokey -select_streams v:0 -show_entries frame=pts_time
sourcevideo.mkv
Hi, Ferdi,
Thank you for the tip. I checked it against what I'm
On 29/02/2024 17.40, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
Hi, Ferdi,
Thank you for the tip. I checked it against what I'm doing.
The 'pts_time's that it returns do not correlate with the exact times that are computed from frame
counts. For example, pts_time=760.607200 should be exactly 760.3[364635..] (bas
Hi All,
I'm taking a break from my "errors in trimming and concatenation" pursuits.
I've attached a single-page HTML about streams.
...this will eventually be FFmpeg documentation if possible, _not_ a book...
If you see anything wrong or questionable about it -- anything at all, no matter how
Well, the attachment, which was only 50kB, got stripped off. I'm trying again.
Hi All,
I'm taking a break from my "errors in trimming and concatenation" pursuits.
I've attached a single-page HTML about streams.
...this will eventually be FFmpeg documentation if possible, _not_ a book...
If y
Hi All,
I'm taking a break from my "errors in trimming and concatenation" pursuits.
Here is a single-page HTML about streams.
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/Streams.html
...this will eventually be FFmpeg documentation if possible, _not_ a book...
If you see anything wrong
I have a couple of things to look at.
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/Streams.html
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/GOP%20%26%20Frame%20Reordering.html
Comments are welcome. Please be brutal. 'Streams' is crucial.
I have little knowledge of transport strea
On 03/03/2024 18.33, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
Mark:
On 2024-03-02 19:51, Mark Filipak wrote:
I have a couple of things to look at.
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/Streams.html
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/GOP%20%26%20Frame%20Reordering.html
Comments are
On 04/03/2024 06.25, Rob Hallam wrote:
The visuals look good! Nice work. I don't want to detract from that, but:
Thank you, Rob. You're right about style inheritance but that's not the issue. Firefox doesn't scale
font-size linearly or consistently whereas other browsers do. You can see that b
I have new content for anyone interested in what I hope will be the future of
FFmpeg.
New
Six Element Objects & 12 Stream Objects
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/OFFmpeg.Six_Element_Objects_&_12_Stream_Objects.html
Streams
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation
I have new content for anyone interested in what I hope will be the future of
FFmpeg.
New
Stride-Match With Decombing Examples
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/OFFmpeg.Stride-Match_With_Decombing_Examples.html
Six Element Objects & 12 Stream Objects
https://markfilipak.githu
I have new content for anyone interested in what I hope will be the future of
FFmpeg.
New
Digital_Camera_'SAR'-v-Film_Scanner_SAR
https://markfilipak.github.io/Video-Object-Notation/OFFmpeg.Digital_Camera_'SAR'-v-Film_Scanner_SAR.html
Stride-Match With Decombing Examples
https://markfilipak.gi
I cut at the end of an open GOP. When I did that, FFmpeg did not set the MPEG
'broken_link' flag to '1'.
The frame following the cut has to be flagged:
'closed_gop' = '0' because it's an open GOP, also, and
'broken_link' = '1'.
How do I do that? I searched but did not find.
Thanks
--Mark.
___
Thank you, Mark.
On 25/03/2024 16.45, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 24/03/2024 15:48, Mark Filipak wrote:
I cut at the end of an open GOP. When I did that, FFmpeg did not set the MPEG 'broken_link' flag
to '1'.
The frame following the cut has to be flagged:
'closed_gop&#x
Dear Developers,
Thank you for adding 'pkt_dts' and 'pict_type' to '-show_frames'. Those will
make things easier.
Now, could you fix it?
'-show_frames' shows pts < dts.
frames.frame.133975.pts=503957216 <-+ These are actually 3 frames
frames.frame.133975.pkt_dts=503968477 <-+ apart in th
On 03/04/2024 04.05, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 6:10 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
Dear Developers,
Thank you for adding 'pkt_dts' and 'pict_type' to '-show_frames'. Those
will make things easier.
Now, could you fix it?
'-show_frames' s
Is there more to this? If there is, it's not evident to me.
If there are several B-frames in a row, then adjust your mind to 'see' larger shifts across the
multiple B-frames and adjust PTSs & DTSs to match.
Cutting off a leading open GOP:
<—closed GOP——
Does FFmpeg provide any way to write packet SCR (System Clock Reference) (i.e., at PS_PACKET_HEADER
+ 4 bytes)? I will need to rewrite SCRs for all ps packets via a math eval.
I searched but could not find.
Thanks,
--Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
Does anyone see what I'm doing wrong?
BEFORE.
0, 503945955, 503957216, 3753, 640646, 0x90f222e3
0, 503957216, 503964723, 3753, 125904, 0x3f60a4e2
0, 503960970, 503960970, 3753, 106426, 0xe5c85d36
0, 503964723, 503975985, 3753, 126806, 0x9c5d46c5
COMMAND to change
On 13/04/2024 17.27, Jim Worrall wrote:
On Apr 13, 2024, at 01:57, bbb wrote:
Sorry for bothering you. It only behaves like this when I use "-codec copy".
Without that option it accepts the exact time I've specified.
On 4/13/24 13:47, bbb wrote:
I want to cut off the start of a video. When
Hi All,
I'm still investigating why cuts & concats sometimes don't work. I've found that sometimes open GOPs
are physically in PTS order & sometimes in DTS order. I reckon that's part/all of the problem.
I have some questions.
Command #1:
ffmpeg -i y:\VIDEO_TS\VTS_03_2.VOB -map 0 -copyts -c c
DTSes & PTSes only exist in MPEG PESes for I-frames. So, where/how is FFmpeg getting the DTSes &
PTSes that it shows for B- & P-frames?
--Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsu
On 09/05/2024 06.07, Yann Cainjo wrote:
Hi Mark
Hey Yann
DTSes & PTSes only exist in MPEG PESes for I-frames
Where did you get this information ?
By parsing actual presentation streams. Start reading 24 lines down in this message. Note that email
will wrap long sentences but its easy t
Howdy,
Doesn't work:
ffmpeg -i c:\source.mp4 -map 0 -af abitscope -c:v libx265 -x265-params crf=18 -c:a ac3 -sn -dn
"c:\abitscope.mp4"
Doesn't work:
ffmpeg -i c:\source.mp4 -map 0 -vf abitscope -c:v libx265 -x265-params crf=18 -c:a ac3 -sn -dn
"c:\abitscope.mp4"
The reports are below. Does
On 20/05/2024 14.09, Moritz Barsnick via ffmpeg-user wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 13:14:43 -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
Doesn't work:
ffmpeg -i c:\source.mp4 -map 0 -af abitscope -c:v libx265 -x265-params
crf=18 -c:a ac3 -sn -dn "c:\abitscope.mp4"
[...]
[vf#0:0 @ 005
Howdy,
Maybe I don't need 'abitscope'. It's just an experiment when I found that 'oscilloscope' didn't
display audio levels.
I have a 5.1 channel DTS soundtrack. It's the only soundtrack. I want to mux in a new, 2 channel AC3
soundtrack with soft dialog emphasized. I'm using 'loudnorm' & 'pan
On 20/05/2024 14.09, Moritz Barsnick via ffmpeg-user wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 13:14:43 -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
Doesn't work:
ffmpeg -i c:\source.mp4 -map 0 -af abitscope -c:v libx265 -x265-params
crf=18 -c:a ac3 -sn -dn "c:\abitscope.mp4"
[...]
[vf#0:0 @ 005
I've attached ebur128.jpg. It's only 37 k-bytes.
Do you see that first 'shelf' just below LU = -13? I want to boost that the most by percent, maybe
double the power (3 dB). I want to boost LU = 9 not at all, and I want to boost everything below LU
= -14 not at all.
So the transform I want wou
On 21/05/2024 01.19, Anne Wu via ffmpeg-user wrote:
-snip-
... Also, I'd like the
timestamps of the output video to remain the same as the original,
so essentially preserving the edit-lists from the original, which I
don't think the above would accomplish. Is there a way to do that?
Try putting
Attachments:
1. original ebur128.jpg
2. loudnorm-thresh=-85 pan ebur128.jpg
3. what I want ebur128.jpg
___1. The original
has a 'shelf' just below LU = -13. That's soft speech.
The peak is at LU = +9. That's shouting.
So the transform I want goes like this:
LU = -18..-14 gets no boost.
LU = -14..
ways thought that people learn more from success than from failure, and
you made it happen.
--Mark.
On 21/05/2024 16.04, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 10:52 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
Attachments:
1. original ebur128.jpg
2. loudnorm-thresh=-85 pan ebur128.jpg
3. what I want ebur128.j
This is from H.262.
___
| |
| field_sequence – A 3-bit integer which defines the number of the |
| field in the eight field sequence used in PAL systems or the four |
On 24/05/2024 13.19, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
пт, 24 мая 2024 г., 20:16 Mark Filipak :
This is from H.262.
___
| |
| field_sequence – A 3-bit integer which
On 26/05/2024 14.18, Bart Westenenk wrote:
Hello all,
I want to alter the motion vectors of B and P frames in a H.264 video. The point of doing this is
watermarking / steganography, the goal is to change the motion vectors' width / height based on the
watermark.
Motion vectors don't work lik
How do I do the equivalent of this:
pts = pts==504223732 ? 504219978 : pts;
in '-bsf' in Windows? I can't figure it out.
I've tried:
-bsf setts=pts='eq(pts\,504223732)504219978'
-bsf setts=pts='if(eq(pts\,504223732)\,504219978\,pts)'
-bsf 'if(eq(pts\,504223732),setts=pts=504219978)'
and man
On 31/05/2024 16.31, David Ing via ffmpeg-user wrote:
How do I do the equivalent of this:
pts = pts==504223732 ? 504219978 : pts;
in '-bsf' in Windows? I can't figure it out.
I've tried:
-bsf setts=pts='eq(pts\,504223732)504219978'
-bsf setts=pts='if(eq(pts\,504223732)\,504219978\,pts)'
-
Question:
What's happening? Is there a workaround?
The video from a Blu-ray is:
Stream #0:0[0x1011]: Video: h264 (High) (HDMV / 0x564D4448), yuv420p(progressive), 1920x1080 [SAR
1:1 DAR 16:9], 23.98 fps, 23.98 tbr, 90k tbn
FFprobe's '-show_streams' (and other commands) shows this:
pix_fmt=
Hi,
Is there some reason that '-bsf noise' doesn't like x265?
Look:
Works 100%:
ffmpeg -copyts -i source.m2ts -map 0 -bsf noise=drop='lt(pts\,2854113)+gte(dts\,504219978)' -c
copy -sn -dn -muxdelay 0 target.ts
No video:
ffmpeg -copyts -i source.m2ts -map 0 -bsf noise=drop='lt(pts\,2854113
'-ss' and '-to' are flawed. They are not taking open GOPs into account. What they need to do is make
IDR cuts. They're not currently doing that.
I regret this report is so long. But It's well worth a read. I'll post a final report when all the
cuts and joins are complete.
Background.
I'm work
On 01/06/2024 15.39, Laine wrote:
I'm trying to convert 30 fps videos to 24 fps. I've been playing with a lot of
methods for removing what I think may be known as lag spikes, spurious
duplicate frames which fall outside the usual pattern of 4 unique frames and 1
duplicate of the 4th.
Hi, Lai
Oops. I wrote foo...
"1-1-1-3" was "2-2-2-4"
On 01/06/2024 15.39, Laine wrote:
I'm trying to convert 30 fps videos to 24 fps. I've been playing with a lot of
methods for removing what I think may be known as lag spikes, spurious
duplicate frames which fall outside the usual pattern of 4 unique
Since the change to '-vf showinfo', it now shows PTSes.
Those PTSes appear to be bogus.
They don't match the PTSes reported by framecrc.
They don't match at all.
--Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/list
Hey,
My cuts are perfect, true IDR. The join is perfect, yet MPV stalls for about 1/2 second and shows
one, maybe two black frames. The only thing I can think of that would screw up the playing across my
joins is MPEG's 'closed_gop' flag. It needs to set it to '1' for the GOP on the early side
With something a complicated as this stuff, I knew I would screw up something. Correction: I fixed
the 'Commands used'.
Hey,
My cuts are perfect, true IDR. The join is perfect, yet MPV stalls for about 1/2 second and shows
one, maybe two black frames. The only thing I can think of that would
On 04/06/2024 08.04, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 7:19 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
Is there a way to set 'closed_gop' in FFmpeg?
Is there a way to set 'closed_gop' for an individual GOP?
Not possible, use something more efficient, less buggy and far more useful
On 04/06/2024 08.04, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 7:19 PM Mark Filipak
> wrote:
>> Is there a way to set 'closed_gop' in FFmpeg?
>> Is there a way to set 'closed_gop' for an individual GOP?
>
> Not possible, use something more efficie
For your reading pleasure, I've attached 'How To Make IDR Cuts.pdf'.
--Mark.
How To Make IDR Cuts.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe,
On 05/06/2024 09.44, Paul B Mahol wrote:
What is OFFmpeg ? and how to use it?
It is Object-FFmpeg. It is a fully video-object-oriented language, not
functions pasted into python.
Objects are video/audio/subtitle/chapter streams, frames, fields, pictures,
halfpics, scans.
There's very few g
On 05/06/2024 18.44, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
Where can I obtain OFFmpeg product/solution?
I regret that you can't, Paul. I'm one old person working alone and I program mainly in assembly
(and scripts of course), not 'C'. But I have experience leading coding groups and in the last year
I'v
Please recall that I've cut both ends of 2 M2TSes and then joined them. Recall that both M2TSes are
open GOPs.
Please recall the commands:
ffmpeg -copyts -i "g:\FANNY AND ALEXANDER [1982(1983)]\00305.m2ts" -map 0 -bsf
noise=drop='lt(pts\,2854113)+gte(dts\,504219978)',setts=dts='if(eq(DTS\,2846
I've asked this many times regarding VOBs, now I ask regarding M2TSes.
Is there some parameter that can be set to force FFmpeg to report what's actually in PES headers
instead of allowing it to make things up?
'-vf framecrc' reports this:
DTS PTS
+---+
1, ¦ 50421
On 07/06/2024 00.11, Hans Carlson via ffmpeg-user wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024, Mark Filipak wrote:
Does anyone have an M2TS raw parser? Lacking that, does anyone have a map of M2TS so I can parse
it manually and locate the 'closed_gop' MPEG tag?
Try searching for "m2ts parse
'-bsf setts=pts' seems to always work, but '-bsf setts=dts' has problems. Look:
C:\Windows\System32>ffmpeg -copyts -i "g:\FANNY AND ALEXANDER
[1982(1983)]\00305.m2ts" -map 0
-bsf noise=drop='lt(pts\,2854113)'
-c copy -sn -dn -muxdelay 0 "g:\FANNY AND ALEXANDER [1982(1983)]\foo.m2ts"
0,284660
On 08/06/2024 05.29, Paul B Mahol wrote:
It is evident that you never looked at actual setts documentation.
Don't be silly, Paul.
Is there something wrong with this:
-bsf
noise=drop='lt(pts\,2854113)',setts=dts='if(eq(DTS\,2846606)\,2850360\,DTS)'
that I'm just not seeing?
Nobody can take
On 08/06/2024 11.48, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 5:07 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 08/06/2024 05.29, Paul B Mahol wrote:
It is evident that you never looked at actual setts documentation.
Don't be silly, Paul.
Is there something wrong with this:
-bsf
noise=drop=&#
On 08/06/2024 12.05, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
If you do not explicitly set expression for both pts and dts options, they
will be set to same value later.
Thank you, Paul. I see (and I'm surprised by it).
So this command:
-bsf setts=dts='if(eq(DTS\,2846606)\,2850360\,DTS)'
produces this:
0,
This is a spliced video.
The Good:
VLC and PowerDVD play it flawlessly. The splice is technically perfect.
An MPEG-2 TS packet analyser says so. I trust what it says because what
it says matches my cuts and it matches what '-f framecrc' says. The
commands that made the segments and the splice are
On 11/06/2024 13.00, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 6:20 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
This is a spliced video.
The Good:
VLC and PowerDVD play it flawlessly. The splice is technically perfect.
An MPEG-2 TS packet analyser says so. I trust what it says because what
it says matches my
For anyone who's interested, I made a 4 second clip (15,482,880 bytes) around
the splice.
Contact me off-list.
--Mark.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link abov
If no one corroborates my findings, I can't proceed with a bug report. Are
there any volunteers?
--Mark.
I made a 4 second clip of the splice section.
VLC and PowerDVD play it smoothly.
showinfo is in Wonderland. It skips frames and shows non-existing
duplicates.
MPV exhibits a 2 second glit
On 12/06/2024 14.53, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/12/2024 11:35 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
If no one corroborates my findings, I can't proceed with a bug report.
Why not? Nothing about that in https://ffmpeg.org/bugreports.html.
I need someone more knowledgeable about FFmpeg to triage. For ex
On 13/06/2024 02.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/12/2024 2:44 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I need someone more knowledgeable about FFmpeg to triage.
They're often called 'developers'.
Okay, Carl. https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
Since there are so many things wrong, I predic
Hi Jim!
On 13/06/2024 17.04, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-13 13:16, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 13/06/2024 02.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/12/2024 2:44 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I need someone more knowledgeable about FFmpeg to triage.
They're often called 'developers'.
Ok
At https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055, there's someone with an alias of "MasterQuestionable" who
is harassing the heck out of me.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visi
Let me bring everyone up to date.
ffmpeg -i ... -f framecrc
ffmpeg -i ... -vf showinfo
ffmpeg -i ... -show_frames
All show differing DTS and PTS timestamps. showinfo & show_frames have 2 second
gaps.
The question is: Which one shows the actual timestamps?
The MPV player pauses during that 2 seco
You see. This is the type of discussion that needs to occur _before_ a bug
report is filed.
On 14/06/2024 19.03, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
-snip-
A certain FFmpeg invocation generates a 99-frame test video which
causes MPV player to pause in playback,
That's not quite correct, Jim. The crea
So far I'm at 4h32m40s transcoding/remuxing my 5h11m37s video. There have been 354 duplicated
frames, roughly 1/3rd at each splice. The job has been running for two days. I'll let you know how
it comes out. All the splices are on black frames, so 354 duplicates may be no big deal. It
hopefully i
The action at trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055 is really interesting. It's already up to almost 50
comments. I can barely keep up. I think something may come of this. Let's hope, eh?
It appears that a video having a physical order that's DTS-order is a bit of a surprise to my expert
friends. That's
While I'm thinking of it, I want to share something. My impression is that FFmpegers think in
input-output terms. You might want to think in physical terms: What is physically on the disk/in the
stream, instead. Yeah, yeah, I know everyone thinks they do that, but do you really? Clearly, some
of
On 15/06/2024 11.18, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 4:16 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/15/2024 1:30 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
What you even mean with above unclear statements?
Perhaps you might read the last 8-10 messages as Jim attempts to
decipher it.
I was explicitly referrin
It would be nice if folks from here went here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
and saw what is going on. It's up to 76 comments now, so what I ask will take
you a while.
What's going on is a crime.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.
On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would be nice if folks from here went here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
and saw what is going on. It's up to 76 comments now, so what I ask will take
you a while.
What's going on is a crime
On 16/06/2024 03.51, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 23:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would be nice if folks from here went here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
and saw what is going on. It's up
On 16/06/2024 19.25, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-16 01:19, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 16/06/2024 03.51, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 23:04, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 15/06/2024 23.39, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2024-06-15 19:27, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would be nice if folks from here went
I had a brainwave...
The 4 second video is in DTS-order. That's unusual, but that's what Criterion
gave us.
What if I could rearrange the packets to PTS-order?
If showinfo and show_frames then agreed with framecrc, that would tell the
whole story, wouldn't it?
Is that possible? Is it possible t
To expand on my idea:
The video is this:
I P B B P B B P B B I P B B..
I want to change it to this:
I B B P B B P B B P I B B P..
To do that, I reckon I need to,
1, move the packets that contain P-frames,
2, insert revised 'program_clock_reference_base's and 'program_clock_reference_extension's
On 17/06/2024 03.16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 3:16 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
To expand on my idea:
The video is this:
I P B B P B B P B B I P B B..
I want to change it to this:
I B B P B B P B B P I B B P..
If this is what I think it is, your are wasting your time.
It is
On 17/06/2024 13.50, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:35 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 17/06/2024 03.16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 3:16 AM Mark Filipak
To expand on my idea:
The video is this:
I P B B P B B P B B I P B B..
I want to change it to this:
I B B P B B
On 17/06/2024 17.18, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:29 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 17/06/2024 13.50, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:35 PM Mark Filipak
On 17/06/2024 03.16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 3:16 AM Mark Filipak <
markfilipa
Paul, I misunderstood your question. (see at end)
On 17/06/2024 17.59, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 17/06/2024 17.18, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:29 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 17/06/2024 13.50, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:35 PM Mark Filipak
On 17/06/2024 03.16
On 17/06/2024 18.05, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:00 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 17/06/2024 17.18, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:29 PM Mark Filipak
On 17/06/2024 13.50, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:35 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipa
MasterQuestionable appears to be the boss of trac. I don't know whether MasterQuestionable is a
person or a group. The language from MasterQuestionable is as one would find in a chat among peers
(i.e., developers) who come into the chat with a wealth of experience and a common language and a
par
On 18/06/2024 11.16, Greg Oliver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 9:45 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
MasterQuestionable appears to be the boss of trac. I don't know whether
MasterQuestionable is a
person or a group. The language from MasterQuestionable is as one would
find in a chat among peers
On 18/06/2024 12.03, Greg Oliver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:22 AM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 18/06/2024 11.16, Greg Oliver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 9:45 AM Mark Filipak
MasterQuestionable appears to be the boss of trac. I don't know whether
MasterQuestionable is a
person or a
MasterQuestionable has downgraded the timestamp bug from 'important' to 'normal'. I'm copying my
response here because trac is in a different account and that account's email-'cc's are rejected by
ffmpeg-user. --Mark.
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055
https://streams.videolan.org/ffmpeg/inco
On 19/06/2024 10.01, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 14:23, Mark Filipak wrote:
I think this may be a far ranging bug that affects '-ss' and that provokes many
of the
"non-monotonous DTS" error messages that seem to appear out of nowhere when a
trivial, non-t
I've seen un explainable '-ss' (i.e., seek) problems.
I've seen trivial changes to FFmpeg commands produce a flood of un explainable "non-monotonous DTS"
errors when the trivial change had nothing to do with anything that would change DTS. (And I find it
tragic-funny that FFmpeg 'fixes' the bogu
I'm sorry, Rob, press [Shift][L] to loop MPV.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
On 19/06/2024 12.02, Rob Hallam wrote:
-snip-
I can confirm I see a pause at "23%", though mpv reports it as
00:00:00 and then a seeming jump or fast increment through
percentages. I would probably have to record the screen or something
to see exactly what happened, unless there's a way to get mp
On 19/06/2024 12.29, Rob Hallam wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 17:21, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2024 12.02, Rob Hallam wrote:
-snip-
I can confirm I see a pause at "23%", though mpv reports it as
00:00:00 and then a seeming jump or fast increment through
percentages. I would pro
On 19/06/2024 11.57, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2024 6:22 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
MasterQuestionable has downgraded the timestamp bug from 'important' to
'normal'.
Yes, and???
From the sound of it, this _is_ a normal/medium (or even "low") severity bug in th
On 19/06/2024 12.45, Paul B Mahol wrote:
ffmpeg -i Ticket_11055.m2ts -an -c copy -f framecrc broken.video.txt
Thank you, Paul. I have two _different_ outputs. One from this:
ffmpeg -i g:\Ticket_11055.m2ts -an -c copy -f framecrc c:\broken.video.txt
and one from this:
ffmpeg -copyts -i g:\Ticket
Correction of first file name, sorry, copy goof.
On 19/06/2024 12.45, Paul B Mahol wrote:
ffmpeg -i Ticket_11055.m2ts -an -c copy -f framecrc broken.video.txt
Thank you, Paul. I have two _different_ outputs. One from this:
ffmpeg -i g:\Ticket_11055.m2ts -an -c copy -f framecrc c:\broken.video.
On 19/06/2024 13.07, Mark Filipak wrote:
Correction of first file name, sorry, copy goof.
On 19/06/2024 12.45, Paul B Mahol wrote:
ffmpeg -i Ticket_11055.m2ts -an -c copy -f framecrc broken.video.txt
Thank you, Paul. I have two _different_ outputs. One from this:
ffmpeg -i g:\Ticket_11055
On 19/06/2024 13.25, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
It could be ffmpeg libavformat m2ts demuxer bug. Get the m2ts stream
inspector tool to confirm.
Thank you, Paul.
I searched "m2ts" & "inspector":
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.ht
On 19/06/2024 11.57, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2024 6:22 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
MasterQuestionable has downgraded the timestamp bug from 'important' to
'normal'.
Yes, and???
From the sound of it, this _is_ a normal/medium (or even "low") severity bug in th
On 19/06/2024 14.55, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2024 11:19 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
From the sound of it, this _is_ a normal/medium (or even "low") severity bug in that it doesn't
affect the vast majority of ffmpeg use.
How do you know that, Carl?
Address me as I sign
On 19/06/2024 14.48, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 7:43 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 19/06/2024 13.25, Paul B Mahol wrote:
-snip-
It could be ffmpeg libavformat m2ts demuxer bug. Get the m2ts stream
inspector tool to confirm.
Thank you, Paul.
I searched "m2ts" &a
601 - 700 of 1100 matches
Mail list logo
