http://www.theonion.com/content/node/40319
The gag is okay, but half of the humor comes from the fact that
classical music is so rarely even _referenced_ in popular culture
these days that you can get a snicker just by mentioning the NY Phil
and Lorin Maazel in the pages of The Onion.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 17:22 Uhr dc wrote:
The Peters Urtext edition of the (manualiter) Toccatas, 1956, seems to
follow the rule. All my other volumes of organ works are Bärenreiter
(with one Breitkopf).
Thanks, that's what I needed to know.
The client has actually given in. He
Ken Durling wrote:
I agree, it's never been an issue for me either - more problematic is a
reiteration of the same note later in the 2nd measure, and whether the
measure rule applies from the tied note. But still the courtesy
accidental is always the safe road. (I do like curtsy accidental
dc wrote:
Darcy James Argue écrit:
I had the opposite instinct -- that a parenthesized courtesy
accidental on a tied note at the beginning of a measure would not
carry through the measure
But what if you don't use parentheses? Then it would carry through. One
more reason for not having
On 2:36 Uhr Darcy James Argue wrote:
Sent offlist -- Mac VST version. The Mac AU version -- the one that
works with Finale -- has a completely different UI, it looks nothing
like the Windows version.
You mean, it doesn't have an UI.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
On 09 Sep 2005, at 5:09 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I can't recall where I've read this, but I'm sure a search of Stone
or Read or Ross will support it -- the later note in the second
measure requires an accidental. The rule about accidentals working
throughout the measure only applies when there
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 09 Sep 2005, at 5:09 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I can't recall where I've read this, but I'm sure a search of Stone
or Read or Ross will support it -- the later note in the second
measure requires an accidental. The rule about accidentals working
throughout the
On 09 Sep 2005, at 6:15 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 09 Sep 2005, at 5:09 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I can't recall where I've read this, but I'm sure a search of
Stone or Read or Ross will support it -- the later note in the
second measure requires an accidental. The
OT...
I have an older Mac with an ATA 2.0 Gig HD.
Yesterday, I turned on the Mac, and heard some strange noises coming
from the HD. It sounds like the old Iomega Click of Death that
some of you probably remember.
Anyway, the drive seems to be dead. Norton can't find it. Disk
Warrior
I thought I remember hearing that this was a known issue - a feature
that was added, but not finished in the Mac version, or something to
that effect. Maybe I assumed this. For me, the Line Spacing menu
item is there, but nothing happens when I select it.
Nothing other than FinGPO is
Yes, I've had the same results. Line spacing works fine for me in the
Text Tool only. If I try to edit text anywhere else, the Line Spacing
option can not be selected.
Mark Blumberg
Walnut Creek, CA
On Sep 8, 2005, at 6:04 AM, Hans Arktoft wrote:
Anyone else noticed that Line Spacing is
Just got Finale 2006 and installed it on my system yesterday. I basically
launched into work on Fin2k6, and didn't have the usual obliggatory getting
acquainted period, so there are probably a lot of things I haven't
discovered yet, as they may not fall into my normal work pattern.
The first
At 10:41 AM 09/09/2005, Colin Broom wrote:
However, every time I set the display
colour of tuplet brackets to black, it reverts back to blue the next time I
re-open Finale. Anyone else come across this?
Yes, I can confirm this.
Aaron.
___
Finale
we're now offering the
Akiles CoilMac-M Manual Punch and Coil Inserter.
http://www.npcimaging.com
I tried to go there, but Server Could Not Be Found.
--Andrew
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On Sep 8, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Ken Durling wrote:
Just curious, although I've heard the work [Sinfonia]. I'm not
intimately familiar with it, and I'm only aware of the Mahler 2
Scherzo in there. What else is there? And is/was the Mahler for sure
under copyright?
The Mahler just serves as
On Sep 8, 2005, at 6:55 PM, M. Perticone wrote:
hello mr. stiller and listers,
if i recall well, there's a notice acknowledging permission from
various
publishers. i don't have it at hand, but i'll check it tomorrow at my
studio.
There may be now (and if so, that's very interesting),
Hi, collected wisdom, especially those of the francophone persuasion,
I have to divide some lyrics in French into syllables, and I can't find
a reference. My Petit Robert tells me in the introduction that the
subject is of little interest (not to me!), except to say that
separately-sounded
On 09 Sep 2005, at 10:41 AM, Colin Broom wrote:
However, every time I set the display colour of tuplet brackets to
black, it reverts back to blue the next time I re-open Finale.
Anyone else come across this?
I can't reproduce this on Mac.
The studio view I'm not yet convinced about,
2005-09-09 kl. 15.14 skrev Fisher, Allen:
Line spacing shows up fine for me. Finale 2006, 10.4, G5 Single.
Are you running any Audio Units other than FinGPO?
No, nothing else.
I thought I remember hearing that this was a known issue - a feature
that was added, but not finished in the Mac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the Mahler was out of copyright I guess...
Well, it would have been in most European countries. Mahler died in
1911, and in 1969, when the Sinfonia was published, the 50 year rule
still applied most places. There was probably one exceptional country
(possibly
Darcy James Argue wrote:
You can type numeric values for volume and pan in the instrument list.
I agree that the UI for adjusting the pan in the mixer/studio view is
unusable. Also, for panning, instead of absolute MIDI controller
values, Finale should use percentages (e.g. 33% L, 67% R)
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/holes/story/0,10801,104504,00.html?source=NLT_AMnid=104504
Phil Daley AutoDesk
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On 09 Sep 2005, at 2:04 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
You can type numeric values for volume and pan in the instrument
list. I agree that the UI for adjusting the pan in the mixer/
studio view is unusable. Also, for panning, instead of absolute
MIDI controller values,
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 09 Sep 2005, at 2:04 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
You can type numeric values for volume and pan in the instrument
list. I agree that the UI for adjusting the pan in the mixer/ studio
view is unusable. Also, for panning, instead of absolute
There's an issue with resource sharing amongst Audio Units that is causing
some problems. I thought that maybe that was related. It doesn't appear to
be.
On 9/9/05 9:03 AM, Rich Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said this:
I thought I remember hearing that this was a known issue - a feature
that was
On 9 Sep 2005 at 6:21, Darcy James Argue wrote:
[So far, the thread seems to be leaning towards or not, especially
if the accidental in question is parenthesized.]
My feeling is that you don't really need a rule for this. All you
need is to ask yourself:
Is the notation unambiguous so that
Hey, Everyone - I've gone blank this afternoon for some reason! Could
someone let me know what this chord would be called: D - Fb - Ab
I know it's a D diminished but can't remember if this is the regular
diminished chord or a doubly diminished since it's 2 minor 3rds... Just
gone brain-dead
Did you mean D - F - Ab? You said Fb. If it is F, then it is D° or
Ddim.
J.D. Thomas
ThomaStudios
***
J.D. Thomas
ThomaStudios
West Linn OR
www.thomastudios.com
***
On Sep 9, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Jacki B. wrote:
Hey, Everyone - I've gone
On Sep 9, 2005, at 3:31 PM, Jacki B. wrote:
Hey, Everyone - I've gone blank this afternoon for some reason! Could
someone let me know what this chord would be called: D - Fb - Ab
I know it's a D diminished but can't remember if this is the regular
diminished chord or a doubly diminished
On 9 Sep 2005 at 15:41, Colin Broom wrote:
The studio view I'm not yet convinced about, which is something I'd
been looking forward to.. After looking at it for a bit, I basically
ended up switching back to scroll view. One particular flaw in the
way that studio view works is in the panning
On 9 Sep 2005 at 12:49, Phil Daley wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/holes/story/0,10
801,104504,00.html?source=NLT_AMnid=104504
Firefox is still a safer, more secure browser than Internet Explorer.
Compare the Secunia pages for IE6.x and Firefox:
IE6.x
9 Sep 2005 at 13:40, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Also, for panning, instead of absolute MIDI
controller values, Finale should use percentages (e.g. 33% L, 67% R)
like, oh, I don't know, EVERY OTHER APPLICATION THAT LETS YOU SET
PANNING.
As an option, I cn understand, but as the only way to
On 9 Sep 2005 at 14:24, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 09 Sep 2005, at 2:04 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
You can type numeric values for volume and pan in the instrument
list. I agree that the UI for adjusting the pan in the mixer/
studio view is unusable. Also, for
Thanks, Everyone... I'm going crazy I think! Sorry for not stating things
clearly. I currently have it spelled as an F in the bass, a G# and D in the
treble, with no B... It definitely has a diminished type sound to it, or
even a minor sound... The chord before it is a D major - and this
Could it be E7 no 5th. ?
George G.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jacki B.
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 8:32 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Chord Definition
Hey, Everyone - I've gone blank this afternoon for some reason!
on 9/9/05 3:49 PM, Ryan Beard wrote:
Jacki,
Do you really mean Fb? F-nat would give you a D°
triad...
LOL - Sorry to freak everyone out!! Upon looking at it again, it has F
natural in the bass, G# (or Ab?) and E natural in the treble - but the E is
sort of a suspended note that resolves to
On 09 Sep 2005, at 3:54 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
And do you actually think that's a *good* idea?
Well, he wasn't addressing whether it was good or not (it obviously
isn't). He was just showing that your assertion of fact was
COMPLETELY MISTAKEN.
Oh fercrissakes. It was deliberate
On 09 Sep 2005, at 4:16 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
0 is actually hard right.
GAH! I meant hard left, of course.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
on 9/9/05 5:07 PM, George Galway wrote:
Could it be E7 no 5th. ?
Thanks, George - I'm sorry to have mistakenly said there was an Fb (E) in
the chord - I realized the E was a suspended note that resolves to a D...
There is an F natural in the bass, so I'm starting to think this IS the D°
On 9 Sep 2005 at 16:16, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 09 Sep 2005, at 3:54 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
And do you actually think that's a *good* idea?
Well, he wasn't addressing whether it was good or not (it obviously
isn't). He was just showing that your assertion of fact was
On Sep 9, 2005, at 4:40 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Seems to me that this is functioning (according to your description)
as some kind of dominant chord to the target chord of C Major, in
which case, there are a couple of ways of describing it, depending on
the context.
As it is now, it seems
On 9/9/05, Jacki B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/9/05 3:49 PM, Ryan Beard wrote: Jacki, Do you really mean Fb? F-nat would give you a D° triad...LOL - Sorry to freak everyone out!!Upon looking at it again, it has Fnatural in the bass, G# (or Ab?) and E natural in the treble - but the E is
sort of
At 05:42 PM 9/9/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Percentages are massively worse, as the percentage would be a signed
percentage of, er, um, what? Rightness? 25% right? -33% right?
Yeah. 100% left, 100% right. Sounds good to me. Better'n north by
northwest. :)
Seriously, I only think in terms
Darcy James Argue :
Finale, on the other hand, does not define pan in terms of derivation
from the center. Instead of center = 0, they use center = 64. 0 is
actually hard right. Now I understand why they are doing that -- it's
how the MIDI controller data is actually sent -- but it is
On 09 Sep 2005, at 5:42 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
No, percentages are *not* the right way to do it.
Percentages are the *standard* way to do it. All major digital audio
applications use percentages. Moreover, the Kontakt Player users
percentages for pan, which means Finale is not even
On 9 Sep 2005 at 18:12, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 05:42 PM 9/9/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Percentages are massively worse, as the percentage would be a signed
percentage of, er, um, what? Rightness? 25% right? -33% right?
Yeah. 100% left, 100% right. Sounds good to me. Better'n
On 9 Sep 2005 at 18:23, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 09 Sep 2005, at 5:42 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
No, percentages are *not* the right way to do it.
Percentages are the *standard* way to do it. . . .
Well, we are talking past each other.
I said it's WRONG, you said it's STANDARD.
Degrees? 90 degrees left? 60 degrees right? 0 degrees = center.
(By now, you have all figured out that I don't know how to get the
symbol for degrees on my keyboard.) W - N - E?
That would make some sense to me, but it's not so difficult for me to
learn another set of numbers that
Le 05-09-09 à 09:14, Fisher, Allen a écrit :
Line spacing shows up fine for me. Finale 2006, 10.4, G5 Single.
It shows up fine in the menu, but when you click on it, or type in
the shortcut, the dialog box fail to appear.
I'm also on 10.4 but Dual G5.
Both computer I installed Finale 2006
On 9 Sep 2005 at 17:19, Chuck Israels wrote:
Degrees? 90 degrees left? 60 degrees right? 0 degrees = center.
(By now, you have all figured out that I don't know how to get the
symbol for degrees on my keyboard.) W - N - E?
Well, the problem is that you've got 180 degrees and 128 MIDI
At 09:13 PM 9/9/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, the problem is that you've got 180 degrees and 128 MIDI values,
Now I see what you're getting at.
Let me take you through why my preference is that scaling be abstracted and
generalized.
In most cases, percentage works for me because I'm a
Well, MINE goes to 11!
Your explanation reminds me how rich a joke that was
Ken
At 07:07 PM 9/9/2005, you wrote:
At 09:13 PM 9/9/05 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, the problem is that you've got 180 degrees and 128 MIDI values,
Now I see what you're getting at.
Let me take you
(By now, you have all figured out that I don't know how to get the
symbol for degrees on my keyboard.)
Try alt-shift-8 although I'm not sure how it will look cross platform!
90° 180°
We use the degree symbol for 1° and 2° (first time and 2nd time only).
--
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
At 03:43 AM 9/10/05 +0100, Simon Troup wrote:
Try alt-shift-8 although I'm not sure how it will look cross platform!
90° 180°
Looks great, to a degree. :) ALT+0176 on Windows. 176°
Dennis
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On Sep 9, 2005, at 7:43 PM, Simon Troup wrote:
(By now, you have all figured out that I don't know how to get the
symbol for degrees on my keyboard.)
Try alt-shift-8 although I'm not sure how it will look cross platform!
90° 180°
We use the degree symbol for 1° and 2° (first time and 2nd
55 matches
Mail list logo
