Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread dhbailey
Eric Dannewitz wrote: Yes, and I'm sure every orchestra maintains lists for first call Accordian players, and other instruments NOT regularly in the Orchestra. You reinforced my point. Saxophone is not a regular part of an Orchestra. Wind Ensemble/Orchestra, yes, but a traditional Orchestra,

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread dhbailey
Chuck Israels wrote: On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:11 PM, dhbailey wrote: Steve Schow wrote: Regardless of when or how the sax has been used in orchestras, i believe your are mischaracterizing Gary Garritan as he were someone that deliberately left out a particular instrument to try to get more money

Re: [Finale] Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?

2006-10-07 Thread dhbailey
Williams, Jim wrote: Well, just a day or two ago, somebody claimed Finale did *not* include a sequencer. But it obviously does. Sequencing : Finale = Notation: Band in a Box or Sonar. That's my point -- no product does both sequencing and notation well, and I can't believe it's

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread dhbailey
Eric Dannewitz wrote: Then go edit Wikipedia. However, I doubt they will take your edit. You just said standard additional instrument. It's not a standard instrument, but an additional instrument. Get it? Ok, really slow now.Standard...ADDITIONALinstrument. And say just as

Re: [Finale] Re: OT bekakte

2006-10-07 Thread Dennis W. Manasco
At 6:19 PM -0400 10/6/06, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: ... Nicely defined here: http://www.yiddishdictionaryonline.com/dictionary/display.php?action=searchtype=romword=farkakte ... Oops... After a quick scan of subject lines I was ready to opine about Bakelite... Never mind... But thanks

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 4:27 AM, dhbailey wrote: Do you mean to tell me that every instrument included in GPO is a regular member of a standard orchestra? I don't think so. I'm not sure how that's relevant. You're saying you want GPO to include fewer instruments? Most orchestras do no have a

Re: [Finale] Re: OT bekakte

2006-10-07 Thread Barbara Touburg
O, that is something entirely different then! Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: At 11:43 PM 10/6/06 +0200, Barbara Touburg wrote: Suddeny I see a Dutch word. What does bekakte mean in English? In Dutch to bekakt means pretending to be chique and insisting on displaying it. I'm sure you'll be

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Eric Dannewitz
A Glockenspiel was used in Mozart's Die Zauberflote. But I'm sure Mozart was looking forward and knew it would be just a BAND instrument. Last time I saw the San Francisco Symphony they had a Harp but no saxophones. Funny...according to you they use them..not! One of the ladies I play

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://secretsociety.typepad.com Brooklyn, NY On 07 Oct 2006, at 11:01 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Saxophone is a band instrument. Or a Wind ensemble instrument. It's not a part of a traditional Orchestra, and I

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 7, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. Wow! Really? I suppose you have an inside line on this? Christopher (It shouldn't be TOO good, or it will lose the realism. Squeaky clarinets, honky oboes (or else an out of tune muted

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 11:24 AM, Christopher Smith wrote: On Oct 7, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. Wow! Really? I suppose you have an inside line on this? If by inside line you mean http://www.garritan.com: Announcing: Garritan

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Very cool. I'll have to start saving up for this ;-) Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://secretsociety.typepad.com Brooklyn, NY On 07 Oct 2006, at 11:01 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Saxophone is a band instrument. Or a

[Finale] Re: Finale vs. Sibelius

2006-10-07 Thread Bob Shuster
I want to thank everyone who offered advice and some great links to help me decide between switching to Sibelius or updating to Finale 2007 (from Finale 98.)  I did take your advice, reading all the materials I could online and spending some time with each app. I first spent a full six hours with

Re: [Finale] Re: Finale vs. Sibelius

2006-10-07 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 7, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Bob Shuster wrote:.  I'm also anxious to see when it will be completely compatible with the Intel Macs (I have a MacPro machine) - particularly for my Garritan GPO and JABB libraries - which are currently unusable.Good news, Bob - AFAIK, FinMac2007 is already completely

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John T Sylvanis
So is choirs, solo voices and mandolins, at least it's what Gary told me. John. On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 11:10:54 -0400 Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an upcoming project. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://secretsociety.typepad.com Brooklyn, NY

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Alright! Since most of my instrumental writing is for Wind Ensemble, this would be great... yeah, I wonder what it will cost. Dean On Oct 7, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Very cool. I'll have to start saving up for this ;-) Darcy James Argue wrote: Garritan Wind Ensemble is an

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
We've all heard that band but then we have heard an orchestra sound like that too. I challenge you to find that sound from the Dallas Wind Symphony, the Tokyo Kosei Wind Orchestra, or any of the really fine university ensembles. Some really good music by some respected composers is being

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Christopher Smith
On Oct 7, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Richard Smith wrote: We've all heard that band but then we have heard an orchestra sound like that too. I challenge you to find that sound from the Dallas Wind Symphony, the Tokyo Kosei Wind Orchestra, or any of the really fine university ensembles. Some

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
At 7:53 PM -0700 10/6/06, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Then go edit Wikipedia. However, I doubt they will take your edit. You just said standard additional instrument. It's not a standard instrument, but an additional instrument. Get it? Ok, really slow

[Finale] finale 2007 install: use 2005 templates?

2006-10-07 Thread shirling neueweise
am about to introduce myself to finale 2007 (hi, i'm jef... please behave and we can be friends) and wondering if there are any issues to be aware of in simply dropping my old default file (template), instrument and page sizes docs and preferences from 2005 into the appropriate places in the

Re: [Finale] Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
At 11:14 PM -0400 10/6/06, John T Sylvanis wrote: That may be, the point still remains: produce notation software that has realistic rendition which then can be recorded to media. CD or tape or whatever may come in the future, for a demo. This will liberate the composer from his eternal

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 4:27, dhbailey wrote: The saxes may be missing because they weren't ready in time, they may be missing because Gary simply felt like it wasn't important to include them (why include glockenspiel, though? That's a band instrument if ever I've seen one) Well, perhaps

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 13:40, Richard Smith wrote: Some really good music by some respected composers is being written for wind ensemble and many composition students are being advised that the best way to hear one's music performed is to write for band, not orchestra. Are we talking about bands

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
The distinctions are not always clear. The wind ensemble's connection to the band should not be obscured but the the connection to older wind music is also important. Richard Smith www.rgsmithmusic.com Are we talking about bands or wind ensemble? Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought there

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 15:20, Richard Smith wrote: [quoting me:] Are we talking about bands or wind ensemble? Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought there was a difference. The distinctions are not always clear. The wind ensemble's connection to the band should not be obscured but the the

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
That's a good point. I suppose I think to much in live terms. Of course doubling could be accomplished by hidden, duplicate staves. I think all I would want that's not in GPO is a good set of concert (not pop) saxophones, cornets and/or flugel horns, and euphonia that sound like euphonia

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread David W. Fenton
On 7 Oct 2006 at 15:48, Richard Smith wrote: [quoting me, unattributed, again:] But for samples, wouldn't you want a completely different sound? WHile they can play the same repertory, they amount of section doubling is drastically different between the two ensembles. Or so I've always

Re: [Finale] Re: Finale vs. Sibelius

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 1:47 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:On Oct 7, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Bob Shuster wrote:.  I'm also anxious to see when it will be completely compatible with the Intel Macs (I have a MacPro machine) - particularly for my Garritan GPO and JABB libraries - which are currently unusable.Good

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Daniel Wolf
Eric Dannewitz wrote: A Glockenspiel was used in Mozart's Die Zauberflote. At risk of being picayune, the Glockenspiel used in Zauberflöte is a keyboard instrument somewhat different in sound from the modern, played-with-mallets, orchestral and band glockenspiel. DJW

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
You're right, of course. Doubling the same instrument is just a waste of resources. Egg on my face! I think, for my purposes, I would prefer a wind ensemble to a larger concert band set up because of the greater clarity (much like the real world). Richard Smith www.rgsmithmusic.com

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 07 Oct 2006, at 6:32 PM, Richard Smith wrote: You're right, of course. Doubling the same instrument is just a waste of resources. Egg on my face! Not at all. As I mentioned, in Garritan instruments, doubling the player variations (i.e. Flute Player 1 and Flute Player 2) gives

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Richard Smith
I seem to be having trouble with language. When I said instruments, I meant samples, not different samples of the same instrument. Sorry for being unclear. Richard Smith www.rgsmithmusic.com Not at all. As I mentioned, in Garritan instruments, doubling the player variations (i.e. Flute

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John T Sylvanis
True, Richard Strauss used it in Don Juan. John. On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:17:19 +0200 Daniel Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric Dannewitz wrote: A Glockenspiel was used in Mozart's Die Zauberflote. At risk of being picayune, the Glockenspiel used in Zauberflöte is a keyboard instrument

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Was it a celesta? Dean At risk of being picayune, the Glockenspiel used in Zauberflöte is a keyboard instrument somewhat different in sound from the modern, played-with-mallets, orchestral and band glockenspiel. DJW Dean M. Estabrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have you ever heard of an eleven or

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
At 4:04 PM -0400 10/7/06, David W. Fenton wrote: On 7 Oct 2006 at 13:40, Richard Smith wrote: Some really good music by some respected composers is being written for wind ensemble and many composition students are being advised that the best way to hear one's music performed is to write for

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
I think it was--or at least the late 18th century equivalent. I also suspect that the German Glockenspiel can actually refer to different instruments in translation. It's possible that celesta is one of them, as well as the mallet-played orchestra bells. What I grew up calling a

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Chuck Israels
Interesting that celeste is not listed, yet that's what I always hear in Magic Flute performances and recordings. Seems OK to my ears. Chuck On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:42 PM, John Howell wrote: I think it was--or at least the late 18th century equivalent. I also suspect that the German

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
This dialog serves to remind me of an experience I had in my first year of teaching ... ca. 1966. Our high school had a very fine advanced band called a Wind Ensemble, which, in fact, had a minimum number of players per part, in general. Then there was a less advanced Concert Band, with

Re: [Finale] Garritan [was: Finale/Sibelius as sequencer/sampler?]

2006-10-07 Thread John Howell
On the contrary, three of the terms mean a keyboard instrument as the single or one possible meaning. John At 5:58 PM -0700 10/7/06, Chuck Israels wrote: Interesting that celeste is not listed, yet that's what I always hear in Magic Flute performances and recordings. Seems OK to my ears.