Re: [Finale] #5

2013-11-21 Thread David H. Bailey
On 11/20/2013 10:32 PM, John Witmer wrote: My music theory teacher always called them on purposes, not accidentals' I tell my students they're call accidentals because that's where the most common and prolific musical accidents happen. -- David H. Bailey dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com

Re: [Finale] #5

2013-11-20 Thread terry cano
OK so while we are on the subject ;)  Why are accidentals called accidentals?  'don't bout you but I place them there on purpose not by accident ;)  Actually, that statement is from a composition teacher that I once had. It is one of my favorites. Terry On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:16

Re: [Finale] #5

2013-11-20 Thread John Witmer
My music theory teacher always called them on purposes, not accidentals' John - Original Message - From: terry cano tcanomu...@yahoo.com To: finale@shsu.edu Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [Finale] #5 OK so while we are on the subject ;) Why are accidentals

Re: [Finale] #5

2013-11-20 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
Accidental: something that happens, when the music strays from its original key. Klaus From: John Witmer wit...@nctv.com To: finale@shsu.edu Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:32 AM Subject: Re: [Finale] #5 My music theory teacher always called them

[Finale] #5

2013-11-19 Thread Jim Dukey
Weak? Then I've known and played with SO Many Weak Players, from the San Francisco Symphony, and virtually ALL groups I've ever played in. Players who mark their parts to be SURE of the accidentals. Check your precious Finale Parts sometime, see what the players marked in. Or the Conductor. See

Re: [Finale] #5

2013-11-19 Thread Chuck Israels
There's a reason they are called courtesy. Chuck On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Jim Dukey oldm...@yahoo.com wrote: Weak? Then I've known and played with SO Many Weak Players, from the San Francisco Symphony, and virtually ALL groups I've ever played in. Players who mark their parts to be

[Finale] 5 more Mac plug-ins

2011-01-16 Thread Jari Williamsson
Hello! These plug-ins are now also ported to the Mac: * JW Topline Notation * JW Tie * JW AlphaNotes * JW Merge Articulations * JW Keep Line Download at the Finale tips site, Downloads section, Plug-ins for Mac subsection. www.finaletips.nu Best regards, Jari Williamsson

Re: [Finale] 5 more Mac plug-ins

2011-01-16 Thread Eric Dannewitz
*passes out* Very cool. Thanks Sent from my iSomething On Jan 16, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Jari Williamsson jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se wrote: Hello! These plug-ins are now also ported to the Mac: * JW Topline Notation * JW Tie * JW AlphaNotes * JW Merge Articulations * JW Keep Line

Re: [Finale] 5 more Mac plug-ins

2011-01-16 Thread Florence + Michael
Great! I tried the Merge Layers, Keep Line and Merge Articulations on my Mac (Intel Core 2 Duo, OS 10.6.6, Finale 2011c ): everything seems fine. Michael On 16 Jan 2011, at 12:23, Jari Williamsson wrote: Hello! These plug-ins are now also ported to the Mac: * JW Topline Notation * JW

Re: [Finale] 5 more Mac plug-ins

2011-01-16 Thread Chuck Israels
Thank you, Jari. Chuck On Jan 16, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote: Hello! These plug-ins are now also ported to the Mac: * JW Topline Notation * JW Tie * JW AlphaNotes * JW Merge Articulations * JW Keep Line Download at the Finale tips site, Downloads section, Plug-ins for

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-12-28 Thread Thurletta Brown-Gavins
Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question To: finale@shsu.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 03.11.2005 Thurletta Brown-Gavins wrote: I currently use Finale 2002 in OS 9.2.2 on a dual-boot (OS

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-04 Thread Javier Ruiz
Dear Andrew, Why are not you using 10.3.9? It is very, very stable. (I know, I know, it ain´t broke...) Javier Ruiz The 3/11/05 18:09, Andrew Stiller escribió/wrote: I have a system very similar to yours: a dual-boot iMac. I keep Finale 2K2 in System 9, and 2K4 in OSX 10.3.3.

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-04 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Nov 4, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Javier Ruiz wrote: Dear Andrew, Why are not you using 10.3.9? It is very, very stable. (I know, I know, it ain´t broke...) Past experience has taught me never, under any circumstances, to upgrade an operating system on an existing computer. Stuff crashes.

[Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-03 Thread Thurletta Brown-Gavins
I currently use Finale 2002 in OS 9.2.2 on a dual-boot (OS 9.2.2 and 10.3.9) G4 with a MidiMan 1x1 and Yamaha PSR-79 keyboard. I use it only six or seven times a year for choir/organ music (inserting paraphrased lyrics into hymns, transposing, putting refinishing touches on my Christmas

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-03 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 03.11.2005 Thurletta Brown-Gavins wrote: I currently use Finale 2002 in OS 9.2.2 on a dual-boot (OS 9.2.2 and 10.3.9) G4 with a MidiMan 1x1 and Yamaha PSR-79 keyboard. I use it only six or seven times a year for choir/organ music (inserting paraphrased lyrics into hymns, transposing,

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-03 Thread Robert Patterson
I use Fin05b under 10.3.9 with few problems. There is no getting around that fact that Fin02 under 9.2.2 runs faster and more responsively on the same hardware than any OSX version of Finale under OSX (including the vaunted Fin06). But this is more than offset by the stability of OSX and the

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-03 Thread Eric Dannewitz
I wouldn't touch 2006 with a 20 foot pole. It is really buggy, slow, and generally a waste of money in my opinion. 2005 was the last version that was any good (in my opinion). However, I do think that 10.4 is the system to use. I've noticed speed gains on my aging systems. It also depends on

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-03 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:43 AM, Thurletta Brown-Gavins wrote: Since resources are tight, do I upgrade to 2005, spring for the buggy 2006 before the upgrade offer expires in December and pray things will be resolved, or wait for 2007? I have a system very similar to yours: a dual-boot iMac. I

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-03 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 03.11.2005 Eric Dannewitz wrote: It also depends on your system. I have a G4 933Mhz, and a MiniMac. Both are maxed out in ram. With Finale 2006, both are unstable, the MiniMac being the most unstable (crashes when printing). The 933 G4 also will randomly dump out of Finale 2006. I cannot

Re: [Finale] Mac Finale 5, 6 or 7. That is the question

2005-11-03 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 03.11.2005 Andrew Stiller wrote: IMO Finale 2K2 was the finest iteration of the program ever produced. I would still be using it today were it not for the fact that it will not run in OSX, and System 9 is dying. Because of the necessity of jumping to OSX (which I loathe, hate, and