John Howell wrote:
At 1:32 PM -0700 6/19/07, Bob Morabito wrote:
Again, Ryan W. (who ALSO wants this feature added, and who has kindly
supplied this info thru my online case)) has told me, that to make
the feature request vote official, people would need to submit it by
opening a case online
At 1:32 PM -0700 6/19/07, Bob Morabito wrote:
Again, Ryan W. (who ALSO wants this feature added, and who has kindly
supplied this info thru my online case)) has told me, that to make
the feature request vote official, people would need to submit it by
opening a case online or call.
I'm
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:05 PM, John Howell wrote:
And I might also observe that Finale is primarily a notation
program, while MIDI is a set of performance standards. Finale does
not pretend to be a full-featured sequencer, and MIDI was not
designed to produce notation. (Same is true of
And before anyone gets started on MIDI files not being
notation and so has no real place in a notation program, well,
there are a whole cartload of MIDI transcriptionists who spend
a large part of their day getting MIDI files from composers
and turning them into notation to be read by live
On Wed Jun 20 12:05:33 CDT 2007 John Howell wrote:
I'm wondering if I'm just ignorant of a few things. This is the
first time ever that I've seen the words opening a case in regard
to MakeMusic. And I've gotten the distinct impression that MakeMusic
does not operate on the basis of
On Wed Jun 20 21:00:48 CDT 2007, Christopher Smith wrote:
You are right of course, that nobody wants to sacrifice the
versatility of the notation that Finale offers for sequencing
features, BUT...
(everyone has a big BUT Pee Wee Herman)
Finale COULD do much better transcribing MIDI files.
I have posted in forums about the problem of Finale's transcribing
imported midi files--ie. with Finale generating many repeated
notes/chords, NOT in the original mdi file.
The durations of the original notes/chords are split , in different
ways, between their original occurrence , and Finale's
